The BBC and other media outlets have publicised a disturbing claim in a Parliamentary report, that racism has played “a key role” in the deaths of pregnant women:
End racial disparities in maternal deaths – MPs
An MPs’ report is calling for faster progress to tackle “appalling” higher death rates for black women and those from poorer areas in childbirth.
The Women and Equalities Committee report says racism has played a key role in creating health disparities.
But the many complex causes are “still not fully understood” and more funding and maternity staff are also needed.
This is mostly based on a previous official report titled ‘Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care‘. (They have added some interviews with mothers who felt that their concerns were ignored for racist reasons.)
The first thing to note is that pregnant mothers are very safe, with a death rate of six per 100,000. Even taking a year-long period, and including indirect causes, deaths are extremely rare. Suicide and drugs/alcohol are prominent causes of the few deaths recorded, with cardiac disease and Covid of equal impact. (Hatched bars show direct causes, solid bars indirect causes.)
So, for example, Covid was an indirect cause of death because it happened more widely and not because of pregnancy.
Half the causes of death are not obstetric. This should be a warning bell about the interpretations later placed on the data.
Later data show that the greatest predictor of later death was pre-existing medical problems including obesity. Obesity is also given as a primary cause. Not receiving advice is also noted as a cause, though it’s not clear if this can be due to not taking advice despite antenatal classes being offered. Some of the case histories mention this, and it would be relevant to understanding causes, and could be compared to the take-up of vaccinations.
Table 2.9 gives us the figures regarding race differences, the subject of media attention on the Parliamentary statement, but also prominent in the summary of the research report.
The numbers, mercifully, are small. Childbirth is safe in the U.K. The ‘White European’ results are the only ones sizeable enough to merit detailed examination, and they show that direct and indirect causes are of almost equal power, slightly favouring indirect. The racial group deaths are few, and some noise is to be expected.
To put this report into context, as regards U.K. ‘Black Caribbean’ mothers, we are talking about three direct deaths and six indirect, so nine in all. ‘Black Africans’ (who probably have spent more of their lives in Africa), are five direct, eight indirect, 13 in all. Combine the two, eight direct, 14 indirect. Tiny numbers, but favouring indirect causes.
Here are the calculations of rates per 100,000.
The rates per 100,000 differ considerably, but the base populations also differ considerably, and there are 18 times more whites than blacks. When events are very rare it is probably better to give absolute results, rather than relative risk odds ratios, which could be misleading.
In my view the main finding is that some mothers are unwell prior to childbirth, and often die for reasons not directly caused by childbirth. Some of those causes of ill health are self-imposed.
The Parliamentary group seems to have gone overboard on a racism explanation for which there is no evidence in this study. Indeed, there is virtually no data analysis in this report at all. They give the basic demographics, but few if any two-by-two tables. They do not show correlations, nor do they construct and test any explanatory models. Can they predict from their findings what puts women at risk? Drugs, drink, being overweight? Little from the authors on these necessary questions. A simple multiple regression on the total sample would have been instructive. The list of participants is impressive, the data analysis rudimentary, and the use of relative risk over-dramatic given the very big differences in sample sizes.
As is usual, they give stern lectures to service providers about the need to further educate themselves. They say less, if anything at all, about mothers keeping themselves healthy, for their own sake and their babies’.
This article was first published on James Thompson’s Substack page, Psychological Comments. Subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
You can scroll through the Our World in Data page below but this tiny country with 2.64 million people, 372 dead *from* Covid ( so that’ll be an over-estimation no doubt ) and only approx 25% have had at least 1 death jab, therefore if the intention in locking down was to get injections into as many arms as possible, TPTB failed miserably in their agenda here didn’t they? WTF were they thinking locking down and predictably decimating a country such as this, or any African nation come to that?? Absolutely crazy and demonstrably no benefits have been shown as a result, only devastation for these poor people who were barely scraping by as it is.
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/gambia
I am sure you will understand my response Mogs.
Then there is Burundi – current death toll from the ‘rona at 38. This hasn’t changed since August 2021.
All going nicely to plan.
The ‘theft of the commons’ (see Iain Davies) starts by enforcing indebtedness on countries. Once the debts prove to be unserviceable the country effectively belongs to the lenders and the real looting can begin.
Exactly the same process is occurring in Ukraine and many other countries will go the same way. The ridiculous spending during lockdowns such as Track and Trace, Nightingales, Eat out to Help Out, Furlough etc were simply ways of ensuring we ratcheted our debt levels. Now this unserviceable spending is being replaced by the blatant importation of economically useless migrants which are costing £6-7 million per day and fighting a war which has nothing to do with us and clearly with money the country cannot afford. At some point Fishy and Chunt will “sadly” have to declare the country bankrupt and then we will no longer be sovereign and that’s it. The pretence of democracy will be removed and everyone will do as they are told.
There will be no recovery from this scenario short of revolution and bloodshed.
If you are correct, remember that crossbows do not require a licence
Great post.. I agree with every word..
Thanks George.
Isn’t it great how souvereign all these pseudonations became after decolonization had happened? One could almost believe this was an early outburst of neoliberalism — Shrink the state! Privatize Africa!
Whilst we make aid reliant on Net Zero, China will offer aid them regardless of that – it’s obvious which way they will jump.
Sky News segment on bombing in Odessa & the clearing up of bomb damage in the aftermath. Sure wish that I had the super strength powers of the women clearing away the huge blocks of damaged building….
https://news.sky.com/video/ukraine-war-what-do-we-know-about-the-latest-attack-on-odesa-12926106
Lockdowns lovers and Net Zero maniacs don’t care about Africans.
They’ll let them die on the altar of Net Zero
These posters should be proof read at least three times. There is no excuse for errors of grammar or syntax.
Just as well the WHO and our Governments acted so swiftly to “save” the lives of very elderly people, some of whom got an extra few months of life …. but with no quality of life whatsoever.
Tragedy! This is obviously set to get worse if the new WHO proposals and International Health Regulations are implemented.
And you have not yet discussed the toll on education- without laptops….
Collateral Global has highlighted these issues for a few years now.
Unfortunately when I mentioned any of this to people in the U.K. their eyes glazed over.