The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare has published peer-reviewed research in the European Journal of Immunology on Sept. 24 regarding natural immunity. This suggests that natural immunity from Covid 19 persists in a useful way for at least a year. This is arguably better performance than the immunity conferred by the current vaccines. I don't much like the Epoch Times but at least they reported on the research.
@halfhearted natural immunity from Covid 19 persists in a useful way for at least a year. This is arguably better performance than the immunity conferred by the current vaccines.
I do not see much to argue about. I have not heard anyone dispute that natural immunity is superior but more risky of severe illness. It is unlikely that a vaccine masquerading as a virus stimulates the immune system as well as a virus does, but the virus might kill you. Why would anyone think otherwise, unless they totally misunderstood the working of vaccines? Unfortunately, some vexatious crackpots on this site exaggerate the risk from the vaccines, while simultaneously understating the risk from the virus, the biggest offender is Mike Austin.
> I don't much like the Epoch Times but at least they reported on the research
The Epoch Times is a crackpot publication.
ewloe said
"...some vexatious crackpots on this site..."
ewloe said
"...is a crackpot publication..."
You seem rather fond of dismissing views you do not share as "crackpot". I suggest you should concentrate on the evidence. "Follow the Science" as they like to tell us.
Many preprints out (and some reviewed) globally showing natural infection provides significantly better protection against infection than double vaccination and unlike vaccines wanes very little, if at all over long time frames.
Which isn't really a shock given its how pretty much every other viral disease on the planet works but a concept which was ignored when SARs2 arrived.
Right through this we axed well established scientific knowledge on day 1, actively denied it for 18 months and are now "learning" that knowledge was correct all along.
"...Chris Croce, a senior associate scientist at Pfizer, admitting on camera the advantage of acquired immunity over his company’s vaccine. “You’re protected most likely for longer since it’s a natural response,” Croce revealed..."
More solid references in this RT article to the undoubted superiority of natural immunity.
@halfhearted undoubted superiority of natural immunity.
If it were undoubted there would be no point in research.
