Social media has been in an uproar since a Dutch member of European Parliament posted a video of a hearing in which a Pfizer director admitted the company never tested whether its Covid mRNA vaccine prevents transmission prior to its approval for emergency use.
Though the fact that Covid mRNA vaccines do not prevent transmission was, of course, abundantly clear from the data soon after their implementation, this myth was a primary justification for vaccine passes, and a primary cause of the unprecedented vitriol launched at those who refused Covid vaccines throughout 2021 and continuing through today.
Not only did governments exert this pressure through policy, but in many cases politicians and officials used their office to deliberately stoke the social stigmatisation of the unvaccinated. Here’s a look back at some of the unprecedented vitriol that was launched at those who refused Covid vaccines from 2021 and beyond.
Officials in many jurisdictions proposed making the unvaccinated pay more for healthcare.
In Victoria, Australia – where lockdowns were longer than in perhaps any other city in the world – one politician proposed cutting the unvaccinated out of the national health system entirely.
A particularly disturbing idea that began to gain serious traction among the elite commentariat was to have hospitals triage emergency care to serve the unvaccinated last, or even denying healthcare to the unvaccinated entirely – a fairly clear-cut crime against humanity.
One vocal proponent of the idea of triaging emergency care to disfavour the unvaccinated was David Frum, Senior Editor of the Atlantic, most famous for his outspoken support for the invasion of Iraq. When his infamous tweet on the subject sparked an uproar, Frum doubled down.
Piers Morgan agreed that the unvaccinated should be denied emergency care.
Shockingly, this appalling idea of triaging emergency care based on vaccination status is still being proposed to this day.
The demonisation of the unvaccinated was, of course, far from limited to healthcare. Vilifying the unvaccinated became a kind of illiberal fad among the elite commentariat. The U.S. CDC even paid screen writers and comedians to promote Covid vaccines, which in some cases involved paying them to mock the unvaccinated.
In a bout of recidivism to the early 20th century, Austria and Germany introduced the chilling concept of “lockdown for the unvaccinated”.
“Lockdown for the unvaccinated” gained traction in the English-speaking world as well.
Most countries, cities and states across the Western world introduced vaccine passes that their own citizens had to show in order to partake in daily life. The World Health Organisation published an extensive document on implementing a digital vaccine pass system, including an international vaccine status registry and instructions on how to later revoke someone’s vaccine pass.
The most dystopian of these vaccine pass systems was in Lithuania, where the unvaccinated were banned from nearly all public spaces and employment outside their homes; the few shops where they could purchase essentials had to post large red signs on their doors indicating that unvaccinated persons could be present.
And of course, who could forget Justin Trudeau’s classic fuhrer-style rant about having to share public transportation with the unvaccinated, despite Government documents later revealing that he had no science to back any of these claims.
Like so much of the response to Covid, these vaccine passes and the illiberal fad of stigmatising the unvaccinated was unscientific, unprecedented, ineffective, totalitarian, brutal and dumb.
It was never remotely realistic for any government to expect every single person to get vaccinated, especially when the vaccine in question involved a novel genetic-based therapy. Thus, these proposals to impose draconian hardships on those who refused Covid vaccines would inevitably involve the state imposing draconian hardships on a sizable portion of the population.
According to former Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff – one of the most credible voices on the subject – Covid vaccines likely yielded benefits for the elderly and vulnerable, but it remains entirely unclear whether Covid vaccines have yielded any net benefit at all for healthy adults and especially for children. Coupled with the still-unknown risks associated with mRNA technology and the now well-documented cases of death and serious injury from these vaccines, for governments across the world to have exerted extreme pressure on children and healthy adults to get these vaccines is absolutely sickening.
That some healthy young people were surely coerced into receiving an injection that led to their death or serious injury, when the data showed that the benefits did not outweigh the risks, is an unconscionable tragedy.
Michael P. Senger is an attorney and author of Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World. This post first appeared on his Substack page, which you can subscribe to here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Never forget, never forgive. Someone that regularly posts on here attempted to insult me by saying I was bitter. They stigmatised an entire group because the group exercise their right to bodily autonomy. The group would not do as they were told so must be punished. They then went after children. So, yep, I am bitter. I’m more than bitter in fact, I’m f*n livid and I want my pound of flesh. And I’ll remain feeling like this until I get it.
Quite right being bitter about these crimes. They simply can’t be forgotten, swept under the carpet.
You mean how I observed your attitude towards Dr Aseem Malhotra’s 180 degree turnaround and speaking out against Big Pharma and the narrative as “bitter and unforgiving”? I like how you conveniently omitted the part where you insulted me by calling me “a bit of an eejit” AFTER you called me “rude”. “Rules for thee but not for me”, eh? But because I’m not a bitter grudge-holder I’ll overlook your hypocrisy, just this once. 🙂
Nope, not you. Not everything is about you my narcissistic friend.
Doesn’t it say a great deal about a person when they have to outright lie because they have no comeback? I’m sure not everybody else here has your Selective Memory Syndrome and they could attest to reading your little hissy fit that you threw…
“Narcissistic” now am I? PMSL!! And you’ll be right back with some evidence to support that claim, right??
Run off pharma troll for stab #12 and hopefully you can contract myocarditis or similar and then tell us it was the too-many-eggs-syndrome-nothing to do with the stabs. I hear from the speed of science people, that Stab 17 is the real game changer. Just hang on for that.
You are bang out of order with that comment. Butt Out.
Oh so this isn’t the comment that you obviously took exception to then?
“It’s called “Divide and conquer” for a reason you know? Don’t score an own goal just because you’re too bitter and unforgiving to see beyond a person’s mistake so early on in the game.”
And you’re denying calling me an “eejit”? From 11 days ago;
“You know, I went to cut and paste all of your insults and ill-mannered replies, but then realised it would be pointless. I’m not going to continue this exchange, not because your a “forthright woman”, as you tell us all, but because you just seem to be a bit of an eejit. Perhaps I shouldn’t have lowered myself to your basement standards, but there you go. Anyway, as I said, grow up.”
Come back when you’ve grown a spine and can own what you actually said.
I’ll help you out, my rather dim-witted friend, and stop handing you rope.
“Address your tone”. Seems rather apt here wouldn’t you say?🤔 Or perhaps you’ve also got issues with taking a dose of your own medicine. 🤷♀️
Shhh, as in please be quiet. Thank you.
There must always be the opportunity for forgiveness.
But not when the criminals are still at large, unrepentant, and ready to commit more crimes. And the victims are unrecognised and uncared for.
You are not correct. But perhaps my original statement was also inaccurate. I should have said:
There is always the opportunity to forgive.
There is always the opportunity to forgive.
I would like to think that is true. Perhaps it is? I would agree that most of the time there is, and should be, eventually room for forgiveness.
But are there some crimes for which you simply can’t forgive? That are so huge, so cynical, that forgiveness isn’t an option? Especially in the absence of any form of repentance?
Philosophical questions I suppose, to which there are no absolute answers. But I’m interested to hear points of view, to hear anyone who wishes to expand on this.
You are not correct.
Can you specify what I’ve written that isn’t correct? Genuine question. I’m quite happy to have a civilised exchange with someone who may differ from me. That’s the spirit of this site, and anyway none of us has a monolopy on wisdom.
There is always an opportunity to forgive because forgiving is a choice. The choice is whether you are prepared to do your own personal work to come to earnestly let go of your own negative feelings arising from the misdeeds of another. Your forgiveness should not be dependent on the actions of others. Although, the actions of others sometimes make the path to forgiveness smoother.
There are some crimes that are unforgivable in my world also. Things that I would struggle to forgive and that would require me to dig deeply to come to terms with. There are terrible wicked things that men do and permit to be done. Repentance is not a voucher that can be redeemed for forgiveness. Should a victim have to wait a lifetime bearing the burden of negativity because the perpetrator refuses to repent?
And how are we to know what is in the hearts of those claiming remorse? Is the vibration of their voice on one’s ear, a confession of wrongness spoken aloud, enough to let the pain and bitterness subside? What if they say sorry, but don’t really mean it? How are you to know? [Rhetorical questions]
“There are no absolutes” is a contradictory argument. Using the logic that the thing you are trying to disprove exists, only in order to prove it doesn’t exist. We know many things have finite answers. Alive or dead. Thinking or not thinking. Breathing or suffocating. Eating or starving… I am being facetious to make a point. There are many finite answers and objective facts. Which are happened upon and debated by limited and subjective beings. At some point in the past we appear to have stopped our search for objective truth and replaced it with some perfectly insane naval gazing nonsense about “living one’s truth”.
I hope the foregoing answers why I do not think you are correct. I am not being argumentative for the sake of it.
My underlying point is this: There are lots of terrible things in the world. Few of us have the direct power to shape the global stage. But we can all influence our local environment. We have a choice what we project into the world. Good or bad. Often, to do the good thing it is complicated, and requires personal sacrifice, but usually for the best. It also requires some personal courage or risk. Whereas the bad thing is often convenient and provides a payoff. The payoff is often short and ultimately to one’s disadvantage.
If forgiveness is conditional on external forces, we remove our choice to place a bit of good into the world over to a perpetrator who may or may not be repentant. We give over our free will.
Forgiving is hard, but never impossible.
Faith in God allows one to let go of their earthly faith in man’s fallible justice; derived by pompous men with their robes, wigs and rituals (there is a lot of it about). Faith in God allows one to know every man will be judged by their creator and lift the burden of seeking a suitable punishment for their crimes. But, if its definitely been agreed that there is no God, then we are destined to keep applying flawed ideas of justice (retribution) and conditional forgiveness (bondage to pain) in perpetuity, in our continuing futile and frankly cult-like quest to bring some kind of man made utopia about through the mechanism of state imposed control.
In abandoning God and reducing his universal majesty to the status of a fairy-tale we found that we are too poorly qualified to be the masters of our own destiny.
Meaningless without the opportunity to punish. Where is that with this lot of cowards?
Yes, but it’s also necessary to understand the meaning of “forgiveness” in the round. When one grants that, it is not necessarily the same as allowing them to get away with the consequences of what they did. It does not mean they will get away with it. It is often worthwhile as a means of improving one’s emotional position. Loads of psychological bumf on this – e.g. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/forgiveness/definition (and a bit of personal experience).
Yes. I have come to understand one of the purposes of forgiveness is not to absolve the perpetrator of an ill deed (that is not and never will be in our purview) , but allows those affected by the deed to move on and not have the rest of their lives destroyed by negativity and bitterness resulting from the original action.
Our ability to forgive is one of the greatest gifts we have. That’s not to say it is also very hard to do. I don’t think forgiveness has anything to do with so-called legal justice, or one’s ability to remember.
Your linked article and website looks like a vehicle for technocratic scientism dressed up as ‘troof’. Calling the site ‘the greater good’ speaks volumes about the collectivist idealism (‘group forgiveness’ for example) it clearly promotes.
An admiral, but incredibly myopic, view. What if everyone moves on? What if everybody forgets or forgives? How is justice then served? No, you absolutely need the angry, bitter and unforgiving amongst us; we do the dirty work while allowing others a peaceful, harmonious, existence. It is us that will see justice done, while others enjoy the rebalancing that that justice brings.
When justice has been served, then I will rest. I’m willing for that rest to be in my coffin.
See my response to Sforzesca
I’d love revenge – and by that I mean I have visions of lamp posts and rope.
That said, I’m a believer in the old saying ” He who seeks revenge must dig two graves”.
So, I’ll never descend to their level.
But, IF we get out of this there must be justice – although I fear it is more likely to be meted out only in the afterlife as opposed to here as well.
Justice and forgiveness are not the same thing.
You’re right. The example I pasted in is just one of many, and of course many established religions try to explain it as well. In particular, forgiving a culprit does not mean their activities or their financial consequences are going to be ignored or struck off.
Indeed. I concur. Forgiveness is separate from consequence.
Absolutely. It took me a long time to realise that to forgive someone has a powerful impact on our own mental health. I had had grudges against certain people for a long time, and, yes, they behaved badly towards me. I’ve forgiven them, and (think) I’ve ‘let it go’. They have no idea of course that I’ve forgiven them (last saw them decades ago), and they probably continue to be horrible to others, but at least it’s stopped eating away at me!
This sounds nice in theory. But I harbour grudges against certain people for a very good reason: I want to deny them any future opportunity of doing it again. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
No. Forgive the Fascists? Never.
A view that, given time, will eventually lead us into fascism.
That may well be a good point.
And yet, just to let them go gets us fascism straight away.
Who said anything about ‘letting them go’?
You appear to be arguing that fascism is inevitable, and we can influence only the timeframe under which it arrives.
Yes, post-mortem when they meet their Maker.
I’m not in a forgiving mood. Not now; not ever.
And will this still be so, when you meet your maker?
No way!
Never forget. Never forgive.
https://youtu.be/WvHdlQVaqEU
That’s you that is!
Let’s leave that to God. Meanwhile we mere mortals here on Earth… skin ‘em alive!
Yes. But I would like to see public apologies, that reach as many people as saw their original statements. Because…most of the population STILL believe that the unvaccinated are beyond the pale…they still believe what these ‘opinion formers’ said, and unless they retract, we do remain demonised.
True repentance would require sincerely contrite statements admitting that you were wrong and that your words or actions harmed others. Think about what this would mean if government officials did or said this. Or if the mainstream press did this. These people and the organizations where they work would be admitting guilt. Among other things, this would open the flood gates for mass lawsuits …. As well as public trials and maybe death sentences for “crimes against humanity.” In other words, this isn’t going to happen.
Primo Levi
“Monsters exists, but they are too few in numbers to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the functionaries ready to believe and act without asking questions”
Excellent quote thanks.
Thanks FL. You have said it all for me.
Pound of flesh? Go metric get more: kilogram of flesh.
The entire episode has really shaken my faith in this country and it’s values. The enthusiasm that people had for segregation and apartheid. I never, ever, thought I would see that here.
Me too. I no longer feel the same about this country or people. It can never go back to what it was before the covid scamdemic started, I feel totally detached from life in general.
“I feel totally detached from life in general.”
Yes, unfortunately that sums up how I feel.
I feel totally detached from life in general.
Funnily enough, I feel more attached to life in general.
It’s our sham society I feel detached from, and maybe that’s no loss. Maybe my eyes have simply been opened, and I can now see better things, more clearly.
me too and in the world
An excellent article which hits the nail on the head multiple times. It’s about the financial elites and globalists’ intention to gain global domination, so basically the WEF and co.
Psycho Nazi, Hermann Goring was spot on when asked how Hitler managed to get the support of millions of Germans leading up to and during the second world war;
“It’s easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and they will follow their leader. This works in every nation”. Isn’t this what governments have accomplished the world over during the last few years?
https://stopworldcontrol.com/domination/
A particular favourite of mine was this gem from May 2021, in The Independent by Sean O’Grady. Some of you paying attention at the back may remember it. Headline:
This is what we do about anti-vaxxers: No job. No entry. No NHS access
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/antivaxxers-vaccine-coronavirus-nhs-b1849437.html?utm_content=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1621346192
As the saying goes, ‘We have the receipts’.
And this isn’t simply about two sides of a respectable argument, in which it’s OK to disagree. We are talking here about Crimes Against Humanity.
That’s a great find. And all those doctors being immortalised on film too.
Nice.
There was a discussion about it BTL here back when it came out.
It deserves to stand and be remembered as a marker for how low our society has sunk.
Agreed.
Replace unvaccinated with Jew or Black and then everyone who went along with this demonisation, who didn’t speak up, who agreed, who just accepted understand you are the people who would have been complicit in what was done to others at the behest of Governments in the past.
I will never forgive, never forget and I do want justice.
Don’t forget that the sceptic and similar are largely a self congratulatory echo chamber.
The inevitable rise in illness/hospitalisations (it will soon be winter after all) will see yet more attempts to demonise us I fear.
It will only be when/if our message makes into the MSM that we can feel the battle is being won, and sadly there is little sign of that despite the wonderful efforts of the medical experts on “our” side.
That said, there is room for much optimism. The jabs are causing such damage that people are beginning to wake up. Who doesn’t know of someone who has died/been injured in “mysterious” circumstance. It seems the new jab uptake is a lot lower than those in control would wish – I know quite a few who say they’re having no more.
We’ve got to keep at it.
People who stick up anti-vax posters (available cheaply from ebay I believe) at bus stops, supermarkets, notice boards, litter bins etc. are to be admired.
The White Rose group have posters available for FREE download on their website.
Thanks.
But my fiends tell me that the ones from ebay are better because they come ready stickable.
If only more people were doing it. We’ve had a barrage of lies from the MSM for 3 bloody years.
Time to strike back.
I can find most things on ebay but anti vax posters are turning a blank.
Phew. I thought they’d nobbled ebay for a moment!
Just search for – “anti vax” – it’s just worked ok for me. I assure you there are loads.
For example :-
100 of –
“No to Medical Tyranny”.
Costs £9.99
They come with sticky backs, perfect for sticking on anything anywhere especially where sheep may notice.
It’s not inconceivable that Plod or the Local Authority may try and prosecute for, eg criminal damage. Lol, but I assure you, their chances of success are remote. – Anyway, think of the publicity.
Someone I know got threatened by Tesco – but really there’s little they can do to stop it.
We’ve had nothing but evil propaganda from the BBC/MSM for 3 years.
Time to strike back.
thewhiterose.uk
freedom fighters international instagram will mail you stickers for postage donation
i’ve put up somewhere around 300 white rose stickers maybe 500 [ gave awaysome too
to anyone who seems interested ,very organized at ffi.is in the u .s .
you can even select which ones you want
i really enjoy putting up the sticker, was nervous at first not anymore !
Good for you. I must admit that the USA have better posters though.
But, even if you just make just one person actually think, then it’s worthwhile.
A couple of years ago I was thoroughly disheartened – but then I saw just one anti-vax sticker near where I live –
And I thought – I’m not the only one.
.thank you and i think the british white rose stickers are so much better!
.that’s how i felt when i saw stickers someone else put up , was quite a while after i started that saw some someone else did. . finally i’m not alone there are others out there!
freedomfightersinternational2 on instagram is email a ddress there too
for white rose stickers
http://thewhiterose.uk
We should not have to rely on the goodwill of the MSM or the efforts of online groups to research and publicise the facts on this and other issues in the public policy disaster area. We pay MPs to do this.
It is the dutu of all MPs not in the government to challenge, enquire, criticise and condemn errors or incompetence by the bureaucracy. It is their role to vote down bad policies and vote out bad Ministers. If they don’t want to do this they should be replaced, regardless of party.
They’re all bought & paid for globalists who just follow orders of the whips & enable the agenda of the cabal to be implemented.
The corrupt lazy sods won’t do a thing. They are ALL wholly guilty if not directly then certainly by their abject refusal to do their jobs.
Great summary. Any word on when the Democratic People’s Republic of America will drop their ban on the unjabbed? This seems to be a permanent political gimmick of their entry rules now – unless you’re coming over the southern border of course and your jab obligation is replaced with one to vote Democrat.
Anyone heard any rumblings? We’ve put our hope with seeing our US friends in Biden’s Red Army being obliterated in the mid terms but there’s no second guessing the power of their fraud machine.
Fingers crossed for you … mein Herr Trudeau is finally allowing me to fly to Calgary next week to see my mother for the first time in almost 3 years. So gracious and generous of the great man. Maybe Lord Biden will follow his compassionate lead.
That’s darkly great news. Really glad for you. Yes I hope hair sniffing Brother Number 1 will follow suit..
Also with Pfizer drone Janine Small’s EU interview video now a permanent feature of the internet, I can’t fathom how they can remotely keep this crap up..
The world was subjected to al 8 general methods of torture as identified in Biderman’s Chart of Coercion, published by Amnesty in 1973 in Report on Torture. See slide 26 p49 of the pdf in the link:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ACT40/001/1973/en/
All of the above examples are a form of torture.
Germans started to collect and publish these receipts early on, under #ichhabemitgemacht (I joined in).
Recently, some people who collected and shared those receipts and that # have become targets of prosecution by the criminals and their guardians in the justice system, with them arguing that publishing their own publicly made hate speech in that form constitutes a hate crime and a violation of data protection laws.
You cannot make it up.
And this is far from over.
https://reitschuster.de/post/staatsanwaltschaft-ermittelt-wegen-ichhabemitgemacht/
I am looking forward to the follow ups – a list of all the celebs and B listers who publicly mouthed off telling everybody they had to take the injections. It should be a long running series.
Let’s kick them while they’re vulnerable and hold them under the spotlight of shame.
Since they promoted Chinese policy, let them experience Chinese justice. Parade them through the streets wearing dunce’s hats and placards round their necks: ‘I am a hateful, useful idiot’.
Then the crowds can jeer and spit at them and pelt them with offal.
That sounds remarkably lenient JXB?
Anyone remember this from Jennifer Aniston? Jennifer Aniston explains cutting off unvaccinated friends – BBC News
Thanks for this. What a great start to the series. We need a name / title:
‘Celebs and their intelligence.’
‘Sleb Out-takes.’
Any other suggestions?
How about ‘Sponsored by Pfizer’?
I think for there to be forgiveness there has to be genuine repentance, and I have not seen much of that yet.
I am bitter and not able to give my unreserved friendship to anyone who collaborated with covid madness and does not now admit they were wrong to do so. I am not going to let the bitterness ruin my life, but I will not forgive and forget without an apology. We’re just more limited now in terms of who we spend our time with. I am very lucky in that I can work from home and minimise time spent in social chit chat with covidian work colleagues (which is most of them sadly). There are some people I spend time with who were fairly covidian at the time and still are, up to a point, but who were happy to listen to me ranting and didn’t treat me like a loony or a mad uncle or call me a conspiracy theorist or literally Hitler. Those people I used to spend time with who were not prepared to hear me out or just insulted my intelligence with cheap jibes I have absolutely no time for.
And true repentance is only validated by penance. Public flogging would be my choice.
Indeed, genuine repentance, but above all, an admission that they were 100% wrong – in locking down, in the stupid masks, the anti-social distancing and above all, vaxx coercion.
A couple of people I know have expressed such things, most haven’t. Perhaps a few more think it but don’t want to say it – maybe they would if I pressed them but I can’t be arsed.
Only a fool could believe a person can protect others by being vaccinated. This claim has never before been used.
Vaccination is only a means to reduce spread of a pathogen, PRIOR to it circulating in a population. We vaccinate school children to prevent a measles epidemic, never to stop one. It can be used around individuals at ‘ground zero’ where a particular pathogen has appeared.
In fact vaccination is contraindicated during circulation of a pathogen, as it is not effective for 14 days after the last dose of the dosing regime, during which time it overloads the immune system making the individual more likely to be infected.
Since it is impossible to vaccinate everyone at the same time, the pathogen will be circulating and meeting a large population of vaccinated but super-susceptible increasing disease and transmission rates. (Exactly what is being observed with Omicron and other variants.)
If A is vaccinated, then it makes no odds whether B is vaccinated or not.The fact that A is vaccinated will not protect B if they encounter the pathogen.
So when vaccinated idiots said they wouldn’t want an unvaccinated person near them, that is explicit recognition of the fact the vaccines didn’t work… were not in fact vaccines.
Good analysis. As you suggested at the end, maybe they are not “vaccines” – at least not under the traditional definition. It might have been convenient to classify it as such, though, to avoid the complexity of new drug approval processes, and maybe it was a useful marketing tactic. I’m not attacking the idea of creating new suitable drugs that can help those that are infected – but they should have proper names that do not clash with conventional “vaccines” intended to prevent infection of the recipient.
JohnK – these poisonous injections were deliberately marketed as “vaccines” in order to ensure universal take-up. The wording was cynical and deliberate. The manufacturers knew they were not vaccines, governments knew they were not vaccines and the WHO knew they were not vaccines. In fact the WHO changed their definition of a vaccine in order to accommodate these “brews.”
The “vaccines” had two purposes, to kill millions within a few months of receipt and to introduce slow poisons in to the rest, such that cancers, heart disease, dementia etc would become prevalent. And it has worked. I expect mortality rates will take off over the next twelve months. Sadly.
Never underestimate the evil that is being foisted on us.
What do we think is the objective behind the two purposes you mention (killing and “slow poison”)?
Truly one of the more stupid claims and indeed an admission they don’t believe their poison works.
A friend of mine’s 20-year old son got his 3rd vaxx as requested by the government last December. He went on a skiing trip and came home with the lurgy. He then spent a week in his room, having meals put outside the door, because he was worried he would infect his perfectly healthy parents (both mid-50s), who were also both 3x vaxxed.
Literally proving you don’t believe the garbage works; he did what his cousin did the year before when there was no vaxx. So what was the point of the vaxx? And I’m pretty certain they all got the vaxx because it would help others.
I think what is so frightening is that after the horrors of WW2 and the destruction of whole groups of people, one would think the human race had seen how divisive it is to take against a belief, thought or lifestyle. But, with a few strokes of the pen (or rather printer these days) the public can still be whipped up, with minimum effort, into a sort of hysteria, and it wouldn’t have taken much more urging, from those who had the voice, for physical retribution to have become the fashion against the unvaccinated – things like broken windows, public jostling etc or even more.
If anything, it has brought home to me how thin our veneer of civilisation is. It has certainly changed my outlook and demeanour.
Absolutely. Now you can truly see how easy it was for Hitler to get the Germans on board. A lot of propaganda, scare people enough and Bob’s your uncle.
That was only time during the pandemic when I felt some despair – in the spring of 2021 when it was becoming clear they were reaching a new peak of crazy and were heading for full-on fascism to get the poke into people. Even if it were a tried and tested, well-known, genuinely safe and effective product, no one should ever have been coerced into getting it. The fact you had to coerce people after a year of the lurgy doing the rounds also shows the majority of people knew full well by that time that it wasn’t that dangerous, otherwise they would have been desperate to get vaxxed.
I expected that Brits and Americans would have none of it.
As such, their compliance was particularly un-American/un-British and also the most disappointing and most harmful.
Brits cowardly non-use of the self-exemption options was most pathetic.
In other countries, people, and in particular parents, risked lawsuits and careers to be exempted.
Second most disappointing but less unexpected in light of their totalitarian history and collaboration then was the lack of rebelling of Southern Europeans and Eastern Europeans to me.
Most disgusting for me was and is the expected zealous compliance and othering of dissidents in the German speaking countries in light of their much tainted and still pretty recent history in that regard and in particular in light of their constant vows over the past decades to have learned their lesson.
My limited understanding of what has gone on in Germany and Austria does not paint a pleasant picture and particularly given their recent history.
Clearly lessons have not been learned.
“Brits cowardly non-use of the self-exemption options was most pathetic” True (I’m one of the ones that did declare it), but the official publication of the relevant bumf was made deliberately hard to find. Almost the opposite to advertising, in effect – and part of the bureaucratic behaviour. In fact, it was via various publications elsewhere that I came across it all,
The more I think about it that article the other day that summarized/outlined all the propaganda elements that needed to be implemented is vitally important (and needs to be saved). Basically, the Powers that Be came up with their propaganda/marketing plan to reduce “vaccine hesitancy” … and then they simply worked their plan. To perfection. This was a government plan that actually worked.
The Dutch government in particular can hang its head in shame. The nazti pass was not introduced until October 2021, when they were gearing up for a 3rd poke as it was clear that the poison did not stop transmission or infection. The public health authorities knew this since July 2021, when Israel started the 3rd poke.
So there was literally no justification on that ground. Two coalition partners were not in favour, the 2 EU acolytes were – that is where to look for why this occurred. Digital ID push, possibly, or just simply that Ursula was making a pretty penny on purchasing copious amounts of poison from her buddy Bourla and as long as you could force people into getting jabbed, the money would keep rolling in.
As for the green/red scan shown above – funnily enough, the red one says the person does not have a negative test – if you were vaxxed, by definition you had a green check, even if you had a positive test – the public health authorities wanted to change that, the government refused. So much for this being on public health grounds, and so much for people not seeing your health status. Saying you don’t have a negative test by definition tells the person looking at the scan you are unvaxxed.
From a country that has one of the biggest mouths on the planet when it comes to human rights, this episode has been disgraceful beyond compare, particularly for all the people who were happy to go along with it, saying if you got locked out of places, well, that was your choice. Would they be happy to say that about someone with AIDS? They really did not think and just swallowed every lie – even after WWII and its atrocities being drilled into our heads in just about every class in school.
Yes. The Low Countries re-earned their name recently.
Could this article be edited to include more that I, and others I’m sure, can come up with? For example, Andrew Neil wanted the unvaccinated to be ‘punished’, in this article here: It’s time to punish Britain’s five million vaccine refuseniks, says ANDREW NEIL | Daily Mail Online
Nice one.
The author could have filled up this website with anecdotes corroborating his point.
For the first time I’m feeling there’s an upside to the tweets/utterings of various individuals on the internet being preserved for posterity.
If only we could get more people to visit sites like this that are preserving these tidbits from history.
Thank you for this, but I don’t think it was a fad, I think it was planned. It was predicted by a German doctor, Heiko Schoening, who was prevented from speaking to a peaceful gathering of thousands in Trafalgar Square on 26th September 2020 by an attack from riot police. He was subsequently arrested at Speakers’ Corner. Please see film of his speech from outside Wandsworth police station after his arrest.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BnONDjimhFJk/
At the time I thought his words were a crazy conspiracy theory. The pandemic would be long past before a vaccine would become available as it takes years for them to be brought to market. I don’t think it is a theory any more.
I thank the doctor for mentioning Dr Bhakdi and Dr Reiss who I thank in turn for my current unvaxxed status.
By now, it’s almost impossible to keep up with all the unexposed scandals and travesties (although Michael Senger and this site are documenting plenty of them).
I’m going to write a little piece on my Substack reminding readers that Sesame Street (and its star, Elmo) participated in the propaganda to get children vaccinated by running a PSA, showing Elmo getting his shot. “Sesame Street” is big on promoting tolerance and “diversity.” I note that this iconic children’s show never produced any PSAs telling their viewers to be accepting of the people who decided not to get their shot(s). Indeed, the message seems to be that these are Bad People who should be avoided and shamed.
All of this could be summarized succinctly: You’ll take your lockdowns and your discrimination … and like it!
Germany didn’t really introduce lockdowns for unvaccinated people. What they did introduce, though, is possibly even more sinister: Daily mandatory testing for the unvaccinated in the workplace and loads of other places they were still allowed to access. Conveniently, this will manufacture a pandemic of the unvaccinated, ie, the most frequently tested. And the people resonsible for that are all still in power, all ‘democractically'[*] elected.
[*] Due to the very peculiar German voting system (and people’s frustation with it), the parties recently elected to the Landtag (state parliament) of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony, Hannover, for all practical purposes, with some formely Prussian territory added to it) really ‘proportionally’ represent 52.3% of the voters and the upcoming SPD-Greens coalition government only 28.8%. That’s not only minority rule, it additional excludes half of the electorate completely (about 40% of which didn’t even bother to vote as the outcome – random coalition continuing the existing policy – is predetermined, anyway).
“Germany didn’t really introduce lockdowns for unvaccinated people.”
What were 2G, 2G+ and 3G then? Restrictions on your daily life if you’re unvaxxed. 3G means unvaxxed forced to test to gain access, 2G means vaxxed or recovered only. Looks like a lockdown to me.
Precisely. Access restrictions for shops and facilities, the latter mostly hospitality. 2G+ meant recovered or vaxxed plus recent negative test, BTW. Austria actually issued stay-at-home orders for unvaccinated people. German politicians (eg, Söder) toyed with this idea, too, but didn’t really implement it.
Presumably, it also meant it was easy for the vaccinated people to identify unvaccinated people?
At least in the workplace, obviously, because they were the ones who had to get tested at the start of every day. But I think this was rather a secondary effect and the daily degradation through public segregation plus low volume torture (nasal swabs) for misbehaviour were the intended ones.
I’ll tell you what is utterly sickening – people like Esther Rantzen (started Childline for the welfare of children), Edwina Currie (gave Savile keys to Broadmoor for the welfare of inmates), Karren Brady (Sunday Sport) and the others. All inextricably involved, knowingly or not, in a vile agenda in which
It’s no surprise that so called celebrities were at the frontline of all the hysteria. By definition they’re thick and so insecure they will follow the moronic mass view.
And look who has just become the chancellor of the exchequer. A WEF puppet? A politician who was in favour of vaxx mandates, lockdowns, quarantines and god knows what else. All the crimes against humanity that were committed during the past 2 1/2 years must come to light and those in sage and the gov’t responsible for the serious adverse events and deaths from covid injections must be brought to a court of law to answer all the questions so many of us have including why did they approve these vaxxes for use in the first place.
The same politician who, when Health minister, hid the poor results of Exercise Cygnet which showed our level of preparedness for an endemic was woefully low. Thank the gods he’s only in charge of the money.
I think we have to be careful using this revelation, (that the jabs were never tested to see if they stopped transmission), as grounds for denouncing the medical apartheid and segregation. What if the jabs had actually been quite good at stopping infection and transmission, but were still experimental, poorly tested and caused high rates of adverse side effects? What if this is the case next time?
As Bossche has been warning that vaccinating too many people with a very leaky vaccine is dangerous since it compromises your own immune system & facillitates new strains and prevents herd immunity. Those who chose to vaccinate themselves continue to get repeated cases of covid while those that refused the mRNA drug do not. The more people who get the virus & develop natural immunity attribute to herd immunity. It is the vaccinated who should be asking foregivness. Because of their fears they are the ones keeping this virus circulating and they will always be in need of boosters.