153171
The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Write to Your MP if You’re Concerned About the Impact of a ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban on Free Speech

by Toby Young
20 January 2023 9:00 AM

The Free Speech Union is giving people an opportunity to write to their MP, raising concerns about the impact of a ‘conversion therapy’ ban on free speech. To access the FSU’s campaigning tool, click here. It only takes a couple of minutes to fill in the form.

Few people would object to banning attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity through pseudo-scientific quack ‘treatments’ or by sending them to ‘re-education’ camps where they’re strapped to beds. But it’s unlikely that it’s just these practices that would be caught by the ban, not least because we already have laws that prohibits such practices. As the Government’s own 2021 consultation briefing on conversion therapy put it: “Our existing criminal law framework means that conversion therapy amounting to offences of physical or sexual violence is already illegal in this country.”

There’s also very little evidence that conversion therapy of this type is widespread in the U.K. Indeed, when the Government asked a research team from Coventry University to study the evidence on conversion therapy the only examples it was able to find were drawn from the U.S. As Mark Jenkinson, the Tory MP for Workington, put it in the Telegraph: “From all the published evidence, it is clear that current laws are sufficient to cover the vanishingly rare number of cases of conversion therapy.”

My concern is that the ‘conversion therapy’ the bill will outlaw will be defined much more widely. At present, that term is too vaguely defined to form the basis of a workable new law, and if it remains devoid of precise, technical meaning – if its meaning can be extended to encompass whatever trans rights activists or militant secularists want it to mean – then any such law will inevitably have a negative effect on free speech.

For instance, would ‘conversion therapy’ include a religious leader telling a member of their congregation that homosexuality is a ‘sin’ or ‘haram’? In the state of Victoria in Australia, which banned conversion therapy in 2021, it is a crime punishable by up to 10 years in jail for a religious leader to have a one-on-one conversation with a member of their congregation in which they pressurise them to practice celibacy rather than act on their feelings of same-sex attraction.

The prospect of the state prohibiting, on pain of imprisonment, what a religious leader is able to say to a member of their faith about what their religion teaches about homosexuality is alarming enough. But even more worrying is the prospect that conversations between parents and children about their gender identity will be caught by the new law.

As Kemi Badenoch, the International Trade Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities, has pointed out, it’s possible that a poorly-drafted bill would bring conversations between parents and their children within scope of the ban, effectively meaning parents who attempted to dissuade their child from undergoing serious and potentially life-changing medical treatments could be prosecuted. In the state of Victoria, it’s a crime for a parent to refuse to support their child’s request for puberty blockers.

A poorly drafted bill could also force medical professionals to rule out treatment that they believe is in the best interests of some of their trans patients – forcing them to break their Hippocratic Oath. Doctors have both a right and a duty to recommend what in their judgement is the best clinical pathway for a patient who identifies as trans, particularly if that patient is a minor.

Consider a condition like gender dysphoria, currently defined by the NHS as “a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity”. For trans activists and ideologically aligned therapists, this is an innate feeling that must simply be ‘affirmed’, with the patient’s problems potentially being solved by helping them to ‘admit’ they’re transgender. Anything less, in their view, would be transphobic and something they would like to fall foul of a conversion therapy ban. Yet for many other medical professionals, research on and around gender identity is still in its infancy, and it cannot be ruled out that in some cases identifying as trans may be symptomatic of a mental disorder – ‘gender dysphoria’ still appears in the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the Bible of the American psychiatric profession.

Nor can it be ruled out that an adolescent who identifies as trans and wants to embark on transitioning is simply being swept along by a trend within their peer group or on social media. That’s one explanation for why you find ‘clusters’ of trans teens within particular schools and why teenage girls are more likely to identify as trans than teenage boys. After all, if the sharp rise in the number of teens identifying as trans is just a result of a taboo being lifted, why aren’t trans teens distributed equally between different schools and why aren’t there the same number of trans boys as trans girls? If trans adolescents who are just following a passing fashion aren’t persuaded to wait before undergoing life-changing medical procedures, such as a double mastectomy, they may come to regret it. Is it really in the best interests of such teenagers to criminalise attempts by parents or clinicians to make them pause and reflect before permanently changing their bodies?

The Government does at least seem alive to these dangers and several ministers have expressed the hope that these risks will be identified and guarded against during pre-legislative scrutiny of the bill. That’s why we think it’s important that as many people as possible write to their MPs to bring these risks to their attention. Use the FSU’s campaigning tool to send a pro forma email – and feel free to personalise it. Filling out the necessary details won’t take more than a couple of minutes.

At the FSU, we seem to be engaged in a constant battle to stop the Government making it illegal for people to speak their minds. But if this bill ends up being anything like the conversion therapy ban in the state of Victoria, it will criminalise advice, both personal and professional, that could help young people avoid making life-changing mistakes.

Tags: Conversion Therapy BanFree SpeechKemi BadenochState of VictoriaTransgenderism

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Jacinda Ardern’s Legacy: a Divided Country and a Weakened Democracy

Next Post

Green Movement is Not About Planetary Crisis, “But a Crisis of Meaning for the Affluent”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Attack on Kellie-Jay Keen by Trans Rights Activists, the BBC’s Perverse Insistence on Calling a Rapist “Her” and the Brutal Cancellation of Alfie Brown

by Will Jones
28 March 2023
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Britain’s Backlash Against LTNs: Fed-Up Residents Torch Road Blocks Hours After They Were Installed

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

28 March 2023
by Norman Fenton, Clare Craig, Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Mr Law

The Great Food Reset Has Begun

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

28 March 2023
by Eugyppius

News Round-Up

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

31

The Bad Science Behind Sadiq Khan’s ULEZ Anti-Car Crusade

30

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

25

Britain’s Backlash Against LTNs: Fed-Up Residents Torch Road Blocks Hours After They Were Installed

19

News Round-Up

35

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

28 March 2023
by Norman Fenton, Clare Craig, Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Mr Law

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

28 March 2023
by Eugyppius

The Bad Science Behind Sadiq Khan’s ULEZ Anti-Car Crusade

28 March 2023
by Ben Pile

Mainstream Media’s New Obsession: Labelling Criticism of 15-Minute Cities ‘Conspiracy Theories’

27 March 2023
by Rebekah Barnett

Almost Everything Is “Institutionally Racist”

27 March 2023
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

January 2023
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec   Feb »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment