Despite the recent easing of restrictions for both outdoor and indoor hospitality, new research shows that almost a quarter of Britain’s licensed premises have yet to reopen. The partial reopening of the sector has been largely hampered by the continuation of social distancing guidelines. Nearly 7.5% of Britain’s pre-lockdown total of pubs and restaurants have already closed for good. The Caterer has more.
23.7% of Britain’s… licensed premises have yet to reopen despite the return of inside service, new Market Recovery Monitor research from CGA and AlixPartners reveals.
The snapshot data found just under 25,000 venues are still shut, with similar trading numbers in England (76.6%) and Scotland (77.4%), but a notably slower return in Wales (69.6%).
The Market Recovery Monitor showed slightly more pubs have reopened than restaurants. Around nine in 10 high street pubs (92.9%), food pubs (91.8%) and community pubs (89.6%) are back trading, alongside 89.2% of casual dining and other restaurants.
However, social distancing and restrictions in place still make it unviable for swathes of venues to open, and 45.2% of Britain’s sports and social clubs remain closed, alongside 50.9% of large venues and 27% of bars.
More than 8,500 premises… have already closed for good.
Karl Chessell, CGA’s Director for Hospitality Operators and Food, EMEA, said: “The return of large parts of hospitality for indoor service was a landmark moment for consumers and businesses alike, but it is alarming to see that so many venues have still not been able to welcome guests. Many will have decided that restrictions and space constraints make opening unviable, while some sectors like late-night bars and nightclubs are still completely off limits.
“It will be an anxious wait to see how many of the venues that are holding on until the final easing of restrictions will be able to make it through. Sustained support is clearly going to be needed to save thousands of vulnerable businesses and jobs.”
The continued presence of a fear of Covid (“Covid Anxiety Syndrome“, as it has been labelled) means many people have struggled with returning to normal life. This will no doubt have created further difficulties for publicans and restaurateur hoping to maximise sales after many months of forced closure. Recent polling from Ipsos MORI shows that 14% of British adults aren’t looking forward to having dinner in a restaurant with friends and 18% aren’t looking forward to going to the pub.
The Caterer report is worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
ALL the so-called vaccines have terrible side effects. Check out the UK Column searchable MHRA yellow card data. Eye watering!
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
Try typing in “clot”, for example, and then search by vaccine manufacturer.
Most people have no idea.
The mechanism for the clotting was warned about by the Doctors for Covid Ethics in March.
Nothing to see here
Very interesting article on the BBC, which inadvertently leaks some key data.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57075503
Ignore the misinformation headline that describes “mild” symptoms – that is undermined by the opening paragraph which instantly becomes “mild or moderate”. Look at the charts. They are inadvertently showing that in a trial 50%+ of “vaccine” recipients reported fatigue, rising to nearly 80% when “vaccines” were mixed. Similarly up to 40% report headache, rising to over 60% when mixing “vaccines”.
These figures are shocking. The original study leaks even more information, including severity.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01115-6/fulltext#sec1
Download the PDFs while you can. This appears to be showing, amongst other things that the Pfizer “vaccine” is sending a small percentage (it looks around 2%) of people to hospital for headaches! Both vaccines send more than 1% to hospital for fever and AZ also for “chills”. Well, now we can see why hospitals are busy.
There is a huge spike in severity when mixing “vaccines”, in particular for Pfizer followed by AZ. Could this be a warning of the effect that will lead to Antibody Dependant Enhancement?
I don’t have time today, but it would be interesting to use this data along with yellow card data to compute an estimate of the actual yellow card under-reporting and extrapolate the real figures for side effects. I think we have all the data for this. If proportions for various symptoms match up in yellow card and this study then we could have reasonable confidence in the extrapolation. I couldn’t see any raw data for the study so it will probably require zooming in to column charts and measuring them.
On closer inspection the hospitalisations were actually “severe”, the colour coding was not clear.
Wow. And this may show up more once children begin to be jabbed. Many mothers won’t go public because they will feel guilty, but some will feel the need to warn others.
Alex Berenson reporting that VAERS have prioritised the J&J in cataloguing their backlog, so that reporting on Pfizer is hidden for now.
One thought I had was that UK Column’s page https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports puts the total UK adverse events at about 750,000. They say between 1% and 10% of actual adverse events end up being reported. Well if only 1% are being reported, that would equate to 75,000,000 adverse events, which is more than the amount of vaccines administered. So my crap maths indicates that more than 1% are being reported. 10% reported would give a real figure of 7,500,000 adverse events, out of 50 million odd injections (I just checked and it’s 54 million so not a bad guess!) , which I would imagine is a bit too low, given what we know, so maybe the real figure is somewhere in between the two.
Don’t forget that the number of adverse reactions will likely include multiple reactions per person. We cannot tell how many unique people reported side effects. Fortunately the study also suffers this effect so the two may still be comparable. They have been pretty effective at data obfuscation.
‘Scientists are working to find the potential mechanism that would explain the blood clots. A leading hypothesis appears to be that the vaccines are triggering a rare immune response that could be related to these viral vectors.’
What a load of smelly stuff!
The AZ and JJ vaccines trigger an immune response early as the spike protein invades cells in the blood veins/capilliary linings as soon as its injected, nobody can miss this so its been reported early. The Pfizer/Moderna vaccines cover the mRNA with a gel that stops that quick recognition by the immune system. But as a consequence it has the same effect only it takes the T-cells/anti-bodies longer to muster their defences and the spike proteins can be carried anywhere in the body to create the spike factories that will never get turned off. Its the mRNA vaccines that in the medium/longer term carry the greater threat.
Most every intelligent person looking at this knows this. But the vast majority are scared to say so. They are potentially complicit in mass murder by their silence.
2 jabs – 1 clot
Just the name is offputting, one Johnson is one too many