News Round-Up
24 April 2024
There’s Nothing “Scientific” About Climate Models
23 April 2024
by Paul Sutton
The fact-checker of a powerful press syndicate asked Dr. Tom Jefferson to assist it in "debunking misrepresentations" of his recent Cochrane review finding no clear evidence masks work. Take a hike, he said.
A company called Logically has been paid handsomely by governments to carry out 'fact checks' on off-narrative climate claims to get them discredited and their sources demonetised. But the 'fact checks' are truly dire.
99 doctors and medical professionals have written to the Charity Commission to demand the British Heart Foundation comes clean over allegations it is covering up data on vaccine heart injuries.
The proposed new powers for the WHO give it the right to impose global lockdowns and vaccine mandates and must be rejected by all democratic nations, writes Dr. David Bell.
Following the revelations from the Project Veritas sting we have seen the long arm of censorship at its strongest. But the honest voice of Kevin Bass, acknowledging he was wrong to follow 'the Science', brings hope.
In the latest Weekly Sceptic podcast the talking points are Toby's appearance on the 77th Brigade's watch list, the scrubbing of the internet after the Pfizer sting and the trans insanity unfolding in Scotland.
The recent Project Veritas video reveals that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has been a total flop, but the story has been almost totally ignored by American media, and scrubbed from Google search results, writes Eugyppius.
After receiving several complaints, the General Medical Council has decided not to investigate Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who warned about the vaccines and heart deaths in a BBC interview.
When Paul Chase wrote an article critical of trans ideology for Propel Opinion, it lasted all of six hours before it was taken down. Here he responds to the article Propel published in its place attacking him.
Dr. Josh Guetzkow told the Daily Sceptic that as a Jew living in Israel he was "surprised" by the accusations against Mr. Bridgen, because "there is nothing at all anti-Semitic about his statement".
© Skeptics Ltd.