COVID-19 vaccines must be suspended owing to the level of reported injuries and deaths across all age groups and a full inquiry launched into the MHRA, the regulator which approved them, a group of experts has said.
In a groundbreaking new report sent to every member of Parliament, the Perseus group – a team of experts from the fields of medicine, pharmaceutical regulation and safety management – has set out in detail the numerous concerns raised by experts globally about the vaccines and the specific concerns about the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) responsible for giving them the green light.
“MHRA announced that it has morphed from ‘watchdog’ to ‘enabler’. Would anyone be concerned if that was said by the Office for Nuclear Regulation, the Civil Aviation Authority or the Defence Safety Regulator,” Perseus group spokesman Nick Hunt said.
The evident lack of interest in post-rollout issues with the COVID-19 vaccines was highlighted as particularly shocking.
Before the rollout in December 2020 the MHRA promised a rigorous “four-strand proactive vigilance” of Covid vaccine safety. But freedom of information requests have revealed that very little of this work is being done. The single report supplied from the “Targeted Active Monitoring” strand was 15 months old, from August 2021, the report says.
The group slams the MHRA for failing to act on problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine for months after many other national regulators suspended and withdrew it for certain age groups. The MHRA also continued to ignore “ever increasing evidence of Covid vaccine risks, notably blood clotting, heart inflammation, neurological conditions, immune downgrading and menstrual disorders”, the report states.
The secrecy around Covid vaccines in particular is blasted, with key documents on risks versus benefits that are routinely published for other medicines being absent for Covid vaccines. “This compromised informed consent,” notes the group.
Other problems include that the MHRA authorised the mRNA products as vaccines, which have lower regulatory requirements, rather than properly classifying them as novel genetic products, and that it failed to identify and address problems with manufacturing and quality control, leading to batch quality problems.
More general criticisms of the agency include that it assesses the safety of a medicine relative to its benefit rather than in absolute terms, which the report likens to the Nuclear Regulator saying, “Our nuclear power station is safe because it has fewer contaminated water leaks than other stations”.
The regulator also nowhere defines the tolerable rate of fatal and serious side-effects of new medicines, which the report blames for its slowness to act when problems emerge.
Freedom of information requests also reveal, alarmingly, that the MHRA has no process for investigating Yellow Card reports of adverse events potentially linked to the COVID-19 vaccines or other medicines. This, the report highlights, is just one facet of a broader lack of the kind of robust safety management systems and processes that are standard in other safety critical sectors such as aviation, defence, nuclear, oil and gas and rail. Similarly, freedom of information requests reveal that there has never been a safety audit of MHRA.
The report’s findings are damning and expose a regulator not fit for purpose and clearly failing in its basic aim of keeping the public safe from harmful medical products.
Concerns about the MHRA are nothing new. The 2020 Cumberlege report listed basic safety and governance issues that the Commons Health Select Committee in December 2022 noted with concern were slow in being addressed. But the new Perseus group report lays out in devastating detail for the first time how the MHRA’s longstanding failings have directly impacted on the disastrous rollout of the Covid vaccines.
The Perseus group suggests that anyone who shares its concerns could write to his or her MP to ask if they have read the report and what they intend to do. Other suggested actions include signing the petition to “Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for COVID-19 vaccines” and signing the open letter to the Health Secretary organised by the Together Declaration.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Funded by B&M Gates & best friends with Chelsea Clinton.
Sridhar is the living embodiment of an establishment puppet.
I asked you this already, but regardless – have you played the Dane yet?
As a youth I used to weep in butcher’s shops.
The COVID science was always an interdisciplinary effort: Whoever had some well-sounding academic or at least medical title and was willing to have the right oponions in public could – no matter what his field of expertise, if any, actually was – become part of The Very Wise Sages®
‘Science’? No $cientism. Follow the money.
Real science has been dead since maths and models usurped physical reality (mid 19th century).
Einstein is a famous example (there are few things as stupid as relativity).
This non-Scot whatever she/zhe is has no idea about the immune system.
No one can prove to me that flying viruses exist.
Bacteria can’t exist outside a host.
“Devi Sridhar’s Knowledge of the Epidemiology of Respiratory Viruses Could be Written on the Back of a Postage Stamp”Wasn’t it blindingly obvious?
I always remember the great Ian Brown’s Twitter post in response to comments on his Twitter feed, which contained some “vaccine sceptical” views from smart-alecs along the lines of “Stick to singing mate, you don’t know anything about medicine”. His answer “OK, but you’re taking medical advice from a computer salesman” (Billy, in case you were wondering).
It must be harder for the authors to stomach than for the rest of us – their profession has disgraced itself despite their best efforts to do the right thing. A lifetime of work betrayed by the wicked, the stupird, the selfish and the lazy.
“A lifetime of work” is the issue here – all that study, all those exams, the belief that they were doing the right thing because the process drove them in that direction. To suggest or to ask them now to double check they did the right thing, they thought they knew the right thing, “the science” and were they in the wrong after all? It doesn’t bear thinking about. What a loss of face and of status. Better to double down and see no evil, hear no evil…
”If other countries can do it, there is no reason why we can’t, too.”
As Sir Desmond Swayne put it in a question in the Commons: “Herd stupidity”.
Quite, I still want to check out his voting record on all matters relating to CV NPIs etc ….
I think he voted against most/all of it – when they had votes. Lots of stuff was passed without a vote early on.
Credit where it is due. Clearly the estimed Doctors Heneghan and Jeffries have had enough of pussy-footing politeness and have opened an “who dares wins assault” and frankly I don’t blame them.
The time has come to get rid of the whole lot of them and this waste of space oxygen thief Sridhar deserves to be amongst the first.
A horrible blot on humanity.
When four days ago, I pointed out that Sridhar’s expertise lay in the field of anthropology and that perhaps an epidemiology/medicine/virology qualification might be better suited to her post as chair of Global Public Health (aka ‘the pandemic professor), three folk gave down votes. Prof’ Heneghan would seem to agree with my comment. Thank heaven I took his and Mike Yeadon’s advice and remain unstabbed.
As for the Olympically dim Richard Burgon, it doesn’t surprise me that he pinned his colours to Sridhar’s mast and is likely to be a front bencher in Starmer’s upcoming clown show. Sheesh!
All lockdowns do is kick the can down the road. Simply explainable with two packs of cards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4kWbYlopN4
I’m a subscriber to TTE. Neil (perhaps the Neil who comments here – hope he doesn’t mind me quoting him) said this:
“First time I saw Devi on TV and heard she is a professor in the dept of public health at Edinburgh I had to find her background and was comforted to read she’s an anthropologist who wrote a book with the young Clinton. I thought that explained why her knowledge of virology and medicine differed from my 50 year old knowledge.
She was reported to be one of crankies favourites.
This last week has been a great relief to realise my understanding is ok!”