Contemplating the inflamatory and nonsensical statement made by Biden, combined with existing concentration camps being built and used as quarantine prisons in Australia, one wonders what next for the great unjabbed.
-TfL would find it simple enough to reprogramme Oyster machines to accept only entry with the electronic govt covid freedom licences, thereby rendering unjabbed Londoners unable to travel or work, and therefore on a one way street to homelessness, starvation and death.
-Those with more resources will have access to bank accounts stopped, driving licences revoked, surveillance and harrassment by officials combined with financial punishments.
-Where that doesn't work perhaps more invasive unwarranted and ineffective medical treatments will be proposed. Like the vaccines, it won't stop you getting a virus or passing it on but it might stop you from getting worse symptoms. Conceivably they'll move to compulsory amputation of a hand or something like that. Remember: hands, face, space.
On the fag packet non-science supposedly guiding the govt: one less hand = one less vector of risk. One less leg: less easy to get around and infect the morally superior class of quadruple+ jabbed. But like masks and other NPIs no actual assessment of the harms v benefits will be done but some govt employed nutritionists or pyschobabblers will be on the BBC or Sky contorting the (sorry "their version of the") data to show an immesurable benefit to society.
From White House to Whitehall they must be abuzz with ideas.
A huge crime against humanity is currently being carried out. So if you have never studied the Nuremberg trials, now is a good time.
You will see that media, doctors, lawyers, military and all sorts were put in trial.
The crime many were accused of amounted to not speaking out against the atrocities being committed against humans.
If a media company such as the BBC has been complicit in spreading false information that has led people to take a drug that is harmful or fatal. They are culpable and can and will be put on trial.
Likewise for doctors, nurses, the contact tracing people, the police, lawyers, teachers and so on.
There only defence could be they didn't know that a crime against humanity was being carried out, but that defence did not hold water at Nuremberg, so it is highly unlikely it will hold water now, in this age of communication and internet.
That is why it is very important to confront politicians and healthcare professionals and the media with the information that is being collected showing the harm that is being done to people from the jabs, mandates and lockdowns.
Also show them how every mandate from masks to lockdowns to vaccine passports contravenes our human rights.
At the bottom remind them that they cannot now use the excuse in a court of law that they did not know.
We are in a new kind of war. Information is the weapon we must use to confront the enemy.
Also send them this link:
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
@greeta-funbug It's long past time for you to move on from this kind of extreme anti-vax attitude. You might as well be defending a flat-earth theory.
Even the successful zero covid states (NZ, China) are now moving towards a vaccination strategy.
The BBC can rest easy.
"Those with more resources will have access to bank accounts stopped, driving licences revoked, surveillance and harrassment by officials combined with financial punishments."
Access to the mobile phone network and the internet could also be banned or otherwise heavily restricted.
Slovenia: requires "covid certification" for drivers to fill up their cars.
Austria: locks down 2million citizens for not succumbing to de facto mandatory jabs.
DePfeffel spouts mumbled instructions about changing the definition of "fully vaccinated" to suit the instructions as they go along.
Watch the words which come from him, they might seem garbled and off the cuff but I can assure you they are well rehearsed.
He spoke previously of it "not being too late" to come forward and get jabbed. The implication is that it will be "too late" at some point.
There is a time limit in other words. Yet not one senior journalist asks when that is or what the implications of the time limit being missed are. We all know what they are though right?
The "Great unjabbed"? Down to 12% of the over 12's and about 40k people a day defect to the "Great protected" team.
