• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Online Harms Bill is a Dog’s Dinner That Will Suppress Freedom of Expression

by Toby Young
20 April 2022 1:40 PM

The philosopher Kathleen Stock has produced a corker of a first column for UnHerd about the Online Safety Bill. As she points out in the opening paragraph, she’s one of the people whom the Bill will supposedly protect, but she thinks any attempt by the state to protect people from psychological distress is completely misguided and will inevitably have a chilling effect on free speech.

In virtue of my heretically archaic views about biology and the importance of women’s rights, I’m the target of quite a lot of rude online behaviour. The other day, for instance, I learnt I was lucky I hadn’t been hanged yet. So you might expect me to be emphatically in favour of attempts to remove what the Online Safety Bill calls “harmful communications” from the internet.

This isn’t the case. In fact, I think the Bill’s proposals on this kind of internet content are a dog’s dinner. If implemented, they will undoubtedly suppress desirable levels of freedom of expression on the internet, and cause more problems than they resolve.

Following scrutiny from the Joint Committee, the Bill — which received its second reading in the Commons yesterday — takes recent Law Commission proposals to introduce a “harm-based” communications offence, and places a duty of care on internet providers and websites to restrict content which meets the definition of this proposed offence, give or take a few tweaks. Specifically, they will be required to restrict any content where there’s a “real and substantial risk that it would cause harm to a likely audience”, the sender “intended to cause harm to a likely audience”, and the sender has “no reasonable excuse for sending the message”. Harm is defined as “psychological harm amounting to at least serious distress”. What counts as a “likely audience” comprises whichever individual is reasonably foreseen as encountering that content.

The flaws here were also present within the Law Commission proposals that inspired the Bill. Take the criterion of “psychological harm amounting to at least serious distress”. As many have noted — though apparently not in Westminster — concepts such as “psychological harm” and “distress” are moving targets, semantically speaking, in the sense that the sort of thing they refer to changes over time. For instance, in a society whose primary concern is with the alleviation of negative experience, concepts associated with negative experiences tend to expand their semantic range and become increasingly diluted. So for instance, over time, the category of “abuse” has moved beyond physical events to include emotional ones as well; and the category of “trauma” has extended from atypically catastrophic life events to relatively common happenings like childbirth and bereavement.

At first glance, “experts discover new form of trauma!” looks reassuringly scientific, a bit like “experts discover new kind of dinosaur!”. But whereas the existence of a dinosaur is completely independent of the activities of the experts who discover it, this is not the case with trauma. The more generous experts are willing to be in their definitions, the more people will then count as traumatised; the more people who count as traumatised, the more people will define themselves in terms of membership of that group, and so become more able to exert political pressure on others — including upon the experts themselves, of course — to recognise the precise nuances of their suffering.

This is one of what philosopher Ian Hacking has called the “feedback loops” within psychological classification. Of course, this trajectory towards dilution is not inevitable, and partly depends on wider political sensibilities within a given society. In a culture which prioritises personal resilience towards negative experiences rather than their automatic accommodation, the sphere of traumatic events might ultimately contract rather than expand. But we don’t live in this kind of a place.

As with trauma, so with psychological distress. Things that were felt as minor ripples centuries ago, if at all — misgendering, for instance, or cultural appropriation, or the mere mention of a slur in quotation marks, or even just free speech arguments themselves — are now crushing blows for many. This isn’t to deny that strongly unpleasant feelings are generated, even as the category of distressing events and experiences expands. Feelings have a habit of rushing in to fill whatever gap has been culturally opened for them.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: Read the Free Speech Union’s press release setting out its concerns with the Bill and how it thinks it could be improved.

Stop Press 2: Read Daily Sceptic contributor Dr Frederick Attenborough’s paper for the Free Speech Union about the Online Safety Bill here.

Tags: Kathleen StockLaw CommissionOnline Safety BillPsychological Distress

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Is Arming Ukraine and Sanctioning Russia the Right Response to Putin’s Invasion?

Next Post

Britain’s Daily Covid Cases Plunge by Another Third

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

96 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 39 of the Sceptic: Michael Reiners on Multiculturalism vs Free Speech, Charlotte Gill on Commie Academy and Tim Samuels on ‘White Men Can’t Work’

by Richard Eldred
6 June 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

10 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

9 June 2025
by Will Jones

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

RFK Jr. Removes All 17 Members of CDC Vaccine Panel

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

38

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

29

Miliband’s £14 Billion Nuclear Boost to Avert Net Zero Blackouts

20

Reeves’s Winter Fuel Raid to Raise Just £250 Million Instead of £1.5 Billion

19

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

21

Australia’s Scandal-Ridden Covid Prime Minister Scott Morrison Awarded Nation’s Top Honour

10 June 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

9 June 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

Britain’s Most Dangerous Criminals (According to Lord Hermer)

9 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

10 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

9 June 2025
by Will Jones

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

RFK Jr. Removes All 17 Members of CDC Vaccine Panel

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

38

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

29

Miliband’s £14 Billion Nuclear Boost to Avert Net Zero Blackouts

20

Reeves’s Winter Fuel Raid to Raise Just £250 Million Instead of £1.5 Billion

19

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

21

Australia’s Scandal-Ridden Covid Prime Minister Scott Morrison Awarded Nation’s Top Honour

10 June 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

9 June 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

Britain’s Most Dangerous Criminals (According to Lord Hermer)

9 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment