I left teaching due to serious health issues, compounded by disgust at the blatant disregard for safeguarding and impartiality rules. The issue came to a focus when I was threatened with disciplinary action for saying men and women are biologically different and highlighting how wrong it was for teachers to claim otherwise.
For years I’d been fighting the open indoctrination of Left-liberal views in the classroom. No attempt is made by most teachers to show even a scintilla of even-handedness, with open competition to show who can be most ‘anti-Tory’ and ‘progressive’. Not to mention the blatantly absurd preaching of climate catastrophism.
I was happy to teach, fighting this, feeling that at least the environment wasn’t openly dangerous to pupils. But the trans movement and its activist targeting of schools changed all that – assisted by a recent cadre of woke teachers, incapable of independent thought and hostile to free speech.
To be fair, I had many decent and professional colleagues. I remember warning our excellent head when I left how there was a scandal ongoing in schools which would break very soon.
It’s broken. A teacher in Sussex is on record bullying two Year 8 pupils for disagreeing that a classmate could identify as a cat, simply by saying she is. The teacher claims they’re denying said Moggy’s identity!
She then describes one girl as “despicable” for believing that her own birth sex and gender are equivalent – and tells her to leave the school. The exchange is a disgrace and this woman shouldn’t be allowed in a classroom again. Doubtless she won’t even face censure.
Those marvellous girls are models of what pupils should be. It’s no surprise to hear the fear in the teacher’s voice. She’s incapable of dealing with their quiet dignity, resorting to bullying and personal insults, including of their parents.
The most astounding aspect is the teacher’s simultaneous claim that someone can identify as a cat, but it’s “a fact” that your birth sex and gender are unrelated – and no contrary opinion is allowed. She then gets the woke garbage wrong – shouting that there “is [sic] three genders”, whereas the woke claim is for an almost indefinite number.
Parents need to fight back. I know for a fact that openly dangerous and manipulative material is being presented as factual, with no discussion allowed. A line has been crossed.
So it’s good to see the uproar over this teacher being found out; in fact, such bullying is very common in schools. As is the dogmatic incompetence of the teacher: “there is three genders” being a classic example.
I always knew that many pupils are like these wonderful girls, unwilling to be brainwashed and aware they have the right to speak freely. There is hope, which needs huge encouragement.
Many teachers will agree. They need to stand together on this and champion pupils. Ignore the Unions, who are the worst perpetrators and have no interest in pupil welfare – their entire concern is political activism.
Paul Sutton can be found on Substack. His new book on woke issues The Poetry of Gin and Tea is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The student in the video missed a trick there. She should have identified as a head teacher and fired the shit-for-brains teacher.
We truly do live in clown world
Very excellent point!
She could’ve also identified as a cat and refused to attend school until the other “cat” had been fully vaccinated with the jabs that cat owners are recommended to get for their pets.
She could’ve identified as a giraffe and insisted all the ceilings and doors were 13 feet high so she didn’t get a sore neck.
The possibilities are endless.
Brilliant

It is the head teacher who needs disciplining and shaming too!!! Teachers are only following orders, albeit in this example a clumsy and over zealous way.
There will be no satisfactorily addressing this shameful proselytising of the transgender cult until heads at the top start rolling.
Identify as black and claim racism, or as a dog and kill the cat.
Attack, attack, attack.
This is war. No quarter.
The Left wants your infants. The State is replacing paeent.
Fight them every inch.
I have to agree Neil. We are at war and the state, acting on behalf of the Davos Deviants, has turned on its people. Every opportunity to discredit and undermine their dystopian theology has to be used.
The pupil v teacher recording I have shared widely and all such opportunities should be used. We must avoid adopting their language and lies must be called out – none of this mis and dis carp.
And if somebody has a go, have a go back. F. ’em.
Gender theory is a set of speculations about human nature invented (as far as I know) by US social scientists. Its postulations are not facts, they’re axioms, something that’s believed to be true (by some people) despite there’s no way to determine if it is actually true. It’s also entirely appropriate to refer to them as articles of faith.
Absolutely invented. With any of this type of sheeite , I always try and look for the source of the money. Academics are absolute tools, but someone is funding them.
what is a ‘social’ scientist. – someone like Himmler?
I think the money must be coming from the porn industry: they are preparing/grooming their future customers.
There are 2 genders. Period. The rest are mental illnesses.
There are three genders in German, männlich/ male, weiblich/ female and sächlich/ neutral and that’s the real meaning of gender: the gender of a noun in languages with gendered nouns. When applied to humans, it means whatever the people who invented to corresponding terminology want it to mean. It’s perfectly possible to define 6, 600 or 6000 human genders, there’s just no reason why anyone should have to care for that as its all just preaching and hot air.
Independently of that, individual specimen of sexually reproducing animals, including individual humans, are usually either male or female and whatever doesn’t fall into one of these two categories is technically an odd mutation. The mental illness starts at the point where questions like Do you identify with your body? are being asked in earnest. TS Eliot reportedly once defined reality as What doesn’t go away if you stop believing in it and a person’s body is a part of this reality one has to learn to live with because there’s simply no other choice.
NO! There are two SEXES!!! These people can dream up as many GENDERS as they like – it doesn’t matter – they’re the stuff of mental illness. ‘Gender’ loses meaning entirely when it’s understood as an infinitely variable social construct – an idea in the minds of people who need something to make themselves more substantial. You can lots of ideas but only one SEX! The confusion of these terms is what’s behind it all. By all means have 3, 10, 500 genders; ‘identify’ as a cat, a lamppost, a tadpole – this is what the notion of ‘gender’ so ridiculous. The only important factor is your SEX. There has to be return to this idea.
Gender theory was popularised by a fraud called John Money (fittingly) who sexually abused two twin boys, one of whom had had his penis burnt off in a botched circumcision. Money had him surgically altered to look like a girl. The ‘girl’ always instinctively wanted to pee standing up, to get involved with boys’ activities. Money lied and claimed that the ‘girl’ was living a happy, normal ‘girl’s’ life. His findings were accepted by the scientific community, which is too narcissistic to admit it was duped. Without Money’s influence, it’s unlikely we’d have this problem.
Money would take the brother and ‘sister’ to a room and watch them perform the sex acts on each other that he demanded. At the age of 14, the twins refused to attend anymore. The ‘girl’ went back to being a boy as much as possible. The brother was messed up by his experiences and died of a drug overdose. The boy who had been turned into a ‘girl’ went public about what happened – you can find the interview out there – then killed himself.
That’s where the modern transgender movement comes from: the abuse of two innocent boys by a charlatan pervert scientist. The entire movement is essentially about pedophiles in a variety of professions getting their joliies messing with children.
John Money also worked out of Johns Hopkins University.
This may be the origin of the idea. But it has since taken on a life of its own. The important bit about it is to recognize that there’s no science here involved at all. It’s just words piled upon words piled upon words, structurally identical to other pseudo-sciences like law, theology or mathematics (the latter turned out to be actually useful but only after it had been a freak’s occupation for millenia).
Shame the author didn’t address the sexually explicit material being taught to kids also. After all, with this whole Woke assault on kids, the gender ideology and the sexualization of kids dressed up as ”sex education” are two sides of the same atrocious coin. It’s not that long that kids were relieved of the abuse of having to wear masks at school, now they have a very different sort of abuse to deal with, the psychological type.
And how would those girls have fared if they’d spoken out in Ireland? Would they be protected by their right to free speech? Probably they’d be expelled.
”The Irish Green Party followed many on the left around the world, including our own Democratic Party, this week and came out for censorship and speech controls. Indeed, the party went full Orwellian as its chairwoman Pauline O’Reilly called for “restricting freedom” to protect it.
O’Reilly’s comments are part of the introduction of the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022. We previously discussed this massive assault on free speech.
The legislation that would criminalize “incitement to violence or hatred against” people with “protected characteristics,” as well as “condoning, denying or grossly trivialising genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace.”
Speaking before the Irish Senate (Seanad) this week, Green Party chairwoman Pauline O’Reilly declared “when one thinks about it, all law and all legislation is about the restriction of freedom. This is exactly what we are doing here. We are restricting freedom but we are doing it for the common good.”
What is particularly chilling is how low the threshold is for denying free speech, according to O’Reilly. It now appears that “deep discomfort” is enough:
“If a person’s views on other people’s identities make their lives unsafe and insecure, and cause them such deep discomfort that they cannot live in peace, our job as legislators is to restrict those freedoms for the common good.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/we-are-restricting-freedom-common-good-irish-green-party-calls-limiting-free-speech
“The legislation that would criminalize” …“condoning, denying or grossly trivialising genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace.”
