This past September 21st, the German news agency epd – the news agency of the German Protestant Church – published a potentially explosive report titled ‘Coronavirus Vaccines: Doctors and Researchers Express Concerns‘. The concerns in question were, more precisely, about a possible link between mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines and rapidly-developing or “turbo” cancers.
Thus, we read, for instance:
The Munich-based immunologist Peter Schleicher is currently treating 1,000 patients in his medical practice. Around 30 of them have “turbo cancer”, as he says. This means that “the cancer grows incredibly quickly,” Schleicher told the Evangelischer Pressedienst (epd). He has never before had so many “turbo cancer patients” at the same time, he added.
According to Schleicher, all 30 patients were diagnosed with cancer within three months of their last coronavirus vaccination. He has long suspected that mRNA vaccines can impair the immune system, so that diseased cells in the body can no longer be effectively combated: “In my view, this explains why the tumours grow at lightning speed.”
And further on in the article:
“As early as autumn 2021, I suspected that the coronavirus vaccines could give rise to turbo cancer,” Ute Krüger told epd. The cancer epidemiologist, who specialised as a breast cancer pathologist at the Breast Cancer Centre of Oskar Ziethen Hospital in Berlin in 2004, is currently conducting research at Lund University in Sweden.
For some time now, she has been dealing with cancer patients the course of whose illness has been extremely strange, she says. The cancer specialist points, for instance, to a 70-year-old woman who had been living with metastatic breast cancer for several years: “Shortly after being vaccinated against COVID-19, the tumour growth in her liver exploded.” The patient died within a month.
The article also cites chemistry professors Andreas Schnepf of the University of Tubingen and Martin Winkler of the Zurich University of Applied Sciences, who likewise expressed their worries about the dangers of the vaccines.
Within one week of publication, however, the report had been quietly withdrawn. The article has been preserved on the Wayback Machine here. But it has disappeared from the original URL on the website of the German Protestant Church newspaper, the Evangelische Zeitung. Under the same title, ‘Coronavirus Vaccines: Doctors and Researchers Express Concerns’ – even with the same publication date and time! – we now find a brief disclaimer instead of the article. This disclaimer begins as follows:
Here, there was previously a text about coronavirus vaccinations and alleged possible links to cancer illnesses. It was an agency text which came directly from the agency and which had not been edited [by us]. The editors had already distanced themselves from the text and the repeatedly-used term ‘turbo cancer’, which has gained notoriety from its use by so-called ‘Querdenker‘.
The term Querdenker is widely used in German public discourse to refer to opponents of Covid measures such as lockdowns and mass vaccination. ‘Quer-denker‘ literally means ‘oblique’ or ‘transverse’ thinker and has the connotation of non-conformist or dissident, i.e., someone who ‘thinks differently’. (Thus, the English ‘queer’ appears to be derived from the German quer or to share a common etymological root with it.) The term has somehow become a term of disparagement in contemporary German usage.
It should be noted that Germany’s “Protestant Newspaper”, needless to say, regularly runs articles from its Protestant news agency.
The disclaimer goes on to cite a ‘fact-check’ from Germany’s public health authority, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), which virulently rejects any link between the vaccines and cancer and indeed goes on the attack against those suggesting there is one:
Alluding to such fears is a targeted strategy of opponents of vaccination, which is used again and again. They try to create an association between vaccinations and cancer using invented notions like ‘turbo cancer’.
“There is no scientific basis whatsoever for this supposed relationship,” the RKI concludes. Oddly enough, the RKI ‘fact-check’ makes no specific reference to mRNA vaccines here, even though it is obviously such vaccines which are at issue in this context. It only mentions the mRNA vaccines in passing later on, in order to praise the “ingenious idea” of using mRNA technology to fight cancer.
It should be noted that the original epd article already included contrary opinion, including from the German regulatory agency, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which told the epd, somewhat elliptically, that it “has no indication that the COVID-19 vaccines authorised in Germany altered the human genome”.
Although the German public health authority is cited in the disclaimer, in response to a recent query by the German regional newspaper the Nordkurier, epd Editor-in-Chief Karsten Frerichs insisted that the agency had not come under any pressure from Government officials to withdraw the article, but merely reconsidered the wisdom of its publication after receiving inquiries from “private individuals”.
Peter Schleicher, the Munich-based immunologist cited in the article, calls its withdrawal “outrageous”, describing it as a “frontal assault on freedom of the press”. There is “a great deal of absolutely serious [scientific] literature which undergirds the suspicion” of a link between mRNA vaccines and cancer, he told the Nordkurier.
Robert Kogon is the pen name of a widely-published journalist covering European affairs. Subscribe to his Substack and follow him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The people that did, or do, back the vaccines and all the lies are pure traitors to the human race and I’m sure one day will be remembered as such!
I like Scott Adam’s imagery of our society as two films being shown on one screen. And what you think and believe depends entirely on which of the two films you are watching.
To me and pretty much everyone on here, this news is (a) not surprising at all (b) further proof that we live in a world in which those in authority seek to control us through deception and force.
To those watching “the other film”, the Protestant news agency are a bunch of crazy, deviants that want to create chaos and disorder and are simply making stuff up. And they see these deviants advancing and threatening them all over the world, like Trump, Milei, Elon Musk, etc as people that need to be stopped at any cost and by any means.
I have to say though, that there seems to be more and more people switching over to our film. Still not nearly enough to turn things around, but it’s adding up.
The next step is multiple AI-driven realities. Every digital media you consume has become 100% untrustworthy because anything can be perfectly faked. Everyone gets their own film, and no one really knows what’s real and what’s fantasy. Not even AI, since its input will also increasingly include AI-generated fake realities.
And yet… maybe what will happen is the world will wake up to the fact that whatever comes down the media pipeline isn’t and has never been reality but a distortion of reality.
And perhaps people will start relying on what they see and experience with their own two eyes in the real world rather than relying so much on what they receive from the artificial, distorted media world.
My stock reply when anyone asks how I came to the conclusion that there isn’t a “Climate Crisis”:
I looked out of the window.
Also, I’ve noticed that it is predominantly younger people who subscribe to the climate doom cult; older people have experienced a lot of weather and remember when it wasn’t catastrophised.
The Protestant Church was founded by people who thought differently.
If ‘turbo cancer’ is a real phenomenon, one would expect physicians to be raising the alarm in many countries, including our own. Excess death statistics broken down by cause of death do not indicate a significant rise in cancer deaths.
No you wouldn’t. Almost all physicians bowed to Covid and the state takeover of medicine. Those who didn’t were cancelled. Many such expected a huge increase in cancer after the jabs.
The physicians in many countries were bullied into compliance. However, the actuaries were not susceptible to that.
Well, some of them do. OTOH, one has to keep in mind that physicians are often little but pharma industry salesreps with stethoscopes.
Not if sounding the alarm gets you into serious trouble.
Because we now know that the medical establishment will mercilessly destroy any doctor who dares challenge its authority, we simply cannot expect doctors or anyone in the medical profession to raise the alarm about anything.
This is what happens to dissenting doctors who ‘raise the alarm’:
“A Londonderry doctor has been given a further suspension of six months for using her position to undermine the public health message on Coronavirus.
Dr Anne McCloskey had already been suspended over comments about the Covid-19 vaccination.
A medical tribunal, sitting in Manchester, has now extended that.
It found that her actions fell below standards expected of a doctor and that this amounted to misconduct.
Dr McCloskey did not attend the hearing of the Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service.
It hears cases against doctors where serious concerns have been raised and as a result their fitness to practise has been called into question by the GMC.
In August 2021, Dr McCloskey expressed concerns in a social media video about young people taking Covid jabs.
Her claims included that young people were being coerced, bullied bribed and cajoled into receiving the vaccine.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-67204849
As in communist China, dissidence is suppressed.
Fitness to practice they say….Any Dr that ignores the ‘First do no Harm’ oath and allows experimental treatments into patents should be struck off by the GMC as unfit!
Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, has spoken out about the rise in turbo cancers that he is observing in his patients.
They are – all over the world. Professor Angus Dalgleish here.
English translation of the German Querdenker is Someone who thinks outside of the box. Like all opponents of any German government, they were (and are) obviously being smeared as far-right extremists aka covert Nazis. After all, Hitler never ordered a mask mandates! That should make anyone highly suspicious of those criticizing them.
The powers that be have done far too much damage to the population’s health to admit their guilt for fear of retribution. The only hope is that people will refuse any more mRNA jabs from now on, if they dont wake up now they never will, then so be it!
Time is running out on dissenting media outlets. They need total control of the narrative and to be able to write their own history hence the Hallet enquiry clown show. Sites such as this are either being tolerated or will be gone within the next couple of years they can’t risk the sheeple waking.
Even if all alternative media outlets were closed down tomorrow, I’m too far gone for them, too immune to the BS!
The above piece chimes with a very similar article here by Prof Angus Dagleish who expressed his fears that mRNA vaccines were supercharging cases of melanoma which had previously been in remission but soon after vaccination , burst back into aggressive growth . What appalls is not the effect , but the attempts to diminish and cover up . Just watch as the Hallett enquiry rubber stamps all of the medical nonsense thrust upon us during Covid .
Prof Dalgleish is also an immunologist & attributes the changes he is seeing in his oncology clinic is due to the damage done to the immune system post mRNA injection, the immune system previously having done its job to clean up cancerous cells as they developed & before they replicated in an out of control fashion.
There is enough material in there for a West End farce .
It’s crazy stuff and I think the idea of a turbo cancer doesn’t convey the true horror of it. After all a turbo cancer might be preferable to a painful slow burn. Cancers that were in remission are suddenly reactivated again after years of healthy life. The slightest cell mutation is magnified and given that we are all in a state of relative cancer in that we fight it every moment of our existence, this is a profound attack on the biosphere and the divine anthropos. This is the only way to see these people now. They have had plenty of time to recant and yet they are utterly determined the maximize the death toll from their agenda. Such people need to be considered as serious enemies and clear and present dangers.
What may confuse people is that mRNA technology has been used successfully in cancer treatment (immunotherapy). We need to distinguish between that and the so-called covid vaccines.
We now have the 1984 “Ministry of truth” in full operation. The problem for them is that unless ALL academic papers are removed, they will always be found out. The turbo-cancer phenonemen is real, and is being written up by oncologists. A few serious papers have been published. The fact is that the “jab” does damage the immune system. Why else would the jabbed be up to 3 times more likely to catch “Covid”, and probably anything else going? Of course they defend the medicine, which was never used with “full disclosure” of possible effects, with the excuse that it was an emergency. It was not an emergency, the “cure” is turning out to be much worse than the disease, and our politicians are in absoloute denial. They want censorship (presumably with penalties) to deny their own complicit actions, well not from me!
Lisren to Angus Dalgleish on the John Campbell podcast on Youtube
Thanks for this reporting. Following the links, it seems that there is more to the story!
The publisher (Matthias Gülzow) has followed up with two articles justifying their behaviour:
(early October) https://www.evangelische-zeitung.de/corona-der-turbokrebs-und-der-journalismus
(mid November) https://www.evangelische-zeitung.de/turbokrebs-und-kein-ende
The first article tries to mollify the outraged readership, claiming that they had not been put under pressure to delete the article, but that the claim had not been ‘ausgewogen’ (balanced) by a counterargument. They then claim that they subscribe to the Popperian ideal of science (everything is a theory until disproven)… but they subscribe to the ‘proven peer-review process’, so despite claiming to be open to publishing ‘proof’ of a cancer link, they have rejected (so far) all comers on the basis that it falls foul of said peer-review process.
In the November article, they justify rejecting all the contributions on the basis that they are “Untersuchungen ohne Kontrollgruppe, Artikel aus Zeitschriften ohne normale Qualitätsstandards und immer wieder wilde Spekulationen aus zweifelhaften Internetquellen”, i.e. “Studies without a control group, articles from magazines without normal quality standards and again and again the wild speculations from dubious internet sources”.
Well. Game on. Strikes me there is an opportunity to show Dr Gülzow what he’s missing… after all, there seems to be distinct lack of a proper control group in the various trials underlying the injections that are being discussed, and perhaps he will find that some of his other articles (who knows, perhaps he promoted various saviours other than the traditional protestant Son of God in some of his other articles?!).