approaching or past...
 
Notifications
Clear all

approaching or past the halfway mark by any reasonable estimate?

9 Posts
6 Users
2 Likes
771 Views
Posts: 319
Topic starter
(@ewloe)
Joined: 3 years ago

It is now approx 600 days since the start of this prolonged nightmare.And, to set things in context it is approx 900 days to the next election on 2nd may 2024. We must be  approaching or past the halfway mark by any reasonable estimate. By way of comparison, the Spanish flu lasted 2 years, call it 750 days. So let's see what the govt. intends, by assung they have some control over events.

The Length of regulated period before polling day is 365 days. Once in the regulated period, election spending and donations are subject to regulation, and the influence parties can exert on voters is henceforth limited. 

Hence the parties will wish to have broadly defined their intentions, and to have set out their political landscapes  prior to 2 may 2023, after which the nation will be slowly engulfed  in and paralysed by the run up to the election, this occurs in approx 534 days, i.e a year from next spring.

Hence,it is assumed that the remainder of this government's term will be dominated by two factors. The second factor (the election run up) will be determined by the outcome of the first factor, which is the  government's ambition  be to position the Pandemic in the year view mirror. Unexpectedly high infection rates, deaths or hospitalisations or intrusive restrictions, or accusations of poor leadership, are unwelcome and unlikely to win over undecided voters.

Labour will need to get its shot together.

So it'll be a race starting next spring, to uncouple  the present government from the spectre  of the Pandemic. So in  the next 6 months, the government will  begin its segue away from the monomania of covid19.

There will be many unwelcome and unpopular disturbances to prevent an orderly unwinding the crisis,Scotland may secede and join the EU, Brexit and the dispute with France is a problem, there is the unravelling borders in Belarus, the energy crunch, the global warming, the inflation, the PM is universally ridiculed and loathed and most of his ministers,  MP corruption is a hot item, if I were advising the government as a Tory Grandee, I would advise them to down scale covid19 sooner, rather than later, since any of those issues could get very unwieldy quite quickly. I'd tell them to clear the decks for action soon.

 

8 Replies
Posts: 25
(@ttenl)
Joined: 3 years ago

I don't think we are near half way no.

 

 Spanish flu had a definite start and end.  The was no 'vaccine' so even people stopped dying it was over.

 

Vaccines allow it to be prolonged almost indefinitely because the spectre of it coming back if everyone isn't vaccinated. 

 

Modern technology allows testing to scare people in the BBC. If you trained tested everyone for flu or for etc you could produce lots of doomish graphs of infection rates etc as much as you wanted.

 

People never really started dying in this pandemic. The death rate is/was around the same as 2008-2009.  And that's before the wonder vaccines. Even  full fact admits this. 

Going off topic slightly I thought there was actually the realistic possiblity of the end of the BBC license fee but this farago shows that the government will never allow that to happen.

Reply
Posts: 7
(@hawkins94)
Joined: 4 years ago

It depends what you mean by "nearly over".  I suspect they can end the casedemic whenever their agenda is fulfilled, whatever that may be.  Simply stop testing so many people and it'll disappear without a trace, but the ugly likelihood of vaccine passports, continued boosters etc seems probable.  Thereafter a much bigger state with 1984 like consequences.  To me that would be the beginning of something awful, nowhere near over.

Reply
1 Reply
(@ewloe)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 319
Posted by: @hawkins94

Thereafter a much bigger state with 1984 like consequences.  To me that would be the beginning of something awful, nowhere near over.

So you think they will pin their hopes for the next election on creating a dystopian society, it doesn't seem like a winning formula to me.

Reply
Posts: 258
(@fingal)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posted by: @ttenl

Vaccines allow it to be prolonged almost indefinitely because the spectre of it coming back if everyone isn't vaccinated. 

This is not correct. Smallpox was a massive killer for 1,000s of years....until it was eliminated by vaccination.

 

 

Reply
4 Replies
(@sunjor)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 77

@fingal i believe it took some 200 years though, are  you suggesting Covid is of the same magnitude to demand these draconian actions forever?

 

Reply
(@ewloe)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 319

@sunjor did you not notice,most of the measures were lifted since July 19th, why are you spinning as if they were still in place? Why are you so desperate to prolong the era of of fear and panic?

Reply
(@fingal)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 258

@sunjor We may never eliminate covid (it's endemic all round the world) but we've already greatly reduced both its mortality and its social impact. As of now there's no lockdown in England. The restrictions that remain are relatively easy to cope with. We've got this far in blindingly quick time from a standing start. The main reason for this rapid return of our freedoms is vaccination. 

Reply
(@theapesofwrath)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 6

@fingal Who's reading this comment on December 12th?

Reply
Share:
May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.