there is a very easy way to know, if any article contains the word graphene esp in conjunction with oxide , then it is guaranteed, 100% certain to be pure hogwash.If it also says luciferase anywhere or mentions 666, it's pure hogwash.
Looks ok for now.
Dissident voices have been forced onto dodgy-looking platforms by the so called Trusted News Initiative; I'm coming round to accepting P G Wodehouse's advice that when an Englishman says "Trust me", it's time to start counting the spoons. And yes, I know this isn't English....
I've only skimmed the article but much of it looks like it can be taken on board. I looked at The Strecker Memorandum recently and can well understand how this Dr's hypothesis would have been sidelined, given what we now know about Fauci.
I've heard the term 'trust, but verify' used today in another context, and I would apply it to this site. (I take very few things on trust these days).
@jane-g I agree with trust and verify. Sometimes hard to do with advanced microbiology 🙂
@jane-g I agree with trust and verify. Sometimes hard to do with advanced microbiology 🙂
Articles on nced microbiology do not relate to 666 or the number of the beast, as this one does. Nor to 5g frequencies, is there any crackpot theory missing from this nonsense. two teenagers in a basement in Ontario, are giggling over your gullibility.
@lordsnooty I'd been reading this https://unglossed.substack.com/p/doppelganger?s=r
Agreed - that's why we're in this mess.
One thing, though: I can find no reference to any of the things Snoots is banging on about, unless the site mentions them in a previous article.
@jane-g there is a reference to graphene which I don't see as an obvious red flag as it has been proposed as an adjuvant. here's one paper on pub med and there are others
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/
There's also a reference to 5G - I do however recall a professor of microbiology at Imperial College saying that 5G frequencies absolutely can affect the cellular chemistry of living organisms - the research hasn't been done much like it hasn't been done on the vaccine
Interesting article.
The part about the Indian researchers with their assessment of an HIV insert, their paper was removed, so the link shown leads to a Withdrawn apology
"Researchers from Kusuma School Of Biological Sciences (India) published a study on January 31, 2020. They found Uncanny similarit[ies] of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 “ https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2 They also posited that the virus was man-made. Of course this information would have completely nipped the so-called “pandemic” in the bud before it got started.
The Kusuma researchers were forced to withdraw the study due to pressure from “vested interests.” But they continue to this day standing by their research. One of them, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, tweeted on May 29, 2021, that they were right the whole time about SARS-CoV-2 being man-made and containing HIV genome sequences."
For a copy of that Indian paper try this link.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/suppressed-science-indicates-covid-19-man-made-jenna-luche-thayer
" The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. "
"The novel inserts are part of the receptor binding site of 2019-nCoV"
"To our surprise, these sequence insertions were not only absent in S protein of SARS but were also not observed in any other member of the Coronaviridae family (Supplementary figure). This is startling as it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.
Insertions share similarity to HIV"
Considering HIV and pseudo-HiV are used in gain of function research it lends weight to the proof of the lab outbreak.
