160367
The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Trouble With Matt Hancock

by Dr David McGrogan
2 March 2023 1:48 PM
hancock.jpg

hancock.jpg

It is one of the strange quirks of the last three years that the two genuine watershed moments concerning lockdowns both revolved around Matt Hancock, the Lockdowner-in-Chief. First, the capturing on camera of his ‘passionate embrace’ (if we can put it that way) with Gina Coladangelo in the late spring of 2021 seemed to signal a significant change in the mood music surrounding Covid. Everyone was by that point thoroughly sick of lockdowns and social distancing, and the fact that our most lockdowny politician of all obviously and flagrantly didn’t seem to consider the rules to be important had the feeling of being a genuine nail in the coffin for the whole daft business. Now we have his leaked WhatsApp messages, and – lo and behold! – we are seeing the dam break and the media are actually (three years too late) having a proper debate about whether lockdowns were a good idea at all. They were even discussing it on the Today programme this morning. (What they weren’t discussing, of course, was the BBC’s own role in whipping up panic back in spring 2020. Let’s not hold our breath waiting for that one.)

What is one to make of Matt Hancock? While undoubtedly possessing more than his fair share of low cunning, he lacks any other discernible gifts. The barely suppressed glee with which he announced every single new lockdown measure should have been enough on its own to disqualify him from high office – nobody whose megalomania is so plainly evident should come within a barge pole of a Cabinet position. He is living proof of the old adage that somebody who genuinely wants political power should be the absolutely last person to be allowed to exercise it.

Perhaps the more pertinent question is what to make of a political system which ends up with Matt Hancock as Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. (He was actually being talked up as potential winner of the Tory leadership contest in 2019 and hence Prime Minister. I’ll let that sink in for a moment.) The strongest argument against big government, and particularly against technocratic government, has always been that in the end even technocracies are run by people, and the kind of people who will be in charge will tend to be awful. It might be the case that political Platonism – the idea that there could be an elite capable of identifying the greater good and implementing it on behalf of the hoi polloi – is achievable in theory. But it’s a moot point, because, at least in the absence of a natural (merit-based) ‘aristocracy’ (of the existence of which few are in favour), in any modern political system such an elite will inevitably comprise careerists and sociopaths who couldn’t be less interested in what’s good for anyone but themselves. 

Milton Friedman’s way of understanding things, as always, had the most merit. For Friedman, Matt Hancock and his ilk are inevitable byproducts of the existence of a political system. You will always get the faeces rising to the top, as it were. Since this is the case, the ideal system is one in which those people are able to do as little as possible, and ideally are incentivised so their selfishness produces tolerable outcomes. What you want is a system in which somebody like Hancock can have his petty little fiefdom, in other words, but isn’t in a position to send old people infected with Covid into care homes, slaughter the feline population of England and Wales, close schools, and make it illegal for non-cohabiting couples to have sexual intercourse. Instead, things should be geared so that he can’t really do much, and when he is able to act, the system of rewards and punishment will funnel his fundamentally selfish nature towards beneficial ends. 

What is truly strange about British democracy is that nobody ever reflects on whether it is a good idea for politicians to have much power in the first place. The position is always: “Well, Matt Hancock was bad, but we can appoint somebody else”. The same mentality prevails at the macro level: “We’ve had enough of the Tories, so maybe Labour will do better.” Isn’t it about time we asked ourselves whether the problem is politicians per se and what we can do to limit the damage they are able to inflict?

Dr. David McGrogan is Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria Law School.

Tags: Care homesCOVID-19Lockdown FilesLockdown harmsmatt hancock

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why I Don’t Buy the Seymour Hersh Story

Next Post

“Get Heavy With Police” to Enforce Lockdown, Matt Hancock told Ministers

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

46 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Attack on Kellie-Jay Keen by Trans Rights Activists, the BBC’s Perverse Insistence on Calling a Rapist “Her” and the Brutal Cancellation of Alfie Brown

by Will Jones
28 March 2023
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Net Zero is Coming Apart Before Our Very Eyes

30 March 2023
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

30 March 2023
by Will Jones

COVID-19 Not Responsible for “Explosion” in Heart Deaths, Major Autopsy Study Shows. “Must Be the Vaccine,” Says Top Heart Doctor

29 March 2023
by Will Jones

Whopping 82% of Berlin’s Voters Refuse to Support Net Zero 2030 as Referendum Fails

30 March 2023
by Will Jones

‘Trans Day of Vengeance’ to Go Ahead in D.C. Despite School Massacre by Trans Activist

30 March 2023
by Will Jones

‘Trans Day of Vengeance’ to Go Ahead in D.C. Despite School Massacre by Trans Activist

28

Whopping 82% of Berlin’s Voters Refuse to Support Net Zero 2030 as Referendum Fails

24

News Round-Up

23

Majority of Public Unhappy with NHS for First Time, Survey Finds

42

Net Zero is Coming Apart Before Our Very Eyes

20

Net Zero is Coming Apart Before Our Very Eyes

30 March 2023
by Chris Morrison

COVID-19 Not Responsible for “Explosion” in Heart Deaths, Major Autopsy Study Shows. “Must Be the Vaccine,” Says Top Heart Doctor

29 March 2023
by Will Jones

Findings From a New Faculty Free Speech Survey

29 March 2023
by Noah Carl

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

28 March 2023
by Norman Fenton, Clare Craig, Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Mr Law

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

28 March 2023
by Eugyppius

POSTS BY DATE

March 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb    

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment