180916
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The False Distinction Between ‘Mitigation’ and ‘Suppression’ of a Virus

by Will Jones
7 August 2023 2:03 PM

This morning, the Daily Sceptic republished Eugyppius’s reply to Michael Senger’s claim that the Covid response was “effectively a coup by the Western intelligence community”. It’s well worth reading both articles as they each draw on a considerable amount of research into the origin of the lockdown idea and how it came in 2020 to be accepted as the standard global response to a ‘pandemic’, despite its extraordinary and plainly unjustified economic and human cost.

Michael Senger, noting the close defence and intelligence links of many of the early proponents of lockdown measures, argues that these are indicative of what amounts to a coup or power grab by the people behind the measures, who are some combination of Western security-linked figures and people associated, possibly covertly, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Eugyppius on the other hand sees no evidence that what was novel about the Covid response – the lockdowns and contact tracing characteristic of a mass containment or suppression strategy, as opposed to the milder ‘social distancing’ of a Sweden-style mitigation strategy – was being pushed by any of the biodefence-linked actors identified by Senger before the moment the WHO endorsed the Wuhan lockdown in its February 24th report. He thus argues that the early Covid alarmists “acquired their Covid hysteria along with everybody else” and only began pushing extreme Wuhan-style containment and suppression when it was greenlighted by the WHO.

Eugyppius explains that he isn’t really disputing Senger’s claims about the role of intelligence and defence agencies (“I don’t disagree with any of Senger’s specific observations, and I don’t think they’re necessarily in conflict with my own theses of What Happened in 2020”) so much as questioning the idea that the lockdowns and the rest of the unprecedented mass containment measures were specifically the fulfilment of a longstanding plot by intelligence and biodefence figures.

This is an argument between friends and there is little between the two positions. However, Eugyppius clearly sees it as important to stress that what happened in 2020 was not strictly in line with what those in the pandemic preparedness movement had been pushing for in the preceding years.

My feeling is that the distinction that Eugyppius draws between mitigation and containment strategies is being pushed too far. He regards the difference as one of kind, a fundamental split in approach, whereas it seems to me that it is really one of degree. Both are aiming to reduce the spread of the virus in the general population via reducing social contacts (i.e., they are not ‘focused protection’ or ‘let it rip’ strategies). Both aim to reduce the reproduction (R) number to lower the incidence of disease at any given moment. This is clear in Prof. Neil Ferguson’s infamous Report 9 of March 16th 2020, quoted by Eugyppius, where he defines a mitigation strategy as focusing on “slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread” (italics mine). Thus stopping spread is seen as a possible outcome of mitigation, just not a necessary one. Ferguson goes on to define a suppression strategy as aiming to indefinitely reduce case numbers “to low levels”. Notoriously, Ferguson and team concluded that even a “mitigated epidemic would still likely result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems (most notably intensive care units) being overwhelmed many times over”. Thus: “For countries able to achieve it, this leaves suppression as the preferred policy option.”

However, the difference between these two strategies is really only a matter of degree – how much you distance people and for how long. Actually, there isn’t really a difference in how long either, as pandemic preparedness protocols had always, since they were first developed in the 2000s, envisaged that social distancing mitigations (including bans on large gatherings, closure of schools and ‘non-essential’ businesses, recommendation to work-from-home and quarantine of exposed (not just sick) individuals) would have to remain for the months or years that it would take to develop, test and rollout a vaccine. Thus from a U.S. 2007 plan:

During a pandemic, the goal will be to slow the virus’ transmission; delaying the spread of the virus will provide more time for vaccine development while reducing the stress on an already burdened healthcare system.

Report 9 shows that Ferguson et al. were very ready to recommend suppression “for countries able to achieve it”. This is in line with Ferguson’s later comments that before Italy locked down he and his colleagues thought “we couldn’t get away with it in Europe”. Referring to China’s Wuhan lockdown, he told UnHerd that: “It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… And then Italy did it. And we realised we could.”

The implication here, of course, is that the earlier reluctance of pandemicists like Ferguson to push for more extreme spread-reducing measures was due to what it was believed Western governments would accept rather than any strong distinction between the approaches. As a rule, they pushed for the strongest measures they thought they could “get away with”.

It’s worth noting, as Eugyppius has previously, that at Event 201 – the timely pandemic exercise of October 2019 – that lockdowns and travel restrictions were put on the table by the pandemicists running the simulation but rejected (at that time) by the Government representatives participating.

In this way the sharp distinction between mitigation and suppression strategies collapses, and both are seen as just different intensities of the one basic pandemic preparedness strategy of reducing spread by reducing contacts. As soon as biodefence fanatics thought they could “get away with it” and ramp up the social distancing into full-on lockdowns, they did.

Furthermore, what led them to see they could get away with it was, as Ferguson says, Italy doing it, and Italy did it first on February 21st, before the WHO Wuhan report. This was, as Michael Senger points out, due in large part to the work and influence of Stefano Merler, a kind of Italian Neil Ferguson. Thus they made their own possibilities.

I don’t always agree with Michael Senger on the role of the CCP. Senger sees the CCP to have been promoting a false narrative from the start and to have been secretly promoting alarm in the early days while only pretending to play it down, which doesn’t ring true for me. Likewise, he sees the story of ‘whistleblower’ doctor Li Wenliang, punished by the CCP for warning colleagues about the new SARS-like virus, to be a later CCP fabrication rather than something real – even though it embarrasses the Party by making it look incompetent and fickle. Even if the CCP was capable of that level of media manipulation – which I doubt – I don’t think it would want to when it makes it look stupid.

But I do think Eugyppius may be leaning too much on the mitigation-suppression distinction, which on closer inspection collapses into differing degrees of biodefence extremism separated only by what Ferguson and Co. think they can “get away with”.

I don’t know if I’d call it a coup exactly, as the instigators of a successful coup end up in charge of the Government, which hasn’t happened. But certainly 2020 was the fulfilment of the draconian plans of the biodefence and pandemic preparedness industry, decades in the making. And it’s going to be a long, hard road to undo the terrible precedents of COVID-19 and return to pre-2020 normality.

Tags: Biodefence networkChinaChinese Communist PartyCOVID-19Intelligence communityLockdownPandemic PreparednessProfessor Neil FergusonWHO

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Was the Covid Response a Coup by Western Intelligence Agencies?

Next Post

Secret U.K. Lab is Making New Covid Variants and Working on a Vaccine for ‘Disease X’ to “Stop Next Pandemic in its Tracks”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Fall of Russell Brand, the BBC’s Trans Rights Activism and Graham Linehan Topping the Bestseller List

by Will Jones
19 September 2023
10

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Lucy Letby Must Be Allowed an Appeal

11 September 2023
by Dr David Livermore

Canadian Parliament Gives Standing Ovation to Man Who Served in Waffen SS

24 September 2023
by Noah Carl

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

24 September 2023
by Nick Rendell

News Round-Up

24 September 2023
by Will Jones

Football Focus in Peril as Viewing Figures Plummet Following Replacement of Dan Walker With Alex Scott

23 September 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

78

U.K. Health Security Agency Head: We’ll Behave More Like Sweden When the Next Pandemic Hits

38

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

36

Members of England Ladies’ Angling Team Refuse to Compete in World Championships After Team Picks Trans ‘Woman’ Who Used to Be a Rugby Player

34

MPs Who Believe ‘Women Have a Penis’ Will Be Named and Shamed Ahead of General Election

25

Canadian Parliament Gives Standing Ovation to Man Who Served in Waffen SS

24 September 2023
by Noah Carl

Heart Failure Deaths in 2023 Up 26% on Pre-Pandemic Levels, Data Show

24 September 2023
by Nick Rendell

German Whistleblower Finds DNA Contamination Up To 354 Times Recommended Limit in BioNTech-Pfizer Vaccine

23 September 2023
by Robert Kogon

Decades of Mismanagement Are Dooming Britain to Decline

22 September 2023
by Dr Angus Dalgleish

The Measles Scaremongering Doesn’t Stand Up to Scrutiny

22 September 2023
by Dr Ros Jones

POSTS BY DATE

August 2023
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jul   Sep »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment