Covid vaccine boosters in older people are killing one person for every 800 doses administered and should be withdrawn from use immediately, a leading vaccine scientist has said.
Dr. Theo Schetters, a vaccinologist based in the Netherlands who has played a leading role in the development of a number of vaccines, has analysed the official data from the Dutch Government and found a very close correlation between when fourth vaccine doses were administered in the country and the number of excess deaths, as shown in the chart below. Importantly, in the Netherlands the booster rollout in different regions was staggered over a number of weeks allowing an analysis by region, which confirms the effect.

Dr. Schetters, who is a recipient of the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montpellier in France, told Dr. Robert Malone, an inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, that medical doctors are currently seeing “all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is” and that “in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that”. It is essential to look at all-cause mortality, he said, as the vaccine “potentially affects all organs”.
So it potentially affects all organs. And that’s what the medical doctors now see, they see all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is. And because the adverse effects are so not just single one adverse effect, but can be anything, they surface very difficult to a statistical level. And that’s why we do analysis on all cause mortality, because say, okay, and if we do not know what is exactly related to vaccination, of course, the coagulation problems, myocarditis, we know that, but there are many more things happening at the moment. And so that’s why we look at all cause mortality, and in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that. So let’s say in this week we gave 10,000 vaccinations. Then in this week, we have something like 125 excess in death in that week.
The correlation is striking, he said, to the extent that if you have more vaccines in a week then you also have more excess deaths, and if you have fewer vaccines in a week, you have fewer deaths. Dr. Schetters says he has written to the Director of the Institute of Health in the Netherlands to alert him to the findings.
So what we’ve done is we have written a registered letter to the director of our Institute of Health and presenting the results and expressing my concerns. And just with the question, from a precautionary point of view, please reconsider vaccination strategy because I think this is a real warning. And so it’s not that everybody dies. Actually I do a rough calculation, it’s one in 800
During the interview, Dr. Malone explained that his own organisation, consisting of 17,000 medical practitioners and scientists, has released a statement that the vaccines should be withdrawn as they are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio, a statement with which Dr. Schetters agreed. Dr. Malone said:
I stand as the President of the International Association of Physicians and Medical Scientists. So we’re 17,000 that are only physicians and medical scientists, all verified, no nurses, not because we don’t like nurses, but it has to do with the positioning with the press and messaging. So that’s the basis for our organisation.
Months ago, we came out with a press conference in a clear unequivocal statement that one can find at www.globalcovidsummit.org, where we made a clear, unambiguous statement. In our opinion, as an organisation, these vaccines should be withdrawn. They are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio. And as the person who is responsible for the genesis of this technology, I’m often criticised. Didn’t I realise what I was doing? And there’s no way for me to have known that the normal standards for regulatory development and testing and clinical would be circumvented.
But I stand as someone who has intimate, detailed knowledge of the technology and its risks and benefits, the nature of the formulations, the role of the pseudouridine, all of those things.
It’s my opinion and that of the organisation that I represent, that the data are now sufficiently clear that, in our opinion, the ongoing campaign for vaccination is no longer warranted.
Dr. Schetters’ analysis is in line with the observations we have been making on the Daily Sceptic in recent weeks as we have been following what appears to be a correlation between the spring fourth dose booster rollout among over-75s in England and a wave of now over 11,000 non-Covid excess deaths that are currently unexplained (see the charts below).
The latest official data from the Office for National Statistics, released on Tuesday, show there have been 11,370 excess non-Covid deaths registered in England and Wales in the 13 weeks since April 23rd. If all of these were a result of the spring boosters (of which 4,182,483 have been delivered up to July 22nd) it would be a rate of one every 368 doses. That figure is an upper bound, of course, as not all the additional deaths will be due to the boosters, but it shows the U.K. data are broadly in line with the Netherlands data. Note that a higher vaccine injury rate would be expected in the U.K. where the fourth doses are only being given to the over-75s, as the rate increases with age.
In the week ending July 22nd, the most recent week for which data are available, 10,978 deaths were registered in England and Wales, which is 1,680 (18.1%) above the five-year average for the week. Of these, 745 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate as a contributory cause and 463 mentioned COVID-19 as underlying cause, leaving 1,217 deaths from a different underlying cause. Note that this was the week of the brief but intense heatwave (with recorded temperatures topping 40°C for the first time in some areas), so some of these will be heatwave deaths, as will many of the additional Covid deaths (being people who happened to have Covid at the time).

Deaths by date of occurrence rose dramatically in the most recent week, which might be assumed to be connected with the heatwave of July 18-19th. However, the data by date of occurrence show the spike occurring in the week ending July 15th, too soon for the heatwave. One explanation for this may be that the ONS uses a ‘statistical model’ to calculate death occurrences for recent weeks and this model may not cope well with unpredictable phenomena like heatwaves. If so, we should see adjustments in the next few reports as more real data become available. Note that the cause of the spike in non-Covid excess deaths during June remains unclear.

Here is the cumulative curve of excess non-Covid deaths by date of registration along with the cumulative total of spring boosters.

As noted in previous weeks, the cause of the deaths appears to be largely related to diseases of the heart and blood vessels (cause of death data for July are now available here). Cancer deaths are, perhaps surprisingly given the withdrawal of healthcare access during the pandemic, broadly at normal levels, suggesting there is something other than lack of access to healthcare going on. The continued high level of excess deaths is unexpected as, following the 142,000 excess deaths of the last two and a half years, we would have anticipated a period of lower than average deaths.
The Government ought to be urgently investigating what lies behind the more than 11,000 additional deaths in three months. However, as we saw last week, it has shown no interest in doing so. When Esther McVey MP, Chair of the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), submitted a written question asking the Cabinet Office what steps it was taking “to investigate the higher than expected rate of deaths of 12.2% above the five-year average”, it simply referred the matter to the U.K. Statistics Authority, which merely said it will continue to publish the relevant statistics.
Perhaps Dr. Schetters’ intervention in the Netherlands will start to wake up those in Government who have their heads planted firmly in the sand.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The data by itself cannot show whether the vaccines are involved in the spike in unexpected deaths.
What? Oh Right. It was the climate-thingy, tarding wot dun it. Not the vials of poisoned shit.
Or maybe too many schnitzels.
Anything but the safely effectives and let’s not map the German data to everywhere else in the G20 that went on the Nazi-stabbination spree, that shows the same correlation. And don’t go back to Dec 2020 and map the excess dead to the stabbathons and see spikes and correlation. And don’t analyse countries that did nothing that have no such spikes.
Nuremberg Codes were signed for laughs and a photo op. Let’s not take that too seriously folks.
I take issue with what you say:
It’s not possible to have too much schnitzel
Otherwise you bang on the money I say.
With noodles? Those are a few of my favourite things…as for apple strudels…
Raindrops on roses?
You’re not cynical enough. My guess would be the official stance is that these are classified as inexplainable deaths and that that’s perfectly fine: The people are just dying. Some of them always do that. Move on, nothing to see here.
Totally agree, but, what’s a schnitzel?

Sooner have meat and two veg or a plate of fish and chips, not all that foreign muck!
It is worth pointing out that these are the ‘sudden/unexpected’ deaths, not all deaths.
They are probably consistent with the excess death data in the UK, which includes all deaths.
The German data shows about a threefold rise in these unexpected deaths. The UK has about a 15% death excess — but most deaths aren’t sudden/unexpected, so this is 15% over and above the usual death rates which will be dominated by individuals with significant morbidities (plus suicide, road accidents, etc). Given the low rates of ‘sudden/unexpected’ deaths this suggests that even the UK data shows substantial increase in the risk of ‘sudden/unexpected’ death in those individuals who appear to be healthy. It would be useful if the UK authorities explored this aspect of the data, but for some reason they appear to be hesitant to do this.
“for some reason they appear to be hesitant to do this”
We know the reason. It’s called a cover-up. They are covering up what might well amount to a crime with another crime. Doubly heinous, like murdering witnesses.
I’m not sure hesitant is the right word. I can’t think of what could induce them to look into it as they are in this up to their necks and no good will come to them because of it. IMO it’s a sure sign that they know they are guilty. If they were truly mystified by these deaths they would look into it.
They called us vaccine-hesitant. Perhaps they’re jail-hesitant?
The UK data does show excess deaths from heart attacks and strokes. I guess there will be some overlap with ‘sudden/unexpected’ deaths, especially for younger age groups.
On a related topic, I was informed last month that our company private medical plan premiums would rise by 28% next year due to increased volume of claims. We have about 750 UK employees.
Would be interested to know if any other commenters have had anything similar with a company funded private scheme or perhaps my colleagues are just jibby jab fanatics.
On the plus side your pension contributions should come down at some point.
That rather assumes that the pension providers are honest, straight-dealers…
“Why PEI has not analysed and published there data before now is unclear”.
Not at all, they just can’t see the data ‘coz there’s a big giant elephant stood right in front of the data. They have to tackle the elephant before they can tackle the data, and they’re way too scared to take on the elephant in the room.
First I felt like we were living in Ionesco’s Rhinoceros, with most of the world gleefully turning into covidnazis, now I feel like we’re living in his play La Cantatrice Chauve – What, you know 10 people who died suddenly in the last 4 months? How curious, how bizarre, what a coincidence – so do I! I wonder what could be causing all these sudden deaths? Perhaps it’s hotter summers, the colder winters, the stress caused by anti-vaxxers, shaking out your duvet, a referee blowing a whistle? I am going for booster 110, how about you? I hope it’s not as bad as last time, I was in ICU for a week – but fortunately, when I did catch corona for the 13th time, it was a little milder than before, I was only in bed for 3 weeks this time. Just think if I had not had my most recent, updated, mouse-approved booster!
What gets me is that they keep on handing out boosters, even though that will surely only amplify the signal. It will narrow down the sudden deaths to the age groups still getting boosters. At this point it looks to me like they are trying to find out how many doses of LNP poison a person can take before they croak, all still part of the trial – with the blessing of health authorities and governments across the world.
I think you’re only supposed have 1 LNP shot. Certainly not 5.
I ain’t no scientist, but at this point I’d say the number of LNP shots a person (or a mouse, for that matter) is supposed to have is 0
But yes, I’ve read more than once that the reason they started using this technology for what they call a vaccine is because it was deemed too toxic to use as a treatment and vaccines (at least, real ones) usually only require 1 or 2 shots.
Well I certainly don’t want one. They thought they could use it in cancer treatment where the risk benefit ratio made it acceptable. But knowing how well researched people are on here I guess we know that anyway. It’s bonkers to think they put toxic spike protein producing mRNA in a toxic LNP, I mean what could go wrong two for the price of one. The Highwire was interesting viewing this week with Dr Ryan Cole.
The rise can’t be due to the restrictions and their fallout, as that would have been mirrored in H2 20.
Same for Covid and Long Covid- AND the due to=with Covid IC code was expressively excluded anyway.
Which did not hinder the head of the KBV to come out with an assessment that there is nothing to see here, as this was just due to Covid….
Pure desperation.
Which leaves as explanations: climate change anxiety, Merkel grief, Putin hatred, World Cup anxiety, gender confusion, Reichsbuerger fear or: the big elephant in the room….
But who cares: the MSM did not show up and did not pen a line about it anyway.
And most Germans are absolutely fine with it and would rather have their masks and a vaxx mandate back.
https://reitschuster.de/post/angeblich-mehrheit-gegen-corona-lockerungen/
As Mrs Bee always says: Unf*ckingfassbar!
“Which leaves as explanations: climate change anxiety, Merkel grief, Putin hatred, World Cup anxiety, gender confusion, Reichsbuerger fear”
You forgot racism , brexit, colonialism, Trump, far-right extremism and January 6th.
“Implausible Deniability” is the name of the game for health regulatory authorities around the world. Just stick your fingers in your ears and sing “la la la..”. And they will go on doing it until they have not a shred of credibility left. Then the back-stabbing will start and things will get really interesting. That won’t be of much help to the vast number of people injured or killed by the “safe and effective” jabs, though at least they may finally get the justice and compensation they deserve.
The translation of the German tweet is wrong. Correct would be Since vaccination began in early 2021, the number of people dying out of the blue has been exploding. Plötzlich und unerwartet is a category or rather, a standard phrase used in German death notices to indicate that a seemingly healthy person suddenly died and that the relatives don’t understand why.
Another remark for people unfamiliar with German affairs: You really can’t quote the AfD. These people are evil extreme right-wing nazi terrorists and whoever listens to them or supports or even votes for them is subhuman scum (an actual quote from a German democrat, the original wording was Abschaum, der nichts Menschliches an sich hat).
Am I right in thinking that the AfD were the only party with a parliamentary presence to speak in opposition to the covid restrictions?
At least the only party where this was an official party position and not only something some party members sometimes advocated for, yes. But the real reason for this impressive string of qualifications is that the AfD – while being 110% establishment in every other respect – believes that existing immigration and asylum laws should actually apply in practice, ie, for instance, that rejected asylum seekers should eventually be deported instead of (as is current practice) simply allowed to stay indefinitely nevertheless.
Indeed. I expect I’d be tempted to vote them were I in Germany, and to vote for Le Pen in France and Meloni in Italy. Having read a lot of their policies and heard their speeches, I struggle to detect the “far right” in them.
“Far right” is a Lefty, Woke insult for anybody talking middle of the road common sense.
I’m not even sure what it could possibly mean any more. Far right to me means rounding up your enemies and putting them in camps.
Far right is now Elon Musk, JFK, John Major, Helmut Kohl and me.
And me
Some loony somewhere posted something I saw the other day about the Sunak government being one of the most right wing in recent times
I’ve just read through the complete, current party program and technically, there’s nothing far right in there. Minus details, this could have been a CDU program from the pre-Merkel era. But they’re oppression- and gender- and climate-denialists, want to support families with children instead relying on mass immigration to plug the holes left by a decreasing birth rate, consider EU and NATO organizations which exist for a purpose and not as ends in themselves which might therefore need to be changed or even disbanded if they’re not fit for their purpose, want the German official standing in the UN match its financial contributions (3rd largest), argue for a positive identification of Germans as belonging to a German cultural and historical nation transcending the 12 years from 1933 – 1945 and expect that prospective immigrants actually want to become German and not only gain access to the German welfare state.
This is all stuff people unused to the German situation might consider pretty ordinary but in Germany, it’s a matter of VERY BIG TABOO.
Very big taboo here too these days among the chattering classes.
They have a few wackos, like Hoecke.
Objectively not worse than the wackos the Left or Greens have.
Christ, even the FDP has ‘nuke em’ Strack-Zimmermann, who is arguably the most crazy and dangerous of them all.
It’s imprudent to judge people solely based on what their political enemies publish about them, especially if their enemies are woke. I don’t really have the motivation to spend a lot of time on this as I don’t believe in representative democracy, anyway, and don’t think there is one in Germany but I’m going to describe one Wacko Höcke scandal (2020/03/16).
First the headline: Höcke schockiert mit Auschwitz-Wortspiel! (Höcke makes shocking Auschwitz-joke!)
What did he actually say (paraphrase): He expressed his hopes that people endangering unity (of the AfD, presumably) would eventually be sweated out. As in sweating out a cold, something everyone should be capable of understanding. In German, that’s werden allmählich ausgeschwitzt, almost literally the same. This caused all the usual suspects in politics, society and media to go completely beserk because ausgeschwitzt contains AUSgeSCHWITZt. They actually spelled it that way in order to make the point they wanted to make: NAZI DOG WHISTLE BY AFD NAZI!!!! WAEEEEEHHHHH!!!!!
If I’d be calling someone a wacko because of this, it wouldn’t be Höcke.
They supported the first lockdown. RIP.
Yeah. And in reality, they are a bit to the left of the Tories.
Didn’t someone important in German Insurance Industry get fired for publishing something this a while ago?
Yes, right back in March….
Andreas Schöfbeck, the head of BKK Pro Vita…..
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/german-insurance-company-fires-ceo-who-released-covid-vaccine-injury-data-then-scrubs-data
We’ve all dodged a bullet there I think.
Obviously one cannot immediately draw conclusions on single cases, but at least one coroner in the UK has declared that the sudden death of a healthy young male was a direct result of the vaccine, rather than poor diagnostic procedures, which were a confounding issue. Of course, this doesn’t stop proceedings against the hospital as contributing to the death. Is there any research into whether coroners tend more to cover up or to expose causes of death which might be construed as being caused by poor decision-making by central government, local authorities, or NHS doctors?
This “sudden death” phenomenon, whether genuine or an artefact of counting and attribution, is going to be with us for years.
Behold, the smoking gun….
As far as I’m concerned, they’re not unexplained deaths. If you inject millions of people with a poorly tested, experimental substance with little to no adverse effects data there’s a pretty good chance that it will kill some of them.
And now there’s a mRNA based vaccine being developed against cancer! which no doubt will be “safe and effective” for babies and upward, cancer diagnosed or not! everyone should have it, everyone must have it!
Has anyone else seen “I am legend”?
An in-depth analysis and assessment of the quality of the data and the lies now spread around and surrounding it. https://sciencefiles.org/2022/12/14/schmierentheater-um-impf-todesfaelle-aus-afd-praesentation-korrekte-ergebnisse-dumme-luegen-versicherungsbetrug-oder-ein-schrott-datensatz-unsere-analyse-der-daten/
The desperate tries to explain it away and the farce about the provision and correctness of the data goes on.
Meanwhile, additionally released insurance data also shows a doubling of cancer rates.
https://reitschuster.de/post/impfbilanz-todesfaelle-und-krebserkrankungen-explodieren/
Fürther supported by this
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/us-government-confirms-covid-vaccination