The World Health Organisation (WHO) has quietly abandoned its investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, citing ongoing challenges over attempts to conduct crucial studies in China. Nature has the story.
Researchers say they are disappointed that the investigation isn’t going ahead, because understanding how the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 first infected people is important for preventing future outbreaks. But without access to China, there is little that the WHO can do to advance the studies, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. “Their hands are really tied.”
In January 2021, an international team of experts convened by the WHO travelled to Wuhan, China, where the virus that causes COVID-19 was first detected. Together with Chinese researchers, the team reviewed evidence on when and how the virus might have emerged, as part of phase one. The team released a report in March that year outlining four possible scenarios, the most likely being that SARS-CoV-2 spread from bats to people, possibly through an intermediate species. Phase one was designed to lay the groundwork for a second phase of in-depth studies to pin down exactly what happened in China and elsewhere.
But two years since that high-profile trip, the WHO has abandoned its phase-two plans. “There is no phase two,” Maria Van Kerkhove, an epidemiologist at the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, told Nature. The WHO planned for work to be done in phases, she said, but “that plan has changed”. “The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins,” she said.
Researchers are undertaking some work to pin down a timeline of the virus’s initial spread. This includes efforts to trap bats in regions bordering China in search of viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2; experimental studies to help narrow down which animals are susceptible to the virus and could be hosts; and testing of archived wastewater and blood samples collected around the world in late 2019 and early 2020. But researchers say that too much time has passed to gather some of the data needed to pinpoint where the virus originated.
Many researchers aren’t surprised the WHO’s plans have been thwarted. In early 2020, members of then US president Donald Trump’s administration made unsubstantiated claims that the virus had originated in a Chinese laboratory, and US intelligence officials later said they had begun investigations. The city of Wuhan is home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high-security lab that works on coronaviruses. Chinese officials questioned whether the virus originated inside the country’s borders.
In the midst of simmering hostility between the two superpowers, WHO member states requested in May 2020 that the agency put together a science-led effort to identify how the pandemic started. Although China agreed to the mission, tensions were high by the time the WHO group left for Wuhan, and engagement with China quickly unravelled after the group returned.
In its March 2021 report, the team concluded that it was “extremely unlikely” that the virus accidentally escaped from a laboratory. But the inclusion of the lab-incident scenario in the final report was a key point of contention for Chinese researchers and officials, says Dominic Dwyer, a virologist at New South Wales Health Pathology in Sydney, who was a member of the WHO team.
That July, the WHO sent a circular to member states outlining how it planned to advance origins studies. Proposed steps included assessing wild-animal markets in and around Wuhan and the farms that supplied those markets, as well as audits of labs in the area where the first cases were identified.
But Chinese officials rejected the WHO’s plans, taking particular issue with the proposal to investigate lab breaches. Zhao Lijian, the spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, said the WHO proposal was not agreed by all member states, and that the second phase should not focus on pathways the mission report had already deemed extremely unlikely.
The Nature report adds that outside the formal WHO process some studies have gone ahead. In May 2022, researchers in China published the results of an analysis of donor blood supplied to the Wuhan Blood Centre before December 2019. After screening more than 88,000 samples collected between September 1st and December 31st 2019, the researchers did not find any SARS-CoV-2-blocking antibodies in the samples (though did find some non-neutralising antibodies, which they implied are false positives due to cross-reaction or other issues). A second study, by the Chinese CDC in February 2022, looked at samples collected at the Huanan wet market in January and February 2020 and found evidence of the virus among humans but not among animals, confirming the early outbreak but casting doubt on the idea of a zoonotic spillover event at the market.
