Sometimes the most unlikely things open a world of fun you never knew existed. As the recent recipient of a rejected parliamentary petition email (a failed, but not entirely serious attempt, with others to prevent the Conservative Party using the word ‘conservative’ in its title; unfortunately, it is not something the U.K. Government or Parliament is directly responsible for) I realised that this was ‘a thing’ and decided to dig a bit deeper to see what other petitions had been rejected and why. Indeed, I wanted to know if such a list even existed. It did not take long; I simply Googled ‘rejected petitions’ and this took me to a page on the Petitions webpage of the U.K. Government and Parliament website headed Rejected Petitions. On June 7th 2023 there were 35,842 with the most recent entry for June 4th.
The vast majority are rejected on the basis that they are “about something that the U.K. Government or Parliament is not directly responsible for”. And it turns out that the U.K. Government is not directly responsible for very much. The remainder are rejected on the basis that there is “already a petition about this issue”.
The range of issues that provoke people to try to raise a parliamentary petition vary from disgruntlement and frustration to the genuinely aspirational. Some are just daft. Almost without exception, they are amusing.
The disgruntled
Using the past month as a sample, among the disgruntled petitions was one requesting a re-vote for the 2023 Britain’s Got Talent final to make Lillianna the winner because “it was an unjust decision”. Another person had clearly failed his citizenship application test, the Life in the U.K. Test, demanding that it “should stopped” (sic). Part of the explanation offered by the applicant who considered the test was “just money making business” (quoted verbatim) was: “I have tried my self three times and every time all funny questions, when we r preparing fro exam, we r reading completely different and exam is completely different.” Clearly, this disgruntled applicant, in addition to demonstrating a poor grasp of the King’s English, did not grasp the nature of an exam. ‘No reply’ emails clearly got someone’s gander up as they tried to raise a petition to “Ban all no reply emails from the internet” on the basis the these were “annoying, impersonal and rude to the users who receive them”. They considered that “no reply emails are a form of digital rudeness and disrespect that should not be allowed in the modern world”.
The aspirational
Animals were the subject of nearly 1,000 rejected petitions and mostly about their welfare. “Change the law as regards rabbit welfare… to improve the lives of rabbits and stop rabbits from being Britain’s number 1 most neglected pet” was the basis of one attempt which also called to “make vaccinating rabbits compulsory”. Was this, perhaps, the first indication of a nascent Rabbit Liberation Movement? An especially ambitious attempt at a petition called to “Make killing birds Illegal!” as this was “destorying (sic) our wonderful nature!” This also demonstrated a common feature of many rejected petitions, a tenuous relationship with the rudiments of spelling and a fondness for exclamation marks. The applicant justified the attempt as “It is such a nice world we live in and birds play a big part in it”. Others on the animal welfare front clearly have not done their homework and requested for “Cats to not be classed as vermin” on the basis that “Cats are pets that many families around the world they are loved and nurtured like humans and for them to be classed as vermin is unfair they are not disgusting animals the (sic) are kind and loving”. In fact, cats are not classed as vermin in the U.K.
The daft
While I do not doubt the sincerity of the any of the above rejected petitions, some efforts really did stretch credulity. I don’t know which one of the blob has the job of reading applications for petitions but there cannot be many dull days. One of the best was the request for “Sun cream to be excluded from luggage weight” on the basis that “The weight given for luggage on airlines can be low for families going on holidays, when taken (sic) into account all the things that need to be taken. The amount of suncream and maybe medicine and medication can add a huge bulk to this weight”. They continued, saying that “good quality suncream is imperative” and that suncream is “a necessity not an option!” In addition to the grammatical and exclamation hallmarks of many petitions, this one also suggests that the petitioner does not realise that there are pharmacies in other countries.
Not within the past month but unable to resist seeing if any of the rejected petitions referred to COVID-19 — and many did — I was in two minds about whether this one was serious. I am still not sure. Someone tried to raise a petition in 2020 to “Allow healthy men to volunteer and be infected with COVID-19 for herd immunity”. The person had clearly given this a great deal of thought and called “for healthy men 18-40 to be infected voluntarily and wait out the infection with free beer!” A rigorous medical test would have to be passed prior to getting their hands on the beer as the volunteers “will need to prove their lungs are healthy by running round the schools field in a set time”. If the scheme ever got going the applicant, being the instigator, was “happy to volunteer first”. My guess is the person is fit and likes beer.
The person petitioning to sell the crown jewels, which may only be valued at £3 billion, wanted to give the money to the NHS. Given that the NHS annual budget is £71.5 billion, selling the crown jewels would keep it going for about a fortnight.
Some petitions came from school pupils. One was from some pupils of Imberhorne school in East Grinstead who had clearly been excluded from the year end prom. Their attempt at a petition was titled “Help us go to prom” reckoning that they should be allowed “to attend prom and say goodbye to there (sic) school years and friends”. Another rejected petition reckoned that “teachers should be doing there (sic) jobs properly”. This referred to pupils being prevented from using the toilet on demand and the petitioner wanted this alteration to the rules “so i dont shit my self or pe thanks”. When I noted that teachers were being exhorted to do their “jobs properly” I hoped it referred to the rudiments of spelling.
The not so daft
Finally, a petition with which I agreed and was glad to see that it had only been rejected due to the pre-existence of a petition on the same issue, requested that we “Have ‘None of the above’ added as an option on all ballot papers”. In explaining the request, the petitioner said that “By allowing people to vote ‘None of the above’ it empowers them to explicitly express their discontent with the political system”. Split infinitive apart, I’d vote for that!
Dr. Roger Watson is Academic Dean of Nursing at Southwest Medical University, China. He has a PhD in biochemistry.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This is a very welcome development. The 5-11 roll out is so egregious and nonsensical that you can sense the discomfort, even amongst those trying to push it. How this has been justified in other parts of the world is anyone’s guess but here in the UK at least these jabs must be stopped – for everyone, but starting with very young children.
Only a bit off topic, but:
https://twitter.com/katystoll/status/1507823993776005127
It’s not news (not to the likes of us, anyway), but the level of cognitive dissonance on display is astonishing. Also the fact that Twitter hasn’t “asked her politely” to remove her tweet.
A few of the people commenting on her posts are saying that the “anti-vaxxers” are to blame for making it hard to speak freely about these things! How deluded can they get?!
“Menstruating People” –
is anyone even allowed to say that in todays’ Woketard Clown World 
The Woke Masses on Twatter forced her to write that, because they didn’t like the way the word “women” excluded ‘other genders’ who also menstruate! You couldn’t make it up…
When will Pfizer release their “Mental Illness Vax”?
It is long overdue.
They are not just deluded – they are now clearly mentally ill.
I followed your link and disappeared down a rabbit-hole. My head is spinning.
What’s happened to her is “not minor”. The symptoms are “excruciating”. But she’s “grateful for the vaccine and would do it again”. This from someone who doesn’t want to “ignore the reality”!!
Good luck with this, going for 5-11 year old children with this toxic muck is one of the sickest crimes ever committed against our own people.
Does Sir Chris approve?
VOMIT
Does anyone still care what that moon-faced plonker thinks?
Next slide please…
He needs to be brought to account and we need to know who pulls his strings.
And we need to know exactly when and why he changed his mind after his public announcement in May 2020 that ‘covid’ was of ”no danger to the VAST majority of people”. Was he taken away and given a brisk and robust talking to?
it was immediately after Fauci Valance telecon …when the wests ‘leading’ scientists agreed to cover up the origins of the virus and instigate their plans to get the new style vaccines approved.
Does anyone know where his spaceship is hidden?
What better investment in your grandchildren or children than to send these honest doctors and scientists a tenner to fund their case! (One less Easter egg)
MHRA ? JCVI ? Shame on them.
Honest and honourable people.
As for those who are doing the injecting, urging it and approving it – every one of them should face legal proceedings for gross failure of their duty of care.
Good on them.
Sadly, I think we can predict what the courts will say: “The Government is best placed to decide because the Government has the best advisers. We know that they are the best advisers because they are advising the Government”.
And even when their own advisors say there is no justification for the vaccines for younger cohorts the government knows best and can serve them up regardless.
They struggled even to hint at that – so persuasively pressuring is the ‘narrative’!
Still….their consciences are clear!
I am afraid that a judge that abrogates responsibility for ruling is unfit to be a judge. Can judges be held in contempt by plaintiffs?
If not, why not?
But how does a judge who is not an expert, make a ruling when you have one set of ‘experts’ saying it is ok and another group saying it isn’t? That was the crux of the other big legal case regarding the emergency powers.
Is it a little unsettling to face the reality that courts often decide based not on the evidence, but on who can pay for the most compelling narrative performance.
Apologies for disagreeing with you but the courts always decide on the basis of the narrative from each side. That’s why the best QCs are paid shed loads and the incompetents work for the CPS.
It should be possible to determine who is right when the objectives and framework of the government’s decision are laid out, and the arguments of the experts are properly examined and those experts properly cross-examined.
The judge then must decide based on the arguments and evidence, and never on individuals’ credibility. If they can’t do so they should step aside and make room for someone that can.
Also, the precautionary principal should be applied. Are kids at significant risk from the Killer Cold, and does the clotshot demonstrably reduce that risk. The answer to both of those is clearly ‘no’!
Alas, there is also a principle where the evidence has to be quite overwhelming to overturn a government decision in a technical sphere.
Then again, if (in my dreams) this goes all the way to the Supreme Court, perhaps that ignorant and bullshit principle can itself be overturned.
The ‘precautionary principle’ dictates children should be vaccinated on the off chance one of them passed covid on.
Why do you think there are warnings on bags of peanuts that the bag might contain peanuts?
Why do you think cars are half as heavy today than they were in the 80’s? Because every technical precaution to save lives in the event of a crash must be taken, no matter how futile. The sensible and cheap route to reducing road deaths would be to tech drivers to drive properly, but that’s not profitable.
Unbelievable!
But true.
Have you heard of the weight of the batteries in those Skalectricc cars
Given the tiny threat to most kids from covid, it should be up to the government to provide a peer-reviewed comparative risk analysis and be prepared to argue as to the provenance of its data that the shots are of any benefit to more than 0.0001% of children.
Anyone heard of Solemn?
They would all have to be held in contempt?
Basically, you can’t sue governments and it was government at every level that caused all of this harm. Now I say one can’t sue governments, but this actually happens all the time – for example, police departments pay damages for illegally killing or injuring people they arrest or kill.
So there is precedent for suing public officials for the harms their actions cause. But if one allowed every mayor, city council, governor, state health officer, etc. to be sued there wouldn’t be enough tax payer-provided money to pay out all the judgments that were warranted.
So, again, there will be no legal judgements. It’s perverse and perhaps unprecedented, but there are simply TOO MANY potential defendants. The greatest “protection” against legal suits is the massive number of legally liable defendants.
Pfizer is protected from lawsuits, but so too are all the corporate entities that actually caused harm to billions of citizens.
Is it though? What if it could be proved they knew their product was harmful before selling it? What if they lied, or malfeasance could be claimed and the government contract is legally void.
Different matter. That strays into criminal culpability and fraud.
“……for example, police departments pay damages for illegally killing or injuring people they arrest or kill.”
Rubbish. The Taxpayer pays.
The government has obviously also appointed the best Judges – from the same stable!
>The group sets out in detail in a letter to the Government (plus two annexes) the evidence of a lack of any risk-benefit case for vaccinating children
Theres a lack of risk-benefit case for ALL groups!
The professional approach would have be for all doctors, nursing staff to refuse to administer these mRNA therapies to anyone, or supervise others administering them.
The medical and nursing professions have committed gross professional negligence and malpractice throughout the last two years. The only clapping they deserve is being clapped in irons and hauled before a Court.
You are correct, these supposedly medically competent people who swear to ‘first do no harm’ were offered £12 a pop for squirting this mystery sauce into millions of people and all they could see were the cash signs.
They simply did not give a flying f–k that this stuff was a novel technology being injected into people that faced close to zero risk from the claimed disease.
You do them a gross disservice sir, it was actually £15 a pop.
Up to £30 in some cases. Range Rover dealerships were rejoicing.
Do you have a list of doctors who have bought Range Rovers during the past year?
Yes. My brother owns a Range Rover franchise………
Details of every JLR vehicle bought, by whom, and when, available in a database for servicing and warranty purposes.
Does anyone have a list of these ‘doctors’ who got £12-£15 for each ‘vaccination’? How do we even know they got paid this amount ‘per pop’?
Yes. The government. In other words, us.
I agree completely.
They have done incalculable harm to their professions. Millions of people will never trust a doctor or nurse again.
Which may usher in a period of great health…
“Medical science has advanced so far that there is barely a healthy human being on the planet”
Aldous Huxley
There can’t be a risk benefit analysis when there was no proper information on the risk.
The trials were a mere few months, the control group was quickly vaccinated so there would be no longer term adverse reaction trial data and anything beyond 2 jabs wasn’t even trialled, they just took a complete punt on that. And of course they have put unthinkable pressure on the population to get jabbed with the effect of shrinking the population control group to as insignificant a number as possible.
So it’s hard to do a risk benefit analysis when policy had been to make the risk unknown, and if possible unknowable.
Which begs other questions!
When you have a meaningfully lower death rate in the placebo group of a trial during what was (falsely) called a a pandemic than those that were injected you have to wonder what was going on…
Add in the Biden crime family’s dodgy Ukrain dealings , dodgy lab research ther eand in china and all the other stuff and we just seem to have a huge rabbit hole the MSM is failing to cover up for long.
The only thing im sure of is that im unsure WTF is going on with the political classes ever since epsteins “suicide”.
All in the name of CBDCs to be put in place.
Now if only we were to have an independent judiciary to try the case.
God bless Beverley Turner. Despite all the criticism and online abuse she’s taken for speaking out publicly about convid and clot shots, she is still going strong. Doing whatever she can to help spread the truth. Well done Beverley.
You just have to look at Maddie de Garay, the young girl that Pfizer kicked off the trial after their product crippled her.
Pfizer are evil, the safety trials are a joke.
Pfizer we expect to be evil. The regulators who should be keeping them honest have let us down even more.
They have all been “go at” like the WHO, by we know who!
“Pfizer are evil, the safety trials are a joke.”
What does Chris Whitty, Susan Hopkins and Jenny Harries have to say about this?
They don’t seem to say much about anything.
…you mean after checking their portfolio of pharma shares price fluctuations for the day? /s
What about Fauci and Gates?
A most welcome development. Thank you to all involved.
Those responsible for the last two years of insanity and anti-human behaviour must be held to account.
It’s highly unlikely they will. The establishment of executive, legislature, judiciary and MSM will close ranks even further. There will be a whitewash followed by a fudge, further weasel words will be uttered and oh look, a refugee crisis.
Where was this challenge before any of the warp speed clot shots were served up?
Why doesn’t this list have every Doctor signed up to it?
Clap the NHS?, clap my hairy ar*e.
Most doctors don’t question. Most doctors do what they’re told. Most doctors want to keep their jobs.
Blimey that’s a long list of well qualified conspiracy theorists.
I was listening to Radio 5 when the roll out was announced, the hoops the “expert” from the London school of tropical medicine and hygiene was having to jump through to justify it was staggering, if you couldn’t see through it then you’re not intelligent enough to draw breath. Unfortunately the presenter was still breathing at the end of the interview.
Having to listed to the BBC in the car is like listening to Lord Haw Haw. They are the Fifth Column.
Lord Haw Haw didn’t charge you 150quid a year.
But like you could Lord Haw Haw, you can switch them off.
And you can still refuse to pay the £150. I do.
I’ve not paid them since 2004, the coverage of the whole Dr. David Kelly “suicide” nonsense and the reporting on the Hutton Inquiry was the last straw.
Unfortunately we still pay for the BBC because my wife watches it. I spend evenings rummaging around on the internet for information or perhaps watching movies I ‘acquire’.
Fortunately I learned enough to persuade my wife (a health professional who had her first jab booked) and daughter to at least wait for a few months to see what happens.
Almost two years later they have gone off the idea and are noticing ‘vaccinated’ friends and relatives coming down with covid while we are remarkably healthy.
The power of the BBC is immense.
It is a welcome development indeed, but my question as always is WHY? What on earth kind of undisclosed discourse is happening within the JCVI that leads to the conclusion being drawn that vaccinating kids would be beneficial? I would really love to know the motivation behind that decision being taken in the first place.
They know they won’t be working for the JCVI for much longer if they don’t approve.
It’s a house of cards. If they start saying it’s bad stuff now the whole damn thing comes crashing down.
Which I think it will anyway before too long.
Scientist who questioned ‘risk-benefit ratio’ of vaccinating 12 to 15-year-olds leaves JCVI role | Daily Mail Online
After two years, it is time you did the very easy research that will answer you question.
Pledged made. Doubt our legal system will work for us as usual, but it’s worth the fight.
It works for the lawyers, justice is meant to be a side-effect.
But the lawyers already know what lawsuits they CANNOT file – Basically, any lawsuit that says this entire thing was a scam based on known lies.
We’re two-plus years into this pandemic. Where are all the lawsuits?
There is Court of Public Opinion with Reiner Fuellmich.
David Martin, in his interview with Stew Peters, said that a federal claim has been filed in the state of Utah.
We are in a desperate fight for freedom
Orbán’s Hungary: Lessons for Britain? Is Hungary Unfairly Demonised in the West? (4K)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiUNStlcSsY
The New Culture Forum
Stand for freedom with our Yellow Boards
Tuesday 29th March 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
Junction Bracknell Road B3348
& Old Wokingham Road
Crowthorne RG45 6ST
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday)
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
We need Orban to be boss of Europe! Including the UK.
We certainly do not, he’s WEF and a COVID vax zealot.
Ron DeSantis all the way.
That is welcome news, but it’s still infuriating that the government were able to press ahead with their draconian, authoritarian and unjustifiable mandates of lockdowns, mask wearing, travel restrictions and ‘vaccinations’ at the drop of a hat and vary requirements at short notice from one day to the next, when legal challenges take forever to mount. As always, the punishment for mounting a legal challenge is the process of mounting a legal challenge.
Ukraine war economy. At 2:08 if I heard that right they will give coupons to people along with their vaccine status. Haven’t they been through enough. And I hear the WEF want ‘Smart Cities’ in Ukraine!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBbrcmfGg-E
“Smart” equals “slavery” !
The only “government” I would vote for, would be after the current lot is cleared out comepletely, and replaced with new MPs entirely made up of sucessful business people who had their life ruined by lockdowns. They know first hand a plethora of things wrong with this country, and would have a much better chance of actually forming a government for the people, no WEF young gloabl leaders, members of the trilateral commission, or any other globalist organ, need apply.
I understand the same happened to our parliament many years past.
It was found to be so corrupt that officials (I don’t think there were MP’s then) were all kicked out and the country run by unpaid, volunteer businessmen.
Evidently the place ran like a Swiss watch. I wish I had kept the article on it.
Even before I was interested in politics I maintained country’s should be run by businessmen as it is nothing but a large business.
Along came Trump and proved me right.
“Slave “Cities …smart = slave.
Schwab’s dream – oh, and his father made turbines for Hitler’s Heavy Water plants in Norway, in support of the Nazi Nuclear Bomb project.!
Grinding slow but exceeding fine.
Is that the proposed punishment for the evil barstewards behind all of this?
What is the alternative? Molotov cocktails? That always backfires, my friend. Always.
Put your money where your mouth is. I just have. It’s all we can do. Try to beat the system from within.
A ‘controlled’ experiment to find out how many jabs is exactly one jab too many?
Ah, I now see what you meant!
Prison and throw away the key. And post all the remaining clot shots and masks through the hatch.
Answer: “One”
It’s always a bit creepy when someone calls you ‘their friend’. Like an Egyptian who wants to sell a tourist a camel ride round the pyramids.
I thought you agreed to stop teasing me, Emerald.
Good for them, I will be contributing.
Bravo. I have sent them some money.
We were told that we faced a deadly pandemic. At that point you could justify quite a lot of interference with people’s liberty
We were then told that a vaccine could halt the disease. At that point you might be able to justify compulsory vaccination for all
Then we found out that the vaccine DIDN’T stop the disease. At that point you could no longer justify any pressure to vaccinate.
then we found out that the illness was no longer deadly. At that point you could no longer justify interfering with people’s lives.
There is curently ABSOLUTELY NO justification for anyone to be required to be vaccinated any more. I cannot see any grounds on which this case can be argued.
The case isn’t about requiring anyone to get vaccinated. It’s about whether people should be allowed to inject their children.
And even more about the small matter of our government “recommending” that the parents do so, because… TheScience™
“I cannot see any grounds on which this case can be argued.”
The vaccines provide some protection and the hospitals are filled to the brim with ‘the unvaxxed’. Those are the lies being fed to the public, and as we know a good proportion of the public are utter mongs and believe the lies. SAGE have always known what they were doing. The trick is to get onto the SAGE committee if you want to make some money – but they are very selective and choose only their friends.
Indeed … so no space on SAGE for the Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine at the Univ of Oxford (aka Carl Heneghan), nor for any members of HART.
Moreover, you cannot justify compulsory vaccination under English common law. It gives us inalienable rights, including body autonomy.
No, no, no.
It briefly came in for childhood smallpox (IFR, er, 70%) in the 19th.C. This was ended before the 20th.C began.
Never again … as people said in 1945 about WW2.
Actually, we found out – some of us anyway – that the virus was “no longer deadly” by about week 3 of the official pandemic.
A major part of the fraud was making the public think the virus was equally deadly to all age cohorts. For those under 40, the virus was about as deadly as a case of influenza. This was known, or should have been widely known, from April 2020.
This article in the UK Telegraph says the virus was disappearing in May 2020…but they still went ahead with the trials…
Exclusive: Oxford University Covid-19 vaccine trial has 50 per cent chance of ‘no result’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/23/oxford-university-covid-19-vaccine-trial-has-50-per-cent-chance/
Well, that was one of the quickest knee-jerk donations that I have ever made!
More power to them.
I hope other medicos come on board too.
This should be the vanguard of a whole battalion of lawsuits against our evil leaders.
Hold them responsible, make them pay.
How strange for medics to bring a legal case “on behalf of” a mother and her children. Why isn’t the procedure followed of a person (obviously a parent represents her children) hiring a lawyer (who may act pro bono) who in consultation with his client marshals evidence from witnesses?
PS All those postnominal letters made my eyes cross.
PPS F***ing medics can’t just be guys and gals who know and have witnessed this and that, can they?
You and I know they are grossly irresponsible but getting the legal system to agree is another question.
I’d like to shake the hand of every one of them. Have contributed, and hope that everyone here will.
Are GPs’ surgeries giving out “free” felt-tip pens even when they’re closed?
“Devon couple wrote ‘DNR’ on their foreheads before suicide pact“
Very sad, especially when they had stipulated they never wanted to go into hospital again, a feeling many have now.
Those in this group deserve our thanks for at least trying to get some kind of legal cases on the docket (and thus the “public record.”).
This said, I’ve pretty much given up hope that lawsuits or legal actions will be forthcoming or provide the results I’d like to see. This is because the potential legal “causes of action” (torts) is mind-boggling to consider. Practically every citizen on the planet has suffered some degree of economic or psychological harm. And this doesn’t include the health harms and deaths, which number in the tens of millions.
That is, if civil cases (and criminal cases) were “allowed,” thousands of organizations, officials, medical groups, hospitals, companies, universities, school systems, etc would be on the hook for massive damages. We would have cascading mass bankrupticies.
I actually think the plaintiff’s lawyers are “in on” the scandal – even though all of their members could become millionaires if such suits were allowed. I think they know they have a lucrative profession and appreciate how much the system benefits them … however, if they started suing a Who’s Who of the guilty, they would quickly become the enemy themselves. That is, these brave and fearless trial lawyers know who they can’t sue.
I live near the U.S. Gulf Coast where 11 years ago all the beach communities were effectively shut down because of the BP oil spill. Damages to impacted businesses are still being paid out and total in the billions of dollars.
Now compare these “impacted” businesses to the number of businesses harmed by Covid lockdowns. The Covid effected businesses are 10 millions times higher … and the shutdowns lasted much longer.
I just returned from Disney World and I noted that several businesses in the theme parks are still closed. My hunch is that some of these were not owned by Disney but were renting space and they simply went out of business. Do these business owners (and their employees who lost jobs) have a valid civil claim and should they receive economic compensation (if a court ruled that they were shut down for fraudulent or illegal reasons)? I would say yes … but if even one such verdict was awarded, the flood gates would open.
What about all the college-town businesses that suffered economic harm when college football games were not allowed in the fall of 2020?
You either have millions of legal cases …. or zero … and zero it will be.
… And, as noted, this is just “economic’ claims/lawsuits. The health and wrongful death lawsuits would take the monetary value of potential verdicts into the stratosphere.
Re: The BP oil spill “damage”
There is no doubt this oil spill harmed every business and city on the Gulf Coast but …. but only because “the authorities” told people to stay away from the beaches and beach communities.
As it turns out, it was almost impossible to find any example of oil on the beaches – a few tiny clumps here and there … certainly nobody suffered any adverse health effects from these pebbles of clumps on vast swaths of beach.
This was yet another example of authority-produced fear-mongering and overreach, causing unnecessary economic harm to entire communities. Still, the event it was a windfall for the trial lawyers, who could sue BP and the oil rig companies – and did just this.
However, these same trial lawyer firms will NOT be suing their local governors or mayors for any of the emergency orders they issued with Covid.
And money was paid out to those who said their business was damaged without any proof. It was a lawyers fee feeding frenzy, no more than that.
You make excellent points.
There may, however, be judiciously selected scapegoats. Pfizer might be chosen to exemplify vaccine producers; Christian Drosten to exemplify fraudulent science.
Politicians might be punished in the usual way, that of losing office and any chance of re-election. For the rest, it might be reprimands and promises to learn lessons.
But we must keep putting the harms on public record, as you do. We must keep pointing out the damage done – not by a virus, but by the actions of immoral people.
And we must do all that we can to frighten those immoral people into modifying their behaviour, and to discourage others from following in their path.
Hoooray!
At long bluddy last!
But how much air time or column length will it receive?
There are so many people, who DO know better, complicit in this egregious decision to inject children with these now known toxic substances, that their silence of self protection, or worse, their lack of interest in informing themselves, is shameful. If they could not, in the last year, have grouped together with a plan to act at the right time, as this group has, they really should not be practising. Events in the USA and talk here gave plenty of warning.
Will anyone give this publicity, will they win? I won’t hold my breath.
Good for them!
It’s reassuring to know that there are still some medical professionals with principles they can call on.
Evil ( sponsored from ‘the top’).
This is good news. What needs to happen though is to halt the roll out until the case is heard. Otherwise if we wait months it will be too late for many kids.
I don’t see Dr Jenny Harries or Dame June Raine names on the list!! Shocking or what?
When I asked my Welsh Senedd member if he supported jabbing 5 to 11 year olds he simply replied that the JCVI recommends it (after changing their minds) .
When I challenged him on masks he said it was a WHO recommendation (after it changed its mind).
What an ignorant cop out!
The “group” appears to be a long list of significantly well known UK scientists, researchers and doctors. It would serve this government to sit down with these experts to discuss the issue of administering experimental biologicals to children. There is nothing to lose by the government and perhaps much to gain for all.
In Australia, 79.97% of children 12-15 have had two doses. 52.17% of children 5-11 have had one dose, with 25.39% having two doses.[1]
The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation pushes the Covid jabs for children, but admits: “Most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness.”[2]
It’s incredible that children’s effective natural immune response is being put at risk with the experimental Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’.
Has an ethics committee evaluated this plan to jab children with repeated injections of no direct benefit to their health, and with potentially deleterious consequences?
It’s astonishing that the doctors’ and nurses’ professional organisations here have not challenged this most questionable medical intervention for children – what information are they sharing with parents before they give the jabs?
In my opinion, ‘valid voluntary consent’ is lacking, as I contend no-one has been properly informed about this global experiment against a disease which wasn’t a serious threat to most people. Covid jabs are now being imposed every few months in this reckless off-the-cuff experiment, we have no idea of the future consequences of this ‘leaky vaccine’ load on the natural immune response.
References:
And now in Australia “While no coronavirus vaccines have yet been approved for children under five in Australia, Health Minister Greg Hunt revealed as part of Tuesday night’s federal budget that planning was under way for “children aged zero to four”.”*
The situation is insane. This isn’t about ‘the virus’… They’re determined to have an excuse to inject everyone, and to make everyone submit to jabs over and over again, along with masks and testing on demand, plus QR code surveillance and vaccine passports. The systems are in place now, and we’re being warned they’ll be used at the whim of the government, and the unelected bureaucrats and university academics who are dominating our lives.
Critical thinking people who refuse to consent to the defective Covid-19 jabs are being progressively cancelled out of society, with many losing their jobs under mandates – No Jab, No Job. In most states and territories, people are being forbidden to dine in restaurants, or go to the theatre or events or sports if they haven’t been jabbed – they’re being punished, discriminated against and segregated for refusing to conform.
It’s out of control here, there’s no accountability.
*https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/federal-budget/children-aged-zero-to-four-added-to-vaccine-injury-claims-scheme/news-story/a6cecbc8227d04364495370b9663626a
A pleasant novelty in view of what has transpired over the last two years – truthful medical professionals with a conscience.