The Director General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) reassures us that the WHO’s ‘pandemic accord’ (or ‘treaty’) won’t reduce the sovereignty of Member States. The WHO trusts that these words will serve as a distraction from reality. Those driving the perpetual health emergency agenda are planning to give WHO more power, and states less. This will happen whenever WHO designates a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ (PHEIC), or considers we may be at risk of one.
The WHO’s proposed treaty, taken together with its ‘synergistic’ amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), aim to undo centuries of democratic reform that based sovereignty with individuals, and by extension their state. The discomfort of facing this truth and the complexities it raises is providing the cover needed to push these changes through. This is how democracy, and freedom, wither and die.
Why it’s hard to acknowledge reality.
Our society in the West is built on trust and a feeling of superiority – we built the institutions that run the world and they, and we, are good. We consider ourselves humanitarians, the public health advocates, the unifiers, and anti-fascist freedom-lovers. We consider our system is better than the alternatives – we are ‘progressive’.
It takes quite a step for comfortable, middle-income, Left-leaning professionals to believe that the institutions and philanthropic organisations we have admired all our lives might now be pillaging us. Our society relies on having ‘trusted sources’, the WHO being one of them. Among others are our major media organisations. If our trusted sources told us we were being misled and pillaged, we would accept this. But they are telling us these claims are false, and that all is well. The WHO’s Director General himself assures us of this. Anyone who thinks rich corporate and private sponsors of WHO and other health institutions are self-interested, that they might mislead and exploit others for their own benefit, is a conspiracy theorist.
We are all capable of believing the rich and powerful of past ages would exploit the masses, but somehow this is hard to believe in the present. For proof of their benevolence, we rely on the word of their own publicity departments and the media they support. Somehow, malfeasance on a grand scale is always a figment of history, and now we are smarter and enlightened.
Over recent decades we have watched individuals accumulate wealth equivalent to medium-sized countries. They meet our elected leaders behind closed doors at Davos. We then applaud the largesse they bestow on the less fortunate, and pretend all this is fine. We watch as corporations expand across national borders, seemingly above the laws that apply to ordinary citizens. We allowed their ‘public-private partnerships’ to turn international institutions into purveyors of their commodities. We ignored this descent because their publicity departments told us to, becoming apologists for obvious authoritarians because we want to believe they are somehow doing a ‘greater good’.
Whilst a schoolchild might see through this facade to the conflicted greed beyond, it is much harder for those with years of political baggage, a peer network, reputation and career to admit they have been duped. The behavioural psychologists that our governments and institutions now employ understand this. Their job is to keep us believing the trusted sources they sponsor. Our challenge is to put reality above right-think.
The remaking of WHO
When the WHO was set up in 1946 to help coordinate responses to major health issues, the world was emerging from the last great bout of fascism and colonialism. Both these societal models were sold on the basis of centralising power for a greater good. Those who considered themselves superior would run the world for those less worthy. The WHO once claimed to follow a different line.
Since the early 2000s WHO’s activities have been increasingly dictated by ‘specified funding’. Its funders, increasingly including private and corporate interest, tell it how to use the money they give. Private direction is fine for private organisations promoting their investors’ wares, but it is obviously a non-starter for an organisation seeking to mandate medicines, close borders and confine people. Anyone with a basic understanding of history and human nature will recognise this. But these powers are exactly what the amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new treaty intend.
Rather than consider alternate approaches, WHO is seeking censorship of opinions not fitting its narrative, publicly denigrating and demeaning those who question its policies. These are not the actions of an organisation representing ‘we the people’, or confident in its ability to justify its actions. They are the trappings we have always associated with intellectual weakness and fascism.
WHO’s impact on population health
In its 2019 pandemic influenza recommendations, WHO stated that “not in any circumstances” should contact tracing, border closures, entry or exit screening or quarantine of exposed individuals be undertaken in an established pandemic. It wrote this because such measures would cause more harm than good, and disproportionately harm poorer people. In 2020, in conjunction with private and national sponsors, it supported the largest wealth shift in history from low to high income by promoting these same measures.
In abandoning its principles, WHO abandoned millions of girls to nightly rape through child marriage, increased teenage pregnancies and child mortality, reduced childhood education, and grew poverty and malnutrition. Despite most of these people being too young to be troubled by Covid and already having immunity, they promoted billions of dollars of mass vaccination whilst traditional priorities such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS deteriorate. Western media have met this with silence or empty rhetoric. Saving lives does not turn a profit, but selling commodities does. The WHO’s sponsors are doing what they need for their investors, whilst WHO is doing what it needs to keep their money flowing.
The new powers of WHO
The IHR amendments will reduce the sovereignty of any WHO Member State that fails to actively reject them, giving a single person (the Director General) direct influence over health policy and the freedom of its citizens is indisputable. It is what the document says. Countries are required to “undertake” to follow the WHO’s “recommendations”, which are no longer simply suggestions or advice. Whilst the WHO does not have a police force, the World Bank and IMF are on board, and control much of your money supply. The U.S. Congress passed a bill last year recognising that the U.S. Government should address countries that do not comply with the IHR. We are not witnessing toothless threats; most countries, and their people, will have little choice.
The real power of the WHO’s proposals is in their application for any health-related matter they proclaim to be a threat. The proposed amendments state this explicitly, whilst the ‘Treaty’ expands the scope to ‘One-Health‘, a hijacked public health concept that can mean anything perceived to be affecting human physical, mental or social well-being. Inclement weather, crop failures or the promulgation of ideas that cause people stress – everyday things that humans have always coped with, now become reasons to confine people and impose solutions dictated by others.
In essence, those sponsoring WHO are manufacturing crises of their own desiring, and are set to get wealthier from other’s misery, as they did during Covid. This under the guise of ‘keeping us safe’. As WHO implausibly insists, “no one is safe until all are safe”, so removal of human rights must be broad and prolonged. Behavioural psychology is there to ensuring we comply.
Facing the future
We are building a future in which compliance with authoritarian dictates will win the return of stolen freedoms, whilst censorship will suppress dissent. People who wish to see evidence, who remember history or insist on informed consent will be designated, in WHO parlance, far-Right mass killers. We have already entered this world. Public figures who claim otherwise are presumably not paying attention, or have other motivations.
We can meekly accept this new disease-obsessed world, some may even embrace the salaries and careers it bestows. Or we can join those fighting for the simple right of individuals to determine their own future. At the very least, we can acknowledge the reality around us.
Dr. David Bell is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva, and coordinating malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation. He is a member of the Executive Committee of PANDA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
We are paying the wages of these despicable arseholes.
The Davos Deviants are taking the world to hell in an EV and useless, grubby leeches like Charlotte are concerned that the dead might be given the wrong pronoun. I strongly doubt that even the bloody dead would G a F about how they should be addressed as the hearse carries them away. Even if they were able.
I am bloody furious that the wan#ers in Parliament can be so conceited as to believe this subject is worthy of discussion even over a cup of tea in one of their subsidised cafes. Is this glorified idiot of a retard not aware how utterly, depressingly stupid she sounds to the decent people currently occupying this country?
And whoever was Speaker at the time this matter was raised should hang their head in shame for the sheer insult this subject and this woman has given to the British people.
Nuke the damned lot of them.
Unbelievable!
Thanks Freddy
Next time, why not say what you really think of them!!
I hope to God such an asinine commentary is not repeated by this lazy, corrupt, idiotic cohort of sheer deplorables, disgracing the decent people of this country.
Bravo, hux!
What a disgusting sign of the times and a shocking indictment of the state of British politicians if they’re even seeing fit to raise such a non-issue and utter bilge in parliament. As if there’s nothing more pressing going on right now, effecting every man, woman and child in society than talking about this complete bloody garbage! Talk about priorities.. 
Thanks Mogs
If there is a bolder, brighter, more in our faces way to confirm how much these rank nobodies could affirm their sheer ignorance I hope I never have to see it.
If there is a more obvious way of ramming their contempt of their employers down our throats we are fortunate to have not yet witnessed it.
Surely to God a more sick and deplorable crew of unemployables could ever be gathered together under one roof.
As a defining moment that surely demands the abolition of this caricature of a parliament and democracy this must be it.
For pity’s sake please let this be the nadir.
Sadly, I think these insane nobody’s can and will sink yet further, in ways we just can’t yet fathom.
Not fit to run a bath, and the US is even worse!
Go go go——-You must have a had a power breakfast his morning. ——That was certainly one of your best and most invigorating tirades my friend
Thanks varmint.
Top class HP!!
Thanks Spycatcher.
Funnier than the “Dead Parrot” sketch. ——–“Can I help you at all?——I’ve come to change me parrots gender”—“But it looks like it might be dead sir”————“Nope it’s alive and just sleeping and he wants to be a girl” ——-“I am afraid your LGBT parrot is deceased sir, it’s gone to meet it’s maker”——“But it wants to wear a dress”——“But how does it know it wants to wear a frock if it’s dead”?
Very good
There is no such thing as a “transgender person”. There are men and women, some of whom choose to claim they are the opposite sex to their actual sex.
Exactamondo. There’s male, female then confused/mentally ill. I think there’s a lot of normalising of mental illness and anti-social behaviour going on nowadays, which would not have been tolerated years gone by. And yes, transsexuals have always been with us and they’ve never been any bother or been plastered all over the news, but it’s like now there’s a new breed and they’re a danger to kids and a threat to society as a whole. Now any old pervert man can don a dress, proclaim he’s a *she* just so he can gain access to the women’s changing room or enter a female sports event. That shit never used to happen. Craziness…
SSSHHHHHHHH ——You will be dragged to the Gender Race Equality Diversity and Climate Gulag
She’s not a looker, and cow dung for brains.
Maybe she will look better dead and she can then go on the Dead People Dating Site.
Why doesn’t the stupid b**ch read new the WHO treaty and amendments that are going to toss away our sovereign rights to the WHO and the cronies that control it and do something about that instead of pissing away her time on stupid delusional crap that affects a minuscule percentage of people and even then is straight out of Alice in Wonderland?
And then they wonder why people’s opinion of politicians is low.
Nice one Stewart.
Such an unfortunate photo suggesting an irreversible brain implant.
I.D.G.A.F who you think you are. You could claim to be a flying unicorn for all I care, but once you impose your views over mine, we will most certainly clash. Guaranteed.
And I won’t crumble.
Much love.
Your lifelong, implacable & impertinent opponent.
GDA
In order to avoid being an outlier in the political class, the Conservative Party will now claim this Labour MP is being extreme. The Tories will propose, instead, a regulator to ensure the corpse cannot make this change less than 2 days nor more than 6 weeks after death and a fee has to be paid. Furthermore, it will absolutely be prohibited to make two changes; only one is to be allowed.
I fear we will all be requyired to change our gender and at that point I’m leaving.
Maybe helpline for the dead where they can be advised best how to look wearing a frock in their urn.
‘course they can. All they need to do is complete form XA96a and the record will be changed forever – or until either one of their children complete form XA96b or their parents complete XA96c. If both forms XA96b and XA96c are submitted then whichever was submitted first will be deemed invalid. In cases where multiple copies of XA96b are completed they will be weighted by the ratio of numbers of children (acknowledged or not) of the deceased to numbers of acknowledged parents.
Of course, if there is a valid marriage certificate it will need to be amended and substituted with a retrospective civil partnership certificate. In its absence any pension entitlements which the deceased accrued will revert to any surviving parents or grandparents or to the deceased’s dog or to the state.
Simple.
Marvellous
This article has disappeared
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/04/ex-whitehall-mandarin-led-premier-league-stasi-that-banned-newcastle-fan
What article?
I see no article…
Crikey tof. What’s going on?
A glitch in the matrix…
They’re coming…
Run!
Thank you – I thought I was going doolally (if that’s not offensive to the doolally community).
Methinks the legal department of the Prem might have been in touch.
Looks like it – as per below, article has disappeared from Telegraph.
Look forward to hearing from DS as to what’s going on there.
Yep ——–Toby come clean mate. ——-I notice the article about the Newcastle fan is still there though.
Has the Telegraph article (to which it referred) suffered the same fate?
Good spot – yes!
I would put on her tombstone. Here lies a man with two ar*eholes.
People cannot pay their mortgage or their energy bill. They are being treated like aliens in their own country and our daughters will soon have to wear a headscarf to school. We have men being told it is ok to use the womens loo. We are governed by a political class of WEF and UN lackeys, yet here is a squirming twerp worrying about the rights of dead people. ——-Are there actually any votes in that by the way?
Cool! The bishops can then remember Jesus of Nazareth as a transgender Person of the Trinity, alongside God our Mother, on account of the description of Him wearing ankle-length female attire, ‘tied under the paps’ (Revelation.i.13).
I started a list of things that are important to get fixed. I got to 50 and this still doesn’t make the list!
Brilliant idea. I intend to declare I’m still alive after I’ve “passed” and carry on claiming my pensions.