• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Too Many in Politics and the Civil Service Had No ‘Skin in the Game’ When They Destroyed Livelihoods and Frightened the Nation into Compliance

by Will Jones
13 April 2022 8:00 AM

Businessman and journalist Luke Johnson (who is one of the Daily Sceptic‘s directors) has given a must-watch interview to Jeffrey Peel on his New Era website. Jeffrey writes:

Luke Johnson has been the force behind many of the U.K.’s most successful hospitality and retail businesses. Early in lockdown Luke appeared on BBC Question Time and was one of the first leading business people to question lockdown as a response to the COVID-19 outbreak. In this video I gave Luke the chance to elaborate on his view that too many in politics and the Civil Service had little or no “skin in the game” when they were making decisions to destroy livelihoods and to frighten the nation into compliance.

Luke argues, very effectively, that lockdowns were so devastating a means of ‘controlling’ a virus that they should never be contemplated again.

Watch it here.

Tags: Economic costsHospitalityLockdown harmsLockdowns

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Anti-Lockdown Florida and South Dakota Among Best Pandemic Performers, Pro-Lockdown New York and California Among Worst, Study Finds

Next Post

Sweden Saw Second Smallest Increase in National Debt Out of All EU Countries

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago

I posted this about 30 minutes ago on the German article.

Well worth a read.

81
-1
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

You did. I saw that. You and the DS team are in sync today. 🙂

39
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I don’t know how I do it Mogs.😀

I got the drop on the Laurence Fox apology too.😀

Last edited 1 year ago by huxleypiggles
26
0
AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Do you guys have a time machine? How can you have commented a day ago on an article that’s only just been published? You both continue to amaze me while defying the laws of physics!!

22
-1
Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
1 year ago
Reply to  AethelredTheReadier

They posted the article on Friday and then oddly took it down. Good to see they kept the original comments.

31
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago

Of course they won’t be banned. Not now, not ever. And it doesn’t matter how solid or horrific the data coming out demonstrating clear as day that these products are neither effective nor safe, as long as the regulators are owned by Big Pharma, and what with all the shareholders so heavily invested in this mRNA tech, you’ve not got a chance of getting them stopped. Only thing people can do is keep spreading truth and stop rolling up for any more vaccines. Literally, *none* of them can now be called ‘safe’. Dr Pierre Kory with a good one here including a collection of anecdotes from medical professionals who are seeing the damage of these bioweapons first hand;

”To wit, the (P)FDA just approved a monovalent jab for a variant that is literally near extinct and which was tested only for “immunogenicity” (antibody production and not clinical effectiveness).
Was it tested for safety? No (unless you count a few mice). Why? Easy – because the safety of the entire mRNA platform is apparently now considered “settled science.”

And by the way, lets be clear that it is not “messenger” RNA, it is “modified” messenger RNA – thus I propose we call it mmRNA instead (the modification with pseudouridine is a huge driver of the persistent toxicity – but forgive me for I digress).
Although I have been miserably wrong in the “social prediction market” to date, I am going to double down here and maintain that this horrifically false attribution of safety to injected mRNA inside lipid nanoparticles will eventually be the death knell of any remaining credibility or authority that our health agencies (a.k.a Pharma subsidiaries) somehow still hold. Long sentence I know.

But for now, they will not stop. This last “authorization” was so bad that even Dr. Paul Offitt (a major salesman for jabs) said he would NOT take them.”

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/reports-from-the-front-lines-of-the-dfd

Last edited 1 year ago by Mogwai
136
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

”Aaaand you’re back in the room” LMAO

12
-2
Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
1 year ago

Well it doesn’t get any better. It’s getting so frightening now that I don’t see the point in explaining to people what they’ve done to them selves. I just enjoy their company while I can and keep my fingers crossed.

169
0
mariawarmth
mariawarmth
1 year ago

Except for closest and dearest in my family I have reduced trying to say “For what it is worth there are harms with this vaccine” because friends I think are in denial. I sometimes try though! Let’s keep trying.
Anecdotally a number of friends have recurring chest problems irritable coughs to the more serious heart attacks, strokes. But there is no way of linking this as caused by vaccine because there is no nhs supportive diagnostic route offered? So there is a non inquiring passive approach instead.
Sadly the harms will be already embedded perhaps in the DNA? of our future race before passivity turns into regret.

111
0
Deborah T
Deborah T
1 year ago

BBC, where ARE you? ‘Top oncologist calls for MRNA vaccines to be banned’. Is this not news?!! (OK, DS friends, I know, I know..)

179
0
Valerie_London
Valerie_London
1 year ago

Is this the same Dr Angus Dalgleish?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9815821/What-young-people-told-Vaccine-expert-ANGUS-DALGLEISH-dismantles-beliefs-18-30s.html

26
-2
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
1 year ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

Yes. People BTL on the DS have already laid into him on several occasions before now regarding his previous stance.

I believe that a lot of doctors, probably the vast majority, believed what they were saying at the time. Yes, they should have looked a little harder and listened a little better to those who warned, but better late than never.

Like most people, I suspect he just could not have believed that regulatory authorities would have been so utterly cavalier about their duties. I get the impression that most regulatory bodies simply took the word of the FDA, which, being clearly owned by the pharmaceutical companies, simply took the word of the drug pushers themselves. I remember the head of the Dutch public health authority saying the pfisser results were very promising, and then saying he had only seen pfisser’s own press releases. That last sentence was ignored, and I suspect that as soon as the EMA okayed the poison, all EU states felt no need to think there was a problem or do their own research. Once they did start doing some independent research, so many people had already been stabbed, regulators would only speak up if they had a death wish.

I think we first saw articles from Dr Dalgliesh about a year ago admitting things were not what he thought they had been. We need a lot more people, a lot more doctors to stand up and speak out, attacking them simply will not help or accomplish anything. Even now the establishment attacks and vilifies doctors who speak out, we should not join the establishment.

127
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Here are the articles posted at TCW by Dr Dalgleish:

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-madness-of-vaccinating-children-against-covid-by-a-doctor/

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/strike-off-the-truth-tellers-no-strike-out-whitty-co/

Last edited 1 year ago by huxleypiggles
29
-1
Valerie_London
Valerie_London
1 year ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

I do agree, Jane, even though I felt the need to post that article. Doctors like him and Aseem Malhotra who also believed the jab propaganda at first, are at least brave enough to stand up when they learn the truth.

It is however still shocking to me that Dr Dalgleish was once such a proponent of vaccine mandates and jabbing the young. I wonder how he feels about that now.

59
0
sophie123
sophie123
1 year ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

He has explained that article. It was a phone interview and they took his answers out of context, and refused to publish a follow up correction.

29
-1
Valerie_London
Valerie_London
1 year ago
Reply to  sophie123

Do you have a link for that please? Unless I missed it in this article.

9
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
1 year ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

Yes Abby Roberts has a real problem with Malhotra and Andrew Bridgen. She is uncompromising on the matter. That anger also extends to Dr Campbell on YT. She has a point regarding medical professionals when you consider a guy in the street has the caution regarding something still on trial, and those trials were all mice!
Andrew Bridgen i can forgive because he was not a Dr, though he did vote for jabs for care homes so that would need addressing IMO. But she accuses him of jumping ship. Though, that would mean that there is a reckoning, not last time i looked, quite the reverse. Actually, the more fascist they’ve been, the more rewards and gongs they receive. So to be fair, AB has some balls.

21
0
wryobserver
wryobserver
1 year ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

Don’t be shocked. We medics rely on evidence to make our decisions, and if the evidence changes we must change too. I was also a proponent of vaccines (and lockdowns for that matter). In theory both should work, but when you find in practice that they don’t, and when you understand why, you give up on them, especially when you realise the harms outweigh the benefits. If you plough through my blog from the beginning, ie early 2020, you will spot the shift. It’s at https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com. Interestingly one of my non-medical friends saw through the emperor’s clothes long before I did.

A rheumatology paradigm; when I started in the specialty in the1970s we put patients with lumbar disc prolapse to bed for 2 weeks, sometimes on traction. Then in the 1980s a study came out showing conclusively that this was quite the wrong thing to do, and the practice was abandoned almost overnight.

One should never be afraid to admit when you are wrong. One must also abandon the concept of “settled science”.

36
-4
Elizabeth Hart
Elizabeth Hart
1 year ago
Reply to  wryobserver

“We medics rely on evidence to make our decisions…”

Really?
What evidence was there to support a mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
Why was the medical and scientific establishment so devoid of critical thinking that they were incapable of calling this out?
Why is there such fear against questioning vaccination policy?
This is what must be investigated now, including unnecessary vaccine products being imposed upon people at little or no risk of disease.
Basically, this is over-servicing on a ginormous scale, without valid voluntary informed consent for this medical intervention.
Lay people such as myself called it out at the beginning, but of course no notice was taken…
See my BMJ rapid response published in March 2020:
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2

24
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
1 year ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

A recent presentation by Angus Dalgliesh where he explains his clinical thinking over the last 3 years.

https://rumble.com/v3hhsj2-professor-angus-dalgleish.html

12
0
Less government
Less government
1 year ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Well I, who doesn’t know the difference between Nurofen and Paracetamol, worked out by the end of 2020, that it would be a damned good idea to beg my children not to take this experimental injection. My wife warned me years ago that Big Pharma had ethics comparable to pigs. The stunning suppression of HCQ and Ivermectin and even vitamin D were massive red flags. Mike Yeadon, bless him, reminded us that our O level biology books told us how wonderful Natural immunity is.
So no, I’m not having any of this sympathy and forgiveness for these yellow crocodiles that threw medical integrity out of the window. No shame, no remorse. Never forgive, never forget. There will be, must be, retribution, otherwise they will do the same thing again tomorrow.

Last edited 1 year ago by Less government
23
0
Elizabeth Hart
Elizabeth Hart
1 year ago
Reply to  Less government

“My wife warned me years ago that Big Pharma had ethics comparable to pigs.”

That is a grievous insult to pigs…

22
0
Less government
Less government
1 year ago
Reply to  Elizabeth Hart

You know I was going to say the same, thank you.

7
0
AEC
AEC
1 year ago

We all appreciate the sentiment of this article but, respectfully, Prof Dalgleish, isn’t it time we used words much more carefully? Especially those with a platform, like your good self.
These jabs are neither mRNA nor vaccines.
Modified DNA is not mRNA – messenger RNA. The latter occurs in nature and degrades rapidly once it has done its job. MRNA with pseudouridine does not.
These injections are not vaccines. They are gene therapies.
Unquestionably we need to return to respecting the strictures of the Nuremberg Code, and UN declaration on human rights.

Last edited 1 year ago by AEC
101
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
1 year ago
Reply to  AEC

I think we all need to learn the Magna Carta….The UN Human Rights Act were social distancing during the Lockdowns. Nick & Toby mentioned it saying some people get ridiculed when they bring it up. But as Neil Oliver mentioned; when was the MC null & void because the British people were not consulted. EEC Treason, and countless more!

34
-1
Jon Smith
Jon Smith
1 year ago

.

Screenshot_20231001_090029_com.facebook.katana.jpg
66
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Smith

#metoo

24
-1
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Smith

Love it nd I want one!!!

11
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
1 year ago

“To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence”. No, it was and is pre meditated homicide of the mass murdering variety and those responsible for their production, regulatory approval and coercive administration should be strung up to the nearest lamppost. And left there as a warning.

77
-1
Dr G
Dr G
1 year ago

I see very few of my medical colleagues waking up from indoctrinated slumber.
The fortunate thing is that patients themselves are realising it is the jab that has made them ill.
My role has become an encourager of critical thought in patients, as there is no point trying to red pill most medicos.

91
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
1 year ago
Reply to  Dr G

I read somewhere that the jab take up is very low in the medical profession.

18
-1
thelightcavalry
thelightcavalry
1 year ago

Dear Professor Dalgleish, your expertise and professional conscience shine through. Thankyou.
Nevertheless I find your Daily Mail article of July 2021, “Vaccine expert ANGUS DALGLEISH dismantles beliefs that have seen rates stall among the 18-30s” startling in one so wise who was already an outspoken Lockdown critic. It’s not just that you were pushing a “vaccine” that many were already doubting, it’s that your arguments were so credulous and dismissive. It’s enormously to your credit that, despite that initial publicly stated conviction, you followed the science to where you are now, probably taking a terrific professional risk to do so (whereas I, your critic, have nothing at stake). In sum, I urge you to describe your thoughts now on your journey from there to here.

Last edited 1 year ago by thelightcavalry
38
-2
Maurice
Maurice
1 year ago
Reply to  thelightcavalry

I think he woke up when 3x in a row the modRNA vaccine turbo-charged the cancer of his own patients.

36
0
Maurice
Maurice
1 year ago
Reply to  Maurice

The accurate word for the jabs is transfection not vaccine = stained, tainted or poisoned right through the whole of the body.

22
-1
Valerie_London
Valerie_London
1 year ago
Reply to  Maurice

That is to his credit. There must be many other doctors who have experienced the same and stayed quiet and compliant.

41
0
thelightcavalry
thelightcavalry
1 year ago
Reply to  Maurice

Likely, but if you look at the contemporary comments on Dalgleish’s Mail essay, it’s obvious that reasoned scepticism was widespread. My guess is that even so expert and honourable a man was simply captured by a cult, the vaccine cult, that inhibited clarity of judgement and promoted evangelical zeal. But I want to know what he thinks.

17
-1
sophie123
sophie123
1 year ago
Reply to  thelightcavalry

He has been interviewed about that article. I can’t remember where I saw it but he was annoyed they had misinterpreted what he said and then wouldn’t correct it.

21
-1
thelightcavalry
thelightcavalry
1 year ago
Reply to  sophie123

Aha! Interview with Doc Malik – ‘I was coerced. I didn’t write that article.’

9
-1
Less government
Less government
1 year ago
Reply to  thelightcavalry

Where is the humility, the regret, the shame, the honesty, the apology? Why did it take so long….

3
0
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
1 year ago

The entire MRNA platform should be banned from common use, not just MRNA vaccines.

55
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago

Amen

10
-2
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago

Anyone who did their own research when these dangerous products were being aggressively marketed by the Government, MHRA etc KNEW they weren’t vaccines; they were gene therapies. They KNEW they weren’t very effective. And they KNEW that the claims they were safe were based on lies ….. since there was NO medium to long-term data.

The products had to be given emergency authorisation because they were novel … ie new products, that were still undergoing trial.

I KNEW all that and I’m not particularly clever; I don’t have a medical or scientific background; I just have a questioning mind and I apply “believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see” to anything those in authority say.

Yes, they should be banned. But thousands of powerful people around the world are responsible for the deaths and injuries they’ve caused, and they are highly lucrative for Big Pharma, so they won’t be banned. People are going to have to reject them.

30
0
Less government
Less government
1 year ago

Well I, who doesn’t know the difference between Nurofen and Paracetamol, worked out by the end of 2020, that it would be a damned good idea to beg my children not to take this experimental injection. My wife warned me years ago that Big Pharma had ethics comparable to pigs. The stunning suppression of HCQ and Ivermectin and even vitamin D were massive red flags. Mike Yeadon, bless him, reminded us that our O level biology books told us how wonderful Natural immunity is.
So no, I’m not having any of this sympathy and forgiveness for these yellow crocodiles that threw medical integrity out of the window. No shame, no remorse. Never forgive, never forget. There will be, must be, retribution, otherwise they will do the same thing again tomorrow.

13
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
1 year ago
Reply to  Less government

Not forgetting Prof. Delores Cahill and Dr Mike Yeadon!

1
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
1 year ago

I forwarded this article to our GP practice, who are merrily recommending covid boosters. I wonder if I’ll get a reply?!!

Last edited 1 year ago by DevonBlueBoy
12
0
ellie-em
ellie-em
1 year ago

The 2023 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine has been jointly awarded to

Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman

for their discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/press-release/

I know what I’d like to reward them with…

The convid fabrication continues.

5
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
1 year ago

So with all this information now seeping into the public awareness, a war with Russia could provide an excellent smokescreen!

1
0
Elizabeth Hart
Elizabeth Hart
1 year ago

Why just the focus on ‘booster’ injections?
These injections should never have been foisted upon the population, full stop.
Countless people who were never at serious risk of disease, including children and young people…most people actually…were coerced, intimidated, and many were even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions.
In Australia, the entire population has been deliberately terrorised about Covid-19, with widespread mandates imposed, trashing voluntary informed consent.
What has happened in Australia is beyond belief – coerced medical interventions in a supposed ‘free’ country.
This is a scandal of ginormous proportions, still hidden from public view, as the rotten conflicted mainstream media here has failed to inform the public.
What must be investigated now are the actions of the National Cabinet, led by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison, along with former premiers Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others, and the Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC. This is where the vaccine mandates were initiated, with the floodgates eventually opening for mandates.
For more background, see for example my substack articles:

  • Coercion, intimidation and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent for vaccination. There has been no valid consent for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/coercion-intimidation-and-mandates
  • The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. “A political decision, not a health decision”: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed
3
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 51: Charlie Kirk, Free Speech, the Scourge of “Anti-Fascism” and Why Brits are Cooling on Global Warming

by Richard Eldred
19 September 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

22 September 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

22 September 2025
by Richard Eldred

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

22 September 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

School Accused of “Brainwashing” Children After 14 Year-Olds Told to Read Book “Blaming Them for Their White Skin”

22 September 2025
by Will Jones

The Covid Response Was Not a Mistake – It Was Just Wrong

22 September 2025
by Dr David Bell

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

37

No Benefits for Foreigners Under Reform, Says Nigel Farage: Stricter Visa Tests and Deportation for Those Who Fail Under Crackdown on ‘Settled Status’ Migrants

33

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

25

When it Comes to Reparations, the Church of England Doesn’t Care About Evidence or Ethics

17

Hamas Executes “Israeli Collaborators” in Streets of Gaza

13

The Covid Response Was Not a Mistake – It Was Just Wrong

22 September 2025
by Dr David Bell

When it Comes to Reparations, the Church of England Doesn’t Care About Evidence or Ethics

22 September 2025
by Nigel Biggar

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

22 September 2025
by Chris Morrison

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

22 September 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Now He’s Dead, the Truth About Purple Aki Can Finally Be Said

21 September 2025
by Steven Tucker

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

22 September 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

22 September 2025
by Richard Eldred

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

22 September 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

School Accused of “Brainwashing” Children After 14 Year-Olds Told to Read Book “Blaming Them for Their White Skin”

22 September 2025
by Will Jones

The Covid Response Was Not a Mistake – It Was Just Wrong

22 September 2025
by Dr David Bell

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

37

No Benefits for Foreigners Under Reform, Says Nigel Farage: Stricter Visa Tests and Deportation for Those Who Fail Under Crackdown on ‘Settled Status’ Migrants

33

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

25

When it Comes to Reparations, the Church of England Doesn’t Care About Evidence or Ethics

17

Hamas Executes “Israeli Collaborators” in Streets of Gaza

13

The Covid Response Was Not a Mistake – It Was Just Wrong

22 September 2025
by Dr David Bell

When it Comes to Reparations, the Church of England Doesn’t Care About Evidence or Ethics

22 September 2025
by Nigel Biggar

Sensational New Measurements of Uncorrupted Air Temperatures Destroy UK Met Office Constant Claims of ‘Records’

22 September 2025
by Chris Morrison

Making Tax Digital – a Disaster in the Making or a Brilliant Innovation?

22 September 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Now He’s Dead, the Truth About Purple Aki Can Finally Be Said

21 September 2025
by Steven Tucker

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences