Thousands of workers at Britain’s biggest steel mill, Port Talbot, are facing redundancy under a taxpayer-funded Net Zero plan. The Telegraph has the story.
Tata Steel will be given £500m of taxpayer cash to fund its switch to Net Zero at its Port Talbot steelworks.
The Indian conglomerate is expected to invest £1.25bn, including the £500m of taxpayer money, in retooling the site to produce ‘greener’ steel, which ministers said will reduce the U.K.’s entire carbon emissions by around 1.5%.
However, the new processes will require fewer jobs and Tata will consult on a restructuring that could lead to 3,000 redundancies.
The Unite union described the plans as a “disgrace” and vowed to fight them. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said it was a “devastating blow for workers at Port Talbot and the opposite of a just transition”.
Tata has been in talks with the Government for months about state aid to help switch the plant’s two coal-fired blast furnaces to electric arc versions that can run on zero-carbon electricity.
Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch said the Government “is backing our steel sector” and said the proposal would “save thousands of jobs in the long term”.
Ministers confirmed the deal had the potential to safeguard over 5,000 jobs across the U.K. Tata presently employs about 8,000 steel workers.
Ms. Badenoch said: “This is an historic package of support from the U.K. Government and will not only protect skilled jobs in Wales but also grow the U.K. economy, boost growth and help ensure a successful U.K. steel industry.”
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt added: “It is right that we are ready to step in to protect this world class manufacturing industry and to support a green growth hub in South Wales.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Soon everything will look like TV ads where there are 40% more black people than there are actually in the country.
It is true, your figure is probably conservative. One is told that* the only ads featuring all-white actors are for funeral~cremation services, suicide support, life insurance and equity release programming.
*One watches no MSM.
The propaganda isn’t even subliminal anymore. It is right in your face manipulation.
Not to forget the “game” shows jammed with everything but straight white (majority) ethnic Brits.
Don’t forget Antiques Roadshow.
Always, always, in the background, in camera shot…
Have you read about the new M&S show?
I shall be giving it a miss.
Strangely there are very few black women apart from in clothing adverts. Plenty of capable black men though and always married to a white blonde woman. No white men married to black women and white men are always useless.
Actually even in real life it’s usually a white woman partnered with a man who is black, in my experience, but not every time. But I’ve noticed what you observe on TV and other ads too. Although over here in the Netherlands you do tend to see white men with females of other ethnicities, such as Malaysian-looking.
But I’m still waiting to hear from the resident misogynists ( and their female supporters, apparently ) on who is responsible for this so-called “feminization of the nation” that they keep harping on about. They never seem particularly forthcoming in providing evidence to support their accusations and assertions. Apparently we’re all meant to just go along with that and accept that women are the villains of the piece, despite all evidence to the contrary demonstrating men are the ones calling the shots in most senior positions across all sectors, and no further questions or challenges are tolerated.
Possibly because to acknowledge the elephant in the room would be too jarring for them to cope with: that if there actually is such a thing as “feminization of the nation” to blame for the decimation of society then it’s evidently being ( inc the origins from the past, e.g Rockefeller, Kissinger, Club of Rome etc ) orchestrated, for the most part, by men.
“Prove me wrong”, as they say.
calm down dear!
Had a feeling you’d pop up.
Empty-handed, naturally…
Misandrist.
Feel free to provide some evidence to back that up, but as I’ve been waiting 3 years for one of my other long-time haters to provide some for the very same unsubstantiated accusation I think I shan’t hold my breath.

It pleases me to know i obviously trigger you and your ilk, though. Get used to it.
Or is “misandrist” to you basically any woman that has no qualms about calling out the bullshittery of blatant misogynists on here?
I’ll wait.
I think you mean the 3% that there actually are, are represented as being about 97%.
What is remarkable is Asians, approximately 12%, are hardly represented at all in TV ads, but it seems they are classified as White or ‘White-adjacent’ so they don’t count as ‘diversity’.
Soon? I think we’ve been there for a good while within the media and advertising industry…
Interesting that a woman in charge of recruitment resigned due to her ( quite rightly ) disagreeing with and opposing this idiotic, discriminatory and potentially dangerous policy. So who’s in charge at the RAF then, who should have overall responsibility when it comes to the running of their organization? That’d be a man named Rich Knighton.
https://www.raf.mod.uk/our-organisation/senior-commanders/
So who’s in charge over at the MoD, who has ”overall responsibility for the department”? That’d be a man called John Healey.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Defence_(United_Kingdom)
So we have white men in charge who are actively discriminating against white men, but none of that matters because of the alleged ”feminisation of society”?
Make it make sense!

It is unwise these days to assume ‘Lizzy’ is a woman.
Well done to Matthew Coverley for courageously exposing and challenging this outrageous policy.
Imagine the Chinese Air Force rejecting experienced Ethnic Chinese pilots in favour of Ethnic Africans and Ethnic Indian Subcontinentals, for example!
LBC presenter wants to shut down the internet:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Nbw1N29cEw
More accurately depicted as the DIE Programming, as all that falls in its path does not survive.
‘Civvies in uniform’
I took the ‘Queen’s shilling’ in 1969 and left in ’86. As aircrew I can state from experience of the flying world, that I didn’t meet one person of colour who was either a pilot or navigator. I met a handful of such folk who were corporal stewards on VC10s. There were no female pilots or navigators either. Group Captain Nicholl’s principled resignation was a cri de coeur for common sense.