We’re publishing an original piece today – Valentine’s Day – by regular contributor Dr. Sinéad Murphy, an Associate Researcher in Philosophy at Newcastle University, about some research published by Cardiff University showing that women find men in facemasks more attractive. According to Dr. Murphy, this is not a cause for celebration.
Now that recommendations/mandates/rules/guidance regarding mask wearing have been more or less lifted, it is dispiritingly clear by the numbers continuing to cleave to them that there are many among us who rather like their masks. But not the wildest speculation on why this might be was likely to have settled on the explanation that masking your face makes you more desirable.
How can such a contradiction be, that we are enhanced as we are effaced? Shouldn’t we wish to see more of an attractive person rather than find them attractive because we see less of them?
There is nothing to whet the philosophical appetite like such a paradox – resolution of apparent contradictions is its bread and butter. So here goes:
Paradox: we like to see less of what we like to see.
Resolution: there are two things to see in this case, not one, and we can see more of the thing that we like to see (abstract personality) by seeing less of the thing that we don’t like to see (actual person).
When men wear a medical mask, women do see more of what they like to see because what they like to see is not real men but generic characteristics – Kind, Safe, Caring, Healthy – characteristics that real men can expect only to channel and only at the expense of their realness.
Sadly, this effacement of what is real by polished abstractions is not confined to the realm of romance. It is the overarching trajectory of our times, increasingly promoted as the promise of ‘personalised’ living.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
COVID killed them, obviously. So no need for the CMA to comment, obviously. Obviously.
SADS did it! ….In the library with the candlestick..
Needlestick….
Isn’t the latest word in from The Science™️ that it’s climate change wot dunnit?
Maybe the answer is very simple. They almost certainly got 2 or 3 shots themselves and pushed other doctors to push the poison into patients, in some cases knowing full well that there were doctors who expressed doubt and patients who did not want the shot.
Now they either admit that they themselves may be ticking timebombs and that they adhered to a rather bizarre medical oath “first, pressure people to do harm” and caused thousands of other people harm, including children and teenagers – or keep kidding themselves. Just like people who sell their homes and deplete their savings for a scam artist in Nigeria, but as long as they still get their 5-minute phone call and garbled text messages, can delude themselves that the love of their life will be in their arms soon – just as soon as they send just another 500 bucks. Or in this case, push for just one more shot, ‘cos this one will really work.
Another simple answer is that following the $cience has helped pad their bank balances very nicely indeed.
The answer is so simple, maybe they think it speaks for itself.
Their silence is confirmation of their guilt!
Obviously the authorities just do not care. These tragedies clearly do not concern them in the slightest.
It seems to me that the passivity of the general public in the face of overwhelming evidence regarding Covid and the jabs shows how desperate most people are to believe in a benign and caring ruling class. If there ever is a broad based awakening to what is going on then God only knows what the effect would be on society.
Yep because what’s a measley 32 out of 92,000? It’s a pure lottery and anyone adversely effected will end up in the ‘collateral damage’ pile. Don’t people know that they are still under experimental conditions?? It’s tragically a case of “wake us up when the figures hit triple digits”, move along…next! If they aren’t going to investigate thousands of excess deaths and thousands of excess spontaneous abortions then they sure as hell aren’t going to investigate 30 dead doctors.
It’s all very odd. Did Canada by some careless error, get more than it’s fair share of dodgy batches?
I’m aware of those around me getting minor ailments more often and second or third bouts of COVID lasting longer, but no heart issues in my circle. That said, 2 people in their 40s with stroke or sudden onset lymphoma.
The older folks seem in fine fettle, strangely.
I’m not wishing illness on anyone (although it’s very hard in the case of one person in particular, but I don’t wish to invite bad karma so I stop my self letting the thoughts take shape) nevertheless there seems little local evidence to back up my dire warnings. Hard to ignore occurrences such as this article highlights, nor the spate of sudden deaths in improbably young celebs.
The stout denials of any suspicious causes of these deaths seems (unfortunately) to be working; few people raise eyebrows any more.
It’s getting to look ‘normal’. (Expletive deleted)
It’s going to take far longer than 4 weeks for them to receive the agreed line to take from the Globalists who pushed this policy.