A study which surveyed 35,000 women, published in leading journal Science, has found that 42% of around 27,000 respondents who have regular periods bled more heavily than usual following Covid vaccination. Among around 4,000 participants who typically do not menstruate, 71% of those on hormone-based contraceptives, 39% of those on gender-affirming hormones and 66% of postmenopausal women reported breakthrough bleeding following Covid vaccination.
The study was based on a convenience sample obtained via an online survey promoted through social media and other channels, so the authors are clear rates of adverse events cannot be calculated from it as there may be a bias towards those who suffered the adverse events being studied. There also wasn’t an unvaccinated control group, though anyone who had had suspected or confirmed Covid was excluded. Nonetheless, the study shows that menstrual irregularities are very likely to be a real issue connected with the vaccines.
The authors note that other vaccines have been associated with effects on menstrual bleeding and that there are “multiple plausible biological mechanisms to explain a relationship between an acute immune challenge like a vaccine, its corresponding and well-known systemic effects on hemostasis and inflammation, and menstrual repair mechanisms of the uterus”. They suspect a mechanism via inflammation of the immune system rather than disruption of ovarian hormones because those taking hormone-based contraception were not affected differently.
They found that increased or breakthrough bleeding was significantly associated with age, experiencing systemic vaccine side-effects (i.e., fever or fatigue), having previously been pregnant, and ethnicity.
The authors write that signal detection in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has “resulted in the identification of several possible effects on menstruation that suggest that further research is needed”. They criticise vaccine trials for not including queries about changes in menstruation as part of standard safety monitoring and recommend further study.
You can read the full study here – though be warned it is excruciatingly woke, avoiding mentioning women throughout but being sure to mention “trans men, trans masculine people, and masculine of center genderqueer people” on two occasions. Most of the time women are “menstruating people” or, on one occasion, “woman-only identifying” (constituting 90.9% of the sample, showing it is not representative of the population). You have been warned.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I do wish we could stop referring to the experimental, novel gene technology as a “vaccine”. I really do.
I’m a big believer in truth in advertising – how about: clot shot, death jab, depop jab, temporary minimal therapeutic effect jab or simply – the unsafe, ineffective, highly profitable pharma company dream jab.
“lethal injection” would likely go down well with the UK government’s behavioural science team.
Or just “national emergency”, which describes just about anything these days.
“the Trump vaccine” would be another good one, effective with much of the medical profession; something similar was used by the controlled media on both sides of the Atlantic to discredit hydroxychloroquine.
Even if they said ‘experimental’ first as so far they’ve said it will ‘prevent getting and spreading’ and then admitted it won’t, then it would ‘prevent death’, which is a ridiculous statement.
Theres a coronavirus that enters your cells using a specific receptor, say ACE2. This provokes an immune response including antibodies. The antibodies created target the parts of the virus that attach to the ACE2 receptor thus blocking the virus from being able to infect cells. This coronavirus is one that causes the common cold.
The virus is a positive single strand RNA virus, the RNA is read by organelles in the cell and duplicates are made and protein fragments are displayed on HLA to elicit an immune response. +ss RNA acts as it’s own mRNA, if a vaccine was developed that used an attenuated version of the virus then the viral RNA would enter the cell and be duplicated as the real virus. The antibodies would still be against the spike protein of the example coronavirus.
If instead of the attenuated virus only the genes that code for the spike protein were injected into the cell, then it would elicit an immune response with antibodies against the spike protein.
I actually dislike the term mRNA vaccine as it is misleading, mRNA in normal cell operation originates in the nucleus, and the AstraZeneca version uses the nucleus to replicate and is more of an mRNA vaccine than Pfizer. In my view the Pfizer vaccine is a short length +ssRNA vaccine. I suggest reading the book “Immune” by Philipp Detmer.
Thanks for the detailed analysis. However, it’s more complex than that, in that there are quite a few various coronaviruses (to the extent of them having been identified and given different names) that do the same thing – e.g. HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-HKU1. Various sources suggest that they cause roughly a third of “Common Colds”. Not clear why they say that, as it is not common practice to identify them with the general public. Perhaps that’s a good thing, otherwise it would result in a lot of useless expenditure, at least, with diversion of resources in the medical trade.
The other point well made is that ACE2 cells are the entry route – but note where they are, and more to the point, where they are not located, with regard to the crap idea of washing one’s hands to reduce it’s transmission. Might be sensible if you have a habit of sticking your little finger up your nose, perhaps.
IIRC of the coronaviruses that cause the common cold, there’s one that uses the ACE2 receptor. The other coronaviruses that use ACE2 are SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.
The underlying problem with the CoViD19 vaccines is that they are in the wrong place, they should be in the upper respiratory tract.
Out of interest, what time has elapsed between vaccination and the adverse effects being identified? This could be important.
And after lany decades of trying we don’t have vaccines for these coronavirus.
I wonder if there is a clue there?
Someone on another thread called it a quackcine which I think is highly appropriate.
Proof if anything that the jab has an effect on the uterus so the number of miscarriages being experienced is not a fantasy.
Indeed. They know. They will try to hide this forever if they can. Which is why it is truly mystifying that they are still trying to get people to roll up their sleeves, it is only more evidence for the prosecution that will assuredly follow at some point.
Eventually the “bomb will burst” as they say in Dutch and when this one goes off, it will be nuclear.
An unvaxxed friend told me that 3 of her friends all had significant menstrual disregulation (primarily extremely heaving bleeding for months) but hadn’t twigged until they got together. Another friend in a different country told me last summer that she only realised that the substantial disregulation that had started after she got stabbed and worsened again after the 2nd was due to the vaxx after she heard it on the radio and was surprised I said I had known about it for a few months already.
Yes, I can imagine that vaccines or drugs in general can sometimes have an effect on menstruation, that is nothing new. But the timing, number and severity is. And I certainly have never heard of post-menopausal women getting periods again, that is quite frightening. Hormonal imbalances at that age tend to be connected with various cancers.
No matter how they try to spin this, it is clear there is a hormonal link. Hormones are related to fertility, it is beyond disgraceful at this point that they should still maintain that there is no known risk to male or female fertility. There may be no ‘known’ risk but there is every reason to suspect if not assume that there is indeed a risk and people who still wish to have children need to be properly informed.
I just wonder how many women are carrying the knowledge that their menstrual cycles have been altered but can’t bring themselves to tell anyone. It must be millions, and I suspect that most know it’s because of the vax. Yet another tragic and outrageous dimension of this unspeakable crime. When this dam finally bursts, I simply cannot wrap my head around what will happen; it’ll be unlike anything we’ve ever seen before.
https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/yellow-card-please-help-to-reverse-the-decline-in-reporting-of-suspected-adverse-drug-reactions might be of interest, but there seems to be a general view that there is a lot of under- reporting of injuries caused by various drugs.
I would say it is something to do with hormone disruption by the clot shot. I am many years post menopause, and regretfully I am double jabbed. I suffered hot flushes after having it, and they went on for about a month. I didn’t put two and two together until later, when I belatedly realised what an idiot I had been and how I had been taken in by the government. Hot flushes at my age are no joke!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32892344/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24673464/
Possible relationship between menstruation and cytokines.
Who could possibly have predicted that an experimental, novel medical treatment might have unforeseen effects when given to billions of people without going through the standard safety protocols?
Only nutjob conspiracy theorists and Qanon (who they?) supporters.
Gender-affirming hormones sounds as if it had been directly taken out of Brave New World human engineering department. That’s the mindset behind this. Nature will not let us have what we want. Hence, the citizens of the world of tomorrow we envision have to be engineered properly to enable them to take up the social and political roles which will become their occupation.
And then, there are these suppressor hormones which stop overwhelmingly low-quality people with wombs from getting pregnant all the time. Again, nature is broken, on their own, those ghastly creatures would just keep multiplying. But thankfully, the wonderful chemists of our modern world can fix that, too.
Truly eugenics for the 21st century!
——
The totalitarians of the 20st century are – in Germany at least – usually accused of bowing to an ideology based on Menschenverachtung (contempt for mankind to the degree of treating humans like pests). If the above isn’t also an example of that, I have no idea what is.
Vaccines are the problem, not the cure
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccines-are-the-problem-not-the-cure/
Serena Wylde
Stand for freedom Yellow Boards By The Road
Friday 22nd July 3pm to 4pm
Yellow Boards
Junction Cricket Hill Lane/
B3272 Reading Rd,
Yateley GU46 7AA
*****
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell