38094
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Ambitious Interpretation of Results of the Oxford Vaccine Group’s Latest Paper

by Dr Clare Craig
4 February 2021 11:14 PM

by Dr Clare Craig FRCPath

On February 1st the Oxford Vaccine Group published their latest findings on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. While the findings are encouraging, the way they have been interpreted is questionable. The study is underpowered for the conclusions that are being drawn from it and there has been extensive data mining undertaken retrospectively in an attempt to draw more powerful conclusions.

They concluded that in the vaccinated group two thirds fewer people were infected. Despite admitting that they did not study transmission, they still commented on it. The conclusions reached were the overall percentage testing positive was 54% lower “indicating the potential for a reduction of transmission”. The 54% figure was deduced from positivity including asymptomatic positives. This is not a reasonable conclusion to draw on two counts. They have assumed that asymptomatic positives are a major source of transmission and there is minimal evidence to support that assertion; and they failed to account for false positive test results.

Asymptomatic positives were looked for only in the UK participants. They have not stated how often these people were tested, but it can be inferred that they were tested 10 times each on a weekly basis for follow up from day 22 to day 90. That is 82,070 tests. A remarkably low false positive rate of 0.16% would be enough to account for the asymptomatic positives that they found. Repeat testing will only exclude false positives if a negative result is used to overrule a previous positive result. The criteria for calling a positive were not disclosed in the paper and it is assumed that a single PCR positive test was considered significant.

Instead of realising they had a false positive problem there has been over-interpretation of the results.

They note that there was no impact of vaccination with standard doses after 90 days on the number of asymptomatic positives. There is no reason to expect an impact when it is appreciated that these are false positive results.

Table 1 from paper Single dose administration, and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine (SD/SD means standard dose followed by standard dose; LD/SD means low dose followed by standard dose)

Note that the difference between the two control groups in the symptomatic positives (at the top of the table) is significant – 2.7% infected vs 3.6% infected. If there is potential for that much difference between the control arms, then the impact of the difference between the control and vaccine arm has to be called into question. There does appear to be an effect of vaccination in the symptomatic group, but the effect is not as dramatic when considering that one control arm had a 25% reduction in symptomatic positives by chance alone.

For the asymptomatic positives, again, the difference between the two control arms – 2.2% vs 1.5% – is of the same order of magnitude as the difference it is claimed was due to the vaccine in the low dose arm – 1.2% vs 2.2%. Furthermore, when two standard doses were given, no difference was observed at all – 1.5% were asymptomatic positives in both control and vaccine arms.

How can the vaccine be having an impact if it is possible to find the same impact by randomly assigning people to two different control groups?

Second part of table 1 from paper Single dose administration, and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine (SD/SD means standard dose followed by standard dose; LD/SD means low dose followed by standard dose)

Looking at the different dosing schedules it is clear that the highest number of asymptomatic positives were actually seen in the vaccine arm with a 6-8 week interval between doses. However, this cannot be over-interpreted. The message is that all of the results in the asymptomatic positives were background noise and should be ignored.

Finally, it is worth noting that although they include this sentence:

the analyses are presented here to provide a rigorous peer-reviewed interrogation of updated data.

There has been no peer review at this stage and we must hope that the peer reviewers take a dim view of their over-interpretation of this data.

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Latest News

Next Post

Latest News

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Fall of Russell Brand, the BBC’s Trans Rights Activism and Graham Linehan Topping the Bestseller List

by Will Jones
19 September 2023
5

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

News Round-Up

21 September 2023
by Richard Eldred

Generation Z Can’t Work Alongside People with Different Views and Don’t have the Skills to Debate, says Channel 4 Boss – as She Blames the Lockdowns

21 September 2023
by Will Jones

Rumble Rejects MPs’ “Dangerous” Demand to Cave into Russell Brand “Cancel Culture Mob”

21 September 2023
by Will Jones

“You’d Have to Pay Me to Buy an Electric Car”

20 September 2023
by Will Jones

The Terrible Truth is That Even Sunak’s Mild Net Zero Relaxation May Be Unlawful

21 September 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

56

Rumble Rejects MPs’ “Dangerous” Demand to Cave into Russell Brand “Cancel Culture Mob”

38

The Terrible Truth is That Even Sunak’s Mild Net Zero Relaxation May Be Unlawful

33

Generation Z Can’t Work Alongside People with Different Views and Don’t have the Skills to Debate, says Channel 4 Boss – as She Blames the Lockdowns

27

There’s Only One Way to Halt the Spread of Pernicious Trans Guidance: the ‘Public Sector Equality Duty’ Must Go

18

Spikes in Heart Deaths Among Japan’s Working-Age Men Support the ‘Hot Lot Hypothesis’ – That Some Covid Vaccine Batches Are Much Worse Than Others

21 September 2023
by Guy Gin

There’s Only One Way to Halt the Spread of Pernicious Trans Guidance: the ‘Public Sector Equality Duty’ Must Go

21 September 2023
by Caroline ffiske

Why Are UN Human Rights Advocates Obsessed With Legalising the Sex Trade?

20 September 2023
by Dr David McGrogan

Nigeria is in No Fit State to Look After Precious Artefacts

20 September 2023
by Mike Wells

Education is Much More Expensive Than We Are Prepared to Admit

20 September 2023
by Mark Ellse

POSTS BY DATE

February 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
« Jan   Mar »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In