Other countries are taking the potential health risks of 5G and wireless radiation seriously, says Gillian Jamieson. Why isn't the U.K.? With all the concern about children's smartphone use, this is a glaring omission.
As New Hampshire introduces a bipartisan bill to ban 5G masts within half a kilometre of homes and schools, Gillian Jamieson asks if the U.K. is taking the risks of radio-frequency radiation seriously enough.
Swedish oncologist Professor Lennart Hardell is among experts raising concerns about a possible link between 'microwave syndrome' and the rollout of high-energy 5G masts.
The Government's reassurances on the safety of 5G and other forms of radio-frequency radiation include factual inaccuracies and are unpersuasive, says Gillian Jamieson.
What is a safe level of RF radiation from 5G masts, smartphones and other emitters? What are the health effects? At a forthcoming online event on Wednesday June 14th, experts gather to discuss the latest evidence.
In the Judicial Review of 5G last week, Michael Mansfield KC challenged the Government for its "failure to inform the public about the risks of 5G" and the lack of "investigation of any adverse health effects".
The Court of Appeal has recently given permission for a judicial review challenging the Government for “failure to give adequate information to the public about the risks of 5G". Gillian Jamieson looks at why.
