I have previously written about a tendency by medical study authors to downplay their results if they don’t conform with the official narrative regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. A study done in Iceland and published last summer found that double-vaccinated individuals were 42% more likely to become reinfected than others. But in their conclusions the authors called this just a “slightly higher” probability.
Now, a new study is out, published in the BMJ, that deals with female menstruation problems following vaccination. Nothing to worry about, according to mainstream media reporting. Indeed, in their conclusions the authors say:
Weak and inconsistent associations were observed between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts for bleeding in women who are postmenopausal, and even less evidence was recorded of an association for menstrual disturbance or bleeding in women who were premenopausal. These findings do not provide substantial support for a causal association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts related to menstrual or bleeding disorders.
No reason to worry – really? Let’s take a look at the results section now:
2,580,007 (87.6%) of 2,946,448 women received at least one SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and 1,652,472 (64.0%) 2,580,007 of vaccinated women received three doses before the end of follow-up. The highest risks for bleeding in women who were postmenopausal were observed after the third dose, in the 1-7 days risk window (hazard ratio 1.28 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.62)) and in the 8-90 days risk window (1.25 (1.04 to 1.50)). The impact of adjustment for covariates was modest. Risk of postmenopausal bleeding suggested a 23-33% increased risk after 8-90 days with BNT162b2 [Pfizer] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna] after the third dose, but the association with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AstraZeneca] was less clear. For menstrual disturbance or bleeding in women who were premenopausal, adjustment for covariates almost completely removed the weak associations noted in the crude analyses.
So, actually significant risk for postmenopausal even after adjustments, but for premenopausal the “weak associations” were removed after adjustment for covariates. Why those huge adjustments? Before adjustment they found statistically significant increases of up to 44% – but that top figure was ‘adjusted’ away to just 4% (see Table 3). Yet even after these heroic adjustments there was still a 25% increase in menstrual disturbance following the first dose.
Anyhow, let’s look at the actual numbers by product for postmenopausal.
First Pfizer: adjusted risk (right-hand column) is 1.41 or 41% higher than the unvaccinated after 1-7 days from the third dose and 1.23 or 23% higher after 8-90 days. Both are statistically significant. “Weak and inconsistent?” Really?
Now for Moderna: adjusted risk is 1.33 or 33% higher than unvaccinated after 1-7 days from first dose and also 8-90 days after the third (the latter is statistically significant). Again, “weak and inconsistent”?
Finally AstraZeneca: adjusted risk is 1.24 or 24% higher than the unvaccinated 1-7 days after the first dose and 1.21 or 21% higher than unvaccinated after the second (though neither result is statistically significant).
Last October, the European Medicines Agency finally recommended adding menstrual problems to the already long list of COVID-19 vaccine side-effects. It was about time, after the flood of reports from women. The results of the new study reinforce those concerns, as shown above.
The question that remains is why the glaring discrepancy between the actual results and the authors’ conclusions?
The authors know full well that most journalists neither read nor understand scientific studies; they know how their highest ideal of verification is appeal to authority (‘the authors say, therefore it is true’). Every scientist knows this. Therefore, it is the authors’ responsibility to correctly portray and highlight their actual findings. But instead they try to hide them.
Why?
Is the answer to be found in the ‘competing interests’ section, perhaps?
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: MG reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Gilead, GSK/ViiV, MSD, Biogen, Novocure, Amgen, Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. SL reports consulting for Scandinavian Biopharma and is an employee of AstraZeneca since 16 January 2023. The work in this article was performed before this employment commenced. FN reports prior employment at AstraZeneca until 2019, and ownership of some AstraZeneca shares. MB and YX declare no competing interests. AS reported participating in research funded by governmental agencies, universities, Astellas Pharma, Janssen Biotech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, (then) Abbott Laboratories, (then) Schering-Plough, UCB Nordic, and Sobi, with all funds paid to Karolinska Institutet, outside of the submitted work. RL reported receiving grants from Sanofi Aventis paid to his institution outside the submitted work; and receiving personal fees from Pfizer outside of the submitted work.
If there are still any real journalists out there, how about getting in touch with the authors and actually asking? Would be a nice change, wouldn’t it.
This article was first published on Thorsteinn Siglaugsson’s Substack newsletter, From Symptoms to Causes. You can subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This whole level of discourse is a joke. If you hadn’t noticed the most remarkable trend of the last few years is the utter disenchantment and rejection of mainstream political discourse. Just normal people who never bothered looking into anything are know beginning to ken it. In a time like this more can happen in a few weeks than happened in the prwvious few decades.
Osborne is a delusional quomble just like Boris.
For the Tories to gain the centre ground would mean they have to move a significant amount to the right of where they currently are.
I hope they stay where they are or move to the left so they occupy Osborne’s “centre” ground; that will ensure their deserved extinction so that a truly conservative party can take its place.
Osborne is peeved.
The fake tories managed to hold on to 121 seats but the Davos Deviants wanted them wiped out. The tory hierarchy, which of course includes people like Osborne – another non-flushable turd – failed to do their job properly so he is encouraging the rump to go back to their Bliar lite ways thus guaranteeing that if there is another election they will finally be disappeared for good.
“George Osborne has said the Conservative Party must resist chasing Reform voters and instead move back to the political centre ground if it wants to return to power.”
And what part of the political battlefield does Osborne believe the criminal, lying tories are occupying exactly?
The only reason Ozzy doesn’t want the tory remnants chasing the Reform position is because he knows this might prolong their miserable lifespan and as stated above the DD’s don’t want that.
This is the woke circling their waggons around the Tories in the hope that they won’t be able to escape from their clutches. Simply put, Osborne, like Johnson, is a globalist traitor who wants British people to suffer and to diminish the UK as much as possible because that’s what his masters demand.
How does one remove the neocon globalists from power, that is the question.
Coming from a fully enrolled attendee of Bilderberg meetings, George Osborne’s musings on trying to lure back voters hold about as much weight as a Gary Glitter announcement on childcare.
I like that we can see that they try to maintain the mainstream narrative and yet people look upon it with scorn and derision and laughter. In that sense this is a fine time to be alive.
The centre ground is code for “my views and policies”.
I have been trying to work out what “centre” means and that is the best I can do. The only alternative is “policies the BBC will report without either a smile or a sneer”.
“The centre ground” is code language for: Sunak has cautiously back-pedalled from Net Zero a little and overseen a slight pushback against trans-ideology. This goes against the established political dogma the Osbornes and Johnsons of this world claim to be in favour of (while they’re really just sock puppets moved by invisible forces). Sunak lost an election Labour won. Labour is still fully in bed with Net Trans and Zero Economy hence, it’s now occupying “the centre ground” Sunak Right-Wing Radikalinski carelessly vacated and hadn’t he done so, the muppet show of non-conservative Tory government had certainly just continued. The Tories must therefore, urgently transition back to Net Zero True Believers and champions of the notion that human children are born sexless if they ever want to win an election again.
Under no circumstance must they become so populist to try to do what the voters they lost want to be done. That would be very bad for the puppetmasters.
Read Janet Daley in yesterday’s DT. Excellent piece and says it all in her inimitable way. Osbourne is half the trouble and Cameron is the other half. The way they went o with the Liberals from 2010 set the path of going Left and away from Conservatism.
Remember that Cameron said, when he resigned outside No 10, that his greatest achievement in 5 years as PM was single sex marriage legislation. Was not even in the Manifesto. I rest my case.
Slightly Off-T.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-have-to-deal-with-the-anti-vaxxers-says-kier-starker-next-uk-pm-with-the-endorsement-of-the-wef/5858558
Kneel is a serious threat to the people of this country as this article makes clear.
When Scamdemic ll launches it could become extremely nasty particularly in relation to killer ‘vaccines.’
Centre means complete adherence to neoliberal orthodoxy. Neoliberalaism is basically a scam masquerading as an ideology. Keep the charade going on long enough so that you can get away with all the spoils. It is a perfectly natural approach for someone who considers themself to be on the upper rung of humanity, Just get what you can from the peasants and store it up and weather the storm. Sadly for them things will not work out that way.
Lol back to the centre ground, from the far left…
Why doesn’t he piss off and join Labour or the Lim Dems or the Greens?
This was first asked of the Tory left at the time of Maastricht. For some the answer was to avoid the consequences of daring to deny the blackmail.
The answer since 1992 has been to use the brand of the CP to act as an anger sink and thereby facilitate a further globalist left drift.
Sadly true
It is like a predator appearing among a flock of animals or a remote SIberian village that is being terrorised by a bear. A point comes when it doesn’t matter what you know. You are alerted to the main thing which is that you are being hunted by a predator. Birds might go quiet. When Jeffrey Dahmer walked past the cells of fellow mass-murdering convicts they all stayed silent until he was past. It is never wise to take counsel of your fears but in our time everyone will get it because we have that spark. This is a serious anti-human agenda that requires a serious response.
Focus on getting the spunk. If you haven’t got the spunk then all else fails. Courage is a cardinal virtue according to Plato because without the spunk you won’t do anything. If you feel that your nutsack is depleted then store it up, That can make a big difference, Taoist alchemy involves holding the seed for many years. It is basic and primal but you have to do it. Don’t succumb to this culture that tells you that it is okay to jerk off as much as you want because it really isn’t.
Oh, for crying out loud.
Logged in to upvote.
As someone that trains, there is truth in that.
There are definitely certain individuals on here that would benefit from taking your sage advice. Depleted nutsacks indeed.
Plus, there’s also oysters.
You were given a big pair of swollen bull testicles for a reason. Now put them to use.
Pack it in.
“But the actual way the party has governed has frequently been centre-Left if not outright Left-wing, with extraordinary levels of immigration and tax, a fanatical commitment to the anti-capitalist Net Zero agenda and only a very limp-wristed effort at reining in the spread of wokery across the public sector.”
Indeed, though oddly Mr Jones forgets to mention their crowning achievement – CONVID!
Yes
Throughout MacMillan, Heath, Hague and everyone since except Maggie and theoretically Truss they have moved significantly left.
The people haven’t.
Hauge was a fake Eurosceptic. Once the 2016 Referendum came where was he!
Osborne brought us Austerity , which in reality was , do nothing . Ever since , they have done nothing and Brexit was a complete surprise to everyone except those of us could not believe how lucky we were . The final message from the Pseudo Tories , was that they were all too ready to become Autocrats and completely destroy our Trust . We are now in an age when There is No Trust and Osborne was in at the beginning !
Osborn was such a success I hope the Tories take his advice. His mate Cameron-Clegg was/were just as skilful politically and I’m sure they endorse this view.
A bigger question is just why a political party would change its values (sic) just for electoral success. If it was about values and policies rather than holding office with mates for its own sake they would campaign accordingly.
As the Tories have no values they can do no other than “let’s outflank the Labour Party to please those nice people we met at the WEF/Gates/etc conference or weekend break”.
This apparent conundrum is nothing of the sort. In Westmonster the center is assumed to be somewhere between Tories and Labour, which means it’s all part of the indistiguishable groupthink. In the real world the centre is to the right of all of them. Moving right and occupying the centreground is the same thing!
In the real world 86% of voters chose left wing parties in the last UK GE
I wonder if we can envisage something new over the rainbow free from these levels of corruption. I think it is possible. You speak to the average person now and you are pushing at an open door. They just lost their old world schema and are hoping that there is a new vision. The new vision will be formed out of the horror of our collapse and our last days might be breadcrumbs. But it has to happen. It will be harsh in Britian though how they suddenly pulled the props out of the way and lifted the curtain and you are faced with the coldness of the brick wall at the back of the thatre.There is still some native genius left I hope it manages to overcome this Satanic impulse.
We have to do something the alternative is an everlasting hell of their device.
Centre ground, isn’t as central as I remember. I used to consider myself centre-left, but magically without changing my views substantially, I have become ‘extreme far-right’. The whole concept of left and right is out of date. I would propose ‘realists’ for right and ‘idealists’ for left.
It is a terrible situation in regard to what we are dialled into in terms of the launch of missiles. All the other crap counts for nothing. For me I don’t even know how to look at such a deterioration in intellectual standards and that is before even considering the dreadful consequences to our country. I think we assume that because we are an island we are therefore immune to missile attacks. This is simply not true, We should try to avoid such an exchange in my view.
If missiles start flying about the UK will be hit before the chief warmonger Uncle Sam.
Those Bollox to Brexit leftist Lib-Dems played a part as Nigel stood down, and once he stood down, the Tories pushed the ladder away. Shame they weren’t completely annihilated.
They think of you as less than vermin. Your might might’ve served their purposes for a brief while. There was no thought for your long-term sustenance. Like they might’ve watched a million go into battle in the first world war a century ago. You are just as expendable now to them in fact even more so because they want you out of the way. As long as you understand that you are being attacked by an enemy that wants you out of the way.
These creatures still don’t get it.
As Norman Tebbit pointed out, there is no centre ground, there is common ground.
Chasing some imaginary ‘centre’ ideology misses what people actually want. It is a play ground for a disconnected political elite.
It has become dehumanised. It’s all about abstractions, generalities: the planet, the environment, stopping climate change, saving the forests, fish, apes, equality, fighting racism and obesity, etc all at the expense of Humans as individuals their prosperity, wellbeing, freedom, property rights.
Mr Osborne, if you’re reading this, great, read on…
People who voted Reform are, in the main, precisely the people you should chase. They left you because they were sick of voting Conservative, having the Conservatives win and then getting something that was more Labour than a Corbynista’s wet dream.
But then I forget – you’re not really a Tory, are you?! Silly me. No – you are, as others here have already elucidated, an unflushable turd.
Remind me which General Election Osborne won? Oh yes, that’s right. None.
What is a “moderate voter”? Is it just a particular shade of vanilla on everything? Maybe the vanilla moderate wants only some mass immigration. Maybe he wants to save the planet, but only at the weekend. Maybe he wants men in frocks in their daughters toilet if they would only just have a badge saying “Really a Man” on their chest. Maybe the vanilla moderate wants to be tough on crime but not too tough because that wouldn’t be nice.
——-Yes Politicians just love all the vanilla moderates as their votes are so easy to hoover up. It is so much easier to sell silly Kylie Minogue records than it is to sell proper music.