We may not be inclined to believe these Chinese findings. But we should note that they are more than the U.S. has managed to put out in the same period. The U.S. published one study of archived Red Cross blood in November 2020, which found 39 antibody-positive serum samples (2%) collected December 13th-16th 2019 in California, Washington and Oregon. No further studies of early spread in America have appeared. On this evidence, of course, the virus is more likely to have been circulating in the U.S. than Wuhan during autumn 2019. Certainly, the Wuhan data may not be trustworthy, or the U.S. data may be mistaken. But clearly there is good reason to look into what was going on in America as well as China. Note that we still don’t have a single wastewater study from the U.S. to give an indication of when in 2019 the virus may have begun circulating in different parts of the country (to be fair, we also don’t have any wastewater studies from China). A wastewater study from Brazil turned positive as of November 27th 2019, suggesting extensive community spread in the Americas during that month.
We also still have no idea what U.S. scientists were working on in relation to SARS-like viruses at the onset of the pandemic. Yet we know that in collaborative coronavirus projects with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the genetic engineering of the virus was typically stated that it was done (or was proposed to be done) in the U.S., not China. We also know that Jeffrey Sachs disbanded the Covid origins taskforce which formed part of the Lancet Covid commission he was chairing because he perceived severe conflicts of interest and a basic lack of cooperation from U.S. scientists.
Concerns about a U.S. cover-up are growing. The latest senior figure to call for an investigation into the role of the U.S. in the origin of the virus is Matt Pottinger, the Deputy National Security Adviser at the start of the pandemic, who recently wrote in the Wall Street Journal that “China hasn’t been the only problem”.
In the early days of the pandemic, a small group of Western virologists came together to consider the pandemic’s origin. Emails that eventually came to light revealed their plan to push the public conversation away from the lab-accident hypothesis and toward the natural-origins explanation. In a now infamous February 2020 letter in the Lancet, and in an equally problematic letter in Nature Medicine the next month, some of these scientists labelled any questions about a possible lab origin as “conspiracy theories”, even though they lacked evidence to dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis.
But in September 2021, a leaked Defense Department document revealed that some of the same scientists had worked together, along with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on a 2018 proposal to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Their project? Genetically engineering rare gain-of-function features, called furin cleavage sites, into SARS-like viruses in their possession.
To its credit, DARPA didn’t fund that research, but it was highly significant — or spectacularly coincidental — that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, containing this precise feature never-before-seen in any SARS-like virus, began infecting people in Wuhan the next year. Scientists who had called the lab-leak hypothesis a conspiracy had failed to disclose that the lethal virus sweeping the world was eerily similar to the one they had wanted to create.
China’s systematic efforts to block meaningful investigation doesn’t mean that the U.S. should throw up its arms. In fact, both the Trump and Biden administrations have taken action to dig further. The Trump administration began asking questions internally. Early in his tenure, President Biden also authorised a limited, 90-day review of this issue by America’s intelligence agencies. It’s fair to say that both administrations did something and that neither has done enough.
Earlier this year, an international group of scientists and former national security officials — including us — signed an open letter detailing some of the failures of scientific journals and news organisations and calling for greater accountability. What we now need are bipartisan, evidence-based hearings asking the toughest questions about the pandemic’s origins. Congress must carefully look at China’s transgressions as well as our own shortcomings.
The obfuscation by the Chinese is obviously very poor form and only increases suspicions they are hiding something. However, what the Nature report – and, based on that report, the WHO – fail to acknowledge is that we don’t need Chinese cooperation to investigate what U.S. scientists and officials can tell us about the origin of the virus and early spread in America. Investigating this properly should have begun long ago, and even now it is not too late. The politicians need to compel the scientists and officials to reveal what they know.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“The U.S. published one study of archived Red Cross blood in November 2020, which found 39 antibody-positive serum samples (2%) collected December 13th-16th 2019 in California, Washington and Oregon.”
Which is probably why the West Coast states didn’t do as bad as the rest if the country in 2020 and beyond. They already had a milder strain in 2019 that gave then some degree of immunity.
Say what you will about China and the origins of the covid virus, but one thing is clear, the Chinese understand the concept of national sovereignty.
They don’t seem to have much trouble telling the WHO to go shove it when they want to, which I have to say I respect.
Which in turn makes me strangely hopeful that the WHO’s new pandemic treaty may be a non starter. I don’t see the Chinese signing away their national sovereignty to Gates and Tedros. Unless they completely control them, that is.