I suggest we have here a clear case of pot and kettle.
These people are not at all opposed to war. They’re just opposed to a culture which might one day require them to fight in one by not regarding it as shameful crime but ultimatively glorious violent contest of peoples/ states. In this case, this would be the European culture we inherited from antiquity.
I think they whole disgusting’sex ed’ for babies etc is as big to write another article! . Think this article was specifically about the gender jobs.
your reference to the ‘common good’- those 2 words together always bring me out in a cold sweat. It is scary that people still use it! Essentially who defines it and wtf does it mean. No doubt the dictators of this world past and present sell their mass genocides on the common good card
Well done girls.Take my hat off to you.

Keep fighting the fight folks- this ‘be kind’ lot are anything but.
American parents are really giving it some
Those girls are absolutely superb. There is hope.
Does this affect private schools to the same extent?
I do know from communications I get from my Alma mater, a girls’ private school (where I went on a free place in the 70s), that it’s as woke as bejeezus.
A quick quiz question, for anyone who hasn’t read Mogwai’s post, above:
Who said:
“We are restricting freedom but we are doing it for the common good.”
(a) a character in George Orwell’s 1984?
(b) a member of the Chinese Communist Party?
(c) a Green Party member of the Irish Senate?
The answer is obviously c). The 1984-character would tell you that it’s good that the party has set people free by relieving them from the burden of having to make their own choices and the CCP member would simply restrict the freedom of anyone asking such stupid questions much more severly very quickly, without being the least bit worried about that by his conscience.
All of the above I would imagine.
O’Brian while asking Winston how many fingers he had; CCP talking about covid and c- because they may well be heavily influenced by a &b. Hope they don’t read a clockwork orange, but hey that is already a reality this side of the pond
Scary.
And Atlas Shrugged nailed exactly what’s happening: the war on reality, the desire to control man’s mind, postmodernism wrecking literature and the arts, the requirement that businesses no longer prioritise shareholder profit, but seek the common good… It’s all there in a book written in 1957. Our present day society is very much the one that book opens with.
The teacher supports child abuse and belongs in jail. Less melodramatically, what strikes me more than anything is that the teacher is clearly thick. She spouts off woke rhetoric – ‘diversity, equity and inclusion’, ‘cis’ – like she’s learned it by rote and is unable to back up her claims with facts. ‘Intersex’ is not a third sex: it’s a woke term for some poor child that’s got a birth deformity such as testicular feminisation syndrome. From her voice, she’s extremely inarticulate – all dropped glottal stops. She’d have been told off for poor speech ability by my school teachers. She clearly has no critical faculties and is just a woke zombie who is run rings around by a pair of 13 year olds. This is what the profession has been reduced to. Hearing that teacher speak that way makes me really angry, actually.
Far too often these days I let the woke mob get to me and genuinely fear for our collective future. Hearing these kids stand up for themselves in a way I’d never have been able to imagine at their age makes me so hugely proud.
This nonsense all started with idiots like me who always “Yes, please!” next to Sex when filling in forms, leading to ignorant bureaucrats substituting Gender for sex.
Sorry.
I wonder why the teacher introduced the totally irrelevant issue of homophobia. Methinks she doth protest too much
The film is absolutely excellent because it shows that some children are brave enough to confront this idiocy. The teacher appears to be a bully with a very poor grasp of English grammar and no ability to debate intelligently with a polite acceptance of an alternative point of view. Not many children would have the courage to argue their point of view or have parents who have enabled them to do so.
“Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings!” (Autocorrect changes it to ducklings so is clearly in on the idiocy too!)
Let the fight back begin with the children.
Who remembers “Please Sir” with John Alderton? His pupils were always running rings round him and that was back in the day when the school leaving age was 15.
That disgraceful teacher and her Head-teacher who allowed (encouraged?) this kind of bullying propaganda to be taught, should be hauled up before a Parliamentary Committee to account for themselves.
But of course they won’t. It’s far more important for Parliamentary Committees to investigate ITV over Schofield and Johnson for basically admitting that he knew the Covid restrictions were completely unnecessary.