Scotland’s highest court has ruled the U.K. Government acted lawfully by vetoing Nicola Sturgeon’s self-ID gender laws in a humiliating defeat for First Minister Humza Yousaf. The Telegraph has more.
The Court of Session said Alister Jack, the Scottish Secretary, was within his rights to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, despite it being approved by MSPs.
The Bill would allow Scots to change their legal gender by simply signing a statutory declaration, dropping the requirement for a formal medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
It would also drastically lower the time period in which someone must live in their “acquired gender” from two years to as little as six months and allow 16 and 17-year-olds to obtain gender recognition certificates for the first time.
Mr. Jack made an order under Section 35 of the Scotland Act, which created devolution, to prevent the Bill getting Royal Assent – the first time this power had ever been used.
He argued the legislation undermined U.K.-wide protections for women, including sanctity of female-only safe spaces.
There was a huge public backlash against the reforms after trans predator Isla Bryson was initially sent to a women’s prison in Scotland after being convicted of two rapes.
Humza Yousaf, Ms. Sturgeon’s successor as First Minister and SNP leader, pressed ahead with a petition for judicial review of the decision despite legal experts warning he had little chance of success. The case was heard before Lady Haldane in September.
Meghan Gallacher, the Scottish Conservative deputy leader, said of the recent ruling: “This is a humiliating defeat for Humza Yousaf and the SNP, who have once again squandered taxpayers’ cash on a self-serving but doomed court case.”
Yousaf, however, said inevitably: “Today’s judgment confirms beyond doubt that devolution is fundamentally flawed. The Court has confirmed that legislation passed by a majority in Holyrood can be struck down by Westminster. The only way to guarantee we get true self-government is through independence.”
Because self-government is doing so well for Scottish schoolchildren.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well, the difference between the Asda chief and Rachel Thieves (erstwhile tea-lady at the Band of England) is that the former has to run a business while the latter does not.
Rachel Thieves (nice one) couldn’t run a bath.
That’s not a problem, Lord Alli will pay for a bath filler for Thieves.
Even fewer staff than they have now, perhaps. After all, although getting rid of boring jobs is probably alright, cutting back on service to customers isn’t. I don’t mind buying fuel from them, where there is no-one to see (no cash accepted – they require £100 up front on an account at their pumps), but they have a habit of cutting back on check-out staff in the small hours, so one can be in a queue for ages if you don’t want to do it all yourself in the store.
They do not “require £100 up front”. They get an authorisation for that amount from your credit/debit card provider, before you start fuelling. The amount is NOT debited from your account.
Labour = Marxist-Socialism… what did Lord Rose and the idiot voters in July expect?
But, but, but, Thieves had lots of support from business before the election. What’s that Sooty? They were not real business owners running proper businesses? Makes sense as how would anyone employing staff not see being forced to increase wages and pay extra employee tax not see her budget as anti-business and anti-growth. September’s CPI will be the low point before a steady rise, interest rate cuts will be glacial and mortgage rates will stay high due to borrowing costs. Looking forward to months of seeing the Lefties Ofcom force GB News to have on for balance – unlike the BBC etc – being torn to shreds.
How long does a government last these days? They are bound to be aware of this and so any such awareness could easily bring about vandalistic or scorched earth tendencies. The bottled it up for a decade and now they want to splurge on it before they get ousted. The next government, if there ever is another election, will be even worse against a backdrop of even worse conditions.
The whole gist of the last four years was ‘don’t be naive’. So don’t let naivete settle on you like a cloud again. If you are naive this time around then you don’t need me to tell you what you deserve. And bear in mind that your naivete and acquiescence has very negative effects on better people than you. They are likely to give you short shrift at the final reckoning.
How may are left for even considering a fight. You thought it would carry on forever like Terry Wogan and Blankety Blank. I’m afraid it isn’t like that. You8 need to match or surpass every depiction of a Russian or north Korean engaged in mortal combat. If you don’t have it then you belong to the world of the dead and they will take care of you shortly. A big difference between saying shit and living by it.
So Liz Truss was correct with her budget then?
It won’t just be supermarkets reviewing the number of employees they can afford. Any shop which has managed to survive on our devastated High Streets will be doing the same thing and most of them will conclude that they can’t generate the sales to pay the increased minimum wage, NI increases …. plus increased rents and council tax.
If Labour had intended to destroy local communities and town centres they couldn’t have done a better job of it.
So that’s obviously what they wanted.
Of course he’s right BUT it’s fair to point out that Lord Rose is a Conservative peer.