- “The Dossier uncovers WEF-Gates Event 201 launch announcement from Davos 2019” – Jordan Schachtel discovers a recording where the Event 201 organiser tells Davos in January 2019: “Bill Gates has emphasised over and over again in his public announcements how important it is to have security aligned with national government and public health in a pandemic event like this.”
- “Fewer than half of those eligible for Covid booster have come forward for vaccine, analysis shows” – A sluggish take-up of dose 5, reports the Mail – only 47% of those eligible so far.
- “America will still demand proof of Covid vaccination to enter the country in 2023 – making it the only country in the West” – The Transportation Security Administration has extended the rule in the U.S. until at least January 8th to “limit the risk of COVID-19, including variants of the virus”, despite the CDC admitting the vaccines don’t prevent spread, reports the Mail. Ludicrous.
- “Pro-lockdown fanatics don’t deserve an amnesty” – Camilla Tominey writes in the Telegraph that “it’s not just in retrospect that we know the Covid measures were a disaster – we were vilified for pointing it out at the time”.
- “It’s time we get a grip on the exploitation of our young people” – Lockdown has been devastating for vulnerable children, write Steve Chalke and Anne Longfield in the Times.
- “Vaccine heart damage and the warnings brushed aside” – Neville Hodgkinson in TCW Defending Freedom with an overview of how the Covid vaccines harm the heart.
- “More Questions about Spring 2020 Covid in New York City Hospitals” – Jessica Hockett in Brownstone with some fascinating new insights into what really happened in NYC in spring 2020.
- “Münster School of Health on How Best to Bake, Boil and Dry Your FFP2 Masks to Ensure Their Hygienic and Responsible Re-Use” – Eugyppius revisits “one of the dumbest documents to emerge from the German pandemic”.
- “The New Pause Lengthens to Eight Years One Month” – So why the continuing worldwide “pandemic of panic” about the mildly warmer weather we are enjoying, asks Christopher Monckton in WUWT.
- “King Charles’s environmental leadership hailed by Rishi Sunak” – The PM was among more than 200 political and business figures welcomed to Buckingham Palace ahead of the UN climate change summit COP27, reports the Telegraph.
- “Britain Missed a £260 Million Climate Finance Payment Deadline” – No wonder he didn’t want to attend, says Eric Worrall – “the first thing Prime Minister Flip-Flop could face when he arrives in Sharm El-Sheikh will be a demand for overdue payment”.
- “Oat milk is killing the planet” – John Lewis-Stempel writes in UnHerd that the billion-dollar industry has duped vegan activists.
- “The climate scaremongers: Health chief’s nonsensical warning of doom” – Paul Homewood in TCW defending Freedom takes Dame Jenny Harries to task for her climate balderdash.
- “Climate Change and the Lancet’s ‘Heat Death’ Deception” – With COP27 approaching, the journal claims rising temperatures have killed people but ignores that they appear to have saved far more, argues Bjørn Lomborg in the Wall Street Journal.
- “Why Elites Like Greta Thunberg Hate Capitalism” – Free markets have lifted millions out of poverty, liberated women and protected the environment – so why are so many progressives against them, asks Michael Shellenberger.
- “Greta Thunberg takes aim at her ‘heterosexual, white, privileged, middle-aged’ critics” – Age, race and sexual orientation – that’s three ‘protected characteristics’ that the Far Left climate activist has managed to target in one sentence, according to the Telegraph.
- “12 year old boys to be asked if they are pregnant, NHS poster says” – Experts have slammed an NHS hospital in Scotland for asking 12-year-old boys if they are pregnant and referring to women and girls as “people with internal reproductive organs”, reports the Mail.
- “‘Conspiracy Author’ David Icke Banned From EU, Labeled a ‘Terrorist’” – Anti-Semitic conspiracy author David Icke has been banned from entering the EU and designated as a “level three terrorist”, according to his son Gareth Icke, reports Zero Hedge.
- “How a tweet got me sacked ” – Iain Macwhirter in the Spectator says his ironic tweet cost him his job because journalists and editors now live in irrational fear of the Twitter mob.
- “Advertisers boycott Twitter as Elon Musk accuses campaign groups of censoring free speech” – The Telegraph reports that the billionaire has complained of a “massive” drop in revenues as woke major companies take aim at online free speech.
- “Twitter advertiser boycott organised by dark money Soros, Clinton, and foreign networks” – Infamous shadowy network Arabella Advisors is funded by American and foreign progressive billionaires, says Jordan Schachtel.
- “How I survived my annus horribilis” – Kathleen Stock in UnHerd says that speaking the truth has set her free.
- “The Online Harms Bill still threatens free speech and privacy ” – The removal of content is still required on the “whimsical basis” of anything that the platform has “reasonable grounds to infer” could be illegal, writes Matthew Lesh in the Spectator.
- “Devastated U.K. Twitter employees learn they’ve been sacked by email after waking up to find their work laptops wiped” – A brutal cull reported in the Mail, as some staff in San Francisco sue.
- “£27m of taxpayer money ‘wasted’ on woke projects such as ‘decolonising 120,000 dried plants’” – The Government body responsible for funding research and innovation accused of spending public funds on “embarrassing” and “low-grade” projects, reports the Telegraph.
- “How Free Speech Friendly are the Major Payment Processors and Crowdfunding Platforms?” – The Free Speech Union’s Carrie Clark has looked at the terms and conditions of the major payment processors and crowdfunding platforms and ranked them according to how free speech-friendly they are.
- “Southampton pop-up Covid jab clinic giving 36 children a higher dose of the Covid-19 vaccine” – Watch Retired Consultant Paediatrician Dr. Ros Jones discuss with GB News‘s Mark Steyn a Southampton pop-up Covid jab clinic giving 36 children a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine three times that intended for their age group.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Please justify this
Anti-Semitic conspiracy author David Icke.
This is a label that gets chucked about all over the place. I seem to see it everywhere. Even Dr Bhakdi is getting accused of it and facing jail time as a result. Regarding Icke, his lizard people wacko theory is said to be a reference to Jews, but I don’t know if that’s just some dirty rumour started to smear his character and it’s stuck. Anyway, as much as I’m not a fan what does this say about free speech? It also tells me the EU are threatened by him. What a ridiculous reaction to ban him and a very feeble excuse with zero evidence as far as I’m concerned.
They used the same slur to kill off support for Jeremy Corbyn.
The IHRA definition of anti-semitism is wider than an ocean. Deliberately, of course.
The ‘go to’ smear tactic to discredit people, even those who use the term ‘globalist’ (yes, WTAF?). How can that be a ‘thing’? Once it’s applied, it’s a devil to get out – like red wine and white carpets, the stain remains long after the subject has been vindicated. Like people often say, if you get hit by this term, the paltry powers that be are probably feeling the pressure which mean you are over the target. If I was David Icke, I would ignore it.
He can’t enter the EU which is difficult to ignore.
Ive yet to see any specific attribution to him that is anti Semitic.
The worst part is that DS has casually applied it to him and I want Them, ie Will Jones to justify his malign point. This is not supposed to be sloppily playing by the MSM framework.
I agree with you, AYM. If he’s trying to get into the EU then that is probably why he’s been smeared with the label. I very much doubt he has said anything anti-semitic at all but the interpretation of that term has now been widened to include ‘globalist’ (again, WTAF!) and I can even imagine that it might be applied to climate change sceptics, experimental gene therapy sceptics and so on in the future. The DS needs to look at itself a bit more closely if this is the case especially as its founder is also founder of the Free Speech Union!
Exactly right.
“Greta Thunberg takes aim at her ‘heterosexual, white, privileged, middle-aged’ critics”
Aha..! So, essentially, she’s mad at her Father.?
Didn’t adolescents write poems or rap lyrics about it, instead of ruining society for us all.
lol I had exactly the same thought!
“Oat milk is killing the planet”
Interesting piece which proves that everything eco is a more expensive, poorer and less wholesome version of something we can already provide, as if that’s a surprise..
Personally I like a bit of oat milk but I’m ok with milk too – i.e.choice. However, I can’t stand these arrogant privileged twerps with their grandiose pronouncements, cheered on by George ‘We must end all animal husbandry’ Monbiot, against animal agriculture meaning the end of the livelihoods of thousands of farmers in the UK and millions throughout the world. This is akin to wiping out history. And all because they can’t be bothered to do some real research at their universities and find out that global warming is a myth and that climate change has been happening for aeons. These alarmists think they’re fighting for life on the planet while vilifying the gas – CO2 – that is responsible for life on the planet!
I thought that is was a very interesting article. I knew itanyway and have had conversations about it with people. I was tempted to send the article to my daughter-in-law who’s a fake-milk afficionado but in the interests of family harmony I didn’t, wimp that I am. There are enough egg-shells as it is…
I like oat milk. I don’t consume dairy or egg products. Neither do I glue myself to roads or participate in efforts to wantonly damage items in supermarkets or art galleries.
I’m just an ordinary person, exercising personal choice.
An interesting 20min video from Ivor looking at a conference in 2019 from Chatham House, a pandemic thinktank, and comparing what they are proposing in the way of restrictions and comparing it with the data and WHO 2019 flu pandemic guidelines. And the underhand, manipulatory tactics the Belgian guy talks about ( which everyone in the audience finds funny ) are just shameful. Nothing evidence-based whatsoever.
https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/Wow—See-How-Pharma-Runs-the-Pandemic-Game—Stunning-Stuff:c
A Finnish report uncovers the fact almost 40% of deaths were falsely attributed to Covid. We all knew the death figures were hugely inflated anyway. But does anyone know where this rule came from that a positive PCR within 30 days of dying would get recorded as a Covid death? Because all countries seemed to be doing that and it was based on no scientific rationale at all. Was it orders from the WHO?
“The most obvious red flags were that approximately 95% of Covid mortalities had multiple serious comorbidities and the average age of death was around life expectancy. CDC statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities, while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such comorbidites include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%). The average age of Covid-related death is 77 years old.”
https://trendingpolitics.com/finland-exposes-massive-covid-reporting-scandal-nearly-40-of-covid-deaths-were-fraudulent-knab/?utm_source=jdr
AB looks into a related story and example here.
Personally, I know enough and have made up my mind about this ever since we got that info that only 6k out of 130k dead in England and Wales had Covid as the single COD on their death certificate. https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-veteran-medical-examiner-who-reviewed?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Dr Jackie Stone has avoided jail but now has a criminal record. She is quite rightly appealing the charges and including counter charges of her own. Good on her. She needs to go to town on the corrupt system. Last time I heard doctors were not meant to get persecuted for helping people and saving lives was not a criminal offence. Good luck to her.
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/zimbabwe-court-sentences-dr.-jackie-stone-on-2-charges-drops-2-charges-no-jail-time-but-the-physician-plans-on-hitting-back-5fbcbb1b
Dr’s actions removing the funding stream of a sick patient from pharma is the crime, they don’t give a monkey’s about the patient, just the money.
Yet more proof, as if it were needed, that this never was about a virus. Had there been a super deadly virus that was an equal threat to kids, elderly and everyone inbetween ( notice they haven’t mentioned jabbing zoo animals or pets being virus reservoirs for some time…) then the authorities would be glad to let doctors get on with doing their job, using their expertise and throw everything plus the kitchen sink at this pathogen. The very last thing you would do is not just prevent but actively go after and prosecute doctors who treat patients with extremely safe, off-label drugs that’ve been around for decades, so have a proven extensive history of that safety.
Then there’s all the fraudulent ‘science’ to smear HDQ and Ivermectin, the censorship around doctors who were using it and patently seeing results ( McCullough, Kory etc ). Wouldn’t you just be glad to find something that worked if it was a legit pandemic and you had the public’s health as a major concern? Instead our civil liberties and bodily autonomy were abused, people were inappropriately put on ventilators, given dangerous remdesivir or killed off with midazolam/morphine until 9 months later a toxic, novel product was warp-speeded in based on a piddly 2 months safety data.
