- “Vaccine makers ‘standing ready’ for human bird flu pandemic” – Vaccine makers GSK, Moderna, and CSL Seqirus are developing new human shots, while others such as Sanofi have said they have the capacity to churn out a sizeable number of jabs, reports the Mail.
- “Devastating, horrific – the jab’s true effect on mothers-to-be ” – Sally Beck looks at the evidence on Covid vaccine safety in pregnancy for TCW
- “Purveyors of Hate” – Dr. Robert Malone looks at the problem of defamation, which he has experienced, and what individuals can do about it.
- “Kylan deGhetaldi’s story: Why YouTube removed all his music videos” – A single anti-Covid vaccine video can result in YouTube removing all your content over 16 years and banning you for life, says Steve Kirsch.
- “Billions blown on the great wind farms rip-off” – Wind farms have had a lot of subsidy over the last couple of decades, and the total cost is rising by billions every year, writes Andrew Montford in TCW.
- “U.N. Is A Climate ‘Disinformation Threat Actor’” – If the U.N. and U.S. Government are so committed to censoring disinformation, why are they themselves spreading it, asks Michael Shellenberger.
- “Prince Harry and Meghan back group that accuses parents of ‘gendering’ unborn children” – The Archetypes podcast has a partnership with the Global Boyhood Initiative, which encourages primary school children to question ‘gender norms’, according to the Telegraph.
- “Tory councillor suspended over ‘I don’t want Pride sex flags’ post” – Angela Kilmartin has been suspended from the local Conservative group for 21 days, pending further investigation, reports the Telegraph.
- “Something queer is going on at the headquarters of Oxfam” – Oxfam has given up just stuffing food into the mouths of hungry people worldwide, and is now stuffing its employees’ heads with politically correct nonsense, writes Dr. Roger Watson in the New Conservative.
- “Nicola Sturgeon admits blundering over trans rights meltdown as she dismisses SNP’s woes as ‘growing pains’ in interview on ITV’s Loose Women” – In an interview on ITV’s Loose Women, Nicola Sturgeon said she took responsibility for failing to generate a “rational debate” about her Government’s abortive gender identity overhaul, reports the Mail.
- “Feminist teacher, 57, wins battle to overturn police ‘hate incident’ recorded against her after being accused of ‘transphobia’ over social media posts” – Cathy Kirby from Norwich had police officers contact her after trans activists claimed her posts on Twitter were ‘transphobic’, but she has now had the ‘hate incident’ removed from her record.
- “Peer disinvited from university debating society over support for Ricky Gervais trans joke” – Organisers claimed they were “strong armed” and “bullied” into cancelling the event by the university’s student union, the Telegraph reports.
- “The cultural revolution is devouring sport” – From football to NASCAR, every sport is now a platform for relentless propaganda, says Frank Furedi in Spiked.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Allison deleted the post on X, ergo there may be a prima facie case, else why was it deleted?
When was the tweet deleted and was it deleted in anticipation of the actions which plod later undertook?
Not committing a crime is not a “case”.
Since the police did not tell her which tweet it was, she cannot say she deleted it.
X do not delete posts, therefore Allison deleted the post, so why?
Please could someone enlighten me: what exactly did Allison say?
Impossible to say because the police did not say which tweet it was.
So then if the police doesn’t tell her which tweet they found objectionable, what is she supposed to do about it?
Doesn’t anybody accused have a right to know what he or she is accused of?
She may be told at interview (she is taking an FSU lawyer). However, as we know, the process is the punishment not the conclusion.
So how does it go then?
The police turn on at your house.
They tell you someone made a complaint about you but they can’t tell you what it is.
Then what?
If they have no reasonable grounds to suspect that you committed s crime, what right do they have to trouble you?
That’s not uncommon for the British police to do. I once got pulled out of a pub by the police to record my personal details and told this was done because I was considered a suspect in some crime. I asked what that crime was but they wouldn’t tell me. Some months later, I got called by the police and asked to come to the police station for an interview because I was considered a suspect in some crime. When I again asked what that crime was, they again wouldn’t tell me, for my own protection, as I was told. Yet some time later, I got another call and they told that they didn’t consider me a suspect anymore and hence, I wouldn’t need to come for the interview.
I have still absolutely no idea what this was about.
I also think it is very difficult to defend yourself if you don’t know what it is all about. Can you just not refuse to come to the police station until you know what it is all about?
This is all too ridiculous.
If they arrest you on suspicion, they must say what the suspicion is, in this case probably stirring up racial haterid (which I doubt she did). You do not need to do anything until you are arrested, and at that point a competent lawyer will want full details of everything. You need say nothing. The police will probably refuse to say anything to the Lawyer, which leaves an impasse that the Police hate. Then they have to charge or release you. An NCHI should not be recorded anyway, it is NOT a crime and should never be disclosed. At that point, if disclosed, sue the Police! Not a Crime. They can never prove stirring up racial haterid, who is the witness, someone admitting they hate you? It is simply an allegation of opinion.
The attack on free-speech (and its replacement by government-approved speech) which we can see all around us isn’t an accident, a slip-up, an oversight, or a mistake. It is our government’s fundamental policy, and is designed to facilitate our degenerate Establishment’s central project: the Great Replacement. Indeed, without the destruction of free-speech this project cannot succeed. This is why our response has to be to insist on free-speech in all circumstances.
To the bandwagon-jumping ex-government. You were (supposedly) in charge from 2010 until 2024. This all happened on your watch.
Did you know about this yet choose to do nothing, perhaps through cowardice? Were you blissfully unaware and therefore utterly clueless? Are you suddenly seeing things clearly because you lost power?
Shall we take your wails as sincere or simply as attempts to become electable once more?
Jog on. You’ll have to do much better than that.
Totally agree.
All of a sudden Liz Truss, Ian Duncan Smith, Robert Jenrick go all apoplectic and huff and puff about this, when they had 14 years to abolish “non/hate crime incidents” and did nothing.
Boris Johnson’s a fine one to talk and presumes we all suffer amnesia. These incidents also happened under the Tories. This is from May this year;
”A police force was last night accused of ‘trampling’ over democracy after detectives allegedly put pressure on a local Tory party to unseat a colleague wrongly accused of a hate crime.
Anthony Stevens, a Conservative councillor in Northamptonshire, was arrested last year after posting an image from a video – first revealed by The Mail on Sunday – of a Christian preacher having his bible wrested off him by police in the street.
The father of two was held for nine hours, during which he was also quizzed about his online support of another politician who criticised gay pride events. Mr Stevens, 51, a member of Wellingborough Town Council, was released and later told that no further action would be taken against him.
But the MoS can now reveal that days before Mr Stevens was arrested, a Northamptonshire Police detective phoned Jonathan Ekins, a former local Tory mayor for Wellingborough, and allegedly told him Mr Stevens should be ‘removed’ as a councillor because of his views.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13434031/Police-accused-trampling-democracy-detectives-pressure-local-Tory-party-unseat-councillor-arrested-wrongly-accused-hate-crime.html
Remember your rights, so says Black belt barrister. It seems to be happening to a lot of people;
”NOTE: Article 10 (Freedom of expression) is a protected right.
This must not be eroded by the establishment.”
https://x.com/dshensmith/status/1856603097910374651
There’s some debate on the interwebs whether the Police were making a call about an alleged non-crime hate incident or establishing the groundwork for the investigation of a real crime.
In any even the general advice seems to be to tell the police only what they are legally entitled to know and make sure you make no further comment without your solicitor being present and advising you.
Just out of curiosity, what are the police “legally entitled to know”?
The Police as I think we can all agree have been superb at their jobs, All burglaries and thefts are solved and the thieves imprisoned, likewise any woman raped, or assaulted can be assured that the attacker will be brought to justice, knife crime a thing of the past, likewise terrorists, Shoplifters all caught. Yes I think we can all agree the Police have done such a sterling job that they have so much free time on their hands they can now go after all of those who say hurty words that conflict with the big book of approved words, beliefs and sayings of our political masters and our betters.
I know that if my car .phone, property is stolen or vandalised the Police will have it sorted and solved by ——————————–errr
Agreed, Freedom Loving Boris, Starmer’s the sort of person who fine someone £50,000 for opening a gym or a hairdressers in March 2020.
Hold on a minute, in March 2020 we found out that it was only your own freedom you loved Boris.
Whoever sent those police to intimidate her on Remembrance Sunday, of all days, for freedom of speech A YEAR AGO, showed their treasonous contempt for the Armed Forces of the West.
Never mind “Starmer’s Britain” – NCHIs were invented and enhanced under the tories, so button it, BoJo.
What really happened in Amsterdam…
https://youtu.be/DvTyg1kJGzM?si=-PwR6ncKHSl9utD3
We must be extremely careful what we believe in media in this modern age of misinformation..
Question absolutely everything..
I wont bother saying it…….. Yes i will… I told you so..
Thank you for providing this link. It confirms what I read recently about the Amsterdam attack being started by Israeli youths, but I couldn’t find the article again.
Allison was one of the few speaking truth through Covid. I suspect she is too effective and they are trying to shut her up
This is the most important thing to have happened for some time. Free speech is being eroded. She is “visited” without reason or charge, which is the same tactic as the Gestapo used in NAZI Germany. People are just taken away never to be seen again! I don’t think we have concentration camps yet (boncentration bamps in Pythoneese) but you never know. Join the FSU now!
Worth reading in full it says at the bottom. Actually, no it isn’t because the whole thing is a wonderful example of totally incompetent journalism from the legacy media.
The police visited Pearson – on a badly chosen day – to arrange a formal interview at a police station in relation to an alleged offence under Section 17 of the Public Order Act. So all this media hot air about non-crime hate incidents – which are a stupid idea of course – is totally wrong. The police are investigating a possible crime although one that many of us here would consider complete bollocks. And without knowing what was tweeted further comment is pointless.
As more information has been revealed – not noticed so far by the DS – this has become a glorious example of the utter incompetence of the police, in fact THREE police forces as well as the expected failure of the legacy media. The possible ‘offensive’ post has been found by the Guardian but the slight problem is that it was NOT posted from Allison Pearson’s account.