Almost 80,000 students are taking legal action and demanding refunds over the costly courses disrupted by Covid that left many without the skills they need for the fields they wish to work in. The Times has the story.
When Caitlin McDonald applied for one of the world’s best neuroscience courses at University College London she was told of weekly sessions in high-tech labs, operating machinery and reading brain scans.
Instead, she says, she sat in her bedroom as lecturers on pre-recorded videos struggled to explain where the buttons were on a machine. “They had a picture up and talked us through the safety procedures. They said, ‘you can’t really see on this picture, but there’s actually a really important thing happening over there’. I had to take their word for it.”
McDonald, 25, is one of nearly 80,000 students taking part in mass legal action against universities demanding refunds for the quality of their teaching over lockdown.
For Ryan Dunleavy, the solicitor who is leading the claim on a ‘no win no fee’ basis, the case is straightforward.
“If you book a holiday and pay for a five-star hotel, and when you get there the hotel’s burnt down and they put you in a two-star hotel, you’d want the difference in price between the hotels,” he said.
“The students paid for something which was promised to them. It wasn’t delivered. Yes, lockdown wasn’t the fault of the universities and the pandemic wasn’t the fault of the universities, but just like private schools, and every other service provider I can think of, they should have discounted their fees accordingly. It’s as simple as that.”
Caitlin McDonald, 25, is one of nearly 80,000 students taking part in a mass legal action against universities seeking refunds for the lack of in-person tuition
Of the 109 universities that responded to freedom of information requests by the Times, 64 said they had given no refunds or compensation over teaching quality during COVID-19. Many universities have a blanket policy not to hand over money, while others set up schemes offering compensation in specific circumstances.
The refunds that were paid, totalling £1.5 million, were shared among 1,300 students. However, 1,257,355 students enrolled in their first year in September 2020, paying at least £9,250 in tuition fees each year. If all of them claimed a share of the £1.5 million that would equate to about £1.20 back for poor teaching quality.
More than 99% of affected students have so far received nothing.
Caitlin McDonald was given her degree but now she is looking for a job and a qualification achieved online makes employers think twice.
If I went to work in a lab now I would have to be fully retrained, I would need someone to walk me through step by step which buttons I’m supposed to press. Everyone in my class has gone into branches of psychology instead of neuroscience, as the training just wasn’t there.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Most degrees were already worthless (and therefore infinitely overpriced).
Agreed. For this I regretfully need to recall the example of my own sister, a PhD lecturer. Long, long, I mean if felt like at least six months after schools had gone back to semi-normality (which means hundreds of kids jostling down busy corridors), she was still ‘working from home’ and providing ‘remote learning’ to her students. I remember being shocked that her and her colleagues were still farting around in stupid masks behaving as though being near other humans was a risk. One thing the plandemic taught us was that highly educated people are just as gullible as everyone else.
Sue them all. They were already corrupt, in some cases bought-and-paid-for hotbeds of virtue signalling, dogma and woke tosh. Why anyone paid a penny for those years of stupid video calls is beyond me.
Good for the students. We urgently need a massive lockdown backlash, if we are to have any hope of lockdowns never being used again. Let the government feel the wrath of future taxpayers.
What happened to the wedding industry chiefs who were going to sue the government? Will they have a case?
There are far more graduates than jobs that require degrees. Of course very few jobs really need a degree.
It’s not hard too imagine that plunging large numbers of young people into debt at the start of their working lives was a good way of pricing them out of the housing market.
In the early 2000s Blair was already making sure that they’d own nothing.
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
Indeed, I haven’t forgotten that introducing tuition fees was the very first thing his government did, having promised total fairness, and the moon on a stick. (And what did he do just after his re-election in 2001? Award himself a massive pay rise. They think we’ve forgotten.)
Oh, and he said: “I want every household to have the internet.” He knew why: we didn’t then.