This is from a lawyer in response to a general enquiry about how they were doing:
... we are sliding into totalitarianism under the guise of managing a pandemic and too many people are complacent or purposely turning a blind eye. The commons have just passed a law making noisy protest ( incl by one person), punishable by 10 years in prison, there is a bill to decimate judicial review which will curtail judicial oversight of the exec, reducing hugely a check on gov power, the online safety bill will allow the state to regulate everything online and remove "disinformation". A law to force people to vaccinate or lose their job and to not allow relatives to visit loved ones in care homes if not vaxxed was introduced last min as a statutory instrument and given only 90 mins for debate . When it passed the next day there was a mainstream media news blackout on it. I knew it had passed and put on the Today Prog to see how they would cover it and they didn't. If you did a Google search the next day it brought up no results for it at all. The gov is now consulting on laws to protect the state from enemies, internal and external incl 14 years in prison for embarrassing the gov. That will be the end of journalism, not that there has been much free journalism over the last 12 months or so anyway. Medics who speak out get pilloried and threatened. Robert Malone has just declared publically that he is not suicidal and Mike Yeoden, former VP of Pfizer is leaving the country. People in France who aren't vaccinated banned from trains when natural immunity following covid means you are.much.lesd.likely to spread it than the vaccinated. There is an encyclopedia.of.peer reviewed papers on the efficacy of Ivermectin in not just treating covid, but mitigating long covid and being prophylactic which would end the pandemic but still the MHRA blocks its use. I am sorry, but it doesn't matter what we have going on in our personal lives, we have a duty to call this out and resist in any way we can before it is too late because at this rate it will not be long until there will be nothing of our old lives to go back to. France banning unvaxxed from trains and our gov now saying vulnerable kids down to 12 should be vaxxed when they are at minimum risk from covid and the stats on the vaxx are that they are a far greater risk to them. None of this makes any sense. The world is going mad and I don't recognize the country I grew up in anymore or people whose values I thought I understood
Well put Think Harder. I've long thought that we are never that far from the machinations of the the 'ist' mindset in politics and public affairs, whether it be called communism or fascism, or whatever. For any student of synchronicity or meaningful coincidence (a subject that intrigued the great psychoanalyst Jung). Or, indeed God's sense of humour, here is one worthy of pondering. Just this morning, I was re-reading the late Chapman Pincher's compelling book 'Treachery' when I read that Anthony Blunt, one of the infamous band of traitors known as the Cambridge Five, was typically given a code name by his KGB handlers. The first one was Tony. This was then changed to Johnson, and later it was Yan. Do you see where I am going? Can we look forward to one day being ruled by a member of CCP or the World Government?
@beornwulf
Yes I suspect we are seeing the end game of the CCP's efforts over a long period.
to not allow relatives to visit loved ones in care homes if not vaxxed was introduced last min as a statutory instrument and given only 90 mins for debate
This is something of serious concern to me. There seems to be a divide in opinion online, so I went and checked out the Statutory instrument that was passed. It appears to specify that visiting a relative in a care home is an exception to the requirement for double vaccination, meaning that visiting is unaffected from the requirement. However, have I got this wrong? Is anyone more familiar with the SI than me able to confirm either way?
to not allow relatives to visit loved ones in care homes if not vaxxed was introduced last min as a statutory instrument and given only 90 mins for debate
This is something of serious concern to me. There seems to be a divide in opinion online, so I went and checked out the Statutory instrument that was passed. It appears to specify that visiting a relative in a care home is an exception to the requirement for double vaccination, meaning that visiting is unaffected from the requirement. However, have I got this wrong? Is anyone more familiar with the SI than me able to confirm either way?
I understand from a Nursing in Practice feature that the law has yet to be passed and that this will be The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 amended. Currently the last amendment was 17/12/2020 . Can you post a link to the SI you refer to ?