You can always withdraw from the treaty when the WHO trigger it.
“The politicians need to compel the scientists and officials to reveal what they know.”
That’s hardly likely to happen, is it? Indeed, that would be the last thing the US government needs.
That would mean exposing that what Fauci was up to , in the government’s name, and what the government knew all along – origins, masks, untested gene therapy, lockdown.
.
Good point.
The quotation refers to ‘an equally problematic letter in Nature Medicine the next month [Mar 2020]’ and Will refers (link under ‘coronavirus’ [projects]) to an article in 2015 published by that journal. Nature‘s editorial note of March 2020 to that article still stands:
‘We are aware that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.’
Whoever was responsible for engineering the virus, it seems that the USA and China were both involved. It’s not either/or. They should both be admitting culpability. Western parliaments and senates and independent-minded journalists should be holding both to account.
The patents for the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen are held by a number of well known actors who have profited over the last few years & predate 2020 by a fair number of years. Dr David Martin has done much work on this. I’ve attached a summary of the key patents he’s identified.
Not just the USA and China. The evidence points to British involvement as well: Eco Health Alliance (Daszak); Jeremy Farrar …. now becoming head honcho at the WHO).
Short of world wars, the most cataclysmic global event for centuries, and with all the combined resources of all the world’s richest countries the origins of “covid” are still a mystery and shall remain so. How can this be? Nothing to see here, move on. Ditto the cause of the Nord Stream pipeline – just impossible to establish who did that – complete mystery.
I don’t agre with Ron Unz on the vaccines and cannot fathom how naive he is in that regard.
Especially so in light of him being the first to argue that Covid was a US bioweapon directed against China and Iran.
Which I am now more and more inclined to believe, after having mocked and discarded this theory for 2 years in favour of the accidental or deliberate release of the man-made virus in/by China.
Oh, would some Power give us the gift; To see ourselves as others see us
Maybe we in the West should try, just for a moment, to see ourselves from China’s viewpoint. Why should they trust the West one jot? Why should they think for a moment that they will get anything approaching a fair hearing in the West? Why should they believe for a second that anything they reveal will not be twisted and turned against them in the most cynically partisan manner possible?
I’m not defending China here, let alone saying all is sweetness and light in that part of the world. What I’m saying is that I don’t trust our Western governments one iota, so why should an ostensibly rival power?
China is the only country to have submitted to a WHO inspection.
The US and EU refused WHO inspections.
There are dozens of lab-certified Covid infections in the US and EU throughout 2019.
There are no such infections in China. The WHO found no trace of Covid prior to September, 2019.
It therefore seems harsh, even unjust, to single out China for this impasse.
And, btw, the Chinese Government never lies.
Skeptical readers are invited to find or recall a PRC government lie anytime in the past 70 years.
“Xinjiang-related issues are not about human rights, ethnicity or religion at all, but about combating violent terrorism and separatism.”
“The Chinese government has launched anti-terrorism and deradicalization efforts in Xinjiang in accordance with the law to protect people’s lives, which has garnered ardent support of people from all ethnic groups.”
“People in the region continue to embrace peace and prosperity and Xinjiang society continues to develop steadily.”
Regarding a demonstration outside the Chinese consulate in Manchester in October last year, despite video evidence to the contrary, Beijing’s foreign ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin told a regular press briefing that “disturbing elements” had “illegally entered” the consulate.
“China resolutely opposes hegemonism and power politics, wishes to maintain friendly relations with its neighbours and jointly nurture lasting peace in the region and absolutely will not seek hegemony or even less, bully the small.”
Xi Jinping, November 2021
I had only just read the article in Nature and my thought is that the WHO will do whatever the Chinese and Gates (who own the WHO) tells it to do.
The lack of a comprehensive investigation into COVID origins, and the lack of co-operation with what limited investigations there have already been speaks volumes. In fact it tells you that they do have something to hide. In its absence speculation will rightly continue.
The US is not going to admit to any involvement. Expect a Warren Commission style cover-up followed by an Oliver Stone movie.