140617
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

When Will Climate ‘Fact Checkers’ Stop Pretending Honest Differences of Opinion Are Factual Errors?

by Chris Morrison
29 October 2022 5:36 PM

There have been further sightings of Dr. Johnson’s dog walking on its hind legs – or, rather, mainstream media outlets attempting to ‘fact-check’ climate science – “Sir, it is not done well, but you are surprised to see it is done at all.” Both Reuters and USA Today have weighed into our October 2nd article on the causes of the recent rapid slow-down of melting on the Greenland ice sheet, with the usual misgivings expressed about our opinions, not our facts. In of themselves, the ‘fact’ checks are tiresome, but they do provide an interesting insight into the substantial fault line that lies at the heart of the pseudoscientific proposition that the science around human-caused climate change is ‘settled’.

At one end of the green extreme is Professor Tim Osborn from the University of East Anglia who told a recent Daily Sceptic ‘fact’ checker that warming since the late 1800s to the present is all due to human-caused climate change “because natural factors have changed little since then”. However, in their ongoing work, many scientists track the substantial involvement of natural influences on the climate. This can be problematic for the climate alarmists since any natural explanation of climate change runs the risk of putting the human contribution in its proper context. It might, for instance, mean that a wider audience would become aware that the only significant global warming over the last 24 years in the accurate satellite record was caused by a powerful, and entirely natural, El Nino spike around 2016. Needless to say, all such doors has long been closed in the interests of promoting a settled political dogma.

Squaring this circle is well beyond the pay-grade of agenda-driven ‘fact’ checkers, so they tend to ignore it by limiting their checks to opinions, not facts. For some inexplicable reason, their work is often cited as definitive proof that climate emergency sceptics are wrong by social media companies like Facebook, and it’s possible that this is the main reason for their continued existence.

On October 2nd we reported on a paper written by three Japanese climatologists, commenting specifically on the recent decade-long slowdown of melting on the Greenland ice sheet. As we noted, the scientists wrote that “frequent occurrence of central Pacific El Nino events have played a key role in the slowdown of Greenland’s warming and possible Arctic sea ice loss”. Since the time of writing this article, the Daily Sceptic has reported further on the massive recovery in the melting rate, noting that to August 2022 there was a massive 471 billion tonnes annual ice boost on the surface, the 10th highest recorded in 42 years. This recovery has been in progress since 2012 when only 38 billions tonnes were created. We further noted that since the ‘calving’ loss at the Greenland coast is a computer-modelled annual loss figure of around 500 billion tonnes, it is reasonable to suggest that within the margin of error, the ice sheet may well have actually increased in size recently.

In our October 2nd article we argued that these revelations play havoc with the simplistic ‘settled’ science notion that carbon dioxide produced by humans burning fossil fuel is the main driver of global temperature warming. This notion is the central pillar of green activists’ claim that the climate will stop changing if the world reduces its carbon emissions to ‘Net Zero’ by 2050.

Reuters said that our article was “missing context” and the Japanese paper, “did not suggest that these local patterns are more potent than the overall warming power of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide generated by human activity”. This is a matter of interpretation, not fact. What is clear is that natural influences are at work. During the course of the paper, the scientists noted cooler conditions around Greenland compared with nearby areas, and commented: “This nonuniform Arctic warming can be attributed to natural variability, rather than anthropogenic forcing.”

Meanwhile, USA Today rates “false” the claim that the Greenland ice sheet is recovering, and earlier melting was caused by ‘natural warming’. One of the authorities consulted was Twila Moon, Deputy Lead Scientist at the U.S.-based National Snow and Ice Data Center, who said: “There is no sign that the Greenland ice sheet is recovering.” She added that ongoing ice loss is “certain”. But as we have seen, the evidence points to a massive, decade-long recovery in ice loss – and “certain” is not a word that reputable scientists use very often. The suggestion by USA Today that it is “false” to suggest that earlier ice sheet melting was caused by natural warming is at odds with the findings of the Japanese scientists who – remember – attribute the massive slowdown to “natural variability, rather than anthropogenic forcing”.

All these climate ‘fact checks’ – and we have had a few of late as regular readers will know – struggle with our reporting of scientific evidence showing considerable natural variation in the climate over time. Such information often contradicts the ‘settled’ science agenda that asserts humans cause all or most climate change. The Daily Sceptic might occasionally get a fact wrong – to err is human – and we will correct or remove as required. But to dress up a different interpretation of the facts – or an honest difference of opinion – as a factual error is misleading, no matter how many ‘experts’ are wheeled out to endorse this rhetorical sleight of hand. Calling these thinly-veiled polemics ‘fact checks’ is looking increasingly silly.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Tags: climate changeFact-CheckersGreenland Ice SheetReutersUSA Today

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Lockdown Proponents Won’t Get Away With Pretending They Were Sceptics From the Start

Next Post

U.S. Schoolchildren Fall Almost a YEAR Behind Due to Lockdowns

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Philip Schofield’s Swift Exit, the BBC’s Fondness for Satanists and the Target Boycott

by Toby Young
30 May 2023
4

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Rowan Atkinson Challenges Electric Cars as Environmental Panacea

3 June 2023
by Richard Eldred

Antarctica Sensation: Ice Shelves Surrounding the Continent Grew in Overall Size From 2009-2019

4 June 2023
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

4 June 2023
by Richard Eldred

Suella Braverman Warns of “Orwellian” Policing

3 June 2023
by Richard Eldred
A participant holds a drawing depicting Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg during a protest march to call for action against climate change, in The Hague, Netherlands September 27, 2019. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw

Net Zero ‘Grocery Tax’ Will Push Shopping Bills Up by £4 Billion, Tories warned

4 June 2023
by Toby Young

Why Putin Won’t Go Nuclear

86

News Round-Up

41

Rowan Atkinson Challenges Electric Cars as Environmental Panacea

55
A participant holds a drawing depicting Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg during a protest march to call for action against climate change, in The Hague, Netherlands September 27, 2019. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw

Net Zero ‘Grocery Tax’ Will Push Shopping Bills Up by £4 Billion, Tories warned

22

The Woke Movement is an Attempt by Young, Privileged Whites to Wrest Power from Older, Privileged Whites

21

As Enthusiasm For Covid Vaccines Wanes and Millions of Unwanted Doses Expire, German Press Finally Starts Scrutinising Contracts Between Big Pharma and Government

2 June 2023
by Eugyppius

Say it Loud – I’m Plus Size and Proud!

2 June 2023
by Tony Morrison

Don’t Tell the Doomsters and Gloomsters, But Ice Around Antarctica’s Thwaites ‘Doomsday’ Glacier Was Eight Times Thinner Around 8,000 Years Ago

2 June 2023
by Chris Morrison

The West’s Hypocrisy on Uganda’s Anti-gay Law

31 May 2023
by Noah Carl

How Theresa May Made Modern Britain

31 May 2023
by J Sorel

POSTS BY DATE

October 2022
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Sep   Nov »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment