Those of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory, have had to endure unbelievable scorn, scientific ostracism and the ignominy of being ‘cancelled’ by the mainstream media as well as by professional colleagues for nearly three years now.
In the summer of 2020 a paper I co-authored, describing the findings of an Anglo-Norwegian team of scientists who had demonstrated unique ‘fingerprints’ of laboratory manipulation in the Covid virus, was suppressed in both the U.S. and U.K. This was at the time that the World Health Organisation, leading science journals and others were going to huge lengths to persuade us that Covid was a natural occurrence, and that we should spend a lot more money to fight any such future threats.
Only now does the Telegraph (uncritically) report that the U.S. Government is no longer going to fund the research it denied doing for nearly three years and the media sat on.
Similarly, it has been an open secret for anyone who follows primary sources of information (the ones ignored by the mainstream media and the BBC specifically, reported as misinformation by Ofcom and targeted by the Orwellian Counter-Disinformation Cell of the U.K. Government) that mRNA vaccines did not do what it says on the vial, as it were.
First the ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised but travelled throughout the body and was found at post-mortems to be everywhere.
Accusations of dramatic variations in batch-to-batch variability – an absolute ‘no no’ in vaccine manufacture protocols – which could explain why side-effects were more common in some batches than others were denied but were borne out by definitive Danish research. These alarming concerns seem to have been brushed off by the regulators when they should have immediately begun investigating them in depth.
All the while the regulatory authorities and politicians, parroting their ‘highest standards’ assurances, have repeatedly declared the mounting disturbing U.K. Yellow Card and U.S. VAERS adverse event reports to be nothing to be worried about.
In June, whistleblowers led by the scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new issue of concern – that of serious levels of DNA contamination. Once again this was ignored by the mainstream media. Though quite happy to report the odd side-effect from the vaccines as an excuse to point out that they are extremely rare, they have never addressed the increasingly problematic official ‘safe and effective’ mantra.
Finally there was a small breakthrough. An isolated but braver branch of the mainstream media in the form of the Spectator Australia has finally blown the lid on serious levels of contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid vaccines. The article describes how the genomics scientist Kevin McKernan from Boston used Pfizer and Moderna vials as controls in a study only to find that they contained highly significant DNA plasmid contamination. It reports that McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials, a sequence that is “used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies” and that this is “something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines”. These SV40 promoters are also well recognised as being oncogenic or cancer-inducing.
Others have confirmed these findings. A German biologist whistleblower has found contamination rates of up to 354 times the recommended limit. All this has been reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is highly significant.
To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a kind of Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines. This has been recognised by the Australian version of the FDA, the TGA, which has changed the picture so much that it raises questions as to whether it played a role in the resignation this week of Premier of Victoria Dan Andrews, who was the greatest proponent of the vaccine and of its mandatory use. (Paula Jardine reported in TCW Defending Freedom in December 2021 on this regulatory sleight of hand in granting vaccine Emergency Use Authorisations for what were gene therapy products.)
All these data, which are slowly breaking through into the public domain, come hard on the heels of the latest findings that booster vaccines actually increase the chance of getting infected. This is according to an in-depth study published by the Cleveland Clinic, one of the largest health care organisations in the world, who monitored their staff as well as patients.
It gets worse. Supporters of this technology have claimed that it can be adapted to chase new variants. But it can’t. The results of bivalent vaccines (with components against at least two variants) are seeing the same result. Authors of the Cleveland study say that “there is not a single study that has shown that the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine protects against severe disease or death caused by the XBB lineages of the Omicron variant. At least one prior study has failed to find a protective effect of the bivalent vaccine against the XBB lineages of SARS-CoV-2.”
In one study, all bivalent-vaccinated mice which were challenged with Covid became ill.
This was predicted by many of us as the SARS viruses are subject to immunological imprinting: that is, once an immune system has seen a virus or vaccine it will make the same response to any close variant (this is also known as ‘antigenic sin‘) making further vaccines not only useless but more dangerous as they induce antibodies that enhance infection (ADE antibodies), not cross-reactivity as has been claimed by the manufacturers.
This is not the end of the issues with the mRNA ‘vaccines’. Several immunology studies have shown that the boosters induce an antibody switch from neutralising subtypes to tolerising subtypes as well as inducing significant T cell suppression, all of which will encourage new infections and suppress the immune response to cancer.
At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the U.S. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.
So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other not-so-rare adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.
Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London. This article was first published in TCW Defending Freedom.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I posted this about 30 minutes ago on the German article.
Well worth a read.
You did. I saw that. You and the DS team are in sync today.
I don’t know how I do it Mogs.
I got the drop on the Laurence Fox apology too.
Do you guys have a time machine? How can you have commented a day ago on an article that’s only just been published? You both continue to amaze me while defying the laws of physics!!
They posted the article on Friday and then oddly took it down. Good to see they kept the original comments.
Of course they won’t be banned. Not now, not ever. And it doesn’t matter how solid or horrific the data coming out demonstrating clear as day that these products are neither effective nor safe, as long as the regulators are owned by Big Pharma, and what with all the shareholders so heavily invested in this mRNA tech, you’ve not got a chance of getting them stopped. Only thing people can do is keep spreading truth and stop rolling up for any more vaccines. Literally, *none* of them can now be called ‘safe’. Dr Pierre Kory with a good one here including a collection of anecdotes from medical professionals who are seeing the damage of these bioweapons first hand;
”To wit, the (P)FDA just approved a monovalent jab for a variant that is literally near extinct and which was tested only for “immunogenicity” (antibody production and not clinical effectiveness).
Was it tested for safety? No (unless you count a few mice). Why? Easy – because the safety of the entire mRNA platform is apparently now considered “settled science.”
And by the way, lets be clear that it is not “messenger” RNA, it is “modified” messenger RNA – thus I propose we call it mmRNA instead (the modification with pseudouridine is a huge driver of the persistent toxicity – but forgive me for I digress).
Although I have been miserably wrong in the “social prediction market” to date, I am going to double down here and maintain that this horrifically false attribution of safety to injected mRNA inside lipid nanoparticles will eventually be the death knell of any remaining credibility or authority that our health agencies (a.k.a Pharma subsidiaries) somehow still hold. Long sentence I know.
But for now, they will not stop. This last “authorization” was so bad that even Dr. Paul Offitt (a major salesman for jabs) said he would NOT take them.”
https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/reports-from-the-front-lines-of-the-dfd
”Aaaand you’re back in the room” LMAO
Well it doesn’t get any better. It’s getting so frightening now that I don’t see the point in explaining to people what they’ve done to them selves. I just enjoy their company while I can and keep my fingers crossed.
Except for closest and dearest in my family I have reduced trying to say “For what it is worth there are harms with this vaccine” because friends I think are in denial. I sometimes try though! Let’s keep trying.
Anecdotally a number of friends have recurring chest problems irritable coughs to the more serious heart attacks, strokes. But there is no way of linking this as caused by vaccine because there is no nhs supportive diagnostic route offered? So there is a non inquiring passive approach instead.
Sadly the harms will be already embedded perhaps in the DNA? of our future race before passivity turns into regret.
BBC, where ARE you? ‘Top oncologist calls for MRNA vaccines to be banned’. Is this not news?!! (OK, DS friends, I know, I know..)
Is this the same Dr Angus Dalgleish?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9815821/What-young-people-told-Vaccine-expert-ANGUS-DALGLEISH-dismantles-beliefs-18-30s.html
Yes. People BTL on the DS have already laid into him on several occasions before now regarding his previous stance.
I believe that a lot of doctors, probably the vast majority, believed what they were saying at the time. Yes, they should have looked a little harder and listened a little better to those who warned, but better late than never.
Like most people, I suspect he just could not have believed that regulatory authorities would have been so utterly cavalier about their duties. I get the impression that most regulatory bodies simply took the word of the FDA, which, being clearly owned by the pharmaceutical companies, simply took the word of the drug pushers themselves. I remember the head of the Dutch public health authority saying the pfisser results were very promising, and then saying he had only seen pfisser’s own press releases. That last sentence was ignored, and I suspect that as soon as the EMA okayed the poison, all EU states felt no need to think there was a problem or do their own research. Once they did start doing some independent research, so many people had already been stabbed, regulators would only speak up if they had a death wish.
I think we first saw articles from Dr Dalgliesh about a year ago admitting things were not what he thought they had been. We need a lot more people, a lot more doctors to stand up and speak out, attacking them simply will not help or accomplish anything. Even now the establishment attacks and vilifies doctors who speak out, we should not join the establishment.
Here are the articles posted at TCW by Dr Dalgleish:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-madness-of-vaccinating-children-against-covid-by-a-doctor/
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/strike-off-the-truth-tellers-no-strike-out-whitty-co/
I do agree, Jane, even though I felt the need to post that article. Doctors like him and Aseem Malhotra who also believed the jab propaganda at first, are at least brave enough to stand up when they learn the truth.
It is however still shocking to me that Dr Dalgleish was once such a proponent of vaccine mandates and jabbing the young. I wonder how he feels about that now.
He has explained that article. It was a phone interview and they took his answers out of context, and refused to publish a follow up correction.
Do you have a link for that please? Unless I missed it in this article.
Yes Abby Roberts has a real problem with Malhotra and Andrew Bridgen. She is uncompromising on the matter. That anger also extends to Dr Campbell on YT. She has a point regarding medical professionals when you consider a guy in the street has the caution regarding something still on trial, and those trials were all mice!
Andrew Bridgen i can forgive because he was not a Dr, though he did vote for jabs for care homes so that would need addressing IMO. But she accuses him of jumping ship. Though, that would mean that there is a reckoning, not last time i looked, quite the reverse. Actually, the more fascist they’ve been, the more rewards and gongs they receive. So to be fair, AB has some balls.
Don’t be shocked. We medics rely on evidence to make our decisions, and if the evidence changes we must change too. I was also a proponent of vaccines (and lockdowns for that matter). In theory both should work, but when you find in practice that they don’t, and when you understand why, you give up on them, especially when you realise the harms outweigh the benefits. If you plough through my blog from the beginning, ie early 2020, you will spot the shift. It’s at https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com. Interestingly one of my non-medical friends saw through the emperor’s clothes long before I did.
A rheumatology paradigm; when I started in the specialty in the1970s we put patients with lumbar disc prolapse to bed for 2 weeks, sometimes on traction. Then in the 1980s a study came out showing conclusively that this was quite the wrong thing to do, and the practice was abandoned almost overnight.
One should never be afraid to admit when you are wrong. One must also abandon the concept of “settled science”.
Really?
What evidence was there to support a mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
Why was the medical and scientific establishment so devoid of critical thinking that they were incapable of calling this out?
Why is there such fear against questioning vaccination policy?
This is what must be investigated now, including unnecessary vaccine products being imposed upon people at little or no risk of disease.
Basically, this is over-servicing on a ginormous scale, without valid voluntary informed consent for this medical intervention.
Lay people such as myself called it out at the beginning, but of course no notice was taken…
See my BMJ rapid response published in March 2020:
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
A recent presentation by Angus Dalgliesh where he explains his clinical thinking over the last 3 years.
https://rumble.com/v3hhsj2-professor-angus-dalgleish.html
Well I, who doesn’t know the difference between Nurofen and Paracetamol, worked out by the end of 2020, that it would be a damned good idea to beg my children not to take this experimental injection. My wife warned me years ago that Big Pharma had ethics comparable to pigs. The stunning suppression of HCQ and Ivermectin and even vitamin D were massive red flags. Mike Yeadon, bless him, reminded us that our O level biology books told us how wonderful Natural immunity is.
So no, I’m not having any of this sympathy and forgiveness for these yellow crocodiles that threw medical integrity out of the window. No shame, no remorse. Never forgive, never forget. There will be, must be, retribution, otherwise they will do the same thing again tomorrow.
That is a grievous insult to pigs…
You know I was going to say the same, thank you.
We all appreciate the sentiment of this article but, respectfully, Prof Dalgleish, isn’t it time we used words much more carefully? Especially those with a platform, like your good self.
These jabs are neither mRNA nor vaccines.
Modified DNA is not mRNA – messenger RNA. The latter occurs in nature and degrades rapidly once it has done its job. MRNA with pseudouridine does not.
These injections are not vaccines. They are gene therapies.
Unquestionably we need to return to respecting the strictures of the Nuremberg Code, and UN declaration on human rights.
I think we all need to learn the Magna Carta….The UN Human Rights Act were social distancing during the Lockdowns. Nick & Toby mentioned it saying some people get ridiculed when they bring it up. But as Neil Oliver mentioned; when was the MC null & void because the British people were not consulted. EEC Treason, and countless more!
.
#metoo
Love it nd I want one!!!
“To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence”. No, it was and is pre meditated homicide of the mass murdering variety and those responsible for their production, regulatory approval and coercive administration should be strung up to the nearest lamppost. And left there as a warning.
I see very few of my medical colleagues waking up from indoctrinated slumber.
The fortunate thing is that patients themselves are realising it is the jab that has made them ill.
My role has become an encourager of critical thought in patients, as there is no point trying to red pill most medicos.
I read somewhere that the jab take up is very low in the medical profession.
Dear Professor Dalgleish, your expertise and professional conscience shine through. Thankyou.
Nevertheless I find your Daily Mail article of July 2021, “Vaccine expert ANGUS DALGLEISH dismantles beliefs that have seen rates stall among the 18-30s” startling in one so wise who was already an outspoken Lockdown critic. It’s not just that you were pushing a “vaccine” that many were already doubting, it’s that your arguments were so credulous and dismissive. It’s enormously to your credit that, despite that initial publicly stated conviction, you followed the science to where you are now, probably taking a terrific professional risk to do so (whereas I, your critic, have nothing at stake). In sum, I urge you to describe your thoughts now on your journey from there to here.
I think he woke up when 3x in a row the modRNA vaccine turbo-charged the cancer of his own patients.
The accurate word for the jabs is transfection not vaccine = stained, tainted or poisoned right through the whole of the body.
That is to his credit. There must be many other doctors who have experienced the same and stayed quiet and compliant.
Likely, but if you look at the contemporary comments on Dalgleish’s Mail essay, it’s obvious that reasoned scepticism was widespread. My guess is that even so expert and honourable a man was simply captured by a cult, the vaccine cult, that inhibited clarity of judgement and promoted evangelical zeal. But I want to know what he thinks.
He has been interviewed about that article. I can’t remember where I saw it but he was annoyed they had misinterpreted what he said and then wouldn’t correct it.
Aha! Interview with Doc Malik – ‘I was coerced. I didn’t write that article.’
Where is the humility, the regret, the shame, the honesty, the apology? Why did it take so long….
The entire MRNA platform should be banned from common use, not just MRNA vaccines.
Amen
Anyone who did their own research when these dangerous products were being aggressively marketed by the Government, MHRA etc KNEW they weren’t vaccines; they were gene therapies. They KNEW they weren’t very effective. And they KNEW that the claims they were safe were based on lies ….. since there was NO medium to long-term data.
The products had to be given emergency authorisation because they were novel … ie new products, that were still undergoing trial.
I KNEW all that and I’m not particularly clever; I don’t have a medical or scientific background; I just have a questioning mind and I apply “believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see” to anything those in authority say.
Yes, they should be banned. But thousands of powerful people around the world are responsible for the deaths and injuries they’ve caused, and they are highly lucrative for Big Pharma, so they won’t be banned. People are going to have to reject them.
Well I, who doesn’t know the difference between Nurofen and Paracetamol, worked out by the end of 2020, that it would be a damned good idea to beg my children not to take this experimental injection. My wife warned me years ago that Big Pharma had ethics comparable to pigs. The stunning suppression of HCQ and Ivermectin and even vitamin D were massive red flags. Mike Yeadon, bless him, reminded us that our O level biology books told us how wonderful Natural immunity is.
So no, I’m not having any of this sympathy and forgiveness for these yellow crocodiles that threw medical integrity out of the window. No shame, no remorse. Never forgive, never forget. There will be, must be, retribution, otherwise they will do the same thing again tomorrow.
Not forgetting Prof. Delores Cahill and Dr Mike Yeadon!
I forwarded this article to our GP practice, who are merrily recommending covid boosters. I wonder if I’ll get a reply?!!
The 2023 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine has been jointly awarded to
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman
for their discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/press-release/
I know what I’d like to reward them with…
The convid fabrication continues.
So with all this information now seeping into the public awareness, a war with Russia could provide an excellent smokescreen!
Why just the focus on ‘booster’ injections?
These injections should never have been foisted upon the population, full stop.
Countless people who were never at serious risk of disease, including children and young people…most people actually…were coerced, intimidated, and many were even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions.
In Australia, the entire population has been deliberately terrorised about Covid-19, with widespread mandates imposed, trashing voluntary informed consent.
What has happened in Australia is beyond belief – coerced medical interventions in a supposed ‘free’ country.
This is a scandal of ginormous proportions, still hidden from public view, as the rotten conflicted mainstream media here has failed to inform the public.
What must be investigated now are the actions of the National Cabinet, led by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison, along with former premiers Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others, and the Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC. This is where the vaccine mandates were initiated, with the floodgates eventually opening for mandates.
For more background, see for example my substack articles: