• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

by C.J. Strachan
22 May 2025 1:00 PM

The British Government recently barred French writer Renaud Camus from entering the UK. His crime? Not actual incitement, not violence, not lawbreaking, but a controversial idea.

Camus, originator of the ‘Great Replacement’ theory, was scheduled to speak at a Big Remigration Conference organised by the Homeland Party, as well as at the Oxford Union. His Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) had been approved. Then, abruptly, it was revoked. The Home Office declared that his visit was “not conducive to the public good”.

Meanwhile, Julius Malema, a South African political figure who openly sings “Kill the Boer” at rallies, glorifies racial violence and promotes land expropriation without compensation, was welcomed.

This is not a metaphor. Malema was allowed into the UK in May 2025 to address his supporters in London. The only reason for his delayed arrival was the May Day bank holiday. When he protested, the British High Commission issued a grovelling apology, assuring him the visa holdup was merely bureaucratic, not moral.

The message could not be clearer: ideas from the Right are criminalised, but hate from the Left is indulged.

Toby Young has recently laid this out in detail in his excellent interview on GB News in the wake of the Lucy Connolly appeal decision. His conclusion: the UK no longer defends free speech as a principle, it defends only approved speech. You can chant about killing white farmers, provided your politics check the right boxes. But offer a sociological theory about demographic change? You’re banned.

Let’s be clear: Renaud Camus’s theory is provocative. It raises uncomfortable questions about identity, culture and immigration. One can challenge or reject it. But to silence it entirely, while welcoming actual political violence wrapped in revolutionary chic, is not only hypocritical. It’s dangerous.

A society that punishes ideas but excuses incitement is not protecting its values. It is broadcasting its fear.

Camus, an elderly intellectual with no history of violence, was treated like a threat to national security. Malema, who has stood before crowds chanting genocidal slogans, was treated like a minor celebrity inconvenienced by airport queues. This isn’t policy. It’s ideology masquerading as law.

Once again, the UK has exposed the workings of its two-tier system. British citizens have been arrested for quoting Churchill, misgendering someone online or holding placards in silence. But a foreign politician calling for racial uprising is welcomed, because his fury flows in the approved direction.

Britain used to be a place where you could say what you thought, provided you didn’t call for violence. Now it’s a place where you can call for violence, provided you think what you’re told.

Renaud Camus was banned not because he posed a risk, but because he posed a challenge, a challenge to the dominant narrative. That makes him, in today’s Britain, more dangerous than a man who sings about killing his countrymen.

Malema is in. Camus is out. And that, sadly, tells you everything about who we are now.

C.J. Strachan is the pseudonym of a concerned Scot who worked for 30 years as a Human Resources executive in some of the UK’s leading organisations. Subscribe to his Substack page.

Tags: Anti-White RacismBiasDemographic changeImmigrationJulius MalemaMass immigrationRenaud CamusSouth AfricaThe Great Replacement

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

High Court Judge Blocks Chagos Deal – But Not for Long as Giveaway Goes Ahead

Next Post

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago

I recommend you go after June Raine personally in a civil suit. Surely she can be held accountable in some way?

110
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Or Matt Hancock, sitting happy on his PPE ill-gotten gains.

97
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Yes, the man in total denial, who got away with it all and still plans a ‘come back”!

47
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Some old pieces of mine

https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/04/british-government-plays-with-fire-over-covid-19-enter-prof-pollard.html

https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/05/further-anomalies-of-the-oxford-coronavirus-vaccine.html

https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/12/the-ubiquitous-prof-pollard-how-serious-is-british-medical-journal-about-commercial-influence.html

14
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Crowd Fund it?

18
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Surely some lawyer will do it on a no-win-no-fee basis. They could make shit tons.

18
0
NashJ
NashJ
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

They’re not being heard – because there are no barristers (I spoke to one of the lawyers) plus the cases are being shifted down the list because of ‘COVID backlog’.

14
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

‘Why were ingredients known to be associated with clots permitted in Covid injections?: the British regulator stonewalls’

https://www.ageofautism.com/2022/04/british-regulator-stalls-clot-ingredients-covid-injections.html

28
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago

https://www.birpublications.org/doi/10.1259/bjrcr.20210139
Bilateral adrenal haemorrhage with renal infarction after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 AstraZeneca vaccination “We detail a case of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia in a 47-year-old female who was found to have bilateral adrenal haemorrhage, renal vein thrombosis, renal infarction and pulmonary embolism 13 days post-vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19.”

This person suffered from blood clots in her kidneys and lungs as well as adrenal glands, which were destroyed. She’s now on lifelong medication to make up for the adrenal hormones that are not produced by her body, as well as other side effects. If the idea was to keep people out of hospital , she’d never have been hospitalised for covid in the first place, but spent a month in hospital because of the life-threatening blood clots.

She’s also happens to be a friend of mine.

When I and MOH were contacted by both our GP practice and the local hospital to arrange a date for our vaccines, we said no, we’d wait and see, thanks. I’m glad we did.
As a retired healthcare professional, I could not see how it was possible to produce a vaccine for a virus that had only been around for a matter of months, and guarantee its safety and efficacy. I just wish more people had refused to go along with the propaganda.

153
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Schwab and Greek Pfizer chief laugh and joke at Davos about those ‘crazy anti-vaxxers as they plan dozens more miracle mRNA vaccines and how to force them on the global population!

Not a mention of all the evidence of ongoing deaths, side-effects and Pfizer ‘economy with truth’ throughout they have been forced to keep publishing and place in the pubic domain. They just gloatingly bask in their vast financial gain and their immunity from prosecution’!

What’s not to like about their New World Order ?

87
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Schwab? As in “zee futor eez ours!”?

18
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Klaus Schwab has downvoted your comment. He must be gagging for the “Online Safety Bill” to come into effect to snuff out the cries of pain from those affected by his scam.

41
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

What we need is not for profits social media platform that doesn’t care if it is fined 10% of fuck all

29
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

What we need is that alternative to the internet that someone posted about, before all freedom of speech is snuffed out (and failing that, maybe carrier pigeons – if so, pigeon shooting at least won’t be banned).

10
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Was watching a cheap thriller on the ‘Great Movies’ channel (free sat) Can’t remember the name of the film but it was about a fertility clinic, and a begrudged ex patent murdering people associated with the place, starting with one of the doctors being bumped off.
When the Detectives were investigating they noticed some graffiti on the wall…HPO
it turned out that HPO was the acronym for Hippocratic oath. I thought to myself, there should be HPO graffiti on every Doctors surgery in the country after these last two years.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
30
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago

I am genuinely moved by your plight. At the same time, I’m conflicted about this. There were plenty of warnings about how problematic these vaccines were. How did you respond to these? You make it sound like you were completely unaware of them. Is that the case? What was your attitude to people who chose not to be vaxxed? And why the heck did you take it in the first place. You’re 48. Are you not aware that just 388 people under 60 with no co-morbidities died in the 2020 of COVID in UK? So the vaccine was completely unnecessary. I don’t know, my heart goes out to you, but at the same time, you took an untested, unnecessary, novel gene therapy without any good reason to take it. I’m sure I will get shot down in flames for saying this. But there it is.

195
-11
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I think a lot of people were unaware. I remember the first reports came out of Norway in Feb 2021. Then the PEI in Germany highlighted the risk in either March or April 2021. But it was studiously ignored by the MSM. I wasn’t working at the time so I had plenty of time to scour the internet for information. I can understand why people might not have known about it, especially if they get all their information off the television or from reading The Times.

68
-2
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Surely the whole idea was to make absolutely sure people didn’t ‘know about it ‘by banning any criticism of or doubts about the un-trialed, experimental Gene Therapy vaccines in the MS Media?

A ban which still applies!

You cannot escape this simple fact! Expert scientifically and medically qualified critics were cancelled, abused ridiculed and silenced from day one of the vaccine roll-out!

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
101
-2
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

The only thing they needed to know was that a vaccine they did not need had been rushed out in a single year with no long-term (or even much short-term) safety data.

I didn’t take it because of the lack of data and because I didn’t need it. Anyone capable of thinking under the age of 80 should have done the same.

Last edited 3 years ago by Fraser Nelsons Underpants
118
-4
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

People like Bev Turner pointed this out on MSM and got ridiculed. Jeremy Vine was like…”should we invite Bev on again, I haven’t invited her that much, maybe this is the last time”.

32
0
TheRightToArmBears
TheRightToArmBears
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

For which Vine received a succession of thick brown envelopes.

9
-1
DS99
DS99
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

And the fact that it was a completely new type of pharmaceutical intervention – not a vaccine really at all.

37
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

Well I agree, but I think the fear of the virus scared the crap out of some people (who trust the MSM rather than the evidence of their own eyes).

31
0
sskinner
sskinner
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” – G. Orwell

21
0
TheRightToArmBears
TheRightToArmBears
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

And the sad little lambs are still wearing their face nappies in supermarkets and alone in their cars.
Do they wear them in bed?

13
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

Unfortunately, they haven’t taught logic in “these schools” (Cf. C. S. Lewis) for quite a long time.

12
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Times muppets.

4
0
Superunknown
Superunknown
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

The jabs were indeed unnecessary, that has been my sticking point all along, including all the other restrictions that were pushed, this risk calculator has been online for some time,
https://qcovid.org/
But virtually nobody I know has even heard about it, if more people did, it would have been clear that most people weren’t at risk.
The mass propaganda campaign worked well, “follow the science” made stupid people think they were intelligent by going along with it, and by suppressing information that went against the narrative, or flat out discriminating against those who were trying to sound the alarm, how were the general public supposed to know?

70
-1
TheRightToArmBears
TheRightToArmBears
3 years ago
Reply to  Superunknown

I had a go at that risk assessment, with just one health problem, a stroke which was 22 years ago. The assessment said I was in the 95th rank out of a 100, where 100 was the highest risk of dying from Covid. What a scam assessment that is.

Last edited 3 years ago by TheRightToArmBears
6
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

There were plenty of warnings about how problematic these vaccines were.

But only if you read the alternative media, as most of us on here probably do. For the many whose only sources were government / NHS propaganda, and what the MSM told them, it’s entirely believable that they would have no idea about the risks. I don’t think it’s fair, as some do, to criticise people in this position. The criticism should be against the perpetrators and their enablers for exploting people’s trust.

Last edited 3 years ago by CynicalRealist
74
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

On a surface level, I think your point is a fair one. Yes, people are busy, going to work, dealing with everything, and there’s little time left over to be deep diving into how the world works. And that’s fine. Up to a point. And I’ll tell you what the point is: the point is when those people start yelling at the rest of us that we are the irresponsible ones, the malcontents, the troublemakers, the granny killers. You can be ignorant, if you choose, but then you can’t claim that your opinion is worth the same as those who do the hard work. You certainly can’t take the moral high ground and act like being ignorant is some kind of virtue. So my sympathy for those who were too busy on social media or whatever to be taking time to listen to long videos from so many brave men and women who were speaking out, is kind of limited.

106
-2
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Agreed. Well put.

36
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Before I canceled my Facebook account I fell out with a mate who photographed himself outside his car with a muzzle. Ok by saying ‘stop complying’ that is telling someone what to do and he took exception to that. Funny he didn’t take exception to two years of government propaganda.
Anyway, he was a MetaleHead, they’re supposed to be known for being rebellious and individualistic. He would’ve seen some of the links I was sharing but obviously didn’t read any. We don’t talk anymore.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
28
0
TheRightToArmBears
TheRightToArmBears
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

Did you ever really connect with him when you were talking to him?

4
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  TheRightToArmBears

Probably not I suppose. Someone said to he, how could you fall out with him, he is so laid back and friendly. Obviously a friendly sheep!

4
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I agree. Those people deserve all the bad vaccine side effects that are available.

5
-3
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

I only discovered alternative media information after getting vaccinated. Because of my age and various health conditions I was in the first vaccine group. I really really wish I had never had it and I have not had any more, nor will I. I just have to hope that I remain okay going forward. Incidentally, I haven’t had covid as far as I’m aware (I’ve never tested myself, despite a couple of bad fluey colds). It’s easy for some people to sneer at us partially vaccinated people, but you have only got to look at the resistance there is in the media to publishing anything but glowing reports about the vaccine, and realise that unless you actually go looking for it, you are not going to find a word said against vaccination. I mean, even when presenting to be jabbed, there was no warning or caution from the ‘jabber’, it was all jolly fun and a great thing as far as they were concerned. The more I think about that, the more I think their behaviour was actually criminal. I remain extremely angry at being well and truly duped.

82
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

I mean, even when presenting to be jabbed, there was no warning or caution from the ‘jabber’, it was all jolly fun and a great thing as far as they were concerned. The more I think about that, the more I think their behaviour was actually criminal. 

The jabbers played a dishonourable and extremely dangerous role. They were the people with “training”; the people who presumably knew all about what they were injecting.

I believe everyone of them, everywhere in the world, should be charged with something like reckless endangerment (the precise charge would vary from place to place).

Let them explain why they thought it was “jolly fun”, “a great thing”, or simply nothing to be worried about, dear. Let’s see what they knew and when they knew it.

I told someone about to take the jab in order to keep a job he needed, that he should ask the jabber for their name and written assurance that it was indeed “safe and effective”.

He told me that had he done this, he risked being turned away as difficult and being informed upon. The bottom line was that it was the jab or his job.

45
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

What annoyed me was the vaccine adverts directed at kids, with SuperHero signs with the vaccine. So they will want to have the jab if they associate the vaccine with being a SuperHero of some kind.

27
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

That was particularly despicable.

It was widely understood that children, with rare exceptions, were in very little danger from “the virus”.

The danger was injected into them by adults whose motivations were highly suspect, to put it mildly.

24
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

The jabbers played a dishonourable and extremely dangerous role. They were the people with “training”; the people who presumably knew all about what they were injecting.

I think that unlikely – everything seems to indicate that many of them were as ignorant and incurious about the reality as most of the rest of the public.

Which is not an excuse, of course, but does seem to have been the situation.

15
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

My use of “presumably” was ironic.

I agree that ignorance and incuriosity seem to have been the order of the day.

But I doubt that those they jabbed thought that they were ignorant. They are more likely to have assumed that they were well-informed.

9
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Remember the jabbers got paid too. £15/jab, IIRC.

Hired killers.

21
-1
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

The modern-day equivalent of thirty pieces of silver?

12
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Except, unlike Judas, they didn’t go out an hang themselves when they learned that they were responsible for causing the death of the innocent.

12
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

I wonder if any of the jabbers recognise the few well-known victims of the juice as having received it at their hands; and how they feel about that.
Personally, I think I’d need counselling – or at least, would quit. That would be an interesting interview in the press.

*Ducks the flying pig….*

9
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

I suspect that they will refuse to learn anything; and I think there’s been a lot of that.

The standard line has always been, “Well – nobody knew at the time.” They will cling to that.

I abandoned my GP when she mentioned the “vaccines” for a second time (in a standard check-up), despite my clear opposition on the first occasion.

When I repeated my opposition and the reasons for it, she said, “Well, we don’t want to put you on a ventilator!” I haven’t been back.

Before I place any trust at all in medical practitioners from now on, I want to know what they did with regard to the whole disaster and what they think about it now.

21
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

“Well, we don’t want to put you on a ventilator!”….In other words, we may legally murder you!

4
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

This is what I can never forgive, and will loathe the likes of Sajid Javid, and that disinterred bog-body Mullins of Pimlico Plumbers who got the ball rolling on the whole sorry campaign.
May there be a special place in Hell for such as these.

24
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Snap. I was forced into having one, but a week after the mandate was cancelled.

I wont be having any more of this ‘clotshot’ junk. The NHS keeps sending me communications asking to book a second jab and I just tell them to bugger off.

2
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

All those daily government press conferences, and how many of the media questions they allowed mentioned possible adverse effects (let alone orthomolecular medicine)?

8
0
NickR
NickR
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

There was a presumption that people exercised ‘informed consent’, this presumption extended to children. You can argue that people weren’t informed but having said it’s no secret that there can be adverse reactions to all sorts of medical treatment, most people are happy to accept this risk providing the adverse reaction happens to someone else. I think once you’ve opted in you’ve opted in.

23
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago
Reply to  NickR

That’s a great point: most people are happy to accept this risk providing the adverse reaction happens to someone else. I had an idea during the vaccine rollout that it would be good to make people give the name of someone they would choose to have the adverse effect, if there was going to be one. That would have stopped a lot of people in their tracks, right. It’s fine that someone gets injured if I get the jab, but only if I don’t know their name, or who they are. Wasn’t there a trashy movie about this a few years ago, a red button you would push for a million dollars, but someone somewhere died. No problem right, as long as you don’t know them, push away. Hmmmm.

32
-1
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

“The Box” directed by Kelly, ( who directed “Southland Tales”, which is brilliant and “Donnie Darko” ). It’s very flawed, but an interesting premise.

4
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I am 100% with you on this.

People need to wake up to the fact that the establishment is not on their side, not there to help them, not there to protect them. Their number one priority is themselves, number two is those who can do something for them and somewhere much further down their list of priorities, if at all, are the masses they are supposed to serve.

And the belief that state bureaucrats, politicians and officials are looking out for you is the root of so many of our problems.

People need to stop outsourcing their well-being to the state and take charge of their own well-being.

That means questioning absolutely everything that the state asks of you.

I mean FFS, most people seem to do more research before buying a car or a TV or a house than before getting a completely new medical treatment injected into their bodies.

That level of stupidity is an invitation to be abused.

If you can get compensation, great. But better still, learn the lesson and never ever ever trust people who deem themselves to be your rulers.

39
0
Fiona Walker
Fiona Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I now proceed from the basis that everyone in authority wants to kill me and things are so much clearer.

40
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

[I]t was announced that a Covid vaccine had been approved and was being rolled out to stop the spread of the virus and save lives, ready for use in December 2020.

This was exciting news for many. Our lives had been placed on hold for far too long and we were ready to resume our lives as they were pre-pandemic; the vaccine was our way out. We all waited patiently for our turn to have our first jab.

I too have terrible sympathy for Claire and others in a similar position – and I mean that sincerely. But the above excerpt shows she was completely swept away by the absolute horse sh!t being spewed from the well-spoken criminal experts on TV every night. She was excited by the prospect of being drugged up with an experimental fake vaccine to give herself 100% immunity from the renamed flu – in order for the politicians to free the population from their cages. It reads that she was impatient with being caged in her house, compliant with the rules that should never have been followed by anyone.

And it’s quite clear that she still believes in the lies that compelled her to be jabbed in the first place.

Take this comment for example:

Zion had the vaccine to protect others and save lives; he was an organ donor so continues to save lives even after his death.

Sorry Claire, but this guy was FOOLED (or was suffering cognitive dissonance), like yourself, into thinking he was taking the fake vaccine to protect others and save lives. Sadly, only after his undue death did he start to save the lives of others as an organ donor.

It must be really difficult for the majority of people in this country, who have lived an entire life giving absolute trust and faith in government, mistaking it as a protective cradle, to suddenly realise that the government actually just tried to kill them and succeeded in many instances.

44
-1
ClaireH
ClaireH
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Why is it quite clear that I still believe in the lies?? I can assure you I don’t! I unfortunately went along with narrative and admit I was blinded! A big mistake of which I’m now paying for as is the families of the ones that died. We do not believe the lies anymore!

0
0
ClaireH
ClaireH
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

You have to also remember this was quite early on, the only thing in the media was what I described in the article, and I kick myself everyday for being so naive!

0
0
artfelix
artfelix
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

That’s harsh, but fair. It really didn’t take a great deal of consideration to think that taking an experimental drug, rushed out to combat a virus that posed statistically zero percent risk to someone in your age group was not a very smart thing to do. I have a lot of sympathy for the vaccine injured but I also have sympathy for people killed playing on the railway lines – but in both cases there’s also the element that perhaps this needed to happen so in future other people might think twice before taking the same risk.

14
0
sobers
sobers
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

The first person to die of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK did so literally days before the OP took hers, though it probably didn’t make the press until a week or so later. Neil Astles his name was, and I remember it well, because his sister (a doctor no less) immediately went on the media to urge people to continue taking the vaccines, despite them having killed her own brother. Talk about a missed learning opportunity! So I have sympathy for the OP, at the point she took her first shot the negatives hadn’t really started to come out. At that point it was really just a feeling of ‘this isn’t quite right, and I think I’ll wait and see what happens’ that kept me away from them. Reading a few bloggers who I trusted who made it very clear that one should stay away from them was probably instrumental in hardening my resolve. If you were only plugged into the MSM I can see why people would have walked happily into the gas chambers vaccination centres.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/08/sister-of-man-who-died-after-astrazeneca-jab-urges-public-to-have-vaccine

16
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

No doubt to protect others and save the NHS. What was it Goebbels said about a lie told often enough?

12
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Just had another quick look at this ladies post and it does state that she was looking after an elderly gentleman who was quite poorly and she didn’t want to pass anything onto him.

3
0
FlynnQuill
FlynnQuill
3 years ago
Reply to  Judy Watson

Vaccines don’t protect other people, they only protect the person receiving it. You will be protected but the other person won’t as they can catch it from somebody else. As we know the so called vaccines did neither. However, it did state this in the NHS leaflet that came with the jab letter and I quote “there is currently no evidence that the vaccine will stop transmission or you yourself catching covid”. Unfortunately ten of millions didn’t read it!

11
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  FlynnQuill

I am only too well aware of the fact that’vacines don’t protect other people’ thank you.

But then again i am talking about proper vaccines not the jabs.

3
0
ClaireH
ClaireH
3 years ago
Reply to  FlynnQuill

But that’s not what we were told last March 21. We know that now but it’s too late for lots of us

1
0
FlynnQuill
FlynnQuill
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I totally agree with your comments. “I didn’t know” isn’t a defence I’m afraid, there is a long sad history of governments and pharmaceutical companies lying. A five minute search on the internet would have brought this to peoples attention. Also that drugs/vaccines can take up to fifteen years to come to market. But people chose to believe bent politicians, the MSM and pharmaceutical companies with track records that Dr Mengle would have been proud of.

8
0
NashJ
NashJ
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Well we are all different. Some have greater death anxieties than others, some have more time on their hands to wade through ONS data, some don’t trust the gov automatically, some still trust their doctor and others believe people make pills and vaccines because they want to help. There are only two sides. Those who don’t give a toss about our welfare (Gov, Pharma, MHRA, Gates, Fauci etc), who have been bought (or threatened) and the rest of us – made up of vaxxed and unvaxxed. And our side needs to stick together, because we are not the sociopaths and we need the numbers in order to overthrow the sociopaths.

12
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Precisely. And when I learned that the Pharmaceutical companies were indemnified against any injuries and people would have to rely on the Government’s Vaccine Damage Compensation Scheme, I found it online and realised it was (a) inadequate and (b) intended to minimise any payouts.

10
0
sskinner
sskinner
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

On top of this the novel vaccines were paid for out of tax revenues and the compensation will also be paid out of tax revenues.

8
0
Epi
Epi
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Yes sadly many many people were too trusting of the Government. Hopefully more and more are waking up to the fact that you can’t trust them or Big Pharma. Its tragic we have to suffer these stories before people realise what’s happening even then most are still in denial. Makes your blood boil.

Last edited 3 years ago by Epi
8
0
TheRightToArmBears
TheRightToArmBears
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

And those 388 people under 60 who died with no co-morbidities was no more than the number who died of the common cold or flu in the previous year.
‘Covid’ is the common cold that humanity has been meeting since the world began.

6
0
RosJones
RosJones
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

It is vital not to criticise those who took this vaccine in good faith and were injured by it. The government encouraged by SAGE and the behavioural scientists of SPI-B, aided and abetted by OFCOM and the MSM, did a very thorough job at convincing most people that the MHRA and JCVI were telling the truth when they kept repeating ‘Safe & Effective’, with no account of the reducing risk from covid and the increasing risk of adverse events as the vaccines were rolled out to ever younger age groups. I’m sure most people writing here, have members of their own families for whom they are increasingly concerned.

1
0
FiFi Trixabelle
FiFi Trixabelle
3 years ago

Claire – that has been a really sobering read on this Friday afternoon. I am so sorry to read your story and that of others. I’m aghast, incredulous…not sure how I can sum up my thoughts on this and at the same time sound coherent. What an absolute disgrace the whole thing is. Utterly, utterly shameful.

73
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  FiFi Trixabelle

Please watch and share this 51 minute long video, which highlights the plight that vaccine injured are going through. I watched it last night and it really struck me how awful their situation is.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/uk-cv-family-a-letter-to-my-mp-v2-exclusive-premiere-on-bnt_HhxneadubQ9x2J8.html

There is something deeply rotten in our society, that those who did what they thought was the right thing to do, could be so cruelly ignored, gaslit, denied treatment, incur financial hardships, be labelled spreaders of misinformation. I feel ashamed to be part of a society that treats people in this way.

We can’t continue to allow this terrible tragedy to be ignored. It’s real, and these people have to deal with it every day. I for one don’t care why they took the vaccine, the fact is they did it because they trusted what they were told, that it was safe and effective, and now they are having to live with the double trauma of being injured and also being completely ignored.

If their voices are heard then it might stop future tragedies like this from happening again. Big pharma has all the money and power, let’s not forget that. We should all be getting behind these injured and bereaved families, and getting them the recognition and justice they deserve.

59
-1
maggie may
maggie may
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

Well said Dante

18
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

Children are still being jabbed to go on holiday as we write. All attempts to halt the vaccination programme have been blocked by the “authorities”.

30
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  FiFi Trixabelle

Now more obviously criminal that just shameful!

15
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  FiFi Trixabelle

I’m sorry, but blind obedience is not a virtue.

I detect too much of a “they were honourable people who were prepared to do their bit” tone when referring to the jab injured.

In fact, as we have seen many times in history and again now, blind obedience can lead to atrocities.

The easy acquiescence of the adult population is what emboldened the government and pharma drug cartel to press on with jabs for kids.

So I would say to the young and middle aged who have been injured by these jabs that perhaps its karma for contributing to an atrocity.

I don’t care if this upsets anyone. Bring it on.

27
-5
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Let us not forget their attitude towards “selfish” people who would not follow their lead and demands. Rot in hell I say.

19
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

I don’t think they’re all like that. Some are just hard working, busy lives and have no time for much alternative news. Maybe the only news they heard was on the radio while at work. Like the young lad. who felt very ruff after he took his second to ‘keep granny safe’. Maybe if we met before his first I’d have persuaded him to avoid it.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
10
-1
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

Agreed, but I’m speaking specifically about those we all had the debates with who said “tough shit, get the jab or you don’t deserve to go in pubs”

Those bastards are the ones who deserve to meet their ends.

24
0
HaylingDave
HaylingDave
3 years ago

Jesus, we know this has happened, but harrowing to read first hand accounts. Jesus

A common theme seems to be good people “doing the right thing” to protect others.

And before anyone stubbornly states: “Well, AZ never claimed to halt transmission”, this is quite plainly a disgraceful, immoral, bio-unethical lie of omission.

And the drug pushers are still walking the streets …

63
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

“Walking the streets” , while counting their profits!

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
22
0
Catee
Catee
3 years ago

Since the MSM, Government and MPs are failing to respond perhaps the group should write to their Queen and her heirs, after all they actively encouraged uptake of the clot shots and the group is made up their ‘subjects’….. No? just hang out the bunting and celebrate 70 years of paying for the useless barstewards instead.

Last edited 3 years ago by Catee
58
-1
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

I like the idea of sending them (them being anyone who endorsed the vaccines) photos of the dead, to their home addresses. With MURDERER scrawled on the back. By the sack load.

43
-1
Catee
Catee
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Yes, me too.

20
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

MURDERER

Well there’s no question that mass murder has been committed and continues to be committed and this will continue for years as the adverse effects slowly manifest.

No point pussy-footing around. A great many people are guilty of mass murder. Call it as it is.

41
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Most still appear to be happy to ‘ pussy-foot around’ – that is one of our biggest problems.

Pussy-footing of course only aids the wrong-doers as we see from the laughing Billionaires at Davos busy planning “Zee future”!

The total lack of interest from on behalf of our Police and entire legal/political Establishment and the flat refusal to investigate allegations and significant evidence of serious criminal activity in High Places is of course not helpful.

( Bottom line: “We got away with it!)

22
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

This is a great idea. Direct action, it works for BLM and stonewall FFS, sometimes being too polite and waiting for people to do the right thing gets you nowhere.

16
-1
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Anonymously, of course!

4
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Well you don’t want the police putting a stop to it, do you? And they need to think it could be ANYONE thinking that.

6
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

Hear, hear.

5
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

The Queen told those not wishing to take the injections”Selfish” ( as instructed by HMG of course).

Presumably She has not changed her mind.

28
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

As I keep posting on here, the only solution to the Windsor problem is an Ekaterinburg re-enactment.

For the country’s sake.

12
-3
Arum
Arum
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

The trouble is, we’re going to need a bigger basement

9
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Arum

This time perhaps don’t drag their poor kids into all this.

4
-1
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Revolution! Blood runs! Flags wave! Come on everybody! Throw down your tools and throw up a barricade!

revolution.jpg
3
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

“26.2.2021 — Monarch says “think about others rather than yourselves” and explains shot doesn’t hurt.”

selfishqueen.jpg
16
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

MURDERER

11
0
AN other lockdown sceptic
AN other lockdown sceptic
3 years ago

Claire, many thanks for taking the time to write this. It is an ongoing tragedy that you are being treated like this. Keep pushing, the truth will come out in the end. My thoughts are with you and everyone who has been harmed by these so called vaccines.

48
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  AN other lockdown sceptic

Only Mark Steyn is boldly attempting to put the truth out there . The International Corporate Media are not answerable to the British people -only their Globalist Billionaire owners- as for the BBC – worlds fail.

44
0
Arum
Arum
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

and he’s being investigated by Ofcom because of it

20
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I got a sign saying BBC telling lies since 1922. But is that fair regarding their past and the Pathe News. Suppose they’ve always been the mouthpiece of the establishment in some form over the years.

8
0
AN other lockdown sceptic
AN other lockdown sceptic
3 years ago

Great credit to DS for publishing this. Lots of credit also to the warrior Mark Steyn for all he’s doing to champion this cause.

65
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  AN other lockdown sceptic

Agreed.

14
0
itoldyouiwasill
itoldyouiwasill
3 years ago

Very sad but unfortunately unsurprising read. The world is being run by psychopaths.

41
0
jingleballix
jingleballix
3 years ago

Sorry…….no compensation is due.

People took the jabs because they wanted them, of their own free will.

Whether they were genuinely scared by the thought of catching C-19, whether they wanted to ‘protect Granny’, wanted to go on holiday or simply couldn’t face being ‘hated’ for not taking one…..someone I know took them because they were free.

What ever reason, they took them of their own free will.

Taxpayers should not have to reimburse people for not doing their own research, and for not be so dumb as to trust a ‘vaccine’ that came along on a few months.

36
-32
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

That’s incredibly harsh. We should try to treat people that made a poor decision with a level of sympathy. A huge number of people took the thing because they’d been scared witless by our trusted government and MSM. My wife was one of them and she now bitterly regrets her decision. Not everyone is a natural sceptic or is able to think critically. For the people who had it to fit in with their peers (the majority I believe) or so they can go on holiday, then I tend to agree, I have little sympathy for those people.

44
-4
HaylingDave
HaylingDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Well put FL, my wife works for the NHS and I got an insight into just how much extraordinary pressure she was under – colleagues, bosses, friends, family – to get jabbed; and the daily and relentless pounding narrative she was subject to.

So many lies of omission; so many evidentiary truths without basis. She’s not stupid, but in the end, simply couldn’t believe the government would peddle such snake oil.

So she also took AZ despite my warnings and structured concerns following the AZ and PZ data sheets that fateful December.

But the actual transparent, peer reviewed, international hard data tangibly showing the harms was not available for 2+ months.

She also regrets taking it now.

I’m thankful every day that she’s not part of Claire’s brave story above.

48
-2
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

Yes, my wife is also in the NHS – they were under incredible pressure. The interesting thing was that once she’d taken it she fell for the propaganda hook, line and sinker for a while. I think it was made more difficult for her because I was saying one thing and every single other person she knew, including all those she worked with, were saying the opposite. So who looks like the nutter? After a while though, she started properly listening to what I was saying and, through showing her the data and scientific studies, and by her listening to scientists who disagreed with the narrative, she came round. Now, of course, everyone should be able to just use anecdotal evidence to see that this stuff is worse than useless. Anyway, she’s now more vocally against the damn stuff than I am!

Last edited 3 years ago by Free Lemming
43
-1
HaylingDave
HaylingDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Well that’s good to hear. I’m glad you wife’s (apparently) okay.

My wife won’t take any more snake oil – she came around to this conclusion on her own as I stopped nagging after a while (which would have only pushed her in the other direction anyway 🙂 .

She keeps her thoughts mostly to herself on the topic, I think she thinks I’m too vocal amongst our peer group as is – she’s probably right.

Yes, she simply thought – as your wife did – that how can dozens, hundreds, thousands of people think one thing, and my husband be so sure of the opposite.

So I have sympathy and empathy for those who have been injured by the Covid-19 vaccine – it’s a harsh, blanket statement to say they were all simply uneducated, naïve and scientifically illiterate ; people’s stories are always a more complex tapestry than they seem.

37
0
PartyTime
PartyTime
3 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

Yes, it’s not about intelligence, we know that from the Asch conformity experiments, whose student subjects were not dumb, they were attending a “good” university in the days when far fewer people went to university; most of them still failed rudimentary perceptual tests under social pressure.

0
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Vaccine propoganda was being pushed very early, maybe April / May 2020. I was not part of DS back then. Something inside told me that a vaccine could not be produced so quickly so I started my own research. Very quickly I found that vaccines take at least ten years to get to market, at least. This is early 2020 so I was on my own. Admittedly I had given up on all MSM 2-3 years previously so I didn’t have daily BS in my face. I was aware of the intense volume of propoganda being pumped out and given this was our money I was immediately bloody annoyed and suspicious.

Suspicions aroused I made an immediate decision that I would not be taking the alleged vaccine and made sure all my family were aware. Suspicions awakened I went deeper and deeper with my research: Agenda 2030, their Great Reset, Billy’s disastrous medical interventions across Asia, Dr Vernon Coleman and on and on. The amount of information readily available to those willing to look was phenomenal. So, I find sympathy with the “vaxxed” difficult to swallow and that includes 90% of my family.

This is not all about critical thinking and so-called intelligence, it is about asking questions of the obvious implausabilities – a thoroughly tested and fully licensed “vaccine” for an illness from the ‘flu family, which was rarely acknowledged, in six months?

REALLY?

53
-1
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Look, I largely agree with you, and I went through an almost identical path to the one you describe. For me/us something stank of shite from the off, and the curious side of me started to ask questions and do some digging (I was never one for ‘conspiracy theories’ so this was all new to me). It soon became crystal clear that something was seriously amiss, there was something going on that could not be explained by a virus. Where I disagree with you is your assertion that everybody is capable of thinking as clearly/cleanly as you are able to; what seems absolutely obvious to us on this site (e.g. how can you develop and test a “safe and effective” vaccine in the space of 6 months) is not obvious to the majority. This shocked me, but it’s true – the vast majority of people are so naïve and trusting of their government and MSM they do not feel the need to question; that’s just how most people appear to be – deeply trusting/respectful of authority. I also think that a kind of Stockholm Syndrome was starting to set in amongst the public, with gov/MSM playing the role of captor. I think, like most things in life, it’s not as simple as you make out. It may be for you, but not for many others. Btw, I’m not talking here about all the moronic idiots who got the shot to fit in or go on holiday – that’s another story entirely! Anyway, we can agree to disagree 🙂

Last edited 3 years ago by Free Lemming
36
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

A fair response and I appreciate it.

“Where I disagree with you is your assertion that everybody is capable of thinking as clearly/cleanly as you are”

FL, I make no claims to being a great thinker but by God I smelled a rat early on and then I went looking for evidence to support my position.

Something else which alerted me to the Scam – no early signs of an increase in funeral cars locally despite the alleged increase in mortality. Anecdotal I know.

Gut instinct said this was a scam and as somebody has already posted, people like those here on DS then put in the hard work to find out what was going on; me included.

I am now an obsessive; no longer about C1984 because our case is proven, more about what might be coming next.

I did the research.

Last edited 3 years ago by huxleypiggles
21
0
DodosArentDead
DodosArentDead
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Here’s what’s on the forthcoming agenda. You can read or listen to MP3. Whatever suits you best… but I guarantee you will be shocked!

Not only by what’s coming but by what already is… that you (or me) ever realised was planned decades/eons ago…

https://drrichardday.wordpress.com/

2
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I’ve been sceptical of the MSM since around 2007 when I started reading the late Angry Harry, anybody remember him?
The rabid feminizes were the story of the day back then (oh how we had it easy). So I was aware of the conspiracy and secrecy of family courts.
As for other conspiracies, I didn’t really look into anything. in 2018 an middle age guy started using the gym and. I helped him out on some of the machines; he worked in a care home and was complaining about mens rights etc, and that he does most of the heavy lifting there. But he always mentioned the Banks and how the Bankers run everything….Seems he was onto something in hindsight.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

All the rules of vaccine research and all statutory safety procedures were violated and broken by the very Agencies whose duty it was to protect us.

There has to be full accountability for this total betrayal of public trust – which I hope for the sake of the vulnerable who have been mercilessly exploited for the massive benefit and enormous financial of a few will never naively return.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
38
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Wholeheartedly agree.

7
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Very quickly I found that vaccines take at least ten years to get to market, at least.

Still do – the Covid ‘vaccines’ are not on the market, are they?

The tests and monitoring trials (especially for myocarditis) will not be wrapped up until 2028, so that’s 8 years.

6
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

It’s not only harsh, but alien to medical compensation practice. If one suffers adverse reactions about which one was not sufficiently and specifically warned, then there is a trail of liability from the professional giving it without proper consent to the manufacturer failing to do sufficient research. Think thalidomide, Opren, etc, etc.

The sad truth, though, is that our government has always seen their compensation schemes as a mere sop to liability, whilst wriggling out of actual responsibility in the event (think of the miners’ compensation debacle, or the dealy in getting money to Pandemrix victims even now). That might be less heinous if the buggers weren’t so keen to spend vastly greater taxpayer money on pushing the vaccines and other nonsense to begin with.

24
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

It’s harsh but it’s spot on. Ultimately if we ended up forcing the government to compensate the people they harmed and killed rather than the vaccine makers, then that money would come out of OUR pockets.
We were not the ones idiotic enough to accept an untested treatment for something that was no danger to us.

If there’s any compensation to be had, it ought to be directed at those of us who suffered bullying and harassment and loss of freedom for no reason. The likes of vaccine passports should never have been a threat let alone actually used against a population

34
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

But they took them of “their own free will” based upon a pack of lies and manipulation and, in my wife’s case (and others whose jobs were under threat), the most extreme coercion. I agree with you on your last paragraph though – what we’ve had to endure has been unforgiveable. And I’m very much an eye for an eye kind of person.

10
-2
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

The jabs for jobs directive was particularly evil

20
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

Yup Boris caused me anxiety when in November he mentioned the “conversation about mandatory jabs”….I wanted to rip his throat out!

18
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

If she’s smart enough to organise and campaign for compensation and write an eloquent article about it, she’s smart enough to question what the government was telling her to do.

She doesn’t really have my sympathy. In fact, she and everyone else who went out and got jabs like lemmings contributed to the climate of pressure and vilification that those who didn’t want to get jabbed had to endure. They acted irrationally rushing to get a completely experimental treatment for a disease that was of little threat to them. Ignorance is not an excuse.

She sure has the time to invest in the matter when she’s properly motivated.

13
-2
ClaireH
ClaireH
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

You are correct, I did act irrationally and I regret that now. Now we can raise awareness so that more people are not as ‘irrational’ as I was. There is now evidence that we can share, we didn’t have this when I got mine at the start. My aim is to raise as much aware as possible so people don’t make the same mistake, not to be shamed for being naive!

0
0
A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

I take your point but this effectively absolves the government of all responsibility. I think it fair to say that the public were misled, since the manufacturers allegedly stated that it was not a vaccine, it would not stop the spread of the virus or stop it’s transmission. I don’t know who first stated that it would reduce the chances of hospitalisation but that seems way off the mark. As a start perhaps we should be looking at cutting MP’s salaries by 50%, followed by other public servants who were willingly duplicit in this scam.

30
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

There is a video of Fauci and others saying how the jab ‘stops the virus dead’, so once it hits you it goes no further. No doubt they were claiming the same in this country.

13
0
iandel
iandel
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

There was no critical analysis of what this was all about, merely mass acceptance of the official narrative or “herd thinking” as a contact of mine aptly sums it up.

18
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

No. There was regulatory EUA. They kept saying the benefits outweighed the risks “for the vast majority of people”. This was patently incorrect, AND THEY KNEW IT

14
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

Sorry to hear about your experience. The answer to the question is pretty simple I think – once they admit to a single case of ‘vaccine’ injury, they know the floodgates will open. Even people currently keeping shtum will be more keen to come forward. It’ll be an absolute avalanche and will cause the roof to come off the whole pack of lies. That is my belief.

68
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Yes, that seems the most likely scenario.

Plus if the clotshot narrative unravells for the government, it will probably cause people to start questioning the other measures – lockdowns, etc. A realisation among many people that the measures to “keep people safe” actually caused massive harm is something which nearly all politicians (apart from the decent handful with principles) will be determined to avoid.

30
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

If all those bastards who singalled their virtue, sneered down their noses at us and said we had a choice between being in society and taking the vaccine or being excluded from society……if those absolute bastards were now to get compo at my expense too, that would be the final straw for me

37
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Quite right. But there is a difference between, say, suddenly finding that a long established drug/vaccine is dangerous and you’re liable for compensation, and rushing through novel technology, about which many of us were warning well beforehand, and forcing it on people willy-nilly.

Why, it’s almost like insisting on throwing soldiers into a war you already know you can’t win.

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Why Has the Government Still Not Compensated the Vaccine Injured and Bereaved?

A very simple answer to that question:

Compensation would concede the “vaccination” programme was wrong.

It would also lead to a torrent of further claims.

This would confirm what ALL on here already know – these perforations are exceedingly dangerous and frequently death inducing.

Many more people would wake up to the crimes committed against us.

In short, compensation would blow open the whole can of worms and the demands for justice would erupt.

64
0
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Indeed. And that’s actually true since decades, for all vaccines and globally, see Malone.
Burden of proof is reversed and doctors are complicit in the deliberate obfuscations and coverups here.
My SIL became mentally handicapped through the smallpox vaccine.
For decades, doctors tried to blame it on her forceps delivery instead, before someone finally connected the dots- obviously far too late to have any chance of compensation.
At least this sad episode made our family very sceptical of and resulted in avoiding the gene therapy clot shots from the start.
Our trust in the medical profession and big pharma was always low, but now it has evaporated fully and for good.

34
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Not on the BBC though.

3
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

That is the only reason I hope these campaigns for compensation succeed. Not because I think the injured deserve restitution. (It’s their own stupid fault.) But because it will mean that the establishment pay for what they have done and will make a repeat of this less likely.

8
-1
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
3 years ago

It’s all about marketing. There has been a 20 year ramp up of vaccine marketing. One of the key messages is that you are stupid if you question vaccination. So a year of hype building up the fear, then the coercion to “get jabbed”. Jabbed. I ask you, isn’t that term an absolute piss take. So anyone who trusts in others knowledge will get suckered. Only the naturally sceptical, contrary or with the skills to investigate multiple sources of information had a chance of resisting the brainwashing.

These people will likely never get compensated or the harms even recognised by our dear leaders. Medical management is, by design, diffuse. Trying to find the responsible person is impossible. That’s why you get hospitals where mothers and babies die when they shouldn’t have, nobody in charge, nobody dare raise their voice, patients ignored. Medical culture and systems are poisonous, riddled with error, and in many cases deadly for the patient.

37
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  TheTartanEagle

“get jabbed”. Jabbed?

I must agree this instinctively raised my hackles. An invasive, potentially dangerous, before we knew how dangerous, medical procedure was being pushed much like a takeaway burger with the highly scientific and medically secure terminology:

“Just get jabbed.”

That really did reinforce my contrariness. “Erm, pherk off.”

33
0
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

The propaganda terms were just so obvious to some of us and yet others, to my horror, repeated them without irony. Phrases like “have you got your jab?” which I heard on several occasions made my skin crawl. These people were literally repeating words put into their heads by behavioral scientists.

28
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

A brief conversation out in the countryside with someone I know slightly:

He – have you had your jabs yet?

Me – you must be pherkin joking.

What about the pub? I’ve had mine so I can go for a pint.

F#ck the pub.

I kid you not.

27
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I had a passenger last summer and they mentioned on Radio about vaccine passports for pubs and clubs..I just said, ‘well I won’t be going to the pub then’, he agreed.

13
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Exactly. So much of the fear campaign didn’t refer to the injections as vaccines.

What’s in a name?!

18
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Infantilising terminology like this was all part of their strategy. “Get Jabbed” sounds much more innocuous than “get injected with a substance which is still in clinical trials”, doesn’t it?!

24
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Before ‘just get jabbed’, we had…’just wear the damn mask’. I fell out with a colleague about that.

16
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

A pretty healthy and active 40 year old friend of mine divulged recently that he is having serious problems with his liver. Apparently, so the “experts” say, “there’s nothing wrong with [his] liver, it just isn’t working as it should.”

The ridiculousness of their statement….!

He was receiving frequent medical attention but then seemingly got scared and has since failed to attend further appointments. I haven’t dared ask him if he’s been jabbed… He said the experts also said his problems are owing to his having been infected with COVID.

Christ Almighty.

52
0
A Sceptic
A Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

I know 2 people recently with serious liver problems, one now awaiting a transplant. Since the vaccines started, I also know personally 3 people who ended up having heart operations, one with kidney failure and one with pericarditis. That’s 7 people with serious organ problems in 18 months. I have never previously known anyone with health issues like these. This vaccine is poison.

44
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  A Sceptic

A good friend of mine is awaiting heart surgery. He’s just been told a heart opp scheduled for 02 June has now been pushed to 11 June.

Cardiologists times 2 cannot tell if he’s had a heart attack or is suffering from pericarditis.

He has been perforated.

26
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

How did you find out he’s been jabbed, hux? Straight out and asked him?

4
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

M A, that is not a question I ever ask. In the same way that I believe my medical history is private I treat my friends personal privacy in an identical manner.

My friend simply told me, not to brag, just a statement of fact. That’s how he is. He’s got a medical history charge sheet longer than mine but still took the injections, AND he sees a blood specialist quarterly who advised against.

I’m totally baffled but hope he pulls through.

22
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Good, that’s my position. I don’t want to be accused of that which I am so opposed to.

9
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

“that is not a question I ever ask. In the same way that I believe my medical history is private I treat my friends personal privacy in an identical manner.”

What a wimp. I’ve asked lots of people if they’ve been ‘jabbed for Covid’. They don’t have to answer – but always do. This is an issue that has affected all of us, so why be scared to ask?

4
-4
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Principle, EF. We put up our stand in the name (amongst many other things) of bodily autonomy and the belief that one’s medical affairs are one’s own business – so how can we expect others to tell us if they’ve done something they may well have believed was in their medical interest? Simple, really. Our beliefs will be revealed in the course of almost any discussion, and those who know they’ve been jabbed may think on…

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
12
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

A friend who works in a florist tells me that in ten years working there she has never seen so many funerals.

26
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

All with of COVID, of course.

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
11
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Those people hadn’t had enough jabs!

6
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Blimey.

3
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Well, if that’s the case it will show up int he excess death stats in due course – they can’t hide it indefinitely.

7
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

And the excess deaths stats will be attributed to Covid…

9
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

The timing could well be such as to make that difficult – but they will no doubt try hard to do so!

4
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

That’s ‘anecdotal’ by itself but ONS figures will be hard to explain away if they show a 10-20% rise in all-cause mortality.

‘Oh, it’s post-pandemic stress disorder’. What a ludicrous period we are living through.

But we have to keep up the pressure. The WHO was apparently very upset that it got so many hostile comments on its world takeover plans.

12
0
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

Death stats for Scotland are running hot, 200 a week more than there should be at this time of year, so 20% more.

I am hoping more people will be “seeing for themselves.” The florists, the undertakers, the registrars should be the first to notice. Pubs and hotels for wakes. Then the solicitors for probate, and estate agents for resulting house sales. Charity shops will be receiving house contents. If people in their 40s and 50s are dying in greater numbers, the insurers, mortgage providers and administers of pension schemes will notice.

Presumably the hospitals are aware of increased illness brought on by the gene therapy injections. Whether anyone will have guts to say anything remains to be seen.

18
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  A Sceptic

“This is not a vaccine this is a poison” so said eminent French virologist and former senior medic responsible for overseeing France’s vaccine polices. Luc Montagnier ( now deceased).

He was abused and “cancelled” of course.

Do we see a pattern here?

26
0
HaylingDave
HaylingDave
3 years ago

I know, I know ..”a fat lot of good it will do …” But that’s a different argument.

PetitionOpen a Public Inquiry into Covid-19 Vaccine Safety
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/602171

8
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

I don’t think that DS has quite got the message.

These vaccines are perfectly safe and effective. They are the first vaccines EVER to have no adverse effects whatsoever, under any circumstances, for any victim patient. Even if you mixed the vaccine with a lethal dose of arsenic, such is the power of the Big Pharma trial results that we can be confident that the recipient would be bouncing with health.

That being the case, you can see why there is no reason to provide any recompanse. The Yellow Card data is obviously misinformation, inserted by North Korean hackers, and anyone claiming to be dead of injured as a result of a Covid vaccination is obviously a Russian agent using dirty tricks to influence Western elections.

So long as you comply with the provisions of the Online Safety Act and only use government-approved websites you will be completely safe from any disinformation. Once the OSA passes, of course, those are the only websites you will be able to use….

54
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Love it.

8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Will the Yellow Card stats even be allowed when Nadine Dorries gets her ‘On line harms Bill’ forced through Parliament?

They might easily fall under the “not illegal but damaging” ( to Government propaganda) category.

15
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I find your considered assumption perfectly reasonable and likely.

9
0
Nessimmersion
Nessimmersion
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

As the chorus line of Quackcine shills and grifters said:

image-13.png
19
0
rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago
Reply to  Nessimmersion

delete

Last edited 3 years ago by rockoman
1
0
The Rule of Pricks
The Rule of Pricks
3 years ago

I wonder where the ambulance-chasing lawyers are?

If ever theres a sniff of a (large) group of people with a potential claim against the state or large institutions, even the most vexatious claims, theres usually any number of shyster lawyers trying to collect as many claimants onto their books to ‘represent’ them…..PPI being the most recent but there are many examples.

When will they come out of the woodwork? Its easy to ignore or deride a single claim but when theres many and the sums run to multi-millions, some lawyers will take it on even if the chance of winning a case is small, as they always go for settlement.

28
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  The Rule of Pricks

The first case is likely to be expensive!

The type of law firms who advertise for business will wait for someone else to win a case for vaccine injury / death, thereby setting a legal precedent, then they’ll all appear quickly enough!

8
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  The Rule of Pricks

I’m waiting for the ads….”Did you take the Astra Zeneca or Pfizer vaccines in 2021? Did you suffer an adverse effect or reaction? You may have a claim for compensation…”

16
0
Fiona Walker
Fiona Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

And also: did you wear a mask between 2020-22? Suffering with micro fibres in your lungs? You may be entitled to compensation…

12
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  Fiona Walker

Did you lose partial control of your marbles in 2020? Have you completely lost your ability to calculate risk? Did you catch the thing you’d been inoculated against and nonetheless thought that meant it had worked really well? If so, you’re one of millions of fruitcakes who aren’t entitled to anything but ridicule. Get boosted now!

13
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Have you lost your ability to taste, smell, touch, see and hear and think since watching government coronavirus briefings, and nothing else? If so you may be entitled to decompensation.

8
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Have you or a recent family member suffered a coronavirus vaccination malfunction? If so, our team of virtual lawyers is waiting to take your call. Call now and receive a free box of commemorative monkeypox stickers

13
0
iandel
iandel
3 years ago

The title of this article is a question, the answer to which should be quite self evident.

If the UK Government – or for that matter any government – agreed to compensate those injured by the covid vaccine, or families bereaved by those who have died from it, then they will be effectively admitting responsibility for having coerced the populace into accepting it in the first place. And wasn’t it the case that the pharmaceutical companies were granted immunity from liability? If big pharma are shielded from civil lawsuits it seems highly unlikely that governments are going to be the fall guy for what has turned out to be a hugely deceptive marketing ploy.

30
0
HaylingDave
HaylingDave
3 years ago
Reply to  iandel

Indeed, and I don’t think the unravelling would be limited to just the UK government, given – for better or worse – the UK’s prominent position in geo politics.

I’m fairly sure the unelected globalist elites do not Covid-19 vaccine-related injuries and deaths anywhere near the MSM ; they’re content for governments to simply ignore the fringe twitter accounts, irrespective of the growing numbers.

Last edited 3 years ago by HaylingDave
15
0
iandel
iandel
3 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

Perhaps those affected, whether directly or indirectly, should band together. With enough numbers they could become a political force.

8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  iandel

Attempts to do this via Twitter and Face book were closed down and cancelled by minions of ( at the time) Dorsey and Zuckerberg ( Clegg’s employer).

Gates is now lavishly funding those trying to block Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter

10
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Musk is 2x richer than Gates so he could potentially ruin him … if he really wanted to.

However, it’s more common for billionaires to cooperate as when Warren Buffett decided to give his $100 bn or so to the Gates Foundation before he dies. I think Buffett was a bloody fool. This appears to be one of the least deserving causes he could have donated to.

7
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

Why? Because the Government and its whipped Tory MPs (especially the green and gullible 2019 intake) pump the Government Li(n)e that the Vaccines are a huge success for Johnson and that the vaccine injured and bereaved just do not exist!

This is now only what we have come to expect from the Johnson Gang.

Under the Johnson ‘New Normal’, if you just keep denying something exists then it ceases to exist! ( Like ‘parties’ for example.).

15
0
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago

I was heartened to see a tiny chink of light, shining from the local daily paper. This rag has, for two years, been full of pro-vaxx, “safe and effective” etc. etc., with news stories cooked up to support the propaganda, and the whole shebang bought and paid for by NHS/Government and LA advertising, appearing daily.

Today, for the first time, there was an item, albeit somewhat muted, about a lady who is now suffering from seizures, with the headline “Investigation as mum suffers seizures which started shortly after Covid jab”. Of course, it remains to be seen whether the cause of her condition is honestly identified, or the usual “it’s because of Covid” excuse is trotted out, but it’s the first time anything not rabidly pro-“the vaccine” has appeared. My other musing is whether the journalist responsible will still be working there in the near future!

26
0
acle
acle
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

Interesting as I hadn’t heard of seizures being widely connected to the vaccines. Yet my in laws recently met up with a friend (in his mid 70s) who in the past year developed and was diagnosed with epilepsy. “Funny sort of age to get epilepsy” pondered mother in law…

15
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  acle

Colleague at work…..her husband started seizures out of the blue last year. Rushed to hospital, in a medically induced coma for 3 days, in intensive care, couldnt work or drive, couldnt go out alone for months. . Hospital did every test and scan going, but couldn’t say what it was.

I believe he has just been cleared to drive again, but I haven’t heard if there’s a firm diagnosis. And yes, he’d had 2 or 3 doses of the magic vax.

13
0
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
3 years ago

I have to admit to feeling conflicted. On the one hand of course you deserve everyone’s sympathy for what has happened to you. On the other I must say I feel very frustrated by the fact you took this “vaccine” at all and are repeating the very same propaganda that led you into this mistake in the first place.

Let’s get these things straight: it was not “your” vaccine; you were not waiting for “your turn”; and you did not do the “right thing.” These are all words, phrases and narratives designed by the nudge unit to lead you into taking an untested gene therapy you did not need.

You are suffering right now because you were credulous. Please learn from it and do not be so credulous in future. I’m sure I will get downvoted for being so callous but sometimes people need tough love.

52
-2
TJN
TJN
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

Hi FNU – I guess you’re here from The Spectator, where I invariably liked your comments.

There’s a lot in what you say here. People were credulous – unbelievably so. One of my deep frustrations is that even if just say 20% of the population had had the gumption to see through this shitshow – the lockdowns, the masks – then it could never have happened, and all the dreadful consequences (most of which we still await) would have been avoided.

But they didn’t. And in truth, I part resent the British people for that. I don’t feel that I can ever trust them again, or really feel like one of them.

Yet credulity isn’t deserving of punishment. That’s why we supposedly have all the checks and balances, and laws, in place – the MHRA; JCVI; independently thinking doctors and professionals; an independent, questioning media, a government with the people’s interests at heart – to protect the credulous.

And yet the credulous were ruthlessly targeted by trained psychologists. They weren’t protected from their credulity – as they should have been – that credulity was exploited.

In my terms, given the scale of what has happened, and that it was sponsored with the full resources of the State, that constitutes a Crime Against Humanity.

My heart goes out to the vaccine injured.

7
0
dante
dante
3 years ago

We live in a very high trust society, a friend literally told me that she trusted the Government, and another that the greatest minds in science developed these vaccines to help mankind ( yes I know, but that’s where we are).

Our world in Data does a great breakdown on Trust within society

https://ourworldindata.org/trust

And the UK comes out almost in top for trust in science. At the end of the day, whilst we may have had different mindsets, the amount of money, propaganda, peer pressure from friends and family was something we have never encountered before. I just think we should set aside reasons why, and deal with the catastrophic outcomes of these dangerous injections. I wouldn’t want another single man, woman or child to go through what these folk have gone through. It’s got to stop.

23
-1
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

“We live in a very high trust society”

Which is why it is so easy for people from low trust, low honesty societies to con us, especially as we keep being told that “we’re all the same under the skin”.

9
0
Chris_uk
Chris_uk
3 years ago

I have a horrible feeling this is going to be a very long fight. The politicians and media threw themselves so fully behind the “vaccines” that there is simply no way back for them now. Eventually, one day, probably when I and most of the victims are long gone, this will be acknowledged as one of the most shameful episodes in history, worse than the Windrush generation, the Post Office scandal, or any other. But for now, there is a mountain to climb. I don’t think we should berate the injured for falling into the government’s trap. The pressure was extreme, and these people genuinely wanted to help the vulnerable. They have my full sympathy and support. I only wish there was something I could do to help.

35
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Before this fight is over they will be forcing their next ‘experimental’ jab!

12
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I’m sure millions will be off to get the latest jab so they can keep their EU Vaxx Pass valid. It expires 270 days after the last ‘Covid vaccine’.
No jab = no Vaxx Pass = travel made difficult.

13
0
Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Totally agree.
We have been systematically lied to, figures have been exaggerated, we sceptics have been falsely accused of “killing people and having blood on our hands”
TPTB and the MSM have vilified us as “Covidiots, Covid deniers” and selfish and irresponsible.
In my own case, just myself and my younger son could see the truth and we were discriminated against (Mrs FP to a lesser extent) by the rest of our extended family as either stupid or ignorant and lacking in intelligence.
I just hope that I will live long enough (73 at the moment) to see the truth told and apologies (not money) made to “we few, we noble few” who held out against the madness that took over(with notable noble exceptions such as Sweden and Florida) that engulfed the whole world.

Last edited 3 years ago by Fingerache Philip
32
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Fingerache Philip

I think I’m more or less estranged now from my (very limited in size) family. One of them banned unvaccinated relatives from the house last Xmas.

Still, lots of friends have stayed sane and I’ve made some new ones.

The last figure I saw suggested that 8-9% in my age range (65-70) stayed sane.

To live longer, I suggest you just watch a few videos by health experts (as opposed to quacks) like Ivor Cummins, Robb Wolf, David Unwin. I read Dr. Malcolm Kendrick’s blog regularly.

17
0
Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

Thanks for that, John.

5
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago

Essentially, you want the government to take money from me and give it to you because you made a cretinous decision.

25
-11
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Exactly! Couldn’t have put it better myself. Those who want the state to wipe their arse need to start thinking for themselves.

17
-4
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

Delete your face to protect others.
Fill you body with poison gunk to protect others.
Die in agony, it’s worth it if it saves one life.

I’ll protect myself, thank you very much.

33
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago

If they start compensating people there will be official statistics of – how many, what type, etc.
Possibly not what they want made public.

17
0
paul parmenter
paul parmenter
3 years ago

You learn something new every day. I had no idea that death might not make you 60% disabled. I obviously missed all those dead people who are still functioning at least 40% normally.

22
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  paul parmenter

Mmm, vampires perhaps?

6
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

“Would you consider buying a LEGO FUNERAL SET for your kids?”

legofuneral.jpg
7
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago
Reply to  paul parmenter

They are all in the Cabinet?

2
0
kate
kate
3 years ago
Reply to  paul parmenter

I think the idea is that you could be disqualified if it were proven that you were already 40% disabled prior to the vax finishing off the other 60% of you.
That could cut down on a lot of expenses.

Last edited 3 years ago by kate
1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

This sounds like a job for the Alpha Male/Team Assemble and the ‘Common Law Constables’ of the Guardians300!
Where are they?

4
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago

Seems lot’s of people “took the jab to help others”. Yeah right, they were clamouring over themselves to get that FB photo and virtue points.

Not sure why the tax payer should have to fund yet more idiots.

26
0
AN other lockdown sceptic
AN other lockdown sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

WOW! I missed that the first time around. Very dark.

3
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Come off it. Lay people aren’t medical experts. If they take professional advice from a doctor, they’re entitled to expect ‘reasonable competence’, just as if they had hired an architect, accountant, lawyer or surveyor.

The medics. who advised these folk that it was ‘safe and effective’ were a mixture of quacks and crooks. I’d say that it was professional negligence.

18
0
kate
kate
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

What I found suspicious was the way that vaxxination was taken out of the hands of qualified medical practitioners and given to scarcely trained people in vax centres.
No chance of any qualms from qualified people.

Yes carefully planned.

6
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

Lest we forget:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPjoQ3XpzkM

3
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Ah yes. Very apt. The tingle in your fingers and your feet. That’ll be the Guillan barre syndrome.

3
0
PW
PW
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Unsurprisingly the comments are turned off!

3
0
PW
PW
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

I’d never seen that, Goebbels would have been proud! I used to like Jim Broadbent, not now, I’m afraid…wonder how much he got paid???

2
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

I was wondering why the Government did not mandate Vitamin D tablets, since one of the major and uncontroversial findings was that Vitamin D deficiency was strongly associated with serious and fatal Covid infections.

The only reason I can come up with is that high Vitamin D levels would result in people shrugging off the illness with few symptoms, and then having natural immunity. But Big Pharma wanted their vaccine to be the thing that cured Covid – not ivermectin, not Vitamin D.

So ALL the countermeasures we took were aimed at just lowering the spread – not addressing the illness. And ANY other treatment – even it it produced a perfect cure – was to be suppressed. Because there was this unspoken requirement that the vaccine and Big Pharma were to be the heroes. And ONLY them….

Last edited 3 years ago by Dodgy Geezer
34
0
Fiona Walker
Fiona Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

No money in it for them. Remember, they don’t care about us at all, we are a nuisance and they want us dead. Most of us anyway.

12
0
Fiona Walker
Fiona Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  Fiona Walker

They also wanted a whole population test of their new MRNA technology, which had proved impossible earlier (pre-pandemic) due to ethical considerations. Total bastards.

14
0
Castorp
Castorp
3 years ago

A government that oozes criminality. Whose globalist contingent actively seeks to misinform and murder us and our children.
Complicit mainstream media.
Complicit swathes of the political and scientific establishment.
Welcome to Jubilee Britain!

21
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

Have they spent the money?

2
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

After driving through a village seeing a large funeral taking place, I stopped to get Fuel. I asked the old guy at the garage was the deceased local, he said he didn’t live far away. He owned a Bike shop and was only 48; just dropped dead! I said was he fit, he said “oh aye, he was very fid and cycled everywhere.”….I mentioned the spike since 2021 and mentioned the chart showing the high rate of Sports stars collapsing. He was an old bloke and seemed interested in the subject but wasn’t surprised about the censorship.

14
-1
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago

All adults who allowed themselves to be injected with the experimental gunk should lose the right to vote.

6
-5
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

A fair number of them have already lost that right permanently…

12
0
Alkanet
Alkanet
3 years ago

Yes of course anyone would feel sorry but that shouldn’t extend to those who read the NHS leaflet and didn’t get “vaxed” paying towards the injuries or deaths of those who either didn’t read the leaflet at all in their haste to protect themselves (it’s highly questionable that anyone had other motives in my cynical opinion) or were taken in by the offer of something that was clearly described as being useless. Somehow I doubt anyone will be seeing any compensation in the next ten years or more.

10
0
Jacqui
Jacqui
3 years ago

This WHO pandemic treaty will enforce vaccinations – they won’t just rely on coercion. It will be a supranational policy with decisions taken out of individual governments’ hands. I reckon we haven’t seen nothing yet.

15
0
TSull
TSull
3 years ago
Reply to  Jacqui

Even if I die trying, I will do my utmost to take the life of anyone forcing me to endure any medical procedure. I suspect I am not alone.

33
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  TSull

In England/UK we have a mass of common law protection (and a 2013 legal precedent) which makes this more difficult to force on us than in most EU countries, though not impossible. We went through the entire 20th.C without any mandatory medical treatment of this kind, so WTF is the 21st.C legally any different?

Get onto social media and start shouting at the WHO, so to speak.

The WHO seems to be led in effect by an ex-Marxist terrorist, a billionaire eugenicist and the Chinese Communist Party. What an utter scandal. Ridicule it; that’s more newsworthy to most people than technical arguments.

17
0
PW
PW
3 years ago
Reply to  TSull

They’ll have to shoot me first!

8
0
AletheaAc
AletheaAc
3 years ago

The fact that the spike protein caused blood clots was known pretty early on, way before Astrazeneca and J&J were halted. If you were in medicine, you started to see changes in people’s blood right after the first shots were released. Then in mid 2021, there were a rash of scientific articles like this one: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10456-021-09805-6
Where some scientists started to raise red flags.

But, lets just say I am a skeptic and not a conspiracist. The first act of skepticism, in my opinion, is to stop and think a bit before running with the herd. If one sees a level of propaganda being leveled at the populace that is unprecedented in scale, and world wide, the skeptic knows that something is horribly horribly wrong. And therefore stands still while the herd rushes by.

As to vaccine injury compensation… EUA’s give Big pharma indemnity, and you are not likely to get government to compensate victims… I say this for several reasons. To begin to acknowledge the injuries, is to acknowledge complicity. Yet, we see complicity at all stages of government, in many countries. So, there is not a single neutral party who could act as a juror in a Nuremberg type event, to judge the level of complicity. When you start to think about it at this level, you realize that this assuredly was a planned event 20 years+ in the making, as there is no other way that a roll out of this kind of thing could be done, without having a number, if not all, of the steps worked out beforehand. Which means that the likely that this was a turn key event, just waiting for the perfect moment is high. So, if you look at it from this perspective, then one must also ask to what end? New World Order, perhaps. But certainly eugenics – whether purposeful or unpurposeful. But the thing, you need to think about when thinking of vaccine injury, is that it is not just you, or your husbands/ wives, etc. that will suffer, but every single person who has been vaccinated, and then has children, these genetic changes will be passed down to the children, and the children’s children.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm#
We know the vax is effecting the DNA. There are going to be greater consequences to the human genome to this, that people are not even talking about yet. We are basically still dealing with the wounded after a bomb blast – stopping bleeding, and immediate triage (to use an analogy), and haven’t started to look at the structural damage to what just happened to mankind. I will tell you that we are in for a bumpy ride, which is already apparent with all of the post pandemic world. It will continue to get worse, as people realize their children will never be “whole” after they received the vaccine, and that the vaccine permanently changes people’s dna.

So, when you can’t get your government to respond, and you can’t get an international body to respond, and you can’t go after the drug companies, and you can’t get the media to respond… you are left with only one real option. And that is to go after the assets of the civil servants who advised and made the laws which made the policy. I am not just talking about the Neil Feguson’s of the world, but each and every policy maker and media personality who went on a news conference or media blitz, or wrote a law advocating draconian rules, etc. Every person who signed off on these things, needs to be taken to court, and made to pay into a vaccine compensation fund, until you have captured enough of them, that there is enough incentive for the government to act, and act to preserve the assets of the elite… This is the only way that I think you will get any restitution.

Each person who got the vaccine was seen as a sacrificial victim to further the agenda of someone or something else. Governments and media then got “the people” to shame each other into getting the vaccine with their nudges, but those nudges started somewhere. and someone is going to have to start tracking these people.
Another suggestion might be to try to find an in with Anonymous (the hacker group) and ask them to hack the various government institutions which are with holding data and release it to the world… but that is more of a pipe dream… I think you are likely not going to see any meaningful resolution to vaccine compensation.
Yesterday in my loose world was 3 vaccinated, 3 cardiac events. Pandemic of the vaccinated in Australia and New Zealand so I hear both from boots on the ground, and articles here. Myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, strokes, the reality is that those who are suffering post vax, really aren’t going to live long enough likely to see any resolve to this… as the OP stated, these are not just things that go away, or that one recovers from.

So go after the policy makers wallets would be the best strategy imo.

And next time the government pays trillions of dollars in marketing money to advance an agenda… don’t buy in.

27
0
rtaylor
rtaylor
3 years ago

The government don’t work for the British people. They work for a death cult.

9
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

What We Learned From Hating The Unvaccinated
https://susandunham.medium.com/what-we-learned-from-hating-the-unvaccinated-fc428fa0732c

2
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago

Is this the same solicitor and group of 95 vaccine victims as featured on the Daily Mail podcast ‘Medical Minefield’?

I listened to it feeling optimistic that one of the mainstream podcasts was finally addressing the issue, but soon felt irritated by the tone of the the thing.

The thrust of it was how to discuss Vax injuries without being labelled ‘anti-vaxx’. (Who gives a toss any more? I don’t.)

Every adverse reaction was described as ‘rare’. Prof Paul Hunter dismissed myocarditis as ‘mild and of short duration, not causing long-term damage’. The members of the group of 95 felt guilty because they didn’t want to cause vaccine hesitancy; (I’ll bet there are some around in the US who wish they had provoked Opioid-hesitancy).
In short, it was a wash-out of a broadcast, but it did point out the injustice of the treatment of the injured by the government.

I’m sorry for anyone who felt pressured to take the jab, but they should have asked questions first (I exclude those whose job demanded they take it, but hope their bosses never again enjoy a moment’s peace of mind).

12
0
kate
kate
3 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei0CyReFYcg&ab_channel=GBNews
She is interviewed here

2
0
Adrian25
Adrian25
3 years ago

.

20220528_115129.jpg
5
0
Victoria
Victoria
3 years ago
Reply to  Adrian25

Highly recommended

I Read Bill Gates’ New Book (So You Don’t Have To!)
https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/ep418-gatesbook:4

https://www.corbettreport.com/gatesbook/

4
0
FlynnQuill
FlynnQuill
3 years ago

Reading these heart breaking stories, I still cannot believe that people didn’t see the red flags to begin with. A vaccine (which this is not) can take anywhere between ten and fifteen years to come to market. These people only had to do a little due diligence to find that out and all of them would still be alive today. But hey, we have a super cure for a virus we allegedly know very little about within a few months of it appearing in the world, that’s a red flag the size of mount Everest!!

I don’t want to sound heartless, but these people had the same information at hand as the rest of us, but chose to put their health in the hands of lying politicians, the MSM and SAGE. Christ, some of them are that ill informed they think a vaccine protects others; it doesn’t, it only protects the person being jabbed. So, the comment I hear a lot from the vaccine injured is “I did it for my family, my neighbour or to protect others” etc. Well, if these people had had a shred of critical thought they’d have found out that it won’t and it doesn’t. These same people probably wouldn’t buy a car or a house without doing due diligence. However, will happily do no research whatsoever on something that was created by the biggest criminal company in the world within a few months. For a virus, nobody knew anything about (allegedly) and had it happily injected in to their bodies. Incredible!!

Last edited 3 years ago by FlynnQuill
14
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago
Reply to  FlynnQuill

“..something created by the biggest criminal company in the world…”

Spot on as far as Pfizer is concerned, but the thrust of this complaint was about the Astra Zeneca, which, having the hallowed ‘Oxford’ prefix, enjoyed a veneer of patriotic sanctity as well as seeming more practical for mass rollout because of easier storage.

They should still face up to their victims, though.

6
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  FlynnQuill

The other red flag was the trashing of HCQ and Ivermectin, also of generic Vit D3 & Zink.
That Lancet paper trashing HCQ had massive holes and when Dr highlighted the issues, they were smeared and censored.

4
0
NashJ
NashJ
3 years ago

Good on you Claire for being brave enough to speak out. The more people who speak out, the more people will realise what’s going on and that can only be for the good. Our numbers are swelling WEF/UN/WHO – and we’re coming for you.

9
0
TJN
TJN
3 years ago

A heart-rending story. I haven’t had the jab myself, and neither have any of my family. But my thoughts are with the vaccine injured – every day I think of them. I hope and pray they get justice in this world, from the individuals responsible – and that those individuals also get justice in this world, and in the next.

11
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

“Sir Christopher first raised this issue in June 2021, when he realised the Government was failing the people who had done the right thing…..”

I am very sympathetic to anyone who has been injured or a loved-one killed by these “vaccines” but I’m also very tired of being told that having the jab was “the right thing to do.”

No it wasn’t. The right thing to do was to do your own due diligence! If far more people had done that, they would have realised that (a) the jabs weren’t very effective (b) there was considerable expert concern about their safety and (c) the Government’s vaccine compensation scheme was woefully inadequate and intended to minimise payouts.

I practised due diligence and I resisted the coercion to have an experimental, rushed and dangerous product injected into me.

20
0
Peter W
Peter W
3 years ago

Government managed to find thousands of people to operate the useless Track & Trace but can’t to run the vaccine compensation scheme.

10
0
Victoria
Victoria
3 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

Spending £32bn on track and trace – the majority of this money is spent on developing the digital passport. Track and trace was just the smoke screen

The WHO treaty, if signed, can only run on a digital passport. If not signed now, they will continue working on getting it signed in future

Digital passport is not a vaccine passport but linking all aspects of your life digitally and control your life in any way they want to

11
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Peter W

I remember a vaccination centre by a bus Station, I won’t name where. Every time I leaned on the well looking at my phone, the security thought I was taking pics of the site. Some large fat bozo would walk past every time.

0
0
Shona
Shona
3 years ago

From 23 Oct 2020: Looks like the UK government was expecting a high volume of adverse reactions: “The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.”  (item II.1.4)

https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED%3ANOTICE%3A506291-2020%3ATEXT%3AEN%3AHTML&src=0

3
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Shona

They didn’t seem to do very much with that system.

1
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

Reading many of the comments I understand the anger people hold towards those who took the jab. It is the tyrnny of the majotity, that’s why they’re dangerous.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ron Smith
7
0
Adrian25
Adrian25
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

Not only angry at those who got jabbed because that then put pressure on the rest of us to conform to the idiocy of the mob, or majority, but also at the way we were ridiculed.
Tony Blair, The Queen, newsreaders, celebrities….. they were all at it.

11
0
Adrian25
Adrian25
3 years ago

The main reason I disbelieved the pandemic hoax and the vaccine hoax from the beginning was because I had studied the Climate Hoax for years and knew that government, media, and ‘authorities’ were either lying or totally stupid and therefore could not be trusted to tell the truth about anything.

Last edited 3 years ago by Adrian25
10
0
Adrian25
Adrian25
3 years ago

..

Three-Phases-Covid-Vaccine-Mortality-600-1.jpg
Last edited 3 years ago by Adrian25
4
0
RosJones
RosJones
3 years ago

Ruud Dobber, a member of AstraZeneca’s senior executive team, told Reuters in July 2020 of the plans for government indemnity: “This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in…four years the vaccine is showing side effects.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-liability-idUSKCN24V2EN

1
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago

For Johnson read Hitler, Hancock = Himmler and Whitty, Vallance & Van Tamm = Mengele.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out

by Richard Eldred
15 August 2025
7

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Labour Councillor Cleared After Calling Far-Right Protesters “Nazi Fascists” and Urging “We Need to Cut Their Throats”

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Labour Councillor Cleared After Calling Far-Right Protesters “Nazi Fascists” and Urging “We Need to Cut Their Throats”

35

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

20

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

14

Short-Term Heatwaves in Britain Weaponised by Met Office Using Junk 60-Second Heat Spikes to Push Net Zero Fantasy

12

News Round-Up

10

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

Short-Term Heatwaves in Britain Weaponised by Met Office Using Junk 60-Second Heat Spikes to Push Net Zero Fantasy

15 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

Why Should We Recognise Palestine But Not Taiwan?

15 August 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

POSTS BY DATE

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr   Jun »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Labour Councillor Cleared After Calling Far-Right Protesters “Nazi Fascists” and Urging “We Need to Cut Their Throats”

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

15 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Labour Councillor Cleared After Calling Far-Right Protesters “Nazi Fascists” and Urging “We Need to Cut Their Throats”

35

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

20

Fury as Labour-Run Council Tears Down “Dangerous” St George’s and Union Jack Flags From City Streets (But Palestine Flags are Allowed)

14

Short-Term Heatwaves in Britain Weaponised by Met Office Using Junk 60-Second Heat Spikes to Push Net Zero Fantasy

12

News Round-Up

10

The Myth of the Global Renewable Boom

16 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Censored in Starmer’s ‘Free Speech Britain’?

15 August 2025
by David Craig

Scotland’s Safe Access Zone Law Proves JD Vance Was Right

15 August 2025
by Kapil Summan

Short-Term Heatwaves in Britain Weaponised by Met Office Using Junk 60-Second Heat Spikes to Push Net Zero Fantasy

15 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

Why Should We Recognise Palestine But Not Taiwan?

15 August 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences