75759
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Another Cost-Benefit Analysis Finds That Lockdowns Weren’t Worth It

by Noah Carl
23 August 2021 8:59 AM

Did the costs of lockdown outweigh the benefits? Numerous analyses have concluded ‘yes’. However, these were all carried out by academics or independent researchers. To my knowledge, no Western government has published a cost-benefit analysis of lockdown (presumably due to what it might show).

In an unpublished paper, the economic consultant L. Jan Reid has attempted a cost-benefit analysis of lockdown in the United States. He in fact reports two separate analyses: first, what he calls a “traditional analysis”; and second, what he calls his “preferred analysis”.

Reid’s traditional analysis makes the unrealistic assumption that every life lost is valued equally at $7.8 million (which is the average value from a list of published estimates). It yielded a benefit/cost ratio slightly greater than one, suggesting the lockdowns were worth it. On the other hand, three out of four sensitivity analyses yielded benefit/cost ratios of less than one.

By contrast, Reid’s preferred analysis makes the much more realistic assumption that the value of lives lost decreases with age, such that each 20 year old represents a loss of $11 million, whereas each 70 year old represents a loss of $1.5 million.

To estimate the total benefits of lockdown, he multiplies the estimated number of lives saved in each age-group by the ‘economic value of life’ for that age-group, and then sums the values across all age-groups.

When calculating the costs of lockdown, Reid includes the hit to GDP, money spent on federal stimulus programs, lives lost from the restrictions themselves, and several other items. Overall, his preferred analysis yields a benefit/cost ratio far below one, indicating that the lockdowns weren’t worth it.

While I suspect Reid overestimates lives lost from the restrictions themselves, the benefit/cost ratio is still below one even excluding this particular item. What’s more, he uses a very liberal estimate of the number of lives saved by lockdowns – approximately two million. The true figure, I would guess, is substantially less than this.

Reid concludes that the “cost of the lockdowns was up to 10 times greater than the benefits”. You may not agree with all his assumptions, but the paper is worth reading in full.

Tags: Cost-benefit analysisLockdownsUnited States

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Dozens of Covid Test Providers to Be Removed From Gov.uk Website

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Andrew Tate’s Confrontation With the BBC, Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Presidential Campaign and the Fall of Joe Biden

by Will Jones
6 June 2023
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

WHO and EU Announce Global System of Vaccine Passports for “Future Pandemics”

6 June 2023
by Will Jones

Lockdown Sceptic Molly Kingsley: “I Was Cast as an Extremist But I’ve Since Been Proved Right”

6 June 2023
by Toby Young

News Round-Up

6 June 2023
by Jonathan Barr

Academics Claim There Was a “Non-Binary Minority” in Prehistoric Europe

6 June 2023
by Noah Carl

Giant Pride Flag on Bromley Hospital Criticised by Health Secretary

5 June 2023
by Toby Young

WHO and EU Announce Global System of Vaccine Passports for “Future Pandemics”

53

News Round-Up

32

Academics Claim There Was a “Non-Binary Minority” in Prehistoric Europe

28

Surge in Sexually Transmitted Diseases Linked to End of Lockdown

16

Lockdown Sceptic Molly Kingsley: “I Was Cast as an Extremist But I’ve Since Been Proved Right”

10

WHO and EU Announce Global System of Vaccine Passports for “Future Pandemics”

6 June 2023
by Will Jones

Academics Claim There Was a “Non-Binary Minority” in Prehistoric Europe

6 June 2023
by Noah Carl

‘Climate Finance’ Saving the Planet, One Ice Cream at a Time

6 June 2023
by Chris Morrison

Sir Keir Starmer’s Plans to Turn Britain into a ‘Green Energy Superpower’ will Bankrupt Households and Cripple the Economy

5 June 2023
by David Craig

The Covid Inquiry’s ‘Commemorative Tapestry’ Reveals its True Purpose – Comforting the Afflicted, Not Afflicting the Comfortable

5 June 2023
by Dr David McGrogan

POSTS BY DATE

August 2021
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Jul   Sep »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment