International public health is a mess. Once seen generally as a public good, the focus of the World Health Organisation (WHO) now more closely resembles a scheme for extracting private profit from the public purse. Wealthy corporations drive a ‘public-private partnership’ agenda, the foundations of the rich determine global priorities, and a propagandised public are ever more removed from decision-making regarding their own wellbeing.
There was a time when things were different and public health promoted genuine equity and decentralisation. However, decades of naïvely swapping public control for private money have dismantled the decolonising, community-based model on which institutions such as WHO were ostensibly built. Recent policies have promoted impoverishment and centralised control, and WHO is now seeking power to entrench these.
While WHO remains mainly publicly funded, and defunding bad ideas is sensible, simplistic solutions to complex problems are seldom a good idea. Replacing net harm with a vacuum will not help the people who need substance. Knee-jerk reactions can satisfy those who are unaffected by collateral harm but want ‘something done’ (such as the privileged Zoom class who decided in 2020 that wrecking the livelihoods of others might protect them from a virus), but we should be better than that. Public health, like our personal health, should remain a responsibility of us all.
Some argue that ‘public health’ is a false construct, and only personal health really matters. Those who believe this should clarify what they will do when a factory upstream on their local river starts releasing mercury or cyanide into their water supply. Without a structure to monitor this, they won’t know until people around them get sick or die. If they want to walk outside, they probably prefer clean air. These require considerable communal effort.
We also live far longer than our forebears principally due to improved sanitation, living conditions and nutrition. Antibiotics play an important role, and some vaccines have contributed late in the game. While some of these improvements grew organically, many required communal action (i.e., a public health action). If the road has now led us into the bog, better to back up and re-route the road than destroy it altogether.
What public health is
The WHO was designed in 1946 to help coordinate international public health. It was to be called upon by countries when needed. WHO’s remit was primarily to address high burden diseases that cause avoidable sickness and death where countries lacked the resources or technical expertise needed. Although non-communicable diseases such as diabetes or obesity – or cancers and degenerative diseases such as dementia – kill most frequently, WHO sensibly prioritised the unavoidable results of poverty or geography, predominantly infectious diseases, that strike younger and so shorten life far more.
‘Life-years lost’ is an extremely important concept in public health. If we really believe that equity is important – a reasonable chance of all having a roughly equal lifespan – then addressing diseases that remove the most life years makes sense. Most people would prioritise a five-year-old with pneumonia before an 85-year-old dying with dementia, if the choice had to be made. Both lives are of equal value, but one has more to lose than the other. When truth was important, preventable diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and the effects of under-nutrition were the priority of the international health community.
COVID-19 is therefore an obvious anomaly. It kills at an average age older than most people even live to and predominantly affects those with severe metabolic or lifestyle diseases. It is notable that from the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, only raw death rates were quoted by those who stood to gain from lockdowns and mass vaccination. Conventional public health metrics that consider life-years lost (such as disability-adjusted life years, or DALYs) would have allowed the public to realise that things were not as serious as some needed them to believe.
What public health is not
In terms of equity, it would be ludicrous to divert resources from African children dying of malaria in order to vaccinate them against COVID-19. Such a resource diversion would be expected to kill more children than could conceivably be saved – mass Covid vaccination is far more costly than malaria management. Less than 1% of Africans are over 75 years of age, half are under 20, and nearly all had immunity against Covid before Omicron immunised the rest. So, the fact that such a vaccination program was run by WHO, and is still underway, says everything we need to know about the current intent of WHO and its partners.
Mass Covid vaccination, though clearly a public health negative in low-income countries, was not a mistake but a deliberate act. The people in charge knew the age at which people die of COVID-19, they knew most people already had immunity, and they knew the worsening of other diseases that resource diversion would drive. In the same way, they had known that closing schools would entrench future poverty and increase child marriage, and that closing workplaces in crowded cities would enforce poverty whilst having no impact on virus transmission.
It is therefore rational to conclude that those driving such policies are acting incompetently from a public health standpoint. Calls for their organisations to be defunded and dismantled are fully understandable. In wealthier countries, where organisations such as WHO provide minimal value-added beyond career opportunities, the benefit of demolishing international public health may appear obvious. However, those born by good fortune into countries with strong economies and health systems must also think more broadly. An example will help explain the issue.
Where international cooperation saves lives
Malaria has had a huge influence over humankind. It has killed enough to change humanity, selecting for mutations such as sickle-cell disease that, while deadly in themselves, killed less often than the malaria parasite they protect against. Malaria still kills over 600,000 children every year. Good diagnosis and treatments exist but they die because it is often unavailable. This is mostly due to poverty. The parasite is naturally spread by mosquitoes throughout the tropics and sub-tropics but is only a major issue in poorer countries. As example, there is no malaria in Singapore, very little in Malaysia, but a lot in Papua New Guinea.
A concerted effort in development of better malaria drugs, diagnostics and insecticide-impregnated bed nets (to stop and kill the mosquitoes) has reduced risk for many, but many low-income countries cannot procure and distribute them without external support. As the COVID-19 response demonstrated, some people and corporations are willing to risk the lives of others for profit – so without international regulatory support malfeasants would also send sub-standard and fake products to these countries.
A similar picture applies to many other diseases, including tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and schistosomiasis (a very nasty worm infection). So, while it may be reasonable to state that WHO and partners have been a net public health negative over the past few years, not all the actions of such institutions produce net harm. Not all their work is configured to benefit the rich. If we permanently eliminated all international health effort, then history suggests we would kill far more than we save. That is not an outcome to strive for.
Recognising institutional realities
Somehow, we must retain the benefits whilst removing the ability to sell out to the highest bidder. A penchant for injecting pregnant women with mRNA medicines that concentrate in ovaries and liver, crossing the placenta to enter the dividing cells of the foetus, does not mean honesty or competence are beyond reach. It simply means people can be bought or brainwashed. We already knew that. Public health, like plumbing or selling cars, is a way by which ordinary people make money. Therefore we need ordinary restraints and rules to make sure they do not abuse others for self-enrichment.
The current mess is also society’s fault. Because these institutions deal in health, we pretended they were more caring, more ethical and more able to self-regulate. WHO’s version of self-regulation over the past 20 years has been to cast aside longstanding norms regarding conflict of interest and cozy up with Pharma and high net worth individuals in Davos. We should have expected this and prevented it.
Because WHO is staffed by humans, and humans have a natural desire for more money, it will keep prioritising its corporate benefactors and their investors. Car salesmen don’t succeed by giving customers the best deal, but by gaining the best deal for themselves and their paymasters.
Who and what to fund?
It is irrational to support corrupted institutions, but rational to support improvements in health and well-being. It is rational (and decent) to help populations who, through accidents of history such as past colonial exploitation or other misfortune, lack the means to fully address their own basic healthcare. While bilateral arrangements may address much of this, it also makes sense to coordinate more widely. Multilateral institutions can provide efficiencies and benefits beyond those achievable on a bilateral basis.
A sensible model would recognise human frailty and greed, ensuring international health institutions can only act when and as requested by each country. It would exclude private interest, as the priorities of population health are simply incompatible with maximisation of corporate profit (which WHO’s corporate donors are obligated to prioritise). The tendency of humans to put loyalty to an institution (and their own salaries) above a cause also necessitates strict staff term limits. Equity would demand the same.
International institutions, supported by our taxes, must never be in a position to undermine democracy, curtail freedom of expression or override our fundamental right to work, education and normal family life. Doing so would be the antithesis of bodily autonomy and human rights. It would be the antithesis of democracy. And it would be the antithesis of good public health. Institutions seeking power to impose their will on ordinary, free people must be dealt with accordingly.
The COVID-19 response of the international health industry, led by WHO, impoverished the public and degraded health. The current rush to transfer greater powers to WHO should therefore not be confused with public health. Publicly funding the further erosion of freedom and basic human rights would be self-harm, while funding access to basic healthcare is a global good. The public and the politicians that claim to represent them should be clear on the difference.
Dr. David Bell is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva and coordinated malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation. He is a member of the Executive Committee of PANDA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Anything bozo can ditch today he can unditch tomorrow.
It will be interesting to see whether some pubs display ‘vaccine passport required’ signs while others say the opposite and see who gets the most custom.
Some might remember that when smoking was being discouraged in restaurants places like Macdonalds and motorway service restaurants set aside smaller and smaller areas for smoking yet they were always the most crowded parts of the room.
Sadly the population has become so terified after a year a relentless propaganda that I reckon most people would choose to drink in a pub that required vaccine passports. If the sceme is voluntary and enough people visit pubs that are passport free then it becomes a massive experiment, and if there’s no difference in the number of “cases” that can be traced to passport free pubs compared with those that require a passport then passports will be shown to be a waste of time.
Why the government still wants to introduce passports for theaters, festivals etc. is incomprehensible. Are people sat closer together in a theater than a busy pub? There are virtually no spikes in transmission that can be linked to outdoor mixing, so why are festivals thought to be a risk?
It makes no sense. However I think we’d we hard to find any lucid thought process in any government minister.
It makes perfect sense. Look at the red column and ask yourself who would be most likely to visit those places?
It’s designed to coerce young people in to taking the vaccine.
It means that there will be a division in society. That means families too. Any government who condones this needs to look at themselves in the mirror. Have no lessons been learned from Hitler, PolPot or Stalin. The country also needs to look at itself if it is happy to be part of recreating the terrible situations in communist Europe. I thought we had moved on from allowing dictatorships. I thought we had left the dictatorial EU.
They can roll it out as quickly or as slowly as they like, but it’s coming. It’s part of a Central Bank Digital Currency and ID2020 project. Boris has very little say in it other than some minor administrative details.
Either storm the Bastille, go off grid on an island or be part of a massive genetic experiment. Either way, we’re not going back to normal and all of this has been engineered from the beginning.
Yeah, pretty much sounds like that. Like i keep saying: we’ve been domesticized.
If Boris had any live of country he would have stood strong and supported Donald Trump. Together the two greatest democracies could have bought these globalists down. But unfortunately Boris is part of a selfish, greedy, globalist family who also believe in eugenics. In our ignorant trust we have voted for our own demise as a nation.
It is our duty to boycott the businesses of those who threaten our liberties. Let us now use the window of opportunity, no matter how small to make our voices heard and ensure we make every effort to stop the mission creep, yellow star policies and hope that more businesses, MPs and others with influence can be turned around. On the back of Handjob being called to the Courts on Tuesday over the non opening of hospitality, any ‘good’ news should be widely broadcast and used to our advantage.
As a regualr concert goer I am currently writing to all the artists that I would normally watch to explain why I won’t be attending again, and unless they make a stand on this I won’t buy any of their music either.
The artists will not make a stand. They are too complicit. Many, not all, are very socialist/communist minded. We need to simply boycott by never buying their music, going to their concerts or watching them on stage or film.
it worked very well in Hollywood. The film industry has lost $billions, many artists are leaving California because they cannot afford to live there anymore. Lots of musicians have also noticed their income has plummeted. The silent treatment works very well. My Pillow on the other hand has gone ‘viral’. Hid products are now only on line, as he has taken everything out of the stores who tried to blackmail him. Those stores are suffering too.
Isn’t Ian Brown vehemently opposed to this nonsense?
The vaccinated want to see some advantage to their jab, having a card or app and maybe getting into some pub or elsewhere will make them feel vindicated, the segregation will be ignored
Their advantage is best summed up by a line from Treasure Island.
‘Thems that die will be the lucky ones’.
For others it will be the long drawn out suffering of the Great Reset.
If the vaccinated need to feel vindicated then that is an issue for them. The rest of us are happy for them & if they believe the vaccine will ‘save’ them and ‘protect’ them then they should have no problem with those who decline to be vaccinated. Isn’t their virtual signalling mask wearing compliance enough vindication for them?
l wonder how many patients with something called vax-syndrome will crop up sooner or later, an app or getting somewhere else would be cold comfort, and this is not gloating, l wish them well, but what if their future is sealed?
Like Gulf War syndrome? (Must look that up….)
Still gotta wear that mask on entry huh? I guess that’s me out then lol.
Me too!
Do not wear one. Never have and never will. Once I got over the first days of being ‘eyeballed’ by the virtue signallers and I gained confidence in my ‘rebellion’, it was amazing how many people just ignored my non-mask wearing. Truly liberating.
I agree. I have never worn a mask and never will. It’s demoralising. I also noticed that most shop assistants seem happy to talk to me and actually look relieved to have a conversation. Many say that their job has become miserable and very difficult since wearing masks because their lips are dry and sore at the end of the day and everyone treats them as though they are a nonentity.
We have become a country known for ‘mass testing’. I would like to see the PCR test used for testing for bacteria and /or viruses etc on masks. My suggestion is that in every town with a population of say 20000 plus, a test unit should be set up and all those grubby unhygenic mask wearers should hand in the mask to have it swabbed. The mask can be returned to them to put back on, and then the swabs can be sent away and the results returned to the wearers. I suspect that the level of bacteria, virus, fecal matter etc on the masks will send the virtue signallers running to bin the masks. But I live in a fantasy world I think.
Just tell them you’re exempt. Get one of the damned lanyards if it helps. The more who do it the less they can argue. I’ve never been challenged with the lanyard and in the summer in our local I just told the bar staff once and it was never mentioned again even without the lanyard.
I certainly won’t be going to any event or venue where I’m going to have to tolerate seeing people in face nappies for a number of hours. I don’t wear a mask but going to the supermarket is bad enough but at least I can be in and out very quickly.
Ditched? They’re not ditched. Still a long list of places they’ll be required. You’re either a free non-discriminatory society or you’re not; there’s no halfway house on this. Gove is in the Telegraph now asking for opinions. Why? Were all the many thousands of negative submissions to the official consultation not good enough for you to read? You think people can be bought off with a few crumbs and be grateful? No way. Methinks SPI-B dropped the ball on this one.
I think what Gove is doing re asking for “opinions” is trying to treat this exercise as a separate exercise from the “consultation on vaccine certification”, in the hope that all those who contributed to that are either totally WEARY of this now and won’t bother or they will think that their original response counts as a response to this. That will, they likely hope, add up to a much lower number of responses, and less negative responses [particularly now that pubs and restaurants are taken out of the scheme – for now] and they will then be able to use that in support of bringing in the scheme with the justification “we didn’t get much in the way of response when we asked for ‘opinions’ “.
He jumped the gun. The IT guys said they need more time. So he’s trying to roll back what he couldn’t wait to say this week.
Means nothing. Resist. And continue to let him know that we are onto their games. There will be a price to pay
Looks like a massive opportunity to host some illegal ’90s style raves in empty fields and warehouses!
Definitely although sadly I feel I I’m now too old to be accepted an any illegal event. Husband used to organise illegal raves and but has fallen out with many of the old party crowd because their all pro vaccine.
Florida is explicitly banning vaccine passports from the state. I understand this would prevent private venues from using them also? They do, after all, run contrary to international treaties against coercive medicine, put together after the Nuremberg trials.
Oh really? Can I claim asylum in Florida?
I’ve thought of this, too. Might buy a dinghy
Emailed my mp this morning after he told me a few weeks ago there was no plan for vaccine passports. They’re treating us like idiots
Sorry to say, but your mp is ‘furloughed’ on full pay plus the £10K 30 pieces of silver payment and therefore has no knowledge of any ‘plan’ for vaccine passports or ‘plans’ for anything else. This Government does not have a plan. It rules by opinion poll and instructions from the Covid puppet masters, Tony War Criminal B(liar) and Billy Boy Gates. With that in mind neither the Ministers or furloughed MPs will know what they will be repeating to the brainwashed public until they receive the script.
This government is the absolute pits! Remember how Camerloon used to be called FlopFlopDave?
As I wrote in an e-Mail to my MP, I see this idea of passports in a similar vein to how I viewed the introduction of masks. It is being done to make the terrified hoards feel safe about getting back to normal again.
Handjob admitted this about masks. It was the British Retail consortium who wanted masks to be introduced, so a massive u-turn was made. Remember in March /April 2020 every one of the medical, scientific and Department of Health bigwigs were saying that masks were unnecessary and could even be dangerous? There were never any health and safety checks done on wearing masks all day- I know, because my MP was asking for them on my behalf.
Yesterday, OH and I listened to the Delingpole podcast featuring Dr Mike Yeadon. OH has been wavering about the jab because he is desperate to get back to travelling, the theatre, football and dining out again. After listening to Dr Yeadon, whose advice was to wait and see what happens before having the jab and certainly don’t have it if you are not at risk, OH has returned to his default answer. “I MAY have the jab once the human trials are over”
Vaccine passports are coming, even if it’s in paper form to begin with. Unless we stop this now, once it is a done deal we’re too late.
If I exclude the people I have personally met like us, which numbers are growing but not fast enough, we need to stop it now before the young people get vaccinated, as apart from my husband and myself, every one I personally know who have been offered the needle have all, every last one of my neighbours and family my age, have jumped in to the empty pool and never bothered to check if there was water in it and rolled up their sleeves, willingly and gleefully for ‘their jab’.
I have mentioned the dog situation before, here’s a reminder what happens and has been happening to anyone with dogs that do not get vaccinated yearly.
1: Of my friends and family with dogs, I am the only one who does NOT get her dogs vaccinated every year. They have zero sympathy for my dogs when I state we can’t go to a new training class.
2: Dogs unvaccinated are not allowed to most training, dog walking, kennels.
3: Unvaccinated dogs are classed in the public eye as being dangerous to the vaccinated dogs, I have queried that numerous times and never get a proper reply.
4: Not one person I know who get their dog jabbed every year understands nor do they care that 3 of the diseases the dogs are vaccinated for are probably life long. Nor do they care that the vaccine for lepto does not last 12 months, or that it’s caused by bacteria and can be treated with antibiotics if caught early enough. They also don’t know nor care that there is so many types of lepto and the dogs are vaccinated for only four.
5: When their dog dies young with cancer, has terrible skin conditions and start having seizures, the vaccines are never, ever to blame.
If I’m being pessimistic in regards to the roll out of vaccine passports it’s because I have been dealing with these reactions for many years now.
On a more positive note, I have now met a handful of skeptics that are dog owners and each and every one of them, do not vaccinate their dogs either and a bonus, I met through the stand in the park a lovely lady who runs her own dog walking business and does not require vaccinated dogs.
I said this exact thing on a group, on facebook. We are dogs to them (not that there’s anything wrong with dogs as I have 2 lovely whippets). Like you, I don’t vaccinate my dogs anymore after their puppy jabs and know that it means they cannot get access to everything like their vaccinated counterparts. Will be the same now for us humans. So depressing!
Me too…hands up to having never vaccinated my dog, or dewormed or deflead (I use diatomaceous earth and MSM (methylsulfonylmethane not main stream media!) respectively. He is also intact….needs his testosterone for his heart health etc. He is the healthiest dog on the block. When people bemoan the cost of veterinary services I have to admit I wouldn’t know (under my breath!) What’s good enough for my dog’s body to deal with applies to me too.
“3: Unvaccinated dogs are classed in the public eye as being dangerous to the vaccinated dogs, I have queried that numerous times and never get a proper reply.”
Which suggests they don’t think the vaccines actually work, eh?
I was very interested in your comments as I have had dogs since 1971. (Cairn terriers)
Some years ago I went to a lecture by a South African lady on vaccines for children in the local Friends Meeting House. I was staggered by what she said, one point in question was that they had found that most cot deaths occured within a short time of a child receiving an innoculation.I must have been a sceptic for a long time as my daughter who is now 56 never received all the vaccinations going when she was a baby.
As it happened I queried the question on vaccination of dogs and was not surprised to hear that the lecturer considered that vets were actually killing dogs in their enthusiasm
to medicate. This has stayed with me and after the first vaccination I have left things alone.
I did query with one vet why this was necessary and her answer was that they didn’t know how long the vaccine lasted. A second country vet said they had had the discussion on this and felt every three years was sufficient.. Probably hedging his bets.
My grandfather had smallpox as a boy of 20, He was hospitalised and expected to die but recovered and had a wonderful life in New Zealand and then back in England. He didn’t have a vaccine and told me to never ever compromise with food. Always buy the best.Get fresh air, work hard and get some sleep. He lived to be a great age.
Always question everything, we are being conned every single day by these corrupt people in power.
We MUST stop calling them Covid/Vaccine passports, they are ID, the rest was just the narrow window to get us here. They are ID, that Blair wanted many years ago and has now found a possible way to get there. Maybe they will get takers as those who have been jabbed and now know it does nothing much, want some justification for their jab.
As the no smoking ban came in, pubs starting closing down. The Government gets involved with our lives and the consequences are never good for the ordinary citizen. I suspect any business that starts looking to apartheid will suffer. We are a Democracy. Boris and his government are highly dangerous technocrats.
We need to boycott any business who wants to help harvest our private data….because that is what they are doing .
How long do you think it’ll take somebody to create a false “passport”? I’ll be getting one.
Just like when you had to sign in or use a QR code, I used a false name and number, who’s going to check.
The paper cards will be easy to mimic.
The apps with an encrypted link to a national jab database…not so much.
That said, the utter failure of T&T is a sign they will bungle a central database.
Let’s pray they use bottom dollar Third World programmers, like Boeing did on the 737 MAX.
The 737Max wasn’t doomed by software programmers, eastern or western. It was doomed by fixing an engine too big for the aircraft. The only way it could be fitted with sufficient ground clearance was to move it forward and upwards. This basically makes the aircraft dynamically unstable, as the engine cowling acts as an extra wing area at high angles of attack. This extra lift increases the angle of attack – a positive feedback loop. Dynamic instability is fine in military fighter aircraft where the advantages of dynamic instability (high maneuverability) outweigh the complexity of the software/hardware necessary to handle it, but not so good for civilian aircraft with unwitting passengers. The Boeing 737Max was supposed to have two independent angle of attack detectors to give some redundancy to the 737 Max aerodynamic system necessary to help the pilot, but Boeing in their wisdom made the 2nd one an option. They also claimed the 737 Max was no different in behaviour to other 737s to avoid retraining costs deterring propective purchasers.
All this talk of passports being mandatory to be able to live life etc reminds me of a scheme that my employer tried to introduce to it’s 30,000 employees three years ago.
The company had been appraoched by a private firm, offering to administer and monitor the licences of employees authorised to drive any of the thousands of velicles we have. Those employees are bound by rules which include no speeding (black boxes and limiters fitted) and prohibit the use of even hands free devices to receive calls on the move.
However, the company decided to extend that to every employee driving their own vehicles, by demanding that all employees provide their driving licence details to this unknown company, and authorise them to access our DVLA records every six months to search for endorsements, and prosecutions. Faiure to sign would result in us having to provide explanations to our line managers as to why we were unwilling to comply, leaving it open as to what would happen next.
The backlash from staff was so great that those discussions never happened. Nor was the scheme ever spoken of again.
I hope, when it comes down to it, that similar will happen. A number will comply because all they can see is what they can get out of it, failing to see the bigger pictures, but a large number will say screw you, we’re not complying.
People power!… Folk know when something is wrong (but some are too scared to admit it!)
‘Nightclubs already police entry’. No Gove, it’s not the same thing. A nightclub might ask for proof of age and name and address for licensing purposes. They don’t ask for confidential medical information.
Let’s just ‘bar’ the policiticans and their crony mates from society. The world would be a better place.
So how exactly are cinemas, theatres (to a lesser extent) and nightclubs going to operate when their target audiences are too young to have even been offered a ‘vaccine’?
Cinema owners last week said they didn’t want this and would push back against.
How many old vulnerable people are found in night clubs?
So sharing the train ride to the theatre is okay, but on arrival at the theatre, apartheid takes place.
Endless bullshit nonsense.
Remember Apartheid?
How is this different? Jobs for whites, no jobs for blacks, segregated football stadiums, segregated shopping areas, segregated schools, buses segregated, taxis for blacks, taxis for whites. What happened to the belief that that system was evil? Do they no longer believe that ideal to be so? Why are they trying to bring back a similar society? Replace the word Blacks with Unvaxed. And this in the current WOKEWORLD. Ironic?
It is no different. I have written to a number of Gov departments, ministers and my own furloughed MP objecting to the Yellow Star Health Apartheid Scheme. I am Trade Marking the phrase and selling franchised use of it on stickers, badges, posters etc so that I too can rip off the great British public during this plandemic.
Can’t believe this is the same man who said ‘If I am ever asked, on the streets of London, or in any other venue, public or private, to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am, when I have done nothing wrong and when I am simply ambling along and breathing God’s fresh air like any other freeborn Englishman, then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it”
If you look at the way the Government has reacted to Covid it is difficult to trust their motives in any shape or form.
My guess was from the start (continually reinforced by recent statements) is that their underhand and deceitful strategy is to keep delaying the decision on vaccine passports. The public will then weary and be so uncomfortable waiting for the final decision that more and more (and younger and younger) people who are less and less likely to need the vaccine are implicitly coerced into making the decision based purely on convenience. This is completely unethical from a medical point of view and the only way to prevent such an abuse of medical treatment would have been by the immediate outlawing of any form of vaccination certification.
The medical professional bodies that regulate healthcare should also hang their heads in shame (for such supervised neglect of these ethical issues) in not speaking out.
We can’t have the masses unable to use public transport to get into work to service the needs of the Keyboard W(not)FH cult. So its best just to ban people who won’t comply from venues at are likely to be ‘social’. Yellow Star Health Apartheid.
Just read that the inept BoJo & Handjob have apparently spent £.1.3 billion of OUR money buying 394 Million rapid flow tests which they are going to post to our homes to enable us to self test twice a week. We cannot have the ‘cases’ dropping away so if we all comply and test the lockdown will never end. I will be redirecting my ‘free’ tests to No 10 Downing for Bojo to use and the next ones to Handjob c/o the Dept of “Covid” formerly “health”. No need to buy a stamp. Redirected mail can be just noted with the new addressee name & location and posted in your nearest post box. Please ensure you spray well with anti viral solution before posting.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/04/04/public-will-urged-take-covid-test-twice-week-lockdown-rules/
I am a lifelong Tory, from a Conservative family. I assumed I was voting in a Conservative government, not an increasingly authoritarian dictatorship that has decimated the freedom our forefathers paid for so dearly with their lives, all for a ‘virus’ that 99% survive.
To anyone with half a brain, it is obvious that this whole ‘plandemic’ is the entrance to Agenda 20/30, and the vaccine passport is literally a passport to a social credit system. Boris has sold us out to the World Economic Forum, ‘Great Reset’. Unfortunately, the majority of the public have been terrified by the relentless government propaganda, and are happily ensconced in Stockholm Syndrome, oblivious to the Agenda that is behind it.
My only hope is that a new Party will emerge from this mess, one that will honour human rights and true democracy, that is, if we ever have another election, at the rate we are speeding to a One World Government.