What the Covid 'Inquiry' is really about, says Alex Kriel, is power, and in particular ensuring that the elite’s vision of the technocratic biosecurity state is not only not derailed but is institutionalised.
The real Covid scandal is emerging right in front of the inquiry’s nose, writes Fraser Nelson: Britain could have escaped the horrors of lockdown, but nobody pulled apart the doom models driving it.
Anti-lockdown has gone mainstream with a feature in New York magazine titled 'Covid Lockdowns Were a Giant Experiment. It Was a Failure'. But there's still some way to go, says Jeffrey Tucker.
Helen MacNamara, who is giving evidence to the Covid Inquiry today, was the Government ethics chief who was at the heart of a very unethical lockdown-busting party at the height of the pandemic.
In possibly the most stupid contribution to the Covid Inquiry so far, Lee Cain has said Boris Johnson was wrong to listen to a diversity of views but should have had more diversity in his "white and middle-aged" team.
Oxford's Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson set out 16 issues that the Covid Inquiry should address – such as the definition of a 'case' and the reliability of models – but hasn't and probably won't.
Following his disgraceful treatment at the hands of the Covid Inquiry, Carl Heneghan writes with Tom Jefferson to Baroness Hallett to set the record straight and suggest she move her inquiry onto a more serious footing.
Was lockdown worth it? That's the key question the Covid Inquiry should be asking, says Lord Frost. But it's increasingly clear that it has predetermined the answer and is just going through the motions.
Care home residents were "neglected and left to starve" during the pandemic, lawyers representing bereaved relatives have told Scotland’s Covid inquiry.
The winter death toll last year in Scotland was the worst in 30 years, the BBC reports. What, worse than during the 'pandemic'? And didn't the vaccines stop everyone dying? These questions are passed over, of course.
