We know scientific journals have been engaging in woke activism. A new study finds that the journal Nature's endorsement of Joe Biden made ordinary Americans see the editors as more biased and less knowledgable.
Adults have sharply higher risks of being diagnosed with heart, skin and psychiatric conditions for at least 90 days after they receive Covid jabs, a study in Nature of almost 300,000 people in California has shown.
How much of science is reproducible? It depends how you approach the question, but some papers have found that more than half of studies in psychology fail to replicate. Other social sciences aren't much better.
A new peer-reviewed study in nature reveals what many of us have known for some time: the unvaccinated suffered appalling discrimination during the pandemic, including the removal of fundamental human rights.
Publications like the Times and Nature are still publishing pieces pushing the case for lockdowns using discredited claims and fantasy modelling. We are not out of the woods yet. The lockdown fanatics have gone nowhere.
In his Spectator column this week, Toby looks at the "head-scratcher" of how progressives seek to both politicise science and appeal to it as an objective source of justification for measures like lockdown and Net Zero.
The journal Nature Human Behaviour has announced a new editorial policy of rejecting and retracting research which may potentially (even inadvertently) be “racist, sexist, ableist or homophobic".
Duke Biology Professor John Staddon deplores the capture of Britain's pre-eminent scientific journal by social justice activists and says it is bad news for science.
The risk of being hospitalised with heart inflammation is up to 44 times higher following Covid vaccination, a study in Nature has found.
Nature was once the world's most prestigious scientific journal. Yet in the last few years, it has become increasingly woke. The latest example is a bizarre article suggesting fat people contribute to "diversity".
