In the U.S., North West Europe and the rest of the English-speaking world, people overwhelmingly blame Russia for the war in Ukraine. Which you might say is not surprising.
Yet surveys show that public opinion elsewhere is much more divided. As I noted in a Substack article back in June, there are even countries in Europe where a large percentage of people blame the war on the U.S. or NATO.
These include Russia’s traditional ally Serbia, three other Orthodox Christian countries (Greece, Cyprus and Bulgaria) and two countries that are heavily dependent on Russian energy (Slovakia and Hungary).
Okay, but all these countries have relatively close ties to Russia – whether military, religious or economic. What about people in other parts of the world, who could potentially be considered more impartial?
Earlier this year, YouGov surveyed people in 14 Arab countries for the website Arab News. They found that more respondents blamed the U.S. or NATO for the war than blamed Russia.
However, this result comes with an important caveat: a high percentage of respondents – no les than 42% – said they didn’t know.
A recent YouGov poll sheds more light on the matter. People in various countries were asked who’s more to blame for the war: the West or Russia. The chart below shows the top five and bottom five countries by percentage of respondents blaming Russia.
Interestingly, the top five are all Western, while the bottom five are all non-Western. And in the bottom five, opinion was fairly balanced: about as many respondents blamed the West as blamed Russia; or in Indonesia’s case, slightly more.
In the case of Turkey and Egypt, the results could be chalked up to simple, anti-American sentiment. Surveys show that most people in those countries have an unfavourable view of the U.S.
However, the same can’t be said for the other three. A 2010 survey found that a majority of Indians, and a plurality of Indonesians, had a favourable view of the U.S. And a survey carried out last year found that almost half of Saudis deem good relations with the U.S. to be important.
Who’s to blame for the war obviously can’t be decided through opinion polls. My point is that it’s worth reflecting on the marked differences between Western and non-Western countries. How did Indians, Turks and Indonesians come to such vastly different conclusions from Swedes, Brits and Australians?
One answer is that they’re brainwashed by anti-Western propaganda. But this seems difficult to believe. Turks may have an unfavourable view of the U.S., but their country is still in NATO, so they must be exposed to both pro- and anti-Western viewpoints. And there are more Indians in the West than there are in Russia.
Another possible answer is that people in the Third World (which originally just meant non-aligned countries) approach the issue from a different starting point. They don’t assume the West is in the right; and they don’t view every conflict through the prism of World War 2.
A third answer is that most non-Westerners oppose sanctions on Russia for self-interested reasons, and their answers to the question about blame are a way of rationalising that.
When people in ‘neutral’ countries believe the opposite of what Western governments are saying, it’s always worth asking why.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
No-one seemed to care when they had chiropodists in the original list of people who say it can’t be anything other than man-made global warming. The description was ‘settled science’. It isn’t even science.
You could say that they Put their Foot in it by Toe ing the line !
Hey hey..!!
I’ve known for decades that man made climate change is BS.
Apart from the obvious, you just know that whenever they say “all scientists agree” it can’t possibly be true. Scientists never agree on anything. Proper scientists, that is. The ones who understand that science is a culture of doubt, not a culture of faith.
Stating there is no climate emergency is like saying water is wet, everyone except the watermelons is aware the climate is much like it always has been.
Impossible!
The Consensus™️ – 96%, no wait 97% of scientists agree global warming is ‘real’, er..but stopped in 1996 – drat!… correction climate change is ‘real’ and all Man’s fault.
It would appear the age of reason has come to a close. It was the clergy that for centuries stifled our scientific progress during the dark ages, now in an ironical twist of fate it is the scientists who’ve created the religion.
And that religion is known as –
“The Science.”
We need to avoid confusion with real science.
Just like we need to avoid confusion of Duchess of Sussex’s. “My truth” with real truth.
Just how is that people like me who are not professional ‘scientists’ or ‘academics’ but who are soundly educated and who have a professional background that requires an understanding of climate and weather knew the whole climate thing was a Great Lie, fraud and scam from the very start. We were just voices in the wilderness.
This article appears to rubbish the claims made in your article – which is correct?
https://insideclimatenews.org/todaysclimate/experts-debunk-viral-post-claiming-1100-scientists-say-theres-no-climate-emergency/?utm_source=InsideClimate+News&utm_campaign=294aed9976-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_29c928ffb5-294aed9976-329054845