HART’s recent ‘Null Hypothesis‘ article postulates and evidences a succinct summary of the happenings of the last three years: “The hypothesis that will likely stand the test of time goes like this: a nasty — if not particularly unusual — respiratory disease season was turned into a catastrophe by human misadventure, and this catastrophe was compounded by efforts to save face and justify the unjustifiable“.
In answering the question “what happened”, we did not attempt to tackle the obvious follow-up question (apart from a brief discussion about social contagion): “why did it happen?”
The sceptical community – living up to its decentralised worldview – is not short of opinions and theories, robustly debated. These are too numerous to cover in detail in this short piece: it suffices to say that they cover a wide spectrum ranging from calamitous ineptitude (and innumeracy) of politicians and civil servants, deceitful and underhand sales and marketing by nefarious global corporations, efforts by the elite to enrich themselves by impoverishing the middle classes and the digital enslavement of the masses, through to some more esoteric beliefs covering depopulation agendas, eugenics and long-in-the-planning Satanic plots… the list just goes on and on.
As many of the most ardent supporters of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions (PIs and NPIs) begin to wake up to the collateral damage they helped bring about, it is instructive to stand back and observe tried-and-tested Biblical precedent being re-enacted. Few are not enjoying seeing the pantomime villain Matt Hancock being hoist by his own self-promoting petard via the Oakeshott WhatsApp trove. After all, who does not take some satisfaction from the fall of a petty tyrant? But much like the goat that gets bestowed with the sins of the community in Leviticus (“the goat will carry on itself all their iniquities”) before being cast out into the wilderness (thus avoiding a full and frank ‘lessons learned’ exercise), the demonisation of this preening ’cock (or monkey) does not necessarily get us much further in terms of identifying whodunnit — who was the organ grinder? After all, a self-promoting chancer whose self-confessed epidemiological education is based on a studious viewing of the film Contagion is demonstrably not an evil Blofeld mastermind. Indeed, some sceptics have attempted to use the Telegraph’s Lockdown Files to scotch any discussion of conspiracy and underscore their belief that the disastrous events of 2020-2022 were ‘merely’ a cock-up.
But that simplistic take assumes that the former Secretary of State for Health was more than just a bumbling low-grade chaos agent intent on filling his boots via fast-track procurement channels. Loathsome though he might be, Hancock and his cronies are a symptom – not a cause – of the pit we find ourselves in. Why did he – and the Prime Minister at the time, Boris Johnson – get themselves into such a pickle such that they were not able to navigate a more rational – and less damaging – course through the crisis?
The answer is probably to be found somewhere within what one might term the ‘pandemic preparedness industry‘ as outlined a few months ago in the Daily Sceptic:
The response to the COVID-19 pandemic represented the triumph of a pseudo-scientific biosecurity agenda that emerged in 2005 and has been pushed ever since by a well-organised, well-funded and well-embedded network of ideologues. These fanatics promote and perpetuate the ideas underpinning the draconian new approach by publishing them in leading journals, planting them in public policy and law, pushing them in the media and smearing those who dissent, however eminent or well-qualified.
This avenue of investigation is, we believe, more likely to lead to the source of our misadventure than attempting to rationalise ‘scorched earth’ attempts at containment, suppression and eradication of a killer virus. There was only ever a warped logic to these actions, unless – one way or the other (perhaps for the ‘greater good’ or simply for old-fashioned crony capitalist ends) – you wanted to create a favourable backdrop for a new set of medical interventions that might otherwise have met with limited take-up or even downright opposition. Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty advised government ministers in February 2020(!) that Covid was not deadly enough to justify fast-tracking vaccines. Put another way, earth could not have been scorched in this way if seasonal respiratory disease had not been given a name such that ‘scariants’ could be “deployed” to “frighten the pants off” the general populace.
Whether the driving force behind these fanatics is saintly goodwill, pure greed, corruption – or even a Luciferian conspiracy for that matter – is beside the point. What is essential to understand is how a nasty seasonal respiratory disease season was weaponised to drive one of the greatest policy failures of all time. There does not necessarily need to be a single cartoon villain masterminding events for multiple parties to conspire (‘breathe together’) to create a great evil.
With this backdrop one does not even need to ferret around in the weeds to find out more. Last summer’s detailed Politico/Welt Special Report sheds plentiful quanta of light on the matter (emphasis mine):
Four [supra-national] health organisations, working closely together, spent almost $10 billion on responding to Covid across the world. But they lacked the scrutiny of governments… While nations were still debating the seriousness of the pandemic, the groups identified potential vaccine makers and targeted investments in the development of tests, treatments and shots.
The four organisations had worked together in the past, and three of them shared a common history. The largest and most powerful was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the largest philanthropies in the world. Then there was Gavi, the global vaccine organisation that Gates helped to found to inoculate people in low-income nations, and the Wellcome Trust, a British research foundation with a multibillion dollar endowment that had worked with the Gates Foundation in previous years. Finally, there was the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, or CEPI, the international vaccine research and development group that Gates and Wellcome both helped to create in 2017. …
The World Health Organisation (WHO) was crucial to the groups’ rise to power. All had longstanding ties to the global health body. The boards of both CEPI and Gavi have a specially designated WHO representative. There is also a revolving door between employment in the groups and work for the WHO: Former WHO employees now work at the Gates Foundation and CEPI; some, such as Chris Wolff, the deputy director of country partnerships at the Gates Foundation, occupy important positions. Much of the groups’ clout with the WHO stems simply from money. …
“They’re funded by their own capabilities and or endowments and trusts. But when they step into multilateral affairs, then who keeps watch over them?” a former senior U.S. official said. “I don’t know the answer to that. That’s quite provocative.”
Consider this small early 2020 cameo featuring senior executives from one of these four organisations:
When it first became clear that this disease was appearing, Richard [Hatchett] and I sat down and said, we know what happened with the last swine flu pandemic, where wealthy countries bought up all the doses [of Pandemrix] that were… available for the developing world, we have to try to do something different about that.
Most normal people draw entirely different conclusions from the swine flu saga, not least the absolutely devastating tale of Pandemrix, a giant swindle involving misuse of taxpayer funds to purchase these doses in the first place, the substantial human damage that they then caused, a subsequent cover-up and then further cost to the taxpayer compensating those affected.
Contrast this with CEPI’s ‘mission’: “Vaccines are one of our most powerful tools in the fight to outsmart epidemics. The development of vaccines can help save lives, protect societies and restabilise economies.”
There you have it: the ‘saviour vaccine’, a sacred cow extolled with messianic zeal. It seems that one of the world’s greatest policy failures happens to neatly coincide with the stated aims of the Fantabulous Four. Food for thought given that there is no example of a vaccine ever defeating a sudden onset viral epidemic, let alone a ‘pandemic’ (there is also the question of whether viral pandemics are in any way even a hypothetical threat to modern societies — unless, of course, one incorrectly pins the blame for iatrogenic collateral damage on said virus).
Following the money, therefore, it is not that much of a surprise what came next: while — as pointed out above — “nations were still debating the seriousness of the pandemic” (i.e., correctly monitoring the possibility of a more-serious-than-usual respiratory disease season), the Fantabulous Four were busy setting the scene with targeted investments to create fertile ground to fulfil their aims. Consider then:
- Who might have benefited from a social media campaign showing those faked ‘deaths in the street’ in China?
- Who might have considered funding a social media ‘bot army’ to promote lockdowns, interventions that as per Neil Ferguson’s ‘seminal’ fear-mongering March 16th 2020 paper could only conceivably make any sort of logical sense if they were followed in short order by a ‘saviour vaccine’, as explicitly stated by Ferguson and co-authors in that paper (“these policies will need to be maintained until large stocks of vaccine are available”)?
- Who might have benefited from squashing an early ‘lab leak’ theory that might have implicated some of the Fantabulous Four and the justification for a fast-track vaccine rollout?
- Conversely, once said rollout had been successfully funded and procured at eye-watering expense, who might have benefited from refloating the ‘lab leak’ theory to help justify future ‘pandemic preparedness’?
- Who might benefit from tightly controlling media output and censorship (after all, “true content… might promote vaccine hesitancy”)? Who was writing this script?
- WHO might wish to publish — in 2022 — detailed recommendations about how those in authority should respond to a ‘vaccine crisis’ (defined as any occurrence that “will most likely or has already eroded public trust in vaccines… and may create uncertainty”)?
- Why only the vaccine ‘pillar’ of the WHO’s wish list, the ACT-A (Access to Covid Tools Accelerator), received the funding that was sought? And why did all others on that ACT-A list — most notably cheap therapeutics that might have saved many lives (while of course competing with lucrative vaccines) — remain well short of their funding targets?
This congruency of the categorical trinity — means, motive and opportunity — is difficult to explain away. It is true that much that happened from March 2020 was anarchic, uncontrolled, panicked and unscripted. But there was method to the madness, an ultimate aim to the chaos, namely to make way for a ‘saviour vaccine’ that would only be accepted if the intended recipients had had ‘the pants frightened off them’, i.e., were sufficiently afraid of the alternatives to risk such an unproven medical intervention.
It may conceivably be that many people involved in the Fantabulous Four believe that this collective action was necessary. But collective action – however well meaning – that is dictated by a group and imposed on everyone else is tyranny, pure and simple. It gets worse if authorities are sufficiently captured by this tyranny such that they deploy subversive psychological weaponry on their citizens and suppress any dissent.
These are grave misdeeds that led to great harm, both in terms of bad outcomes and collateral damage from unnecessary non-pharmaceutical interventions, but also from the utterly unnecessary coercion used to foist pharmaceutical interventions on those that did not need them.
Even if we presuppose that there are no evil Blofeld-types standing behind all of this, it is beyond doubt that a fanatical ideology has inspired an evil tyranny. As per the Daily Sceptic: “This ideology is the enemy, and seeing it for what it is is the first step to defeating it”.
This process has begun.
First published by the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART). Sign up for newsletters here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
More doubling down on the (Gates funded) Scripps Research Institute wet market zoonotic origins theory from the Telegraph’s Sarah Newey – Cub reporter on its Global Health Security team, whose coverage incidentally is partly funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/covid-origins-new-genetic-material-china-points-raccoon-dogs/
“It Was A ‘Vaccine Strategy’ From The Start”
Never!
You don’t say!
Is it just me? Or is the daily sceptic becoming more mainstream?
It’s just you.
Not judging by the ‘likes’.
All about likes is it? And how many of the downvoters bother to say why?
I’m saying that the amount of likes you have indicates you have support, therefore it’s obviously not just you who thinks that. And I agree that people who ‘dislike’ a post but don’t offer up any sort of reply are cowardly gits who get off in lurking in the shadows because they’re incapable of reasonable and intelligent debate. Well that’s my interpretation of it anyway.
Well said!
Ooh, I have touched a nerve haven’t I?
What’s up, not strong enough to be questioned? Everyone must be questioned, that’s the whole point of this site! so climb down from your high horses or your as unaccepting to opposing opinions as the woke!
I think it’s more the mainstream is becoming more ‘daily sceptic’.
Wouldn’t that be good!
I think its that the range of points of view is getting wider, which is in the end a good thing, as it means debate and questioning is being encouraged, I agree I found some articles frustrating because like everyone, I can become sort of fixed in my own view of things, but I think as long as the daily sceptic is covering a range of views with evidence as to why the writer thinks the way they do that’s healthy. The MSM has narrowed themselves to one narrative dependent upon its sponsors and owners views, as we see from the interference of big Pharma and Gates sponsorship shutting down debate and skewing the writing.
I think the Sceptic is still ok, but as with all things vigilence is needed.
Well said, we must not allow ourselves to become a one sided opinion or we will be no better than the ones we slag off!
I think we risk becoming a group think if our only reference point is ‘the exact opposite of what we are being told’. Scepticism must allow us the freedom to question and judge what we see and hear without mindlessly condemning it. We are seeking the truth, and there are many angles that the truth can be viewed from.
Here here!
No; the mainstream is becoming more Daily Sceptic…
Evil and demonic powers do exist.
There are very evil people controlling levers of power.
Truss said as much and she was discussing just the financial markets.
Pharma owns governments, media, uni labs, ‘research papers’ etc.
NSW gov’t had to resign in 2021 over corruption – $65 mn paid to many of them. Fake news says no no no. Never happened. Farce checked.
A rounding error for pharma. Cost of business.
Cicero, cui bono?
Follow the money and you find the $cience.
Every single Rona event was paid for from media propaganda, fake research, fake tests, fake positives, fake tracing and tracking, fake deaths, all the beds, machines, signage, all the moronic theatre. Everything. What do you think the incentive is when you can claim Rona and collect money?
$cience is so corrupted, so debased and raped, a new word will have to be created and used to describe actual, real science. Same for the fake news complex. News is propaganda. Conspiracy is now news.
“Evil and demonic powers do exist.”
Spot on Ferd , and they are nothing to do with the supernatural! Evil entities are the least of our problems when you’ve got Billy Gates and anal schwab!
The Expose News team putting together a handy amount of evidence that the virus was made in a lab…I think that with the stellar efforts of people such as David Martin, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova and many more, we can put this whole thing to bed now as far as I’m concerned. The jury’s in and I don’t know how much more evidence we need that the thing was made in a lab and deliberately released, the entire fiasco took years of planning, novel pseudo-vaccines were needed to be put in every arm as this was necessary for the next phase of the plan. Anybody still whining on about animals being the culprits at this stage needs to go back to sleep or get their head read.
”Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab,” said Chan. “This definitely tips the scales for me. And I think it should do that for many other scientists too.”
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal – this is the Eco health alliance DARPA funding proposal.
Oh dear. That really nails it. DARPA confirms that Peter Daszac of the Eco Health Alliance submitted a proposal on 2018March27 to add an HIV1 type furin cleavage site to SARS1. SARS CoV 2 has that furin cleavage site. In fact the double CGG codon Furin cleavage site is the main difference between Covid-19 and the Bat Coronavirus RaGT13. Fauci funded Wuhan through the Eco Health Alliance.”
https://expose-news.com/2023/03/16/covid-was-made-in-a-biolab-fauci-gates-moderna-are-responsible/
Has Sasha changed her position Mogwai? Unless I have misunderstood (always possible; I’m a bit thick!) Sasha doesn’t think that anyone has the technology to have created SARS-CoV-2 in a lab.
There is a strand of thought that the whole lab leak theory is a misdirection. I think Nick Hudson from Panda subscribes to this theory too. I am not sure what to believe now if I am honest. I thought all the molecular biology points towards a lab origin but obviously I don’t know enough to judge and have to rely on others.
I know exactly how you feel – it reminds me of trying to get my head around calculus at school. I think there are four mainstream theories now:
I think I tend towards the second or third explanations!
I think whether the virus was real or not doesn’t matter. It was the suppression of treatments and the vaccine that has done all the damage.
Yes I agree to a certain extent…it could have been any cold/flu..it was the weaponisation of it that is the big problem…
I am in lockstep with you Mogs.
As I posted yesterday I believe this issue is settled – brewed in a lab to a concocted recipe. End of.
… and deliberately released.
Yes indeed.
A good listen this week is RFK Jr on the Defender podcast talking to Sasha Latypova. The gene therapy injections are a bio weapon owned by the military industrial complex and marketed by Pfizer and Moderna. The whole shit show was about the “vaccines”. Which I guess we all knew. The more you learn the more frightening it becomes. Hardly a week goes by without a new revelation blowing my mind. If only the sheeple new. Mad Tinfoil hatters the lot of us.
I love a nice Furin cleavage!
To all of that you need to add the role of those with an authoritarian mindset within our society who all of a sudden saw the opportunity to indulge their authoritarian impulses.
These people are numerous and can be found all over, some in important positions of responsibility, some among the general public. They are everywhere. And they became our Gestapo over these nightmare years.
I agree with th cockup theorists that a handful of people can’t perpetrate all this. But you don’t need knowing cooperation either. Authoritarian and collectivists, of which there are many, are the useful idiots of the “Fab Four”.
They are also the useful idiots of the net zero pushers, the woke agenda pushers, basically the useful idiots of pretty much every despot and tyrant throughout history.
Excellent article. It perfectly elucidates my stance – which is that both malice and incompetence has brought about this hellish period of human existence.
Good article…I don’t know how we get them to stop though. Does anyone think any of the entities like WHO, CEPI, the Welcome Trust, give a bit of a dam what we ordinary folk think?
I hope that mass resistance, or even plain old complacency, will stop anyone from getting more of the gunk at least…..
Andrew Bridgen spoke about vaccine injuries again…to an empty House yesterday, and got the usual mealy-mouthed Government response..the fact that there was little actual scientific evidence or facts in that response doesn’t seem to deter
…and what about the fact that exactly the same thing is happening in response to the ‘non-environmental disaster’ supposedly just around the corner?
I can only think that the people running the large, very rich corporations, at the top of the money-tree are making all the decisions, and that Governments have become so dependent on them, and are literally so captured by their money and power that they go along with any agenda they come up with…..I don’t know how else to explain it…?
(https://rumble.com/v2dkxea-british-mp-andrew-bridgen-leads-an-adjournment-debate-on-the-efficacy-of-th.html
His speech has already been banned by YouTube..another example if we needed it of untrammelled corporate power..which no Government seems to want to check, even though it goes to the very heart of free speech …and in our Parliament!)
Andrew Bridgen should be the main talking point today ! Reading HMG issued data on Jab damage in the HOC he was blanked & it looked like it was old Plebgate himself who told MP,s to leave the chamber as AB got up to speak , also since then You Tube have taken AB,s speech down !! Are we nuts or is it them ? It’s surreal by any stretch of the imagination. AB is a Hero btw
I’m seriously surprised Andrew’s speech wasn’t featured in the Round-up this morning. Weird. It’s way more significant than yet another crappy Telegraph article.
Yes it’s Got to be the Main story in Town !! The subject Trumps everything from the Dawn of time !
And the little scummy shits creeping out of the room, demonstrating clear as day which side they’re on. Not the side of truth, justice and scientific debate, evidently! He was referring to government data FFS
Large corporations don’t mind all the ESG regulation. Regulation generally benefits Large incumbents who have the resources to deal with the regulation.
In small to midsized companies people often have to take on several roles and regulations become one more thing to juggle.
Bridgen talking in parliament being banned by YouTube should absolutely be a news item on the DS. Let’s hope they get round to it.
“Bridgen banned from YouTube”. From what we have seen about the links between government and big-tech this was probably on the instructions of government. Every word he said was backed up by the government’s own data, and yet it will have been tagged as mis-information simply because it does not fit the government narrative.
See also how the UN gets money and influence from the climate scare.
it would not be possible for any of these scenarios to develop if Governments had not got into the habit of following the opinions or “advice” of anonymous international bodies. These are often offshoots from the UN or the EU.
civil servants are closely linked to them and press Ministers to obey but most Ministers seem to be an open door. UK tax payer funded senior staff also develop their own policy through tax payer funded groups which are seriously damaging to democracy. The range from the LGS to Common Purpose and the police senior officers association.
These are ideal for exploitation by the left and it may be too late to save democracy from them all.
“preening ’cock (or monkey)”. Doesn’t really capture the evil clearly evident in Hancock’s actions.
Yes, but the point is he’s just a minor – temporary – player.
I doubt if that is of any comfort to anyone who lost a family member or loved one to any of his preening, narcissistic self absorbed, self promotion and ultimately political not science based actions during his time as Secretary of State for health. Oh yes, my mother died as as result of Midazolam and morphine respiratory depression caused by the administration of medication ordered by Matt Hancock, but it’s ok, he was just a minor – temporary – player.
My condolences on your loss.
I’m not saying that because he’s a “minor – temporary – player” that he should be let off the hook. Quite the contrary. The point I am a making is that for justice to be done we need to punish both the organ grinder AND the monkey, and part of that process is recognising that these terrible deeds were not perpetrated by Hancock acting solo. This will also provide a better deterrence in future – we might not be able to eradicate evil completely, but we can shine a light and make it harder for evil deeds to go unpunished.
“But was there an ultimate aim to the chaos, namely to make way for a ‘saviour vaccine’ that would only be accepted if the public had had ‘the pants frightened off them’?”
I made exactly this point yesterday in the ‘wet market’ piece yesterday.
So ! It was Billy wot done it then ! Well I never ! The Chunt now has similar collateral damage to his name than some of the worst murdering tyrants from history !
Sorry Mr Elwood
I have a theory that Bill Gates is being blackmailed (threatened with imprisonment in connection with Jeffrey Epstein) by the US military-industrial-defence-intelligence complex. He is the persuasive and benevolent (to the masses) face promoting the Covid and climate change narratives and he is allowed (by the complex) to continue his philanthropy life as long as he is compliant with the complex’s demands.
Any thoughts?
Could be , his face is everywhere ! + Why then let him buy USA farmland up ? I suppose they could take it off him when/if he gets he gets exposed by TPTB .
Doesn’t Gates’ love of all things vaccine predate Epstein? If not, can’t be ruled out.
I am all for severe repercussions for all that pushed this narrative. However I have been around long enough to to know that it seldom if ever happens.
Yes very good. I guess all this is to prepare and enable us to sign up to the new WHO pandemic treaty. The ultimate goal seems to be a one world government and digital slavery for all.
It most certainly IS !
Which is precisely why all this chatter about virus origins is just pointless. It distracts from the very real threat, but too many are falling for the sly tactics.
A year or so back there was an interview with a Dr. Stückelberger and Dr Reiner Füllmich. Dr. Stückelberger has a comprehensive scientific background (including population development, cooperation with WHO). Since 2009 she has been dealing with boarding school. Health Regulation. Here are some of the key points
[1] In 2005 the 2. Edition of the “Public Health regulation” come into force. However, the implementation was stopped / no longer supported from around 2013. Dr. Stückelberger was no longer allowed to report on it / was no longer allowed to teach it. The international health regulations are binding. A 3rd edition was published in 2016. The WHO can change this without restriction and all member states must implement this. 2 countries have reservations – USA and Iran.
[2] In 2017 Gates applied for GAVI to be admitted to the Executive Board as a member state: There was a vote – was not officially recorded. But since then contracts have not only been concluded with the individual states but also with Bill Gates. In other words Bill Gates has the same status on the WHO as a country. GAVI has absolute immunity in Switzerland GAVI does not pay taxes. EU authorities (e.g. the ECB) also have diplomatic immunity through location agreements.
[3] The definition of “what is a pandemic” was changed in 2009. “Since then, there has been a global infection rate – serious illnesses and deaths are no longer necessary. Since then, basically every flu can be described as a pandemic. Definition of herd immunity has also been changed. According to the WHO, herd immunity can only be achieved through vaccination. (They have since re-instated natural immunity)
[4] The WHO officially warns against using the PCR tests as a benchmark for infections, but at the same time they are pushing their use.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANKLLWX0DMQ
Audition with Dr Reiner Füllmich for international lawsuit Nuremberg
Good article.
The other big tell was the coordinated attack on cheap therepeutics of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine alongside Vitamin regimen of especially C, Zinc and D.
Tess Lauri Mccullogh and other doctors becoming vilified or ignored, another tell.
Imdunno it’s so obvious that hearing cockup as the explanation, still happening, just leads to lots of sighing, throwing hands up into air, shrugging of shoulders and rolling of eyes at this point.
Yes, mentioned therapeutics in context of ACT-A but could have emphasised how therapeutics were deliberately neutralised. Thanks. Agree.
Cough medicine is the latest product being removed from shelves. In addition, have you noticed the dearth of paracetamol tablets most everywhere, leaving mainly ibuprofen products on the shelves? I can’t tolerate ibuprofen – enteric coated or not – it makes me feel worse.
A very good article
“there is no example of a vaccine ever defeating a sudden onset viral epidemic”
That’s a very significant fact that should have been aired at the time, not that many people, including politjcians, were interested in facts, truth, or real science. Yes, the “vaccines” were and still are the sacred cow that cannot be criticised, hence their absence from the Oakshott revelations: something else that convinces me they were a managed leak and part of the psyop.
We also need to put all this in context. There are clearly a lot of things happening which will be detrimental to the vast majority. They all come under the banner of the great reset. They include net zero, digital id and currency, and the horrendous “One health” cult, which are all aimed at dehumanising us. I don’t believe it is any coincidence that these have appeared in the wake of the greatest health scam in history. There may not be a single Blofeldt behind all this but there is definitely an elitist cult with no accountability.
‘It is true that much that happened from March 2020 was anarchic, uncontrolled, panicked and unscripted.’
Still doing this are we? And I suppose Net Zero is ‘panicked, unscripted’ and just bumbling, incompetence?
So try this.
Mistakes Were NOT Made:
An Anthem for Justice
by Margaret Anna Alice
The Armenian Genocide was not a mistake.
Holodomor was not a mistake.
The Final Solution was not a mistake.
The Great Leap Forward was not a mistake.
The Killing Fields were not a mistake.
Name your genocide—it was not a mistake.
That includes the Great Democide of the 2020s.
To imply otherwise is to give Them the out they are seeking.
It was not botched.
It was not bungled.
It was not a blunder.
It was not incompetence.
It was not lack of knowledge.
It was not spontaneous mass hysteria.
The planning occurred in plain sight.
The planning is still occurring in plain sight.
The philanthropaths bought The Science™.
The modelers projected the lies.
The testers concocted the crisis.
The NGOs leased the academics.
The Scientists fabricated the findings.
The mouthpieces spewed the talking points.
The organizations declared the emergency.
The governments erected the walls.
The departments rewrote the rules.
The governors quashed the rights.
The politicians passed the laws.
The bankers installed the control grid.
The stooges laundered the money.
The DoD placed the orders.
The corporations fulfilled the contracts.
The regulators approved the solution.
The laws shielded the contractors.
The agencies ignored the signals.
The behemoths consolidated the media.
The psychologists crafted the messaging.
The propagandists chanted the slogans.
The fact-chokers smeared the dissidents.
The censors silenced the questioners.
The jackboots stomped the dissenters.
The tyrants summoned.
The puppeteers jerked.
The puppets danced.
The colluders implemented.
The doctors ordered.
The hospitals administered.
The menticiders scripted.
The bamboozled bleated.
The totalitarianized bullied.
The Covidians tattled.
The parents surrendered.
The good citizens believed … and forgot.
This was calculated.
This was formulated.
This was focus-grouped.
This was articulated.
This was manufactured.
This was falsified.
This was coerced.
This was inflicted.
This was denied.
We were terrorized.
We were isolated.
We were gaslit.
We were dehumanized.
We were wounded.
We were killed.
Don’t let Them get away with it.
Don’t let Them get away with it.
Don’t let Them get away with it.
Think you missed the point of the article. I agree. The quote you picked out of context is actually the counter-argument to those who disagree with you. I.e. There was a lot of panic / anarchic stuff in the weeds. The article is making the point that despite that low level disorganisation, the push for the jabs was very deliberate. And bad.
It’s not about the jabs – it’s about everything that is being imposed upon us. That is the point. The jabs are just one aspect. To focus on the vaccines is to miss that point.
Wanted to come back to you on this. I don’t disagree. But there’s only so many words that can go into one article, and so you get some articles that cover more ground and stay high level (and the ‘Anthem for Justice’ is brilliant at that), some that go deep and cover off a particular topic in more detail. This particular article is the latter type for those mainstreamers that still think the jab was ‘necessary’ – many mainstreamers still think this. I’ve previously looked at how the ‘Vaccine Saviour’ mentality came about in mainstream thinking (https://alexstarling77.substack.com/p/tina-turned) and how many “politically active people” (that’s a euphemism, btw) managed a cognitive dissonance-busting 180 degree spin on the matter (https://alexstarling77.substack.com/p/clockwork-seasonality). This article (first published by HART and now also by DS) provides further ‘nitty gritty’ detail as to how this terrible groupthink was perpetrated.
And going back to your first point, I also don’t think ‘Net Zero’ is unscripted. It is a terrible, terrible scam that is close to unravelling. .
Terrific article and, in my opinion, bang on the money.
However, it fails to mention the deliberate suppression of existing medicines (Ivermectin, Hydroxychloriquine and Budesonide, and others). The deliberate blocking of these products may have led directly to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people who may have lived had they been treated with them in a timely manner.
By rights, the people who deliberately used the global population as human guinea pigs should be in the Dock at Nuremberg-style Trials.
Thanks. Therapeutics were mentioned (“And why did all others on that ACT-A list — most notably cheap therapeutics that might have saved many lives (while of course competing with lucrative vaccines) — remain well short of their funding targets?”) but agree could have emphasised the way they were meticulously suppressed.
..one of my arguments has always been this….if you don’t think these products work, ok..but as they are not harmful or illegal why not let people use them if they want to?
When have doctors ever been told, in the past, what they may, or may not prescribe if they deem it necessary?
The fact that these treatments were not only taken off the market but literally banned is a fu**ing HUGE red flag….
And it’s not just Ivermectin and HCQ…As you say it was ordinary steroids and antibiotics…it doesn’t make any sense on any level…..
I’m just doing a catch up on DS articles and comments. I’ve been feeling a bit rough over the past week or so. I’ve just commented on A Y M’s post earlier about products being removed.
“Cough medicine is the latest product being removed from shelves. In addition, have you noticed the dearth of paracetamol tablets most everywhere, leaving mainly ibuprofen products on the shelves? I can’t tolerate ibuprofen – enteric coated or not – it makes me feel worse.”
The sad facts are that lockdowns didn’t work, and vaccines don’t either, judging by the fact that my small town is triple vaccinated but Covid is rampant again right now.
What matters is – does any pandemic bug kill people? If not it doesn’t matter much; norovirus is endemic and unpleasant, and keeps reappearing, but apart from simple isolation measures for sufferers nothing needs doing. So all this catastrophe planning is based on the myth that (a) the next bug will be untreatable and (b) it will kill people because of that. The next bug will come and go, just like this one, and the one before, and the several before that.