Fishy goings on ove...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Fishy goings on over at the MHRA and VigiAccess

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
530 Views
Posts: 43
Topic starter
(@thehandbag)
Joined: 3 years ago

I’m sure someone else has noticed this but, on all the weekly reports on the covid vaccine, there are first date of reaction dates years apart from when they were actually rolled out..

Moderna 1st reaction date - 15 Oct 1958

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987645/Moderna_analysis_print_12052021.pdf

Oxford AZ 1st reaction date - 3rd Feb 1921

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987644/AstraZeneca_analysis_print_12052021.pdf

Pfizer 1st reaction date - 13 April 1968

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987643/Pfizer-BioNTech_analysis_print_12052021.pdf

Over on VigiAccess*

vigiaccess.org

They’re reporting ADRs stretching back to 2017

2019 13
2018 5
2017 1

* tick box at bottom of page to enter. Type in “Covid-19 vaccine” in the search bar, and it’s the last section, “ADR reports per year”.

Rather odd to have ADRs recorded in a vaccine that shouldn’t have been in existence prior to late 2019?

1 Reply
Posts: 1608
(@splatt)
Joined: 4 years ago

That looks like the first data that particular symptom was reported (via you'd expect the old paper based systems).

Those aren't specific to the vaccine itself.

Reply
Share:
May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.