Hmmm, a drug that’s been around for 50 years and proven to be safe as houses or a novel injectable with zero short or long-term safety data that skipped so many stages of typical clinical trials the unwitting global population had to become the research subjects…What a tricky decision. I’ve never met a disease yet where there weren’t treatment options but this was literally the new, untested injection or nothing, as far as they were concerned. The bent ‘powers that be’ were even threatened by Vit D and natural immunity, for crying out loud. Looking back you can see just how insane and transparent the whole debacle was.
Very sad. I wish her all the best.
Coincidence? Sure…
https://metatron.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-are-much-higher-since-185
Maybe I’m missing something but what is the cumulative excess death period charted here? Rolling 12 months? The table in the linked article doesn’t specify and shows unexplained time segments, and is also not obviously linked to the chart illustrated.
Well I am no fan of Twitter or of Elon Musk so the current debacle of the overnight sackings doesn’t surprise me at all. The Twitter employees sound upset but then I wondered whether their involvement, indirect or not, with a platform used for censorship had any effect on their consciences? I doubt it. They went along with it and now feel aggrieved. While sympathetic from a human point of view, I utterly abhor the business they are part of and its ability to attack, damage, censor, destroy, cancel and all the rest. Free speech is vital in the uncertain times we live in but being part of the problem of censorship is inexcusable. In that respect, they are of the same type that now want an ‘amnesty’ for being among the pro-Lockdown crowd: basically people who don’t think about their actions and the consequences of those before mouthing their opinions. I don’t know what Musk plans for the future. I still don’t trust him – he’s a bit like Richard Branson used to be, but without the jumpers, in his endless self-promotion – but I really can’t imagine it’s going to be free range speech territory. Musk is a trickster character if I was to choose one of the archetypes – the type that reels you in believing something only to spin it round the other way. He’s not honest. I’ve never been on Twitter not will I be. It sounds like a lot of hot air to me for people who want the world to know what they think of just about anything. In the past, they’d be down the pub talking nonsense which is as good a place as any for things like that – I know ‘cos I’ve talked a lot of nonsense down the pub in my time too!
Musk is totally untrustworthy in my view, a spawn of the globalists. He even has a bloodline connection. He wants to implant brain chips, believes in the climate catastrophe (or says he does). He is now donning 5000 dollar Baphomet armour (fool as you say). He’s no hero. He will not deliver us free speech. If anything he may tie up his brain chip with the semi conscious drivel on Twitter or use his claim for verified status as an entry point to online ID verification. And why not make that an Iris scan or fingerprints?
I firmly believe you can’t become a multi billionaire without accepting some fealty to the Luciferian tribe.
There is also the distinct, as yet unvoiced, possibility that he might crash Twitter, make it less easy to use or slow it down somehow as witnessed over on Facebook. I use FB sometimes but only really as a way of keeping in touch with various friends in different parts of the world. The main newsfeed bit though, where the posts go, has become turgid and unappetising. It is filled with ads – about every second post – which I used to religiously delete but can’t be bothered with now. Also, you can’t stop seeing posts that you don’t want. There used to be a ‘sleep for 30 days’ option but that has recently gone. All in all, it is a long way from what it used to be back in 2008 when I joined. Musk is a billionaire responsible for some very intrusive technology – Starlink and Neuralink – and in a more honest world, it would be nice to think that the latter could be used solely to help people who are paralysed etc but we don’t and it won’t. Starlink is a surveillance state’s wet dream even though it’s sold as allowing internet access for every one and his/her dog while travelling by camel through the Sahara desert or getting lost in the taiga forest…
“£27m of taxpayer money ‘wasted’ on woke projects such as ‘decolonising 120,000 dried plants’”
Insanity knows no limits, nor indeed are the insane aware of the fact that they’re insane…because they’re insane!
In this article is this little snippet:
Nottingham Trent University successfully applied for a grant to research how castles around the UK could increase the representation of gender and LGBTQI+ people in their history exhibition, although it acknowledges the difficulties of exploring this area during the medieval period.
I almost laughed myself into an early grave. My first question is ‘why?’ Obviously, I answered myself, because gender and LGBTQI+ people feel excluded from the bloody history of sieges, battles, and sackings, not to mention moat engineerings and drawbridge and portcullis designings. Where were all these ‘others’ though? Well, I told myself, they might or might not have been there but I would venture to say that during a siege, the last thing on people’s minds is whether Sir Percival identifies as a woman ‘cos we need every man jack of them to defend the bleedin’ walls! What is rather galling though is that such exercises in futility are funded by you and I. This what our taxes are spent on. And all because of the woke cultists who have invaded the metaphorical castle of sanity – maybe that’s what they should focus on: castles of the mind and how the woke lobby have laid siege to common sense, reason and logic!
I really don’t get this need to show that gay people have ‘made a contribution’, especially if that contribution is hard to find or quantify. Its like having a group commissioned to find all the Neils who were involved in building castles. Some of the builders may have been called Neil (or a derivative of…), just as some of them may have been gay (I think we can forget the TQI+ part…). There might even have been a Neil who was gay (don’t read anything in to that…)
Does it matter, at all..? What does it prove.? What possible relevance has that got to anything.?
The only thing I keep coming to is that people who feel the need to boost the past contribution of various groups, see themselves as superior to gay people, or black people, and so look to give a sop as a patronising way of redressing the balance. There is only one ‘equality’, is there not..?
Exactly, who cares if there were gay castle builders or not? What would it signify anyway? I think you hit upon it by saying: What possible relevance has that got to anything.? It’s the desire for relevance and meaning of their own tribe and attempting to foist it upon us not only in this century but centuries in the past as well. If they really want to go back through history and find relevance maybe they should look at the eunuchs who were rulers in Ancient Egypt and elsewhere but in those cases, they weren’t willingly castrated…
one of the reasons an amnesty isn’t likely to happen anytime soon!?
Are the unvaccinated still a danger to the rest of us? (Nov 3rd 2022)
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2022-11-03/are-the-unvaccinated-still-a-danger-to-the-rest-of-us-covid
……Now the unvaccinated are suddenly back in the mix. They’re dining in restaurants, rocking out at music festivals and filling the stands at sporting venues. They mingle freely in places where they used to be shunned for fear they’d seed superspreader events.
It’s as if they’re no longer hazardous to the rest of us. Or are they?
“Clearly, the unvaccinated are a threat to themselves,” said Dr. Jeffrey Shaman, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University. As recently as August, their risk of dying of COVID-19 was six times higher than for people who were fully vaccinated and eight times higher than for people who were vaccinated and boosted, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
But, Shaman acknowledged, “the danger to the rest of us is a more debatable issue.”
It’s a load of baloney, and not behind a paywall…
..this Twitter thread from Ethical Sceptic explains the way the figures for unvaccinated come about..all smoke and mirrors, no surprise…
…actually it is a surprise in a way because it is shameful…
https://mobile.twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1588507919816851457
Continuing our analysis of the CDC surveillance model showing unvax dying at higher rate than vaccinated.
12,565 superfluous deaths in the CDC model, arriving in an exact match to the unvax excess deaths (rate)
Amazing.
This stands as deductive confirmation and proof of our prior analysis (below) showing the CDC exploited superfluous (specious MCoD and made up) deaths in order to arrive at its Vax and UnVax CFR estimates.
Examine the peak of the blue curve vs the green UCoD curve.
Where have we seen that gap before? 18 days – the time from Covid onset to death.
This means that the superfluous deaths were by other causes – & were falsely given a Covid UCoD in a nosocomial or fraudulent context.
In other words, the true underlying cause deaths were in the green curve – and the peak in blue deaths were merely cases.
Persons dying of other causes were assigned a Covid cause of death, IF and only IF – they were unvaccinated. https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f621.svg
Yep, loads of “unvaccinated now”, even though my husband had 2 jabs it’s been over a year since he had his. So he’ll fall into that category. What they need is a “never jabbed” category as people who are jabbed ages ago and screwed their immune systems will end up skewing the data. In fact, when do you have to have had your last jab in order to be classed as fully vaxxed these days?
“Clearly the unvaccinated are a threat to themselves”.
And yet here we all are, 3 winters in, right as rain. 
Explain that Mr “Specialist”. And while you’re at it, explain all the horrific VAERS data related to these products in a short time compared to all vaccines from 30 years. And when you’ve done that explain how people who’ve had multiple jabs are still catching a Covid cold. Dumbass! Wonder who’s paying his wages..tosser!!
I’m awaiting an article to come on from the LA times, which is NOT funny…
Wayne has been great throughout, and a good laugh…this is funny…LOL!
Wayne The Covid Marshal https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/1f9ba.svg
@CovidMarshall
·1h
Looking back i get very little satisfaction from the days i spent in Mothercare at the height of the pandemic forcing masks onto babies faces, but i dont make the rules and like to think 1 or 2 of those babies made it due to my efforts.
#CovidAmnesty
**WARNING; This is seriously going to piss you off. Read at your own risk!**
I know it’s been done to death now, regarding this stupid bint and her amnesty drivel, but the Naked Emperor has done a grand job of collecting receipts around the internet of the hate and pure vitriol that was directed towards the unjabbed. Some of these I wasn’t aware of. If you ever feel in a forgiving kind of mood just check out this! Honestly, the ignorance and nastiness knows no bounds. We must never ever let these turds off the hook.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/what-types-of-people-would-want-to?
Thanks for the laughs, Mogs. Yes, it does at some level piss me off hugely but honestly these people with all their nasty, spiteful, passive aggressive or out and out aggressive remarks actually show US who THEY are. These are not thoughtful, considered, decent people. They are virtue-signalling, got-to-say-that-and-keep-my-career saying, stupid, ignorant, dangerous types who we now know who they are and how they think (or rather don’t think). Thanks guys and gals – we can steer well clear of you now and all the drivel and self-serving narcissistic bullshit that emanates from your mouths.
Yes, true. Know your enemy. But I didn’t know Adele was amongst them,
and that grotesque remark from Turdeau, encouraging people to turn their backs on and basically disown their family!! Well I shouldn’t be surprised there as there’s clearly no depths he won’t sink to. Jeez, there is no justice in this world until scum like him get their comeuppance. Where’s Karma when you need it? 
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-funeral-business-is-booming-and/comments
The funeral business is booming. And not because of CovidALEX BERENSON
NOV 2
How bad is the rise in mortality?
So bad funeral companies are starting to worry.
Today Service Corporation International, the largest for-profit funeral operator in North America, had its quarterly earnings call. SCI had another great quarter, you’ll be pleased to hear! So far in 2022 the company has made almost $500 million in profits – and its stock rose more than 10 percent today after its earnings report.
The stories about potential culprits suggesting that they should be granted an amnesty reminds me of what has often occurred during official inquiries about accidents of one thing or another. That is to say, it often happens that certain people involved in them are often advised by their solicitors, or barristers, to say nothing that might result in them being prosecuted later on. It will be interesting to see what might happen if the promised inquiry is up and running. Of course, the pharma firms have already been granted immunity, but what about all the officials involved? Will they keep schtum for similar reasons, unless they are granted immunity from subsequent prosecutions? Or other suits for damages?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzPophi-9MY&list=WL&index=4 A somewhat speculative report from JC. “Italy, September 2019”. Browse through the commentary – no surprise, really.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccines-the-antibody-myth-and-the-dangers-the-drugs-giants-knew-about/
Cracking article on the dangers of the “safe and effective.”
Towards the end of this ‘Harry’s Farm’ entries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI84cFcF5ew&list=WL&index=3 Harry criticises the proposed NZ “cattle tax”. A sane attitude to it – and one of many wild political ideas at present.
Covid amnesty?
Remember the evil fearmongering. Excuses for lockdowns were nothing but myths and lies.
Yellow Freedom Boards – next event
Monday 7th November 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction B3430 Nine Mile Ride &
New Wokingham Road,
Wokingham RG40 3BA
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA