There have been 15,357 excess non-Covid deaths registered in England and Wales in the 17 weeks since April 23rd, according to the latest official data from the Office for National Statistics, released on Wednesday. This is 9.5% more than expected, based on an average of the previous five years.
In the week ending August 19th, the most recent week for which data are available, 10,982 deaths were registered in England and Wales, which is 1,719 (18.6%) above the five-year average for the week. Of these, 551 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate as a contributory cause and 354 mentioned COVID-19 as underlying cause, leaving 1,365 deaths from a different underlying cause.
At the Daily Sceptic we have been following what appears to be a correlation between the spring fourth dose booster rollout among over-75s in England and a wave of now over 15,300 non-Covid excess deaths that are currently unexplained. Vaccine researcher Dr. Theo Schetters has highlighted a similar correlation in the Netherlands and raised concerns that the vaccines may be contributing to the deaths.
The correlation in England and Wales, which was strong during the spring and early summer, has not continued, as deaths have remained high while booster doses have tailed off, as depicted below in the chart showing deaths by date of occurrence. This may be an indication of ongoing vaccine injury, perhaps in conjunction with the effects of previous Covid infection, or the operation of another cause.
The picture is actually worse than it looks because after the 148,000 excess deaths of the past two and a half years we would expect a significant amount of mortality displacement, so there should be fewer deaths than normal. On other hand, the ageing population will counteract that effect to some degree.
Following a welcome intervention from Oxford’s Professor Carl Heneghan, the Government has now said it is looking into what lies behind the unusual level of deaths. However, the vaccines have not as yet been mentioned as a possible contributory factor, despite the deaths being largely cardiovascular in nature and the vaccines having known adverse effects on the heart and circulatory system. It is hard to see how the vaccines can be ruled out without proper investigation of the person-specific data by vaccination status as well as autopsies conducted with the possibility of vaccine injury in mind.
The fact that cancer deaths are not above average counts against the suggestion that the main cause of the deaths is denial of healthcare access during the pandemic.
Proper investigation, which takes into account the possibility that vaccine injury is contributing to the trend, is called for.
Stop Press: The study led by Dr. Peter Doshi, an Editor of the BMJ, which analysed data from the Covid mRNA vaccine trials and found the vaccines were more likely to put you in hospital through serious adverse effects than keep you out through protecting you from Covid, has now been peer-reviewed and published in Vaccine.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Mysterious”?
I didn’t realise the DS was venturing into comedy.
You beat me to it, I was going to comment on the ‘mysterious’ as well. I do think you got it right, in the headline the word mysterious should be between quotation marks.
Yes, but only couple of days ago on this site Noah Carl was telling us this was a statistical illusion.
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/08/29/is-there-an-excess-deaths-crisis-in-england%EF%BF%BC/
Help,I need to told what to think and believe, and I’m struggling with the dissonance right now.
Will writes:
The correlation, which was strong during the spring and early summer, has not continued in England and Wales, as deaths have remained high while booster doses have tailed off
Only this morning Steve Kirsch issued a substack titled: ‘Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people’.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-one-graph-tells-you-everything?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I think it was Paardekooper who noticed, from a very clearly explained methodology of examining VAERS data, what he referred to as a “100 day fuse”.
This possibility is something I find quite disconcerting.
Originally I thought longer term effects would be things like auto-immune diseases, cancers, neurological diseases (still do think that). But the idea that either a) the mrna keeps reproducing for longer than they realise or b) that the spike protein lingers and causes damage far longer than they realise of c) both, resulting in cardiovascular disease within let’s say 3 to 6 months of being vaxxed is really frightening, that is ticking time bomb stuff – particularly if they keep expanding the time window by continuing to stab people.
Of course, they do realise that they don’t know how long either the mrna or the spike protein can stick around, they very tacitly admitted this when they disappared the info on the CDC website saying that the mrna was cleared from the body within a few days and the spike protein within a few weeks.
Yes, the deaths occurring many months out is surely extremely ominous in the implications.
I would like to hear some hypothesis that attempt to explain this.
The clot shots are kill shots. Lord Bill of the Gates of Hell has openly admitted that “the vaccines” will reduce world population by 10-15%. I have frequently posted on here that I believe these injections have been brewed to a recipe and Dr Mike Yeadon concurs. The recipe is Kill.
Too many people refuse to face up to what is coming, even on DS.
https://rumble.com/v1hpxdh-warning-graphic-images-global-depopulation-in-full-swing-as-adult-death-syn.html
Posted last night by Burlington Bertie. About 34 mins. It is gruesome but is a compendium of ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ cases from around the world. There is no fakery.
A blonde, tussle haired buffoon even puts in a brief appearance pushing the injections. Nice.
Mark Steyn destroys “safe and effective” loudly and eloquently.
Be warned – not pleasant viewing.
I think Noah Carl made a very good point in that we should be adjusting for population growth and age profile and this makes the current excess death picture look less alarming for the population as a whole.
Firstly note that applying the same logic to the excess during the pandemic means that the excess was substantially lower too – but we knew that…?
Neverthless even after adjusting for this there still an excess (the latest excess is over 1000 – I have my own figures but Jamie Jenkins now does the same calculation). There is also a very substantial difference between age groups.
For illustrative puproses I attach cumulative excess death pictures using pre pandemic mortality for the age group 15-44 and 85+.
With the former group the excess didn’t start to be significant until spring 2021. The latter shows considerable mortality displacement possibly including a possible “dry tinder” effect from two succesive mild flu seasons before the pandemic
I hope the difference is obvious. It might be worth looking too at life years lost as well as the death numbers (30-40 years per death in the younger age group v. months for the over 85?)
This absolutely does need to be investigated.
Wow who’d have thought injecting spike proteins in to ppl would be bad for the heart. I wonder if Pfizer recommended injecting small amounts of arsenic to fight covid whether the BBC would put up any protest? Doubtful.
Do we still have an ageing population? I presume that if excess deaths continue for enough time, that will no longer be true.
Only if the excess ones are in an older age group. If a lot of excess deaths occur in younger groups, it could be the other way round.
Yes, good point. Also, I realised it could be the other way round if, for some reason, there is a further rapid decline in fertility.
Or… the won’t be anyone left to get old.
I detest the term excess deaths because it is loaded with assumptions.
If one understand the assumptions and what the term excess deaths actually represents, then it’s fine. But the word “excess” is just too leading, too suggestive. It should be called deaths over the 5 year average. Much less loaded, less likely to get people panicking.
‘Deaths over’ – ‘excess’ means ‘over’.
Done correctly it should be adjusted for population change, and change in age distribution. Using longer periods makes the maths a bit more complicated.
This is how it looks for working age vs. retired age. More details on my Telegram group https://t.me/mikes_stuff/572, including deaths by all age groups
However, there seems to be a peculiarity in deaths for the 50-54 age group, which shows 38% above the 10 year average pre-pandemic hoax (i.e. 2010-2019). This is 30% above the maximum.
Overall, for the last week of data from ONS (w/e 19 Aug), there are 1,809 excess deaths above the pre-pandemic hoax average. That’s nearly 20%.
My argument concerning vaccines has, from the get-go, been that you can never really know what long-term effects they’re causing, even allowing for long-term surveillance of vaccine safety, unless enough individuals have been studied on a case-by-case basis.
For example, person X, who is 23 years old and previously healthy, took the vaccine 6 months ago, and died last week of heart disease. But in the 6 months since the jab, X has taken up smoking due to stress, for the same reason has consistently over-eaten and is now obese. In this case the smoking and bingeing on fast food is more likely the cause than the jab.
The opposite is true for Person Y, also 23 years old but still healthy, who in the 6 month period since vaccination, has actually improved her health and level of fitness, but nevertheless also dropped dead last week in the same fashion as X. In this case, given that the only significant change to her biochemistry in the last 6 months has been the Covid jab, the latter is overwhelmingly likely to be the cause.
Without extensive, costly and cumbersome investigations such as these, it is simply impossible to isolate the Covid-19 jab as the underlying cause of a generalized trend represented by a graph, especially when that trend combines all manner of demographics, lifestyle changes and circumstances
I don’t think these type of investigations are ever going to happen, and that is exactly the reason why my lifelong credo towards medications of any kind – to only take them when you know for sure there is no other option – also applies to this one.
However, the rolling out of the injections and booster this that and the other has always seen a rise in mortality figures shortly after.
Funny that.
Yes, that is the real smoking gun bit – the very clear temporal relationship between time of vaxx and longer-term elevated mortality levels in a range of highly-vaxxed countries.
Naturally that is not in and of itself proof that it is the vaxx, but when one combines what is a definite warning sign with the fact that the authorities can’t be arsed to actually investigate the matter, this suggests they strongly suspect or outright know something is wrong. The DM has an article about the UK government advice on giving the poison to pregnant/breastfeeding women. I had a look at the actual document and felt so comforted when reading that a whole range of matters such as toxikokinetics, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity have neither been studied nor are there plans for such cause they reckon there won’t be any such problems. Well, I’m convinced – if you cross your fingers and say you assume there will be no problems, things must be okay. $cience in 2022, the gift that keeps on giving.
I wish people could be bothered to read what is laid down in black and white on the websites of the governments and the public health authorities – they literally state, 2 years after injecting billions of people with this sludge, that they either still do not have sufficient information to make any determinations as to safety and/or that they have no intention of trying to gather such information.
Just a quick throwaway – Dutch kingie has cancelled a trip to US as he is suffering from the after-effects of pneumonia (in the middle of summer). The first article I read said he has an auto-immune ailment which is why he didn’t take the J&J vaxx… what an odd thing to say, it’s almost like it’s saying he only got one shot (that was publicised at the time).
Well that’s why you have control groups that should be sufficiently large and well selected that a notable trend in the vaccinated group but not the control group or vice versa is a big red flag that needs looking into in more detail. The groups in the initial trials didn’t seem that large to me given that I think only a few people died of covid from either group, and a big driver for the vaccines was to “save lives”. Of course the long term trials were complete at the time the vaccines were rolled out and are now useless as they vaxxed the control group!
Yes, there’ve been more red flags than a Mayday parade in Moscow. The sabotage of their trial by Pfizer, with the connivance of the regulators, at the end of March 21 was the big red flag that caused me to make up my mind not to be injected.
Vaccines could have even further knock-on effects. One that Del Bigtree emphasises is the effect on newly-born children. What problems might they inherit from their mother’s immune system? Over generations, there could be a cumulative compromising effect.
I suspect your view on the damaging effects on new-borns will reveal themselves as the years roll on and as the damages are unveiled. I fear the future for new-borns is bleak.
Prof Bhakdi warned people when the clot-shots were first launched: don’t have one of them. If you have one, don’t have a second. Under no circs have a third or fourth.
The information was out there, you just had to be sufficiently independent-of-thought to look for it.