• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Theresa May Attending a ‘Socially Distanced Party’ During Lockdown, Lewis Schaffer Triggering the Censors on GB News and Should ‘Terf Island’ Become a Theme Park Ride?

by Will Jones
27 June 2023 10:30 PM

Welcome to episode 43 of the Weekly Sceptic, and it’s a special extended episode! This week: 

  • Prigozhin mounts a coup against Putin – but is it all misdirection?  
  • Culture warriors waste no time in exploiting the Titanic submersible tragedy to score cheap political points 
  • News leaks out that Taylor Swift declined an invitation to appear on Meghan’s Spotify podcast and super-agent Jeremy Zimmer brands her ‘talentless’ 
  • Theresa May attended a ‘socially distanced party’ during lockdown 
  • Conservative mayoral election candidate Daniel Korski is MeToo’d 
  • Lewis Schaffer triggers the censors on Headliners by denying Covid exists 
  • Byline Times gaslights conservatives over cat-girl incident at Rye College 
  • In Birdwatch, the boys discuss Davina McCall and Judy Murray outing themselves as Terfs and imagine a Disney ride called ‘Terf Island’ 
  • In Peak Woke, Nick puzzles over why ‘knacker’ is a racial slur and Toby rails against the Irish Hate Crime Bill

Sponsored by: 

  • The Stack Assistant
  • Live in Care Company (tel: 0118 914 5300)

To advertise on one of the fastest growing podcasts in the world – or if you have a question for Dr. Peterson – drop Nick or Toby a line.

You can listen to the podcast here and subscribe on iTunes here.

Subscribe to Nick’s Substack.

Listen to Nick’s podcast – The Current Thing – by going here (Apple, Spotify).

Sharron Davis book launch.

Produced by Jason Clift
Music by Tinderella

Tags: GB NewsLockdownPartygateSocial distancingTERFTheresa MayTransgenderismWeekly Sceptic

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

2,500 Doctors, Scientists and Healthcare Professionals Call on the NHS to End Mask Mandates

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
itoldyouiwasill
itoldyouiwasill
3 years ago

““If we had done literally nothing, the economic impact from loss of life alone would have been catastrophic.”
I’m sick of hearing bullshit like this. Nobody can possibly know this with so many variables at play. There was a graph recently which indicated that shopping was by some distance the biggest spread of Covid, which seems quite obvious really given it is food and it’s tactile nature. The supermarkets stayed open in lockdowns for rather obvious reasons, which makes a complete mockery of claims like the above.

71
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

During the outbreak of this insanity I was curious about supermarket footfall so did a bit of investigating. Looking at figures from Morrisons a couple of years previously, their 500 odd stores had an average of around 24,000 visits per week, giving around 12 million across the country. And they’re only Britain’s fourth-largest chain. Lockdown was, and is, a nonsense from start to finish.

30
0
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

The example of Sweden also demonstrates that the loss of life would not have been catastrophic! In fact, looking at Sweden’s stats, they’d have been virtually no excess deaths at all, had the UK followed its example!
As it is, lockdowns have almost certainly resulted in tens of thousands of deaths, as people were unable to access essential NHS scans. The economy has taken a huge battering, too. Children’s education has suffered, as well – goodness knows how much damage has been done in connection with that!

Just this week, we’re hearing from leaders that lockdowns make no difference – which is what was concluded decades ago when responses to future pandemics were being considered. For some odd reason, the protocols that had been established then were thrown out of the window at the start of this.

47
0
cornubian
cornubian
3 years ago
Reply to  milesahead

Our One Party socialist state agreed to kill 200,000 UK citizens to, supposedly, prevent an unknown number of people from possibly getting a respiratory disease with a mortality rate equivalent to a bad flu season.
For that is the number of people that the governments own report says will die from implementing the first lockdown. One expert assessed that 560,000 Britons would die.

19
-1
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

If the premise is poop, the argument is poop.

There is, of course, a hidden premise at work: do and believe whatever authority figures tell you, and not only that, but INTERNALISE it.

But what can we expect when the vast majority have had their minds turned to mashed potato by the school system and the mass media?

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
20
0
lost in inner space
lost in inner space
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

Yes, it is virually impossible to state which saved what, because it was and will always be an experiment without a control and with so many things being done at once, no stats person could ever tease apart the individual effects of any of it. Worst experiment ever.

4
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

This isn’t about a desease

CANADA
UNREAL https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f633.svg Father can’t see son over “Anti-vaxx” Facebook posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD0bZ33Xgts
Carl Vernon

Please come and join our friendly peaceful events.

Saturday 15th January 5pm 
 Silent lighted walk behind one simple sign 
 “No More Lockdown”  
Bring torches, candles and other lights  
Meet Corner of Castle Hill & High St, 
Windsor SL4 1PQ

Stand in the Park Sundays 10am  make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane 
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS

Telegram Group 
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

13
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

There’s a great deal of wriggle room between Lockdown and “literally doing nothing.”

The best policy was the one in the Government’s Pandemic Preparedness Plan: inform the public without unnecessarily alarming them; provide advice; shield the vulnerable and let people get on with their own lives.

But that wouldn’t have advanced the Globalists/WEF plans.

60
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago

With a 99% survival rate there would be no apocalypse!

36
0
Aleajactaest
Aleajactaest
3 years ago

Main stream media lies. News at 11.

19
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago

The pro lockdown defenders always reduce themselves to the same argument because there is no evidence to support their cult. Be it masks, curfews, sitting only in pubs, no dancing at weddings, triple masking, closing schools, disinfecting streets, rubbing down shopping trollies, elbow bumping, masking kids, masking while running, masking while in bed.

“it would have been so much worse without…”

Last edited 3 years ago by BeBopRockSteady
46
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

“X is better because not-X is worse – and don’t you dare question that premise, you lunatic gullible conspiracy theorist who doesn’t Follow The Science!”

It is hard not to feel pity sometimes.

And I’d reference lemmings at this point if I didn’t know that the story about lemmings and cliffs was made up.

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
14
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

It is remarkable that the belief in those interventions remains despite there being no evidence of them actually working at all.

27
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

I actually felt a longer list was required.

masks, curfews, sitting only in pubs, no dancing at weddings, triple masking, closing schools, disinfecting streets, rubbing down shopping trollies, elbow bumping, masking kids, masking while running, masking while in bed, one way systems, firebreaks, tiers, quarantine camps, mandates, banning park benches, closing play parks, closing schools, bubbles, N95 masks, time slots for going to the dump, work from home, lanyards, face away from each other in lifts, no hugging, mass testing, lock up grandma, no travel, 5km zoning, essential goods only, mass vaccination, sacking doctors and nurses, furlough, masks on babies, hazmat suits, no visitors in hospitals, DNRs, quarantine your shopping, quarantine yourself, zoom medical care, ventilation, ban Christmas, ban football, close gyms, suppress Ivermectin, 3rd dose, 4th dose, boosters, masks when walking to the toilet at the restaurant, no singing at Church, no protesting (except for BLM).

“it would have been so much worse without…”

36
0
lost in inner space
lost in inner space
3 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

I want to laugh, but given that this is actually what happened, I’m more likely to cry.

14
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Quite a lot of the administrators of society at various levels – guys and gals who (in their ignorance) think they know how the native-prole mind works – were surprised at the sheer willingness of the population to obey, and the length of time for which they did obey, when told they had to stay at home, couldn’t visit family members, had to stay 2 metres away from everyone, etc. In March 2020 many didn’t think the obedience would last for more than a month.

Next time it will be much worse.

15
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Furlough played a huge part in that. Many were only too pleased to be paid to languish at home on full pay, for months on end. The least they could do in gratitude was play along and engage in the obedience training that was required of them. But the that training took effect too quickly and efficiently…

18
0
cornubian
cornubian
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Furlough is the forerunner to UBI. Get everyone addicted to ‘free’ money, then start applying conditions.

17
0
cornubian
cornubian
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Like most of the MSM, Times journalists dont actually believe what they write. They are paid well to lie.

10
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

It is remarkable that some people still believe that the last two years has been about dealing with a “virus.”

5
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago

The great mistake for the first 18 months or so of this pandemic was the belief that the lockdowns had a massive effect. Evidence for this was the observation that every time cases rose lockdowns were introduced, and then cases dropped a little later. The trouble is, there was even back in summer 2020 evidence that each covid wave lasted about 8 weeks in total; the dropping in cases after each lockdown was imposed was just the natural cycle of things.

We would probably have saved more lives with a highly targeted but aggressive lockdown for the most vulnerable — but while that might have worked for the very elderly, it probably wouldn’t have been accepted by the ‘older-healthy’ or the obese.

Indeed, the only argument against ‘Great Barrington’ that hasn’t been proven incorrect by time is that a targeted lockdown would have result in legal challenge.

So, we probably ended up destroying the economy (and livelihoods, healthcare, freedoms, childhood development, education, etc etc) just because the lawyers would have caused too much trouble.

Still, if you want to see the trouble lawyers can cause just wait for the vaccine related injury court cases.

29
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Yep. Bugger all happened in the summer of 2020 in terms of total all cause deaths at the time when we were de facto open again. The pubs were open in early July and they – and restaurants – were heaving all through August. There was no rise in all cause deaths against the norm until December.

21
0
maggie may
maggie may
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Does anyone know who will actually end up paying for vaccine-related injury compensation? If the drug cos have no liability, is it the wretched taxpayer – again??

10
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  maggie may

I would think so,. TPTB have to find the money from somewhere so it will be us, the tax-payers that will foot the bill.

0
0
Steven Robinson
Steven Robinson
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Lockdowns were sold as a temporary measure until vaccines would come along and save us.

Meanwhile, we would have ‘saved’ more lives if the NHS hadn’t outlawed all early treatment (the combination of medicines proven by the likes of Peter McCullough to be effective) and gone along with the plan to addict the population to Big Pharma’s ‘vaccines’. Readers will know why in inverted commas, but the idea that even true vaccines can improve on natural immunity and save lives needs to be challenged. See the highly revealing review of how harmful vaccines by Ray Obomsawin
https://pennybutler.com/vaccine-lies-forever/

7
0
JamesM
JamesM
3 years ago

I believe there is a growing realization that pro-lockdown papers, such as The Times (and its sister, The Sunday Times) got it wrong. It strikes me that this article is a rather desperate attempt by The Times to justify its editorial policy. What a pity that it simply can’t offer an apology instead. The article is, of course, rubbish from beginning to end, and these journalists are fooling no one but themselves.

32
0
Alan M
Alan M
3 years ago

To me, the biggest problem is that Ferguson’s model results are interpreted by the pro-lockdown set as “what would have happened” rather than what they actually are – a possible outcome based on a model based on disputed coding, that has been widely debunked and produced by a team that has a long past history of vastly overestimating the effect of many of the things they model. All we can say truthfully was that we ended up with a death toll that was a lot lower than that.

22
0
The Rule of Pricks
The Rule of Pricks
3 years ago

I’m so bored of the ‘what if’ Nostradamus type predictions. They are not scientifically robust and utterly facile.

Bootstrapping the result seen to claim it was achieved by the measures put in place is nonsense. Claiming that a catastrophic loss of life was averted because we locked down is ludicrous because we have no idea what would have happened if we hadn’t locked down!

But now we do…..Xmas 2021. If we don’t lock down 5000 a day will die. We didn’t lockdown (much) and how many died? So calculate the error ratio – let’s say it’s a 10th of the prediction and then use the same ratio for previous lockdown death predictions which will show you roughly what would have actually happened had we not locked down.

If the lockdown death numbers and the corrected not locked down death numbers are the same then lockdowns achieved nothing!

19
0
SkepticalHomme
SkepticalHomme
3 years ago
Reply to  The Rule of Pricks

Agreed. It’s the same counterfactual logic evinced by the proponents of jabs once they get Covid. “Praise the heavens I was double/triple/quadruple vaccinated – otherwise it would have been far worse!” What? Rather than just the same or even (gasp) better? No evidence either way. I see this all the time with my friends and family on F***book – the f-wittery and delusion is fully baked in, I see little hope for the human race.

9
0
Ceriain
Ceriain
3 years ago

O/T (maybe not)

Breaking on the Beeb: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59979504

Jonathan Van-Tam to leave role as deputy chief medical officer
I wonder which drug company he’s off to.

14
0
jotheboat
jotheboat
3 years ago
Reply to  Ceriain

Will we get somebody in who’ll actually tell the truth next?

3
0
maggie may
maggie may
3 years ago
Reply to  Ceriain

Or rather who is going to pay for his research carried out at Nottingham University where he is apparently going.

9
0
dboss
dboss
3 years ago

The 90k deaths Imperial projected for Sweden were if it did nothing, as was the 500k deaths estimate for the UK. If Sweden followed a mitigation strategy (case isolation, quarantine, 70+ social distancing) Imperial predicted 32-40k (250k for the UK but ICU capacity exceeded 8x. The latter was the key argument for many people who feared they would not get critical care unless there was a lockdown).
Sweden’actually has 15k deaths so Imperial overestimated by a factor of 2. However it’s worse thsn that becsuse their total excess deaths for the whole Covid period is only about 8k so Imperial’s overestimate was even greater.

5
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  dboss

Here’s a breakdown of how catastrophically, wildly wrong Imperial’s modelling was, about every country in the world. And how they flat out lied and said they’d never done such modelling.

7
0
maggie may
maggie may
3 years ago
Reply to  Jo Starlin

Did you mean to attach a link to that?

1
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  maggie may

Bugger. Yes, sorry.

https://www.aier.org/article/the-failure-of-imperial-college-modeling-is-far-worse-than-we-knew/

6
0
The Rule of Pricks
The Rule of Pricks
3 years ago
Reply to  dboss

So using those numbers and an over estimate of a factor of 4 imperial predicted 60k deaths with adjusted behaviour but no lockdown.

How many died with full lockdown? About the same wasn’t it? So the extra measures did nothing.

7
0
Mark
Mark
3 years ago

Just the lying liars of the Times lying to justify their own past hysterical lying, in the hope of evading recognition of the catastrophic harm they contributed to.

Contrast it with the reported approach of a Danish newspaper, linked here by Anti-socialist earlier:

“We Failed”: Danish Newspaper Apologizes For Publishing Official COVID Narratives Without Questioning Them

19
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago

 “If we had done literally nothing, the economic impact from loss of life alone would have been catastrophic,” and, “There would probably not be enough workers left to run the NHS, let alone deal with the backlog of cancelled operations or the tidal wave of long Covid.”

only old people were dying – that was clear from the Italian data in early March

20
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

“tidal wave of long Covid”

this is bullshit too. I have long covid as does my wife by their ludicrously broad definition

18
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

“Still feeling a little bit off after a month” is now a debilitating lifelong condition.

17
-1
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago
Reply to  Jo Starlin

my wife’s sense of smell comes and goes after 6 months – long covid etc

allbullshit

9
0
Dame Lynet
Dame Lynet
3 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Extra zinc helped mine return, also ‘smell training’ – Fifth Sense (uk charity) shows how on their website.

Apparently, if it’s due to a virus there is a good chance of recovering, especially if it already comes and goes.

5
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago
Reply to  Dame Lynet

thanks! I’ll pass on the info

6
0
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

In the early 1990s I had a really bad cold (Covid93 ?) that left me with no sense of taste or smell for months. Then one day I brushed past a lemon verbena plant and like a miracle my sense of smell (and taste) had returned.

9
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago
Reply to  Beowulf

I shall purchase one!

3
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

I read some time ago that the most complaints of long covid come from NHS staff – all of them, not just front of house. I know post viral syndrome exists because I suffered it many years ago after a really bad dose of flu. Everything tasted metallic for ages, then just a bit off for another age. I would also feel feverish and weak intermittently. The only thing that seemed to cure it eventually was the summer – warmth, sunlight, dry air. However, it was never so debilitating that I took time off work (I needed the money anyway!). I think there are an awful lot of snowflakes out there who only need to mention covid in hushed and reverential tones and they are given carte blanche to ‘take as much time as they need’.

7
0
Mark
Mark
3 years ago

If we had “done nothing”, in the sense of coercive state action, and just responded rationally and reasonably, there would have been very little economic loss, because this disease does not affect working age people much. Doubtless the medical professions would have been very busy for a while, the poor dears (and we might have spent a small amount of government money – a fraction of what was wasted on “track and trace” and such, supporting them).

Natural immunity would have spread quickly, and without the active suppression of treatment, doctors would quickly have learned to treat the disease properly, as the early response group has in the US.

Ideally, we’d have gone back culturally to our former robust attitude to whining nonsense, which would have dealt with most of the “long covid” hysteria, and to harmful scaremongering, which would have silenced the media and science panickers. Mask-wearing and other hysterics would have been properly ridiculed.

Basically, it would have been an experience akin to the flu pandemics in the mid-C20th.

But that was never going to happen, because there was far too much money to be made and career enhancement to be got by pushing hysterical panic, and making the world shit was a price worth paying. And for some, undoubtedly, it was the whole point.

24
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago

For example, he writes things like, “If we had done literally nothing, the economic impact from loss of life alone would have been catastrophic,” and, “There would probably not be enough workers left to run the NHS, let alone deal with the backlog of cancelled operations or the tidal wave of long Covid.”

shouting fire in a crowded theatre. this sort of catastrophic panic mongering shouldn’t be consequence free.

13
0
Doom Slayer
Doom Slayer
3 years ago

Propaganda from China spooked Italy. Propaganda from Italy spooked Europe. Couple with spineless, risk averse ministers, civil serpents, nhs bosses and a baying mob media, and you have the perfect storm of irrational thinking. Sad thing is that the arse covering politicians will continue to justify their use and keep them on the table for the future because they are incapable of admitting they got things so wrong. They will do everything to brush the collateral damage under the carpet.

Then we can ask whether the whole thing was a plan and being controlled from above, which is looking more and more likely to me, or whether it was pure opportunism by the the dark forces. But then either way they were just waiting for something like this to happen.

We all know, even Fauci, that symptomatic people drive epidemics. Simply asking those who have the relevant symptoms to stay at home and isolate, concentrating on hand hygiene and focusing on and boosting well known nosocomial infection control measures, would have ended in a similar, if not better, overall outcome in terms of pure covid deaths (which is obviously a fraction of the nonsense figure of 150k). Natural herd immunity was, and still is and only way to make this truly endemic.

13
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

Don’t forget the role of pharma and big tech in all this. They expected to do extremely well out of it, and did so. If this had happened ten years ago – probably even five years ago – it couldn’t have happened in the way it did as Teams, Zoom and all the other toxic technoshit wasn’t at a sufficiently developed level.

12
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

Nothing to do with Big Pharma and global finance. All a communist/socialist plot from some hidden political source. 🙂

Last edited 3 years ago by RickH
3
-2
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

That response requires of necessity a belief in the official story.

The official story is however complete Bollox.

0
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

This whole debacle has taught me a few very important things:
1) The vast majority of people who have attained positions of influence (ministers & journalists mainly) have zero common sense and zero foresight. Anyone with a couple of brain cells to rub together could see that the long-term damage of lockdowns would far outweigh any benefit.
2) Most people really are like cattle – they’ll run off the edge of a cliff if their peers are all doing the same.
3) There’s lots and lots of really evil f*ckers about. Nazi Germany can be recreated easily anywhere and at anytime.

There’s obviously a caveat to 1), in that many in positions of power know exactly what they’re doing.

19
0
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

‘The vast majority of people who have attained positions of influence (ministers & journalists mainly) have zero common sense and zero foresight.’

Indeed. The climate change malarkey is evidence of this, too. If just one of the ‘green’ aims (replacing petrol-powered cars with electric vehicles) is analysed for just 5 minutes, it should be apparent to anyone capable of rational thought that it is based on wishful thinking.

Of course, the same applies to what is expected of ‘renewable’ sources of energy.

However, the Covid response has taken this type of idiocy to levels hitherto unseen!

Last edited 3 years ago by milesahead
7
0
Bobby Lobster
Bobby Lobster
3 years ago

If we hadn’t locked down, then Doris wouldn’t be having problems now, except for Broken Brexit and Net Zero . Unfortunately, Cummings was a lockdown fanatic!

6
0
GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
3 years ago

“Who controls the past (now), controls the future.
Who controls the present (now), controls the past.”

4
0
Drew63
Drew63
3 years ago

If we had done literally nothing, the economic impact from loss of life alone would have been catastrophic

Given that covid-19 deaths are overwhelmingly concentrated among the very aged and the very sick, this assertion can be judged, a priori, as complete bollocks.

To begin with, the very aged and the very sick generally don’t make much economic contribution to society. In fact they tend to consume vastly disproportionate amounts of health and social care resources. Old and sick people don’t pay much income tax (because they are too old and sick to work.)

If covid-19 was a disease that killed newly-minted graduates of engineering and medical schools, then one could make an argument based on the negative economic impact. But that simply isn’t the case.

Go back to school Times journalists before you waste any more time trying to edify those who know better.

Last edited 3 years ago by Drew63
13
0
Mark
Mark
3 years ago
Reply to  Drew63

“Given that covid-19 deaths are overwhelmingly concentrated among the very aged and the very sick, this assertion can be judged, a priori, as complete bollocks.
To begin with, the very aged and the very sick generally don’t make much economic contribution to society. In fact they tend to consume vastly disproportionate amounts of health and social care resources. Old and sick people don’t pay much income tax (because they are too old and sick to work.)”

The especially hilarious aspect of that bit of nonsense from the Times is that one of the hysterical demonisation arguments used – especially by the panicker left aimed at conservatives and the “Conservative” regime – to bully the country out of a sensible herd immunity strategy, was precisely that anything else was supposedly motivated by greed or economic convenience, in killing off dependent elderly and seriously ill people while not affecting productive sectors much.

4
0
SkepticalHomme
SkepticalHomme
3 years ago

“If we had done literally nothing…” I ‘literally’ stopped reading after the misuse of this word by the author of The Times piece. Utter joke that it’s a news sheet of reference. Murdering the English language while promoting murderous lockdowns and jabs.

8
0
SomersetHoops
SomersetHoops
3 years ago

This demonstrates the problems with journalists. They have opinions based on their biases and uninformed ideas. These articles need to be backed up by accurate data and if refering to interventions and their effect should relate the data to accurate timings. Many people will see the Times article and be misinformed as a result of it. Its diifficult not to see it as being biased towards justifying the government’s actions which the data does not support.

0
0
Mezzo18
Mezzo18
3 years ago

The demographic that was most likely to die of, rather than with, Covid was overwhelmingly not economically active; the very old, the chronically ill and the morbidly obese. Many of them caught it in hospitals and care homes. Closing down schools and businesses almost certainly made very little difference and the small number of lives ‘saved’ is likely to be outweighed by the murdered women and children and the suicides caused by lockdowns and resultant poverty.

2
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

Please stop reading, listening to msm until they agree to report with integrity, honesty and clarity. I have stopped all msm entering our house. What a breath of fresh air. There is more than enough honest data from researchers, scientists, doctors and data analysts. That is who I prefer getting my covid info from, like so many.

0
0
Martin Frost
Martin Frost
3 years ago

The lockdown sceptic cause was undermined early on by Boris’s remark that “I am not one of those who just say let it rip”. That was never our position. Sweden’s response was largely correct except that it failed in the early stages of the pandemic to shield the care homes. The Swedes unlike many other countries who made the same error have admitted this. We have since learned that hospitals and care homes were at the epicentre of Covid infection and spread. Lockdowns contribution to controlling the pandemic remains an article of faith without any credible scientific evidence to back it up. 2 years on we know enough about what needs to be done if we are faced with a similar crisis eg a better organised and joined up health system (not entirely dependant on the NHS), sensible Swedish style precautions, focussed protection, promotion of a healthy lifestyle and placing trust in the population rather than kneejerk reactions and panic. When all is said and done, the politicians of this country and much of the rest of the world have demonstrated how not to react in a crisis. What we can do without next time is the contribution of behavioural scientists, mathematical modellers and careerist politicians who jump on any bandwagon if they think it will lead to their personal advancenent and let us not forget all of those hysterics in the media. How far the journalistic standards have fallen with certain notable exceptions of course.

Last edited 3 years ago by Martin Frost
0
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

Times muppets. All they need to do is do a thorough investigation of what has been happening in Belarus, among other places. And maybe put Oliver Wright on another big pharma corruption story.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
7

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

25 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Follow the Silenced is the Untold Story of the Covid Vaccine Trial Victims

24 May 2025
by Antony Brush

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Sends Free-Speech Squad to Interview UK Activists Arrested for ‘Silently Praying’

25 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

51

News Round-Up

26

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

18

Trump Sends Free-Speech Squad to Interview UK Activists Arrested for ‘Silently Praying’

15

Labour Axe the Word ‘Us’ for Being Too “Exclusionary” in Devolved Wales

12

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

Follow the Silenced is the Untold Story of the Covid Vaccine Trial Victims

24 May 2025
by Antony Brush

Do Researchers’ Views on Immigration Affect the Results of Their Studies?

24 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Starmer’s EU Reset Tethers the UK to the EU’s Green Dystopia

24 May 2025
by Tilak Doshi

POSTS BY DATE

June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May   Jul »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

25 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Follow the Silenced is the Untold Story of the Covid Vaccine Trial Victims

24 May 2025
by Antony Brush

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Sends Free-Speech Squad to Interview UK Activists Arrested for ‘Silently Praying’

25 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

51

News Round-Up

26

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

18

Trump Sends Free-Speech Squad to Interview UK Activists Arrested for ‘Silently Praying’

15

Labour Axe the Word ‘Us’ for Being Too “Exclusionary” in Devolved Wales

12

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

Follow the Silenced is the Untold Story of the Covid Vaccine Trial Victims

24 May 2025
by Antony Brush

Do Researchers’ Views on Immigration Affect the Results of Their Studies?

24 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Starmer’s EU Reset Tethers the UK to the EU’s Green Dystopia

24 May 2025
by Tilak Doshi

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences