The Director General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) reassures us that the WHO’s ‘pandemic accord’ (or ‘treaty’) won’t reduce the sovereignty of Member States. The WHO trusts that these words will serve as a distraction from reality. Those driving the perpetual health emergency agenda are planning to give WHO more power, and states less. This will happen whenever WHO designates a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ (PHEIC), or considers we may be at risk of one.
The WHO’s proposed treaty, taken together with its ‘synergistic’ amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), aim to undo centuries of democratic reform that based sovereignty with individuals, and by extension their state. The discomfort of facing this truth and the complexities it raises is providing the cover needed to push these changes through. This is how democracy, and freedom, wither and die.
Why it’s hard to acknowledge reality.
Our society in the West is built on trust and a feeling of superiority – we built the institutions that run the world and they, and we, are good. We consider ourselves humanitarians, the public health advocates, the unifiers, and anti-fascist freedom-lovers. We consider our system is better than the alternatives – we are ‘progressive’.
It takes quite a step for comfortable, middle-income, Left-leaning professionals to believe that the institutions and philanthropic organisations we have admired all our lives might now be pillaging us. Our society relies on having ‘trusted sources’, the WHO being one of them. Among others are our major media organisations. If our trusted sources told us we were being misled and pillaged, we would accept this. But they are telling us these claims are false, and that all is well. The WHO’s Director General himself assures us of this. Anyone who thinks rich corporate and private sponsors of WHO and other health institutions are self-interested, that they might mislead and exploit others for their own benefit, is a conspiracy theorist.
We are all capable of believing the rich and powerful of past ages would exploit the masses, but somehow this is hard to believe in the present. For proof of their benevolence, we rely on the word of their own publicity departments and the media they support. Somehow, malfeasance on a grand scale is always a figment of history, and now we are smarter and enlightened.
Over recent decades we have watched individuals accumulate wealth equivalent to medium-sized countries. They meet our elected leaders behind closed doors at Davos. We then applaud the largesse they bestow on the less fortunate, and pretend all this is fine. We watch as corporations expand across national borders, seemingly above the laws that apply to ordinary citizens. We allowed their ‘public-private partnerships’ to turn international institutions into purveyors of their commodities. We ignored this descent because their publicity departments told us to, becoming apologists for obvious authoritarians because we want to believe they are somehow doing a ‘greater good’.
Whilst a schoolchild might see through this facade to the conflicted greed beyond, it is much harder for those with years of political baggage, a peer network, reputation and career to admit they have been duped. The behavioural psychologists that our governments and institutions now employ understand this. Their job is to keep us believing the trusted sources they sponsor. Our challenge is to put reality above right-think.
The remaking of WHO
When the WHO was set up in 1946 to help coordinate responses to major health issues, the world was emerging from the last great bout of fascism and colonialism. Both these societal models were sold on the basis of centralising power for a greater good. Those who considered themselves superior would run the world for those less worthy. The WHO once claimed to follow a different line.
Since the early 2000s WHO’s activities have been increasingly dictated by ‘specified funding’. Its funders, increasingly including private and corporate interest, tell it how to use the money they give. Private direction is fine for private organisations promoting their investors’ wares, but it is obviously a non-starter for an organisation seeking to mandate medicines, close borders and confine people. Anyone with a basic understanding of history and human nature will recognise this. But these powers are exactly what the amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new treaty intend.
Rather than consider alternate approaches, WHO is seeking censorship of opinions not fitting its narrative, publicly denigrating and demeaning those who question its policies. These are not the actions of an organisation representing ‘we the people’, or confident in its ability to justify its actions. They are the trappings we have always associated with intellectual weakness and fascism.
WHO’s impact on population health
In its 2019 pandemic influenza recommendations, WHO stated that “not in any circumstances” should contact tracing, border closures, entry or exit screening or quarantine of exposed individuals be undertaken in an established pandemic. It wrote this because such measures would cause more harm than good, and disproportionately harm poorer people. In 2020, in conjunction with private and national sponsors, it supported the largest wealth shift in history from low to high income by promoting these same measures.
In abandoning its principles, WHO abandoned millions of girls to nightly rape through child marriage, increased teenage pregnancies and child mortality, reduced childhood education, and grew poverty and malnutrition. Despite most of these people being too young to be troubled by Covid and already having immunity, they promoted billions of dollars of mass vaccination whilst traditional priorities such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS deteriorate. Western media have met this with silence or empty rhetoric. Saving lives does not turn a profit, but selling commodities does. The WHO’s sponsors are doing what they need for their investors, whilst WHO is doing what it needs to keep their money flowing.
The new powers of WHO
The IHR amendments will reduce the sovereignty of any WHO Member State that fails to actively reject them, giving a single person (the Director General) direct influence over health policy and the freedom of its citizens is indisputable. It is what the document says. Countries are required to “undertake” to follow the WHO’s “recommendations”, which are no longer simply suggestions or advice. Whilst the WHO does not have a police force, the World Bank and IMF are on board, and control much of your money supply. The U.S. Congress passed a bill last year recognising that the U.S. Government should address countries that do not comply with the IHR. We are not witnessing toothless threats; most countries, and their people, will have little choice.
The real power of the WHO’s proposals is in their application for any health-related matter they proclaim to be a threat. The proposed amendments state this explicitly, whilst the ‘Treaty’ expands the scope to ‘One-Health‘, a hijacked public health concept that can mean anything perceived to be affecting human physical, mental or social well-being. Inclement weather, crop failures or the promulgation of ideas that cause people stress – everyday things that humans have always coped with, now become reasons to confine people and impose solutions dictated by others.
In essence, those sponsoring WHO are manufacturing crises of their own desiring, and are set to get wealthier from other’s misery, as they did during Covid. This under the guise of ‘keeping us safe’. As WHO implausibly insists, “no one is safe until all are safe”, so removal of human rights must be broad and prolonged. Behavioural psychology is there to ensuring we comply.
Facing the future
We are building a future in which compliance with authoritarian dictates will win the return of stolen freedoms, whilst censorship will suppress dissent. People who wish to see evidence, who remember history or insist on informed consent will be designated, in WHO parlance, far-Right mass killers. We have already entered this world. Public figures who claim otherwise are presumably not paying attention, or have other motivations.
We can meekly accept this new disease-obsessed world, some may even embrace the salaries and careers it bestows. Or we can join those fighting for the simple right of individuals to determine their own future. At the very least, we can acknowledge the reality around us.
Dr. David Bell is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva, and coordinating malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation. He is a member of the Executive Committee of PANDA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The very measures that contributed to putting the NHS under pressure are now being suggested to relieve the pressure.
Please can we replace all health officials with engineers.
Replace them with anyone off the street – they couldn’t possibly do a worse job. In fact, come to think of it, we need to replace all the establishment with regular folk.
Hear, hear.
You think the problem is that the wrong people are in place?
The problem is that there is a group of people who none of us have any clue who they are, who seemingly have the power to arbitrarily impose draconian measures on 60 million people.
There doesn’t seem to be any control mechanism to regulate the insane actions of some junior ministers and bureaucrats.
We shouldn’t be in a position where if the wrong people are in place they can wreak havoc on all of us. A free society should have checks and balances that are a hell of a lot more robust than that.
When power is being abused, the problem is always that the wrong people have power and there’s no formal way of preventing the abuse of power once the wrong people have gotten it. The so-called democratic method of selecting those who’ll end up having power was supposed to prevent that. In hindsight, and when considering historic precedents, this was obviously pipe dream. One could also call this the myth of the 20th century: Humans naturally possess a set of inalienable rights and democracy is what safeguards these. One should really have noted the contradiction in adiecto earlier: If those right were inalienable, they wouldn’t need to be safeguarded. In reality, states grant certain privileges to certain people and what the state granted, the state can revoke.
Well Chimps from the zoo could do no worse.
Another government micro-brain spouting his unelected mouth off.
I despair. What’s the definition of lunacy again?
Government.
Here we go again …
At least anecdotal evidence gathered in pub-like conversations with friends would suggest none would actually return to the hubric folly of pretending non pharmaceutical interventions can actually contain the spread of a respiratory virus.
Reading some of the Mail on line comments was soothing. Overwhelmingly against any return to madness, and those supporting lockdowns are struck down with vitriol.
My favorite: “Just one more shot to flatten your pulse.”
I’m not so sure. They were plenty of people who claimed they would not comply in the previous rounds of madness – but they did.
It’s frightening just how many normies are out there still looking for any excuse to cower.
Most fell at the first hurdle and will fall again when the inevitable next time round comes calling.
Something must be done… something must be done…. Something must be done …. Perhaps they should switch him off? It’s time for them to learn that wild ideas that crash the economy are a bad idea.
So is the plan to ruin more of the economy with more lockdowns so we have even less money to waste on the NHS, rinse and repeat, until it’s gone completely.
Why do the idiots in the H o L keep asking ‘what the government is going to do’ in the face of rising infections?
If fools stop asking the question, maybe those in power will stop floundering around looking for a policy of some sort (doesn’t particularly matter whether it will work) so as not to look complacent.
FGS, Establishment, stop trying to justify your allowances by asking the same pointless questions- it’s a waste of time and resources.
“Depressingly, if unsurprisingly, it’s clear that the Government has not taken a hard look at lockdowns and other restrictions and found them to be too costly, ineffective and unethical to be warranted, but sees them still very much in play.”
The government know exactly what they’re doing – it’s a psyop. The goal is to demoralise and subjugate the population to such a degree that anything is possible. Unfortunately, I’m not sure how much longer my patience will hold. I’m probably not alone.
With you.
We are not bankrupt enough yet, not enough people are dying due to the goo yet and old folks vote.
As for face masks, any rational discussion is impossible with those people.
They can and will therefore only be history, when the cult has collapsed and ended, due to either that bankruptcy, those mass goo deaths or a nuclear war.
With London being first in line for receiving the first bomb, the UK will at least be first and the world leader in that regard again.
I think I’ve changed my Mum’s position on muzzles by showing her the cultrue of fungal & bacterial spores from a mask worn for just 20 minutues… Fingers crossed!
This government was captured by the public sector some time ago.
That is one of the many reasons why Bunter was regarded as a fraud, had to go.
It is also one of the many reasons why ‘more of the same’ will lose the next general election.
The answer is simple: Kemi Badenoch.
The more I’ve talked to people and gently coerced their views on this, the more I’ve seen how many have now smelt the farmyard and woken up to this nonsense. It’s a tall order but let’s hope there’s a collective national “Get f&cked” if they try this again.
And this is really the key.
The authoritarians in position of power were always going to have another go and we are never really going to know if we are truly over this until they try it on and the population say “no”.
If we can push back the calls for measures we’ll be the stronger for it.
I very much doubt if an attempt to impose another Lockdown or return to Covid Restrictions will have the same effect it did in 2020/21.
They can try; but they can’t make us comply.
It’s very noticeable that the various “ethnic minorities” who are massively over-represented in Government, are generally authoritarians when it comes to Covid….. including Sunak, Javid, Braverman, Badenoch, Zahawi and Kwarteng …. who are currently all candidates for the Leadership.
Not entirely shocking news a few days after they finally manage to knock Boris Johnson down.
How about an “NHS Pull yourself together” policy? Like, for example, not slashing GP’s working hours and taking some of that cash that’s been fire-hosed at NHS management salaries and putting it instead to good use recruiting more frontline staff? The health services of other European countries have far more doctors and far less managers than we do, and yet somehow they end up more streamlined and don’t crumble under the slightest pressure from a small uptick in infection rate.
When the cat has gone away, the mice are gonna play.
With Johnson out of the way, another attempt at reintroducing a full set of COVID measures in the hope to eventually reach the blissful Chinese situation where people are starving in apartments whose doors have been bolted shut from the outside or die miserable deaths because their non-COVID chronic illnesses or ailments (like high blood pressure) don’t get treated anymore is obviously on the cards.
Until this murderous lot of closet communists has been thoroughly beaten, there’s always the risk that they manage to make a comeback and go onto another killing spree. If so-called democracy can’t protect us from this, it’s high time that it goes out of the window,.
Two instructive videos of Anna de Buisseret explaining our Statute Law, some of which have stipulated in the Statute that they can never be revoked. Lockdown impositions can never be lawfully enforeced without revoking a number of Statutes, including Magna Carta, signed into our law in the late 13th Century – the original was void due to duress & coercion, the one which remains on Statute was not signed under duress. These Statutes were written in simple English as they were intended for the ordinary men & women of this country to understand them.
Please disseminate this knowledge as far & wide as you can.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/conversation-with-anna-de-buisseret_IuK4yn4YBG2PGgm.html
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/anna-de-buisseret-open-mic_45jx2WObTpolGaH.html
Mediocre non entities seeking oxygen of publicity. Some worrying signs with the Queen awarding the George Cross to Covidian NHS bureaucrats. The continual worship of a service which has locked out the majority of acute care cases because these eejits wanted to follow the Beijing hustle.
We had half-empty hospitals and now we have a massive treatment backlog which is still rising. We have ambulances waiting outside hospitals for hours because the occupant cannot be admitted. Yet still these idiots think that lockdowns are helpful?
Junior Ministers are like paper clips, found around the office, of little value and easily lost in the waste paper basket.
It’s evolution! Respiratory viruses achieve greater transmissibility by becoming less dangerous, and since it’s a competitive market place, more transmissible/less dangerous virus come to dominate and exclude other more virulent versions, and this process is ongoing as milder and milder versions evolve – as we have seen with Omicron and new versions – until we no longer realise they are present.
The correct course of action is do nothing that hinders the spread of evolved milder versions.
Now: are those in Government and NHS Covidiots really so thick they cannot understand this basic feature of evolution and epidemiology or is something else going on?
Spot on. It is impossible to understand what is happening from within the framework of public health protection. To me, we are seeing the beginnings of what I would call “opportunistic totalitarianism”, whereby given any crisis to use as an excuse, the state will jump on the chance to impose restrictive controls, surveillance, etc on the population.
In a sense, democracy is an ongoing battle against human nature, which always seeks to extend the level of influence or control, and awareness (surveillance) of the environment that surrounds us.
For governments, this means control of viruses, terror threats, the climate, and ultimately, people’s behaviour. That kind of overreach temptation is what the people have historically always risen up against. If not for people’s action, democracy would be thoroughly dead in the water by now and we really would be living in Orwell’s 1984.
So to answer your question, the policies that have been enacted over the past 2 years sound like they make sense on a superficial level, but are actually just cleverly worded rhetorical smokescreens using whatever excuse can be conjured up to further the agenda that culminates in total control by the state and large multinational corporations.
Global Majority Questioning the Narrative and Believe That Governments Are Taking Our Freedoms Away
https://t.me/covidpositivenews/976
Official Channel for Covid Positive News
Stand for freedom and don’t give the Globalists so much respect
Yellow Boards By The Road
Wednesday 20th July 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
A3095 Maidenhead Road/B3034 Forest Road
Three Legged Cross, Warfield,
Bracknell RG42 6AE
****
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Henley
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS
https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f446.svgplease sharehttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f446.svg
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Another day, another crisis.?
How very NHS…
So Bojo is less than a week into his Gardening leave & here we go ! !!….
Also where’s this Kamal bloke appeared from
My 11 year old daughter has just had her appointment at Leeds dental hospital cancelled.
Why? Because the doctor has been told he might have the sniffles.
Waited about two months for this appointment. We weren’t offered a new appointment and have been told to phone up over the next few days to see if there have been any cancellations as they’re booked up for months.
Can’t these people just stop all this BS? ARE THEY REALLY SO STUPID AND/OR LAZY?
I phoned to make my next dental appointment and was told “5th April 2023”.
Anybody else notice that whites are being erased from politics, as Tommy Cooper once famously said ” Just like that”
Who the hell does Lord Kamall think he is?
These people need locking up they are very very dangerous to themselves and society in general.
RESIST DEFY DO NOT COMPLY!!!
If I read this correctly, “covid” admissions were in fact 687, since 64% of 1,911 admissions were not for covid but for something else, and the patient happened to have covid as well.