Covid vaccine boosters in older people are killing one person for every 800 doses administered and should be withdrawn from use immediately, a leading vaccine scientist has said.
Dr. Theo Schetters, a vaccinologist based in the Netherlands who has played a leading role in the development of a number of vaccines, has analysed the official data from the Dutch Government and found a very close correlation between when fourth vaccine doses were administered in the country and the number of excess deaths, as shown in the chart below. Importantly, in the Netherlands the booster rollout in different regions was staggered over a number of weeks allowing an analysis by region, which confirms the effect.
Dr. Schetters, who is a recipient of the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montpellier in France, told Dr. Robert Malone, an inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, that medical doctors are currently seeing “all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is” and that “in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that”. It is essential to look at all-cause mortality, he said, as the vaccine “potentially affects all organs”.
So it potentially affects all organs. And that’s what the medical doctors now see, they see all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is. And because the adverse effects are so not just single one adverse effect, but can be anything, they surface very difficult to a statistical level. And that’s why we do analysis on all cause mortality, because say, okay, and if we do not know what is exactly related to vaccination, of course, the coagulation problems, myocarditis, we know that, but there are many more things happening at the moment. And so that’s why we look at all cause mortality, and in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that. So let’s say in this week we gave 10,000 vaccinations. Then in this week, we have something like 125 excess in death in that week.
The correlation is striking, he said, to the extent that if you have more vaccines in a week then you also have more excess deaths, and if you have fewer vaccines in a week, you have fewer deaths. Dr. Schetters says he has written to the Director of the Institute of Health in the Netherlands to alert him to the findings.
So what we’ve done is we have written a registered letter to the director of our Institute of Health and presenting the results and expressing my concerns. And just with the question, from a precautionary point of view, please reconsider vaccination strategy because I think this is a real warning. And so it’s not that everybody dies. Actually I do a rough calculation, it’s one in 800
During the interview, Dr. Malone explained that his own organisation, consisting of 17,000 medical practitioners and scientists, has released a statement that the vaccines should be withdrawn as they are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio, a statement with which Dr. Schetters agreed. Dr. Malone said:
I stand as the President of the International Association of Physicians and Medical Scientists. So we’re 17,000 that are only physicians and medical scientists, all verified, no nurses, not because we don’t like nurses, but it has to do with the positioning with the press and messaging. So that’s the basis for our organisation.
Months ago, we came out with a press conference in a clear unequivocal statement that one can find at www.globalcovidsummit.org, where we made a clear, unambiguous statement. In our opinion, as an organisation, these vaccines should be withdrawn. They are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio. And as the person who is responsible for the genesis of this technology, I’m often criticised. Didn’t I realise what I was doing? And there’s no way for me to have known that the normal standards for regulatory development and testing and clinical would be circumvented.
But I stand as someone who has intimate, detailed knowledge of the technology and its risks and benefits, the nature of the formulations, the role of the pseudouridine, all of those things.
It’s my opinion and that of the organisation that I represent, that the data are now sufficiently clear that, in our opinion, the ongoing campaign for vaccination is no longer warranted.
Dr. Schetters’ analysis is in line with the observations we have been making on the Daily Sceptic in recent weeks as we have been following what appears to be a correlation between the spring fourth dose booster rollout among over-75s in England and a wave of now over 11,000 non-Covid excess deaths that are currently unexplained (see the charts below).
The latest official data from the Office for National Statistics, released on Tuesday, show there have been 11,370 excess non-Covid deaths registered in England and Wales in the 13 weeks since April 23rd. If all of these were a result of the spring boosters (of which 4,182,483 have been delivered up to July 22nd) it would be a rate of one every 368 doses. That figure is an upper bound, of course, as not all the additional deaths will be due to the boosters, but it shows the U.K. data are broadly in line with the Netherlands data. Note that a higher vaccine injury rate would be expected in the U.K. where the fourth doses are only being given to the over-75s, as the rate increases with age.
In the week ending July 22nd, the most recent week for which data are available, 10,978 deaths were registered in England and Wales, which is 1,680 (18.1%) above the five-year average for the week. Of these, 745 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate as a contributory cause and 463 mentioned COVID-19 as underlying cause, leaving 1,217 deaths from a different underlying cause. Note that this was the week of the brief but intense heatwave (with recorded temperatures topping 40°C for the first time in some areas), so some of these will be heatwave deaths, as will many of the additional Covid deaths (being people who happened to have Covid at the time).
Deaths by date of occurrence rose dramatically in the most recent week, which might be assumed to be connected with the heatwave of July 18-19th. However, the data by date of occurrence show the spike occurring in the week ending July 15th, too soon for the heatwave. One explanation for this may be that the ONS uses a ‘statistical model’ to calculate death occurrences for recent weeks and this model may not cope well with unpredictable phenomena like heatwaves. If so, we should see adjustments in the next few reports as more real data become available. Note that the cause of the spike in non-Covid excess deaths during June remains unclear.
Here is the cumulative curve of excess non-Covid deaths by date of registration along with the cumulative total of spring boosters.
As noted in previous weeks, the cause of the deaths appears to be largely related to diseases of the heart and blood vessels (cause of death data for July are now available here). Cancer deaths are, perhaps surprisingly given the withdrawal of healthcare access during the pandemic, broadly at normal levels, suggesting there is something other than lack of access to healthcare going on. The continued high level of excess deaths is unexpected as, following the 142,000 excess deaths of the last two and a half years, we would have anticipated a period of lower than average deaths.
The Government ought to be urgently investigating what lies behind the more than 11,000 additional deaths in three months. However, as we saw last week, it has shown no interest in doing so. When Esther McVey MP, Chair of the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), submitted a written question asking the Cabinet Office what steps it was taking “to investigate the higher than expected rate of deaths of 12.2% above the five-year average”, it simply referred the matter to the U.K. Statistics Authority, which merely said it will continue to publish the relevant statistics.
Perhaps Dr. Schetters’ intervention in the Netherlands will start to wake up those in Government who have their heads planted firmly in the sand.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Also, those are just the very short term deaths.
Indeed, just the tip of the iceberg….
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
This is the rest of the iceberg.
German data is showing that 1 in 25 of the bioweapon injected are harmed by said injection….
https://rairfoundation.com/german-hospital-federation-demands-withdrawal-of-vaccination-mandate-after-massive-side-effects-revealed/
Dr Meryl Nass pulls no punches on the same ONS data.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/today-uk-office-of-national-statistics
Teenagers being recruited in Manchester to a bioweapon booster trial. We know that one of these can kill teens, two are even more likely to but three???
https://mft.nhs.uk/2022/07/28/call-for-teenage-volunteers-from-across-greater-manchester-to-be-part-of-covid-19-vaccine-study/
This is the bio of the lead researcher. Very aptly named for his Dark Lord alliances methinks….
https://www.ovg.ox.ac.uk/team/matthew-snape
That first one for teenage volunteers I find quite shocking. It’s a range of vaccines being used and looks to me like getting people to agree to testing a drug without even the dubious ‘benefit’ of being paid for it. Anybody that volunteered for this would have to be mad. I hope no one does.
These are the people who found thrombocytopenia, nervous damage, and myo/pericarditis in their early 2021 vaccine trial but decided that they really were unlikely to be anything to do with the vaccine.
An evil bunch indeed.
Can’t wait for this to be the main news item on the BBC! Oh, hang on…..
Surprise surprise I’ve not seen anything in the Dutch press either. Some things never change..But the Dutch doctor and Dr Malone are obviously correct; bit of a no-brainer that now we are in Omicron times and everybody must surely have been exposed to one strain or another by now, the risk-benefit ration has changed and therefore no further jab campaigns can be justified, let alone all of the coercion, threats etc which took place first time around.
My money’s on the new-fangled concoction being a huge damp squib this autumn/winter because, apart from a tiny minority of hardened psychiatric cases ( a.k.a. Covidian jab zealots who fear fresh air let alone another human being within a 2m radius ) nobody will bloody turn up. At this rate more regular folk are gonna have bigger concerns than catching another cold with a new name as they’ll have warming themselves, feeding their family and buying petrol so they can go to work as higher priorities I should think. TPTB will try to flog this dead horse for a third winter running but I really doubt they’ll succeed.
*ratio* FGS..
I’ve just received my annual flu jab invitation from my GP practice, which also offers me, maybe, the opportunity to have a Covid booster as well. Is this a small sign that the ‘vaxx ’em all’ zealots are beginning to pull back?
The evidence is crawling out of the woodwork. Today, John Campbell’s YT output came up with a description of one of the German reports (I don’t have the link to hand), which attracted a lot of comments that are negative about the product under discussion.
GBN is dealing with it quite well. E.g. Dan Wootton came up with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pjkFfEPe68&list=WL&index=1&t=13s 2215 comments at time of writing. Also, Mark Steyn covers the topic on most of his programmes on GBN.
Latest UKHSA vaccine surveillance report shows there’s practically no difference in hospitalisation rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated.
They also find higher covid hospitalisation rates in those most recently boosted, for younger age groups.
Is that COVID hospitalisation or hospitalisation of people testing positive before admission? My guess would be rather the latter.
One could take this a step further: It could also be admission of people who were spuriously vaccinated as they had immunity from prior infection, as evidenced by a positive PCR test done when they were admitted because vaccine adverse effects. Doubtlessly, Corona’s witness will claim that’s because of waning vaccine effectiveness and call for more vaccination to counter that. In other words, people harmed by COVID vaccination would be
declared to be victims of COVID due not being vaccinated enough. The would fit the usual, argumentative pattern of these people and medication causing the very illness it’s supposed to prevent would be the ultimate money-making machine for the pharma industry.
Corona’s witness, I like that!
You can add those vaccinated and died of COVID, that is, after all what ADE Antibody Dependant Enhancement does. And or the gradual breakdown of the natural immune system….
Highly recommend RFK jr podcast out today regarding Moderna and FDA collusion and lying found in the recent FOIA reveal in their application for Emergency Use.
Link to podcast
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/867-rfk-jr-the-defender-podcas-78069622/episode/leaked-moderna-files-with-sasha-latypova-100480129/
Access not allowed apparently!
Looks like you will need a VPN for that website where you are.
Or try Apple podcasts
https://podcasts.apple.com/xk/podcast/leaked-moderna-files-with-sasha-latypova/id1552000243?i=1000574962396
‘…that the vaccines should be withdrawn as they are no longer justified on a risk-benefit ratio…’
A bit late – they never were! Snake oil.
Rather insulting to snake oil, don’t you think
Oil that actually had snake venom in it would probably be preferable to this stuff.
I doubt the Dutch government will be listening to Dr Schetters. I did a quick search, saw that he warned about the vaxx previously and outside of that only found a few sites ‘debunking’ him, including a tweet by Marion Koopmans, a member of the Dutch OMT team and WHO advisor.
The Dutch health minister is planning a new round of
poisoningvaxxination from mid-September – right in time for thriving respiratory infections as children head back to school, combined with the now well-known increased susceptibility to infection in the first week or two after being vaxxed, which will almost certainly lead to the equally well-known ‘surge’ in infections, cue for panic, cue for further criminal measures to ‘protect’ the health services by maiming and killing the population.The health minister announced this plan in a letter to parliment, where he explains why he wants to
poisonvaxx everyone in the country over 12 for the 4th or 5th time and if possible give 3 doses ofpoisonvaxx to those who have not yet been vaccinated (note the ‘yet’).He states quite clearly that yes, it is true that for the healthy there is little risk of getting seriously ill, and yes, they must also weigh up the risk of suffering side effects, but even though healthy individuals under 60 do not really need the vaxx, due to the fact that it ‘looks as if’ (literally the wording used) vaxxing reduces infection and even if you’re infected, reduces transmission (one of the stupidest things I have ever heard – if you’re sneezing and coughing out virus, you’re potentially infecting people, whether or not you are vaxxed – and this guy is an actual doctor). So vaxxing the entire population might reduce the number of infections, which might reduce the number of people calling in sick, so there might be less chance of society coming to a halt. And fewer infections will supposedly mean indirectly providing protection for the more vulnerable.
In other words, get vaxxed based on the basis of ‘fingers crossed this will reduce infections’ and a good dose of guilt tripping – we’ve moved on from killing granny to killing every weak and vulnerable human being in society.
Seriously, the letter literally points out that the vaxx does nothing for people under 60 (the majority of the population), has side effects and may, at best, provide some temporary, minimal relief in terms of society-wide infection (with no substantiation for that claim).
Don’t count on the current cabinet changing course. The cabinet does not have a majority in the upper chamber, which means legislation probably won’t pass, which is why the programme will probably be ‘voluntary’, but the pressure will undoubtedly increase. Even now they are still running a stupid ad to be careful about spreading corona – it started around peak of the summer wave, which is now over, but they’re still running it and according to the letter to parliament intend to waste even more of my tax money on more propaganda. Thanks goodness they spend it so well, heaven forbid they might actually waste money on health care staff or treatments, so 20th century.
Who wants to bet that a new variant is discovered just around the time of the autumn booster. Conveniently enough to panic the sheep into getting their jab and also to cover up the vax deaths?
I’m actually wondering how many “sheep” we have left now, compared to when the jab roll-out first began, which seems like a lifetime ago now. I personally know former sheeple who’ve changed their tune. I suppose we’ll soon find out in the coming months but it just stinks of desperation now tbh. I’m also wondering how the ( pretty much ) inevitable reintroduction of some restriction or other will go down. Will NPIs be as widely accepted and complied with as back in 2020? Surely not. But this winter will be the most interesting example of a social experiment yet I think, since the whole fiasco was introduced.
I’m willing to bet that, here in the NL anyway, they are gonna reintroduce masks on public transport, at a minimum. They’ll probably go back to shops having a reservation time-slot policy so that they can limit the amount of people at any one time. Good luck Primark! One thing’s for sure, if the uptake of the new-fangled jab formula is less than adequate this autumn ( their target is 700,000 injections per week here ) then a new ‘scarient’ will be coincidentally found and wheeled out and the fear porn will intensify. But I still don’t think sufficient people will go for it. Many people I know have just got fatigued by it all now and they just want to go back to that “normal” they were long-ago promised.
If all of these were a result of the spring boosters (of which 4,182,483 have been delivered up to July 22nd) it would be a rate of one every 368 doses. That figure is an upper bound, of course, as not all the additional deaths will be due to the boosters, but it shows the U.K. data are broadly in line with the Netherlands’ data.
Pardon me if I’ve missed something, by why wouldn’t all the additional deaths be due to the boosters?
Moreover – as the article points out – there’s been large excess mortality for the last 2 1/2 years:
… following the 141,000 excess deaths of the last two and a half years, we would have anticipated a period of lower than average deaths …
Indeed, but doesn’t this suggest that the numbers being killed by the vaccines may actually be considerably higher than that implied by the current increase above the long-term baseline?
Not trying to pick fault here or anything – just trying to understand what is going on.
Hopefully the DS, and others, will keep banging on about this, as eventually the government will have to respond.
And I feel in my bones that the long-term effects of these ‘vaccines’, which we haven’t begun to seen yet, are going to be horrendous. Sorry to be Jeremiah, it’s just something I can’t get out of my mind, and which I feel will come to pass.
If you really want a regular bath in the death porn from vaxidents I recommend Mark Crispin Millers sub stack.
The first year of the death jabs I collected daily references to “sudden” or “unexpected “ deaths especially, but not limited to, those under 35s. After a year of it I stopped as it was turning into a weird and depressingly long list.
Miller has kept going and his lists cross language barriers.
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/a-bus-crash-in-the-bronxand-every
https://metatron.substack.com/p/scientific-proof-that-the-mrna-causes
Don’t worry.
Cancer due to them is going to to explode, particularly in young women after 5-10 years.
So basically, the goo is working just as intended.
Well the NL will have to find 13,000 employees in order to administer the jabs come the autumn time if they want to hit their 700,000 injections/week target. I doubt they will, although lots of people will do anything for the right price and are more than willing to check their principles at the door. I’m confident there just won’t be the same level of fear, hysteria or hypochondria, all of which will have driven the vast majority to visit the vax centres for their previous jabs. I’m gonna stick my optimistic neck out and say, “not happening this time round”. Too many people know somebody who’s been injured by the jabs or who’s had Covid despite being jabbed, if not they themselves obviously.
Then you’ve got devious, lying prats such as Fauci and Biden ( among many others ) helpfully broadcasting the fact the jabs are utterly useless, like the muzzles they’re so fond of then, but go get another pretend vaccine anyway, just because we told you to! I mean, how utterly thick do they think people are? They say “jump” and the muppets say “how high?”
I just really think and hope there’s less muppet population this time around.
https://nltimes.nl/2022/08/03/health-services-frantically-recruiting-people-administer-new-round-covid-vaccines
In anticipation of the inevitable down votes, but I am not convinced. What is lacking are causes of death as reported, along with a detailed age stratification, ethnicity and comorbidities.
All of these factors can affect a person’s immune response and not in a good way.
We are all individuals, if you have allergies then that is an overzealous immune response. If you have type 1 diabetes that is immune system mediated, likewise for Hashimoto hypothyroidism, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma.
As far as I am aware no one has looked into whether the vaccines can reactivate the different herpes viruses, especially those that lie dormant in immune cells like EBV, CMV or human herpes virus 8. These viruses are implicated in the development of lymphomas including non Hodgkins, multiple sclerosis, even type 2 diabetes.
It is all very well coming up with numbers, but the underlying reasons must be investigated.
Yes there’s some correlation, which is how it’s referred to in the article but nowhere does it say there’s causation. It appears the two words have been treated as synonymous.
Of cause there are going to be adverse effects, you only need to look at other traditional vaccines to see this.
It’s leg work.
One would need to look at VAERS probably rather than Yellow card (I’m not sure yellow card has the detail) and remove all older data or remove short time differences between clot shot and death/adverse event or better to do a cluster analysis based on time from last shot. Then examine symptoms and ages and regroup.
Its a shedload of work. Not to mention:
it’s constantly changing
we don’t have a good cross section data base of placebo or control group
the probable declining usefulness of the VAERS data base through pressure from PTB
Yes, I am also not convinced. However, there are a number of concerns about safety signals from different sources (albeit mainly sceptical) which suggest further investigation is warranted. However, I cannot believe this is likely to happen in the short to medium term, although I really hope that I’m wrong. The problem as I see it, is that there are far too many people with skin in the game (a phrase that I hate but which seem particularly apt). There are those who have built careers on the back of these interventions, those who are protecting careers and of course the huge profits to protect. There are also many people who are both promoting and accepting these interventions who believe fully in their safety and efficacy. I spent 30 plus years in the NHS & Social Services, the last 20 before retirement as a Health Psychologist. Over the period, I learned that efficacy in clinical trials does not necessarily equate to efficacy in the real world, so called “game changers” or “miracle treatments” rarely turn out to fulfill their initial promise (although some may still turn out to be useful treatments) and that it takes time for contraindications to become apparent and even longer to be properly recognised as such. I suspect you are well aware of all this. I could bang on about the illusion of control etc but it does seem to me that there are amber lights flashing all over the place and we are continuing to studiously ignore them.
Here’s an example of monoclonal antibody treatment that went awry.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa063842
That research would be welcome but expensive and any government or corporation responsible for promoting these vaccines will want to block it
And the fact that deaths remained elevated even after the number of new boosters went down suggests cumulative longer-term effect is even worse.
The Covid cultists flog us a fairy story, but the BBC calls it ‘compelling evidence’
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-covid-cultists-flog-us-a-fairy-story-but-the-bbc-calls-it-compelling-evidence/
Guy Hatchard
** Yellow Boards By The Road BUILD BACK FREEDOM
Monday 8th August 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A329 London Road &
Fernbank Rd, Winkfield Row
Ascot SL5 8ED
**
Tuesday 9th August 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Molly Millars Lane,
Between Fishponds Rd & Eastheath Ave
Wokingham RG41 2PT
**
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
*
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
*
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
They will NEVER admit that these concoctions aren’t “safe and effective.” Far too many very important people are up to their sordid little necks in the tissue of lies we’ve been told for the past 2 years.
‘Perhaps Dr. Schetters’ intervention in the Netherlands will start to wake up those in Government who have their heads planted firmly in the sand.’
Isn’t it the responsibility of people to waken up first?