• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Deaths 9% Below Average – When Will The Government Declare the Pandemic Over?

by Will Jones
8 February 2022 11:58 AM

Deaths in the most recent week for which data are available were 9.3% below the five-year average in England and Wales, prompting questions of why in such a mild winter the Government is being slow to join countries like Denmark in reclassifying COVID-19, repealing pandemic laws and lifting the state of emergency.

Figures from the ONS released today show that in the week ending January 28th 2022, there were 1,269 fewer deaths registered in England and Wales compared to the five-year average, which is 9.3% lower. This figure uses data from 2016-19 and 2021 as the five-year average, missing out 2020 as a pandemic year. However, deaths in January 2021 were very high, so this skews the five-year average upwards. Nonetheless, compared with the 2015 to 2019 five-year average, deaths in England and Wales were still 2.8% below average (359 fewer deaths).

The figures also show that almost a third of Covid deaths in the most recent week did not have COVID-19 recorded as underlying cause on the death certificate. Of the 1,385 deaths involving COVID-19, 71.2% (986 deaths) had Covid recorded as the underlying cause of death (compared with 72.9% in the previous week). This means 28.8% of deaths officially counted as Covid deaths were registered as from another underlying cause.

Reflecting the low mortality, excess deaths in hospitals and care homes were running well below average, at 17.9% and 20.1% below respectively. However, deaths in private homes continue to run high, being 17.8% (557 deaths) above the five-year average. While some of this may be displacement from hospitals and care homes, with people continuing to avoid them, the full circumstances around this ongoing issue need to be properly investigated.

Tags: Covid deathsCOVID-19DenmarkExcess MortalityONS

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

“We Aren’t Political, We Are the Working Class”: Freedom Convoy Truckers Respond to Government Smears of Far Right Links

Next Post

How The Green Blob Duped Boris over Climate Change

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

137 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

Tyrants aren’t likely to rush to declare tyranny over, are they?

105
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Ceausecu never had the chance to dismiss himself!

37
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Happy days….

Last breath.jpg
29
-3
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

Because the ‘pandemic’ is the ‘War with Eastasia’.

60
0
emel
emel
3 years ago

They haven’t triple jabbed everyone yet.

38
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  emel

3 is sooo 2021

20
0
Mr Taxpayer
Mr Taxpayer
3 years ago
Reply to  emel

Get 5 jabs and you get a free pizza.

9
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr Taxpayer

More likely a coffin.

13
0
GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
3 years ago

It never really started.

40
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago

Got to protect the pandemic from the people now!

51
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Indeed – see this excellent letter submitted to the government by 130 UK medical professionals – submitted as a BTL comment by “Ug” below the TCW Article by Kate Dunlop

They think it’s all over – not by a long chalk – The Conservative Woman

(The article itself is excellent and a warning to all of us)

“Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

• The Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
• These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
• You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
• Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
• The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
• Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies
The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.
It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic
preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.
The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.
What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

2. Institutional nature of COVID
It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease, as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS.
Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.
Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.
Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.
Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

26
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

3. The exaggerated nature of the threat
Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.
The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.
Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born.
This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.
Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate.
Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.
The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.
Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.
You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense — hundreds of millions of pounds.
The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

4. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere
The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed.
For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.
Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.
Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

18
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

5. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear
Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.
To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies.
Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2.
Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental.
This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.
Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

6. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses
The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains — especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination — is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified.
Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.
Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

18
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

7. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions
It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith.
Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies.
In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.
The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions.
The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.
The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness.
Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.
Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings.
The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred.
Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear.
The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

8. Mass testing of healthy children
Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.
During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.
Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

16
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

9. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions
Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed — without proper debate or rigorous analysis — to the entire adult population).
This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.
Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:
• The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
• The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.
Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines — which have no associated long-term safety data — could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

10. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data
Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.
The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.
Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.
It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit — they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

16
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Conclusions
The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group — the elderly — the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children.
Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.
Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms.

To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with — according to the previous Health Secretary — a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.
In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms.
As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.
The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,
Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed
Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM, Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM
Mr. Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon
Dr. Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner
Dr. Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician
Mr. Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR
Dr. Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician
Dr. Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine
Mr. Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon
Dr. Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner
Click here, for the complete list of signatories.
Republished from GreenMedInfo.com

26
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Apologies this was so long – but It was good so I thought people might be interested – doubt it will achieve anything as the govt is so clearly uninterested in the views of “scientists” other than those they have a vested interest in following, but good to know that further down the line it cannot be said they were not made aware.

46
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Thank you for posting this in its entirety. This is one of the best summaries I have seen that itemizes all the ways the Covid narrative was bogus or dubious.

The letter makes several original points. For example, I appreciate the authors mentioning how the average age of a COVID victim (81 for males and 84 for females) was almost never mentioned in press reports. This had to be intentional. In America, I once did a COVID article and tried to find the average age of a COVID victim. I couldn’t find this data . The public was led to believe that everyone was almost equally at risk when, in fact, only those over 70 or with severe pre-existing conditions faced elevated risks. Well done!

21
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Early on Ivor Cummins did a super job identifying the vulnerable and putting all the numbers in context.

4
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

No apologies needed.
So many people have behaved so admirably and courageously, under great pressure and often terrible distress.
I wish I wasn’t so disappointed in the others. How will we ever trust them again?

19
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Great letter. One comment:
The authors insist this must never again happen. But it’s happening still! Until it’s really over, and the perpetrators identified and punished, it is premature to declare it must never happen again. All efforts should be aimed at ending it now.

19
0
Allnamestaken
Allnamestaken
3 years ago
Reply to  Susan

And the same fear tactics and control strategies will be mutated onto the ‘climate emergency’ as the Graun newspaper puts it.

7
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

The absence of the consideration of the harms was not “willfull avoidance.”
It was willful harm.

7
0
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
3 years ago

How can they declare something that never started as “over”?

34
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

It started because a state of pandemic was declared by the WHO. That’s something abstract which isn’t directly related to any real-world events.

2
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

I assume that once the pathetic pandemic is officially classed as over the enquiries will begin and it will become incredibly clear just how much has been stolen by the Tories and their mates in the name of fighting this trumped up virus.

45
-1
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

I wouldn’t hold your breath

44
-1
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

The Iraq war enquiry didn’t amount to much, Blair is not behind bars and he’s listened to. Seems unlikely that the real truth will emerge from the covid scam/madness for a few generations yet given that almost every powerful institution on the planet is in it up to their necks. I think a lot of the main protagonists will need to die of natural causes or retire from public life at a ripe old age before we’ll get anything like a balanced assessment.

Governments of all political stripes (at least nominally) have to a greater or lesser degree participated in this shitshow.

58
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Good point. This isn’t the first time that “trusted government officials” have lied about data or spread obvious “Misinformation” to produce an intended government action – actions or policies that resulted in the deaths of untold thousands of innocent people and untold levels of misery.

I mean, they’ve lied to the people before (and gotten away with it). What makes so many people think they are not lying now?

8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Wait until they steal your Bank Account- that’s next!

28
-1
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Enquiries along those lines might be useful in the longer term, but they can always suspend them on one pretext or another – like the Grenfell tower one that is still suspended (presumably because of the pandemic).

2
0
rtaylor
rtaylor
3 years ago

Nothing to do with seasonal flu, DNR orders etc. WEF agents want to accelerate crashing the financial system while they’re still in power.

I believe this year will be worse economically than the previous 2 years of covid combined. Hope I’m wrong.

28
-1
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  rtaylor

2022 is clearly a premature forcast IMO.

World Bank has 2025 down for ending the covid “crisis”
EU’s Christine Lagarde said 2025 for the EU CBDC rollout
China & Russia have CBDC ready, UK is still in white paper mode, but expected 2025, US Fed only just published it’s “discussion paper”.
2030 – WEF’s goal

Expect more consolidation for WEF big business/tech between now and then. A “supply crisis” is clearly on the cards. Pandemic 2.0 odds are shrinking by the day given the global overplaying of hands, it seems a busted flush at this point. But there’s loads of other hands to play, energy crunch, war, terrorism is so passe post covid but depends how the politics go, food supply issues seems to have an engineered element, so could be likely too. I think “Financial Armageddon” is the trump card to swing it, but there’s UBI and social credit system ducks to line up first.

we’ll definately be squeezed between now and 2025, but the real hard times will come leading up to 2030 IMO.

28
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

Great observations.

I’ve noticed a plethora of new plant-based food companies emerging in the last 18 months when everything else ground to a halt. Well packaged, generously backed and already in cafe chains and supermarkets.

Lots of associated propaganda about how much carbon and energy it takes to make a cheeseburger etc. Plus rumblings from the medical fraternity about the dangers of meat, with a nice tie in with premature heart attacks.

I’m fully expecting an engineered food crisis soon. The same clown who modelled covidmania triggered the foot and mouth thing, so easy to do.

The question is at what point do we all say enough is enough? When do we demand the traditional British right to simply be left in peace?

Last edited 3 years ago by Vaxtastic
35
-1
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

if you wanted to stunt brain growth you’d prevent people getting enough protein.
If you wanted testosterone free zombie soi-bois you’d make sure people got a lot of meat subsititutes.

23
-2
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

I do believe that is a valid observation. Starting with the demonization of meat as unhealthy, backed up with the feel-good rationalization for the fanatics – you are saving the planet.

12
-1
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Recently saw tins of plant-based tuna in a local supermarket, i’d rather eat cat food, which soon too will likely be plant-based….if we’re lucky.

ice.age.farmer – DARPA is funding the creation of 3D printed food from “mixed waste,” to be served “when traditional food is unavailable.

I can’t wait to see Gordon Ramsay enthusiastically frying a big, juicy soy steak and pretending it’s as good as the real thing.

Last edited 3 years ago by mishmash
4
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Never mind the pandemic

Thank God, at last an announcement. I have been on tenterhooks waiting for this. I’m going to send my vote off straight away

BBC Indian Sportswoman of the Year nominees revealed – BBC Sport

Last edited 3 years ago by Cecil B
33
-1
Username1
Username1
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

PV Sindhu AND Aditi Ashok are both on the voting list!!! Don’t do this to me BBC I can’t make my mind up!

4
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Aditi every time

0
0
Trabant
Trabant
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Surely this is racist?
Can you imagine the uproar at
“BBC White Sportsman of the year”
😱

20
-1
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

Equality and Diversity is allowed to include positive discrimination favouring any and every ethnic / gender / sexuality grouping EXCEPT straight white males – and especially straight white working-class males.

10
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

You put it better than me CR – I would just have said, well, “maybe racist but in good way”

1
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

I can’t bring myself to click a BBC link these days so you’ll have to enlighten me. Is this people from India or British-Indians?

11
0
Bolloxed Britannia
Bolloxed Britannia
3 years ago

This rancid NWO compliant caretaker administration may well declare the scamdemic over due to the growing mountain of stats thàt cannot be denied, but nothing changes until they repeal the Draconian corona virus act!

29
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Bolloxed Britannia

They also need to repeal the Public Health Act 1984 which is what they used for a lot of the restrictions. That’s just for starters. The Civil Contingencies Act has more enforcement of regular parliamentary scrutiny but the likelihood is that MPs would have gone along with it had it been used, at least to start with, so ideally I think we need to see proper constitutional protection for basic freedoms that cannot be removed under any circumstances, a complete ban on the use of Nudge Units and on governments buying advertising space for propaganda purposes (one would need to find a way to word that so that basic public information can still be published, perhaps limited to notification of changes in the law/regulations rather than “guidance”). I doubt we’ll see it in my lifetime but there needs to be a recognition that covid was not a deadly pandemic by any rational definition of the word, and that governments cannot stop respiratory viruses nor should they try.

38
0
jwills
jwills
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Excellent. I won’t hold my breath for it to happen though

9
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Fascists don’t “repeal” their tyranny.

20
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Indeed they do not, unless forced. The ultimate backstop is a much more politically aware, cynical and obstreperous populace, with a much keener sense of when governments are overreaching, but we are far away from that right now.

10
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Absolutely. These things get stopped, not withdrawn. The primary method is disobedience not legislation.

9
0
unmaskthetruth
unmaskthetruth
3 years ago

Surely the true answer, that everyone here knows, is that without a declared emergency the government and big Pharma will be liable for the side effects and damage done by their ‘vaccines’.

34
0
Pendolino
Pendolino
3 years ago
Reply to  unmaskthetruth

UTT you make a very valid point. But pharma may be able to escape liability should their covid products be accepted to the child vaccination schedule:
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/nhs-vaccinations-and-when-to-have-them/

10
0
Pendolino
Pendolino
3 years ago

I’m an unvaxxed septuagenarian. These conniving bastards have had two years out of my life. I’m somewhat averse to shoving chemical swabs deep up my nostrils so as far as I’m concerned all this shit won’t be over until all travel restrictions are removed – home and away! https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/france-spain-denmark-change-travel-23011589.amp

84
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  Pendolino

Cheers!

Toast 22.jpg
26
0
10navigator
10navigator
3 years ago
Reply to  Pendolino

Snap Pendilino. Hols are suspended (possibly for my lifetime). Living in Spain for the last 20yrs, life could be much worse, but I’m incandescent at the injustice and mendacity of it all. If you want to boost your blood pressure, read ‘The Real Dr Fauci, Bill Gates and Big Pharma’ by Robert F Kennedy Jr. What a bunch of ‘CU next Tuesdays.

5
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

The Together declaration was on GB News last night, they said we are not stopping at mandatory NHS jabs, we wan’t to make sure they can never lock us down ever again. That sounds great but with this new online safety fascism, surely if the government ignores any legislation, a bit like the current Nurenburg code, Bill of Rights, Human Rights, and somebody tries blowing the whistle, this new safety fascism will come down on them. Dangerous misinformation of course!

23
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

Mandatory jabs are being sought via the regulatory bodies, Javid is asking for this as a condition of being able to practise as a health professional.

14
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  BurlingtonBertie

As we saw with the Steve James incident, it is bad optics that cause them to retreat.

Perhaps a flash mob similar to the one chanting at Kier Starmer for every senior government figure is the only way to stop this.

Associate them all with the word “traitor”. Propaganda works both ways.

12
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Sadly this has been spun as anti-vax rather than criticising him for being absent in his role as leader of the opposition & not standing up for the working person by promoting & voting for lockdowns.

6
0
john ball
john ball
3 years ago
Reply to  BurlingtonBertie

it is only people who are against mandatory vaccines etc. who are complaining as well that he has failed in his job, the others were not bothered that he was in favour of more lockdownds and restrictions

1
0
Vxi7
Vxi7
3 years ago

It was clear as sky from the beginning it has nothing to do with health. So why would it be any different now??

22
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

They will only declare it over when they are ready to launch the next one – Gates and Javid are on the same page keeping the fear smouldering.

How would Johnson manage without his “Emergency Powers?

I see Esther McVey is calling out the Government ( Javid?) for allegedly secretly planning to use the sold-out MHRA to force injections on the Health Service Workers by the back-door without using the ‘mandate’ option. They will try to pass all responsibility for enforcing their Diktats down the line to companies and lower levels of Administration

They are all so devious! We can trust none of them with our lives, or our future!

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
40
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Its insidiuous, the outsourcing of constraints. Its exactly what they are doing with climate change policy and just about anything else that matters. It becomes so intertwined in every day issues that its near impossible to remove. They pass some nebulous legislation containing wish lists ( like the recent ‘levelling up’ one) and then construct edicts that never go in front of MPs , get drip fed through the media, and before you know it our lives contain new rules and regulations that no-one ever discussed or voted on.
This is how they construct our totalitarian prison, boil the frog slowly, the vast majority don’t know ( or seemingly care) when their freedoms die.

18
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

The Governent killed off all the old people by infecting the Care Homes. And then the NHS killed off all the sick people by withdrawing all medical services for a year.

So now we are a much more healthy country. Three cheers for SAGE and the NHS!

If the government gets its Assisted Suicide bill through, and we can kill off all the people over 60, we will stay a healthy country. Plus, we won’t have to pay out any pensions. Obviously the next plan for the establishment. Of course, taxes will have to rise the support the administration….

13
0
Teddy Edward
Teddy Edward
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

They didn’t infect the Care Homes they used The Liverpool Care pathway to create a false wave of deaths by manipulation of a Laboratory test not fit for purpose.I bore witness and my statement is with the Met.I guess that makes me a marked man they have my personal details.There is no evidence that Covid 19 exists rebranded cold/flu but you guys all know that.

26
-1
Teddy Edward
Teddy Edward
3 years ago
Reply to  Teddy Edward

ps as a Persona non grata Nurse I need any ideas to support myself perhaps Go Fund Me!!

11
0
D B
D B
3 years ago
Reply to  Teddy Edward

Tiktok

4
0
Teddy Edward
Teddy Edward
3 years ago
Reply to  D B

I’m not fat enough.

5
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago

Would the ages at which people are dying be available?

I wonder if there is a rise in younger than average deaths hidden by the dead-wood having been removed?

7
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago

And yet deaths amongst those aged 45-65 are 5 standard deviations (‘substantial increase’) above the normal range, and has been so since the summer. There seems to be little effect of ‘covid wave’ — it is just a relentless excess of deaths. I wonder why.

(Ignore the yellow bit in the graph — that shows a decline because the data for recent weeks hasn’t been fully processed yet)

excessdeathd45-65week5uk.png
18
0
Username1
Username1
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Climate change?

Seriously though, cancelled operations and general lack of medical care that has filtered through since spring 2020?

6
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

I only know people who have been maimed or killed by the jab, I know no one personally that has had any lasting effects from the coof.

10
0
Username1
Username1
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

I’ve talked to many people who have a different take. They will recount stories of a relative/friend/neighbour/work colleague who is in hospital and had COVID. Yes they were old/had a heart attack or whatever but the COVID is the No1 worry. As far as these people are concerned COVID killed the person and that is set in stone. Nothing will change their minds.

9
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Just when we thought the mental screwups of modern capitalism couldn’t get worse…the large majority are digging themselves ever deeper into mental holes – and even more so than with fashion and consumerism, with video games and mobile phone use, this is right “up close and personal”, to do with how people relate

  • to the illnesses and deaths of close family members,
  • to their own chances of living or dying,
  • to anyone they meet socially who says stuff about what’s going on in the world.

We critical few look at this and we think how vile and how scary it is… Probably quite a few of us oscillate between being stultified and being terrified.

Others look at it and think “£$£ opportunity £$£.”

And a very very few actually created the profit-making opportunity and control the lion’s share of it – and they’ve absolutely no plans to relent. Quite the contrary.

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
9
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Depends how good their security is I guess. Remember in the News last year about a death threat at the WEF….They had to cancel their conference.

2
0
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

If people have totally bought into the whole pandemic cobblers then it will indeed be set in stone. Their beliefs and behaviours have to be justified. .

4
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Yes: non-existent or wrong “medical care” for problems of specific kinds.

Officially the leading cause of death for men aged 50-64 is heart disease, and for women it is bronchial, tracheal or lung cancer. Which is not to say that those statements convey very much, because the available categories and how they are organised will be determined by big business. Which doesn’t mean only Big Pharma: for example, there won’t be a Medical Certificate of Cause of Death in the entire country that mentions living next door to a nuclear power station, an electricity substation, or a cellphone mast, or sleeping next to a zuzzing fusebox, as a contributory cause of death.

The suicide figures have probably been fiddled downwards too.

And something new, whatever it is, still seems to be going on.

What is it?

Medics have long been liars – ever since they started ministering to hoi polloi – but what may have happened is that that relationship has been “stretched out”, become more extreme. The contempt and lies and craziness have intensified. But what do we expect given that for long periods beginning in March 2020 the whole attitude was “Stay away from hospitals, you dirty lergy-spreaders”?

Once a person has “assisted the death” of a stranger who naively held him in awe, or they have simply looked the other way, denying the patient’s need for what they know would probably be an effective treatment, administering instead a time-wasting crock of sh*te that they know will raise the probability that the person snuffs it, the next time it becomes easier…

There’s no “ethics” involved. That’s why they go on about “ethics” the whole time.

It’s like when a plumber keeps saying he’s not lying to you.

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
14
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Could be. There are a few options — you’d have thought government would be throwing money at research to find out why, but research into ‘effects of covid’ gets all the money and research into ‘government’s response to covid’ gets crumbs.

7
0
Arum
Arum
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

On a related subject, do GPs get extra funding for covid/long covid patients or are they just obsessed? I went to my GP with a nasty rash on my hands and her first question was – ‘so when did you have Covid?’ – I think she was a bit disappointed when I said I haven’t had it.

6
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Arum

it’s a vax AE symptom, so obviously Doc thinks it’s covid, like all the other AE symptoms.

2
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Sorry posted a few seconds after you before I saw your post, about the same thing. It is relentless isn’t it.

4
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

How many intervals of what length is the standard deviation calculated over?
And how large is it, measured in deaths per 1000 in that age group?

I’m looking at the z-score of 15 for one of the weeks in January 2021. The average death rate per 1000 in the 45-65 group is probably (at a guess) around 5. I’ve no idea what the standard deviation is but presumably there is a bit of jumping around and so (again a guess) it could be say 0.4. If that is anywhere near a reasonable guess, then z=15 would give a death rate of 11, more than twice the normal figure. Were things that bad?
Certainly sustained z≃5 needs an explanation.

3
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Freecumbria’s post has some raw numbers that should illustrate the absolute magnitude of z=5ish.

2
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago

Still a big difference between what is happening in working ages and the oldest ages, bearing in mind that the oldest ages drive total death numbers.

Let’s look at the age 45-64 age group. And look at deaths per million in this age group. We can see (despite the jumble of lines) that the green line for 2022 for week 4 is running above most recent years apart from 2021.

So that is possibly connected with the continuing high home deaths, and may reflect a lack of access to healthcare or be related to the experimental vaccines. Certainly nothing to do with covid the illness.

45-64-8th-Feb.jpg
12
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Freecumbria

But perhaps a lot more to do with “Covid -the Vaccines”!

8
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

It’s strange that the 5-9 age group (who haven’t been experimentally vaccinated on apart from an unlucky few) are still experiencing very low mortality and have been for some time.

5-9-8th-Feb.jpg
9
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago
Reply to  Freecumbria

But if we look at the highest age group for which we have long term data and that is banded at both ends, ages 75-84, and again look at deaths per million, we see from the green line the opposite affect. Deaths running very low here in this age group. Presumably because of an absence of ‘dry timber’ for want of a more human expression.

It’s these older age groups including the over 80s that is the reason total deaths are running below ‘average’.

75-84-8th-Feb.jpg
8
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  Freecumbria

I suggest that there is an impact of the vaccines in ‘excess deaths’ of something like 15 per week per million (say, just eyeballing it for now) and that this is less dependent on age.

So, for older age groups the death rate swamps that 15 per million.

But for lower age groups that 15 per million is very important.

Add to that the suggestion that ‘all the very ill people succumbed to covid during 2020, Jan 2021 and summer 2021’, then this could readily result in lower death rates in those in the oldest age groups but noticeable increased death rates in younger age groups.

8
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Yes, agree.

That’s one of the shocking things that the experimental vaccines can do a lot of harm in the oldest age groups without it being at all apparent in the overall death numbers, because of the dry tinder affect.

And in the working age groups you don’t notice the affect on mortality at all unless you look at mortality by age band because the oldest drive the overall death numbers without banding.

Last edited 3 years ago by Freecumbria
3
0
Life is a journey; are we there yet?
Life is a journey; are we there yet?
3 years ago
Reply to  Freecumbria

Europe Reloaded reports that same phenomena in Spain
.
Cascón Porres commented on the rise in unexplained deaths:

“And that is exactly the problem. These are deaths that occur without being diagnosed, and maybe that’s why they are less important: They don’t create more pressure in the hospital, but people definitely die.”

The UPM researcher noted that it made little sense that all of this data was only used to produce reports on excess mortality, but not to look for the cause.

https://www.europereloaded.com/the-high-mortality-rate-in-spain-puzzles-experts/

Deaths within 14 days of injection happening at home perhaps (ref VAERS data)

. (https://odysee.com/@alltheworldsastage:0/3+Hours-Reading-900+-COVID-Vaccine-Deaths-ALL-Day-0—Day-1-After-InjectionShot-VAERS-Reports:9) 

4
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

See how the sold-out Mirror touches its cap to tyrants and prints their propaganda bulletins !

16
0
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
3 years ago

They won’t. Things will be allowed to drop away (albeit slowly) but I can’t see them ever saying ‘it’s over’.

8
0
eca
eca
3 years ago

Pandemic mania will be discussed by a range of epis and activists including Professor Sunetra Gupta, this Saturday 12/2 at Take Back Our Lives 10-6pm at a venue near Baker Street. DS readers welcome https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2022/01/lls-presents-take-back-our-lives/

7
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

Virus will still be useful to TRPTB in order to achieve control via digital ID, so they won’t give up the fear porn easily.
That’s their endgame and route to permanent power over us all – they think.
But, who knows for sure. Everyone makes mistakes including/especially those bastards. (Blair, Gates et al).

My fear is of mandatory mrna jabs. synthesized gene sequencing for any and all human ailments you could think of and for eternity – or as long as the human survives.
Of course the jabs can’t affect your DNA?
Say hello to polymerase Theta for that one lol. – quite apart from the trashing of your innate immune system to get the thing into your cells, and they haven’t a clue as to precisely how that works either.

Try to understand the immune system before you mess with it. Nature is biting back…

8
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Discovery identifies a highly efficient human reverse transcriptase that can write RNA sequences into DNA — ScienceDaily

3
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/

3
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs

In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural
infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon
signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health…

and…

These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to
neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s
palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased
tumorigenesis, and DNA damage…

https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas

7
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

Thank you for the links.
Bound to be mentioned in the MSM soon.
Do you think the expert “vaccine” developers know of this?

1
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Do you think the expert “vaccine” developers know of this?

They had plenty of evidence from the failed SARs 1 mRNA vaccines that killed all the test animals.

They probably have “plausible deniability” about these effects on Humans, because they didn’t look for them, and their “trials” were designed not to find them.

6
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Once again, this is not about health. It never has been.

7
0
Colby
Colby
3 years ago

..

Screenshot 2022-02-08 at 14-37-23 Right Said Fred on GETTR.png
2
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Colby

Does that mean that they won’t be requiring visitors to their country to show a jab-pass on entry?

2
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

I think visitors from EU/EEA/other Nordic countries won’t

1
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago

The government will declare the ‘pandemic’ over when it’s most politically expedient to do so.

Just like they started and perpetuated the ‘pandemic’ according to their own arbitrary, convenient, logic.

5
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

https://rumble.com/vnbrwx-my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someones-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab..html
Tried to link this to my earlier post re trashing of immune system after mrna jabs, evidence of

6
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago

This ‘deaths in private homes still running high’ bothers me. I doubt very much that these are people who have come to the end of the line, and willingly and peacefully shuffle off their mortal coil in their own beds. More likely they have repeatedly tried to see a gp, or being frail, have asked for a gp to come and see them. (which ain’t going to happen is it? An elderly infirm friend was asked to take a photo of her varicose ulcer, despite having no means to take a picture, or e mail it on, and was spoken to as if she was being a right stupid nuisance). Otherwise I expect they have been waiting hours for an ambulance and have died before it could arrive, or else they’ve been fobbed off by 111. A friend recently waited 11 HOURS for an ambulance. It’s disgraceful. People are dying because we have virtually no non urgent medical care in large swathes of the country.

19
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

Or because they are so afraid of actually being taken into hospital (disappearing into the ‘system’ as they’d see it) and not being allowed visitors or any communication with their loved ones. How frightening that would be for an elderly person, with no mobile phone, and no support. I’m sure there are many like that who would rather die in their own bed.

17
0
Javy
Javy
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

A dear friend of mine, in her mid 80s, had a fall last year and after a spell in hospital was discharged to a Nursing Home. She has no family and I would love to visit her. All I know is that she is in one of three Homes but it has been impossible to find out which one. I have contacted all 3 but each one has told me they’re not allowed to divulge whether she’s with them. She must feel totally abandoned.

12
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Javy

send mail to her at all 3, put your ‘if undelivered’ return address on the back.

Failing that phone them up claiming to be her relative demanding to find where she was sent after the hospital visit.

Last edited 3 years ago by ImpObs
11
0
misslawbore
misslawbore
3 years ago
Reply to  Javy

Go to your MP

1
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

Very true – and that is why I would refuse to go to hospital.

1
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

All of these draconian lockdowns and NPIs were marketed as being necessary to protect “public health?”

At this point, does anyone really think that “public health” is better today than it was two years ago? It’s far worse. The Law of Opposite Effects kicks in yet again.

6
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago

What date is the CoronaCircus Act (the Greatest Show In Town) due to be ‘renewed’? No doubt this will be spun out till then, at least.

7
0
misslawbore
misslawbore
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

It will not be renewed and ends late Marh 2022. Certain clauses may be saved to amend other legislation though

1
0
tony rattray
tony rattray
3 years ago

THE MIDDLE CLASSES ARE LOVING IT!

ScotRail’s peak services ‘won’t return to pre-Covid levels’ – BBC News

Surprise, surprise, the middle classes are not going back to work! Confirming for many that the last two years was a holiday (no commute and lots of extra free time and money to buy a new house – the soda bread baking generation). Hence what was there to question (actually more freedom in a perverse way), especially if you were in the public sector on full pay.

So the future is hybrid working for the middle classes who the working classes will service, whilst the working classes themselves can get stuffed, or vote for the ‘labour’ party. Oh dear.

Last edited 3 years ago by tony rattray
14
-1
Nessimmersion
Nessimmersion
3 years ago
Reply to  tony rattray

Its also a potential source of the biggest money savers for the taxpayer.
All those WFH for the past 18 months are now deemed surplus to requirements & get statutory redundancy only.

6
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Nessimmersion

soon to be called UBI

0
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  tony rattray

But they’re sacrificing their kids in the long run.

2
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago

Sen. Ron Johnson recently made news (or tried to make news) by hosting a panel of COVID skeptics. Several of these whistleblowers reported that the epidemeiologic data base of the U.S. military is showing a tremendous spike in non-COVID medical diagnoses in the last year or so (since vaccines were rolled out).

The spike in these medical diagnosis (reported by military doctors) mirrors the spike in adverse events seen in the VAERS system.

The panelists, including some lawyers for “whistleblower” military doctors, simply asked the Department of Defense to order doctors and health care reporters to speak freely and honestly about any spikes in cases they may have seen.

This order won’t be forthcoming of course. I wonder if anyone in the UK has pursued a similar storyline among the British military? Has there been statistically-significant increases in myriad health diagnoses among UK military personnel?

5
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Someone at another Comment Section just posted this data, which I can’t vouch for but is in line with the excellent coverage Steve Kirsch gave to this subject. Kirsch’s data was from the entire military, I believe. This poster says this is the data from the U.S. Army only.

Still, what caused these spikes?

these are the year on year changes in illnesses reported to the US Army after vaccine mandates.
Below are summarized 2021 (+ vaccine) numbers % change relative to 2020 (- vaccine)
 

  • Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Ambulatory) down 3%
  • (this is basically a control for the data set, and contradicts the “data corruption” explanation).
  • Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Hospitalization) up 37%
  • Total Number of Diseases of the Nervous System By Year up 968%
  • Total Number of Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumor Reports By Year up 276%
  • Total Number of Acute Myocardial Infarct Reports By Year up 343%
  • Total Number of Acute Myocarditis Reports By Year up 184%
  • Total Number of Acute Pericarditis Reports By Year up 70%
  • Total Number of Pulmonary Embolism Reports By Year up 260%
  • Total Number of Congenital Malformations Reports By Year up 87%
  • Total Number of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrage Reports By Year up 227%
  • Total Number of Anxiety Reports By Year up 2,361%
  • Total Number of Suicide Reports By Year up 227%
  • Total Number of Neoplasms for All Cancers By Year up 218%
  • Total Number of Malignant Neoplasms for Digestive Organs By Year up 477%
  • Total Number of Neoplasms for Breast Cancer By Year up 469%
  • Total Number of Neoplasms for Testicular Cancer By Year up 298%
  • Total Number of Female Infertility Reports By Year up 419%
  • Total Number of Dysmenorrhea Reports By Year up 221.5%
  • Total Number of Ovarian Dysfunction Reports By Year up 299%
  • Total Number of Spontaneous Abortion Reports By Year DOWN by 10%
  • Total Number of Male Infertility Reports By Year up 320%
  • Total Number of Guillian-Bare Syndrome Reports By Year up 520%
  • Total Number of Acute Transverse Myelitis Reports By Year up 494%
  • Total Number of Seizure Reports By Year up 298%
  • Total Number of Narcolepsy & Cataplexy Reports By Year up 352%
  • Total Number of Rhabdomyolysis By Year up 672%
  • Total Number of Multiple Sclerosis Reports By Year up 614%
  • Total Number of Migraine Reports By Year up 352%
  • Total Number of Blood Disorder Reports By Year up 204%
  • Total Number of Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) Reports By Year up 2,130%
  • Total Number of Cerebral Infarct Reports By Year up 294%
8
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

That is truly frightening !

0
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago

This is not over by any stretch. My eight year old nephew has just had a letter to say he’s “eligible” to be jabbed as an immucompromised child.

I despair that although his mother (my sister) is on the fence, all those around her are covid freaks so will insist on it.

8
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

He might be eligible but has he had his vitamin D status tested? I’d be doing that first way before i’d be taking him to a jabbing centre and making good any shortfall of vitamin D with some supplements [and vitamin K2 to make sure that it gets to the parts of the body it is supposed to get to].

I’ll keep everything crossed that your sister holds firm and doesn’t get him jabbed. If he is immunocompromised already I cannot see the jab doing anything other than making that situation worse for the poor wee crittur.

12
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Thanks for the advice Milo.

Sorry for my ignorance, but what would the Vitamin D test do or achieve? I’ve not heard of anyone doing this before getting the jab.

1
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

A cynic might observe that it would assist the cashflow of someone else; Vitamin D supplements are quite cheap and easy to buy at supermarkets, now that many of us have learnt a bit more about their usefulness at this time of year. At present I’m using at least 25 µg per day, and more depending on what’s on my menu.

D supplement - 1.jpg
0
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Many diseases are caused through lack of Vitamin D and we in the northern hemisphere lack vitamin D because we don’t get enough sun on our skin. During autumn and winter I take a variety of supplements daily including 4000 iu Vitamin D and Zinc. Since adopting this regime I haven’t had any colds or flu or Covid. As for taking the jab – no way would I injure my immune system by doing so!

3
0
pjar
pjar
3 years ago

God help us, should the government decide that not enough people are dying…

6
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

I told a seven year old that the vaccine is dangerous to some kids, especially little boys. Just in case they roll it out to 7 to 11yo. I hope he remembers our conversation.

8
0
4PureBlood
4PureBlood
3 years ago

I am so sick of this covid aka great reset nonsense. But I undertake as a duty to inform people about facts about cheaply, effectively and qucikly curing this so called virus symptoms. Search for c19ivermectin on your search engine. On that website you will find as of right now there are 142 studies. 93 of them are peer reviewed about curing covid19 with ivermectin. These are undeniable evidences. Get your ivermectin before it is too late https://ivmpharmacy.com

5
0
Osobowy
Osobowy
3 years ago

Here’s something interesting on theme: a government MP from Quebec is strongly calling for a change of course and says that his views are by no mean exceptional in the Liberal government caucus. After the first 2 minutes of customary condemnation of the trucker protest required to get msm coverage, he then goes on to agree with the truckers’ main demand to end the mandates.

Liberal MP Speaks out on Vaccine Mandates:
https://youtu.be/xuASydTUatI

So it may be a great sign that the “epidemic” is coming to an end.

But, make no mistake, this is just the successful completion of an important phase. The goal is 2030, and so far everything is more or less where it ought to be.

We need a lot more people waking up here, including and especially the Daily Sceptic.

Last edited 3 years ago by Osobowy
10
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago

Since there never was a true pandemic, when to declare it’s end is problematic.

7
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago

As someone pointed out yesterday, the 5 year average sums are weird this year – they are using 6 years with a one year gap for 5 – 2016, 17, 18, 19, 21, so as to avoid 2020. If they used a conventional straight five years, they’d come up with more than 9.3% below, you’d have thought.

2
0
Martin Frost
Martin Frost
3 years ago

Government needs to go much further than to declare the pandemic over. It should ban all panicdemic advertising and actively discourage the use of facemasks. The public have been deliberately brainwashed and now require deprogramming. Risk is part of life. The infantilisation of the population has to stop.

6
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago

What? Declare it over and lose their abusive ’emergency’ powers. Do turkeys vote for Christmas (or for Thanksgiving for our US contributors)?

2
0
liz.thornborrow@blueyonder.co.uk
liz.thornborrow@blueyonder.co.uk
3 years ago

They won’t declare the emergency over because the jabs are only authorised for use in an ’emergency’

0
0
Peter W
Peter W
3 years ago

“why in such a mild winter the Government is being slow to join countries like Denmark in reclassifying COVID-19, repealing pandemic laws and lifting the state of emergency….”
Still got lots of jabs to sell to us yet. Gotta keep the Big Pharma bosses happy.

0
0
Less government
Less government
3 years ago

Presumably if we are no longer in a state of emergency, the experimental injections for emergency authorisation only, will have to be stopped – an extremely good idea in my humble opinion, but obviously if you have your nose in the Big Pharma trough, not so welcome.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out

by Richard Eldred
15 August 2025
9

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

16 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is Labour Paving Over Britain’s Arable Heartlands Without Consulting Local People?

16 August 2025
by Simon Panter

News Round-Up

21

Why is Labour Paving Over Britain’s Arable Heartlands Without Consulting Local People?

18

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

31

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

13

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

12

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

16 August 2025
by Clive Pinder

How Can We Create a Censorship-Free Internet?

16 August 2025
by Dr R P

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

POSTS BY DATE

February 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

February 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

16 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is Labour Paving Over Britain’s Arable Heartlands Without Consulting Local People?

16 August 2025
by Simon Panter

News Round-Up

21

Why is Labour Paving Over Britain’s Arable Heartlands Without Consulting Local People?

18

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

31

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

13

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

12

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

16 August 2025
by Clive Pinder

How Can We Create a Censorship-Free Internet?

16 August 2025
by Dr R P

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences