• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

News Round-Up

by Richard Eldred
24 April 2025 1:06 AM

  • “Factories to lay off staff ‘within months’ unless Starmer closes US trade deal” – MPs have been warned that factory owners will be forced to begin laying off staff “within months” unless Sir Keir can strike a trade deal with Trump, reports the Express.
  • “Reeves rules out chlorinated chicken in US trade deal” – Rachel Reeves has ruled out any trade deal with the US that would put chlorinated chicken or hormone beef on British supermarket shelves, according to the Telegraph.
  • “Britain’s borrowing is spiralling out of control” – Figures on the public finances show that we borrowed nearly £152 billion last year, says Michael Simmons in the Spectator. That’s £21 billion more than the previous year.
  • “The UK is heading for a full-blown financial crash, and nothing can stop it now” – Rachel Reeves has utterly lost control of public spending and is putting the economy in peril, warns Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph.
  • “Tax boss retires with £107,000-a-year pension despite record plunge in HMRC customer service” – The CEO of HMRC will retire with a six-figure pension despite presiding over the worst customer service levels on record, reports the Telegraph.
  • “The facts are in: mass immigration has led to a rise in crime” – Coming to this country is a privilege, never a right, says Robert Jenrick in the Telegraph. It should not be afforded to anyone likely to endanger our citizens.
  • “Jenrick vows to unite Tories and Reform in leaked audio” – According to a leaked recording obtained by Sky News, Robert Jenrick told a meeting of young Conservatives that the tories and Reform UK would no longer be fighting each other for votes by the time of the next election.
  • “Tories set to lose half of council seats amid Reform surge” – The Tories are on course to lose around 500 seats in next week’s local elections as Reform makes huge gains across the country, according to the HuffPost.
  • “‘I have 45% chance of becoming PM’: on the doorsteps with Nigel Farage” – The Telegraph joins Reform leader Nigel Farage for a busy day of campaigning in traditional Tory strongholds.
  • “Keir Starmer can’t explain his changing views on gender” – In the Spectator, Isabel Hardman slams Sir Keir Starmer for struggling to defend his position on gender during a heated PMQs with Kemi Badenoch.
  • “As Sir Keir spouted more porkies, Kemi made sausages out of him” – The PM wriggled like a greased-up piglet as Badenoch went for the jugular and exposed his gender hypocrisy with the contempt it deserved, writes Madeline Grant in the Telegraph.
  • “NHS hospitals ‘trying to defy’ trans ruling” – Hospitals have been accused of seeking to defy a Supreme Court ruling that trans women are not legally women, reports the Telegraph.
  • “Why the Supreme Court’s trans ruling is bound to be sabotaged” – In TCW, Sean Walsh argues that the Supreme Court’s affirmation of biological sex is a fleeting win for common sense, doomed to be undermined by progressive activism.
  • “‘Labour’s class warriors destroyed my daughter’s primary school. I will never forgive them’” – This Government’s agenda is driven by envy, spite and nastiness, says Allister Heath in the Telegraph. It simply can’t be allowed to get away with it.
  • “Children could face social media curfew under Labour” – Digital Secretary Peter Kyle has told the Telegraph that he is examining the online equivalent of a TV watershed for children, following concerns that the “addictive nature” of social media is disrupting their sleep, their family lives and other aspects of daily life. So, er, how will he stop children paying on their phones after 9pm?
  • “Do conservatives think?” – On Substack, Dr David McGrogan explains why there is (almost) no conservative political theory.
  • “Michael Gove takes title Lord Gove of Torry, in father’s honour” – Michael Gove has revealed that he will pay tribute to the working-class community where his late father ran a business when he enters the House of Lords, according to the National.
  • “The anti-woke cardinal who conservative Catholics want as Pope” – The odds of Cardinal Robert Sarah succeeding Pope Francis have shortened significantly in recent days, writes Adrian Blomfield in the Telegraph.
  • “Middle-class households with large gardens risk paying higher water bills” – Households with large gardens or swimming pools could be forced to pay higher water bills under new class warfare measures, reports the Telegraph.
  • “BP under pressure from pro-oil hedge fund as MPs urge it to go green” – BP is facing fresh pressure from a pro-oil hedge fund just as MPs push the company to restore its green pledges, says the Telegraph.
  • “Ed Miliband set to U-turn and ban solar panels made by slave labour” – Ed Miliband is set to perform a U-turn by issuing a legal guarantee that Britain’s state-owned energy company won’t use solar panels produced by Chinese slaves, reports the Mail.
  • “Is Net Zero possible without slave labour?” – Ed Miliband’s green energy plans face a major setback as his attempt to remove slave labour from the solar panel supply chain risks delaying his 2030 clean energy target, writes Ross Clark in the Spectator.
  • “Can Ed Miliband get any worse?” – The Energy Secretary’s latest possible scheme of ‘zonal pricing’ is as disastrous as all his others, says Stephen Pollard in the Telegraph.
  • “BBC bans presenter from hosting heat pump podcast” – The BBC has banned Evan Davis from hosting a podcast about heat pumps over concerns that the appliances are too controversial, reports the Mail.
  • “The climate crisis is being misreported – and there is no legal way to stop it (yet)” – UK press regulator IMPRESS is pushing for new legal powers to tackle climate misinformation in the media, according to journalism.co.uk.
  • “Slovakia’s PM warns of ‘extremely high’ levels of DNA contamination in mRNA Covid shots” – Slovakia has become the first nation to take official action on mRNA vaccine DNA contamination, reports Rebekah Barnett on her Substack.
  • “No wonder tourists don’t want to come to Britain” – Brexit didn’t have to mean making booking a holiday in Britain a pain, yet that is how the UK Government has chosen to use its freedoms, writes Ross Clark in the Spectator.
  • “Parliament’s moral posturing on Israel is delusional” – In the Spectator, Jonathan Sacerdoti slams Parliament’s foreign affairs committee for turning its inquiry into Israel into a farce.
  • “Israel deletes Pope Francis condolence tweet” – Israel has deleted a social media post expressing sorrow for the death of Pope Francis, reports the Jewish Chronicle.
  • “Banning Alternative für Deutschland” – On Substack, Eugyppius expresses his fear that the German establishment will try to ban Alternative für Deutschland.
  • “Is Klaus Schwab takedown misdirection from a bigger problem?” – On the Focal Points Substack, John Leake suggests that the recent allegations against Klaus Schwab over luxury spending may be a deliberate misdirection to distract from a much bigger, potentially existential threat to the World Economic Forum.
  • “Could Trump cost Australia’s Liberals victory?” – It’s no coincidence things changed for Peter Dutton after Trump got elected President, writes Terry Barnes in the Spectator.
  • “How the US lost patience with talks to end the war in Ukraine” – In the Telegraph, George Grylls reveals how a frustrated President Trump tried to strong-arm Ukraine into peace by offering Putin major concessions – only to reignite tensions with Zelensky.
  • “Trump blames Zelensky for derailing London peace talks” – President Trump says that Ukraine ‘has no cards left to play’ and must accept that Crimea is lost, according to NBC News.
  • “Trump considers climb down in trade war with China as tariffs hammer US” – President Trump could cut tariffs on Chinese imports to between 50% and 65%, amid fears of the damage being wrought on the world’s biggest economy by the border taxes, reports the Telegraph.
  • “Trump drops threat to sack Fed chief after market chaos” – Donald Trump says he has “no intention” of sacking Fed chairman Jerome Powell after days of threats that sparked market turmoil, according to the Telegraph.
  • “‘Vast majority of Americans don’t back Trump’” – Sir Richard Branson says he does not believe that most Americans support Donald Trump’s actions since returning to the White House, reports the Telegraph.
  • “Elon Musk makes bombshell announcement about his future with DOGE” – Elon Musk says he’ll dedicate more time to Tesla and his role as “First Buddy” will “drop significantly” starting in May after the company reported a breathtaking downfall in first quarter profits, according to the Mail. 
  • “Musk is returning to save Tesla. But can he undo the damage he has caused?” – Tesla’s shareholders will soon find out if Musk’s return and vision of the company is his latest stroke of genius – or the strategic blunder that finally gives succour to his enemies, writes Matt Oliver in the Telegraph.
  • “US companies avoid hiring white men as part of diversity push” – Hundreds of companies are deliberately shunning white men for jobs amid pressure to make workplaces more diverse, reports the Telegraph.
  • “Transgender runners can compete in London Marathon as women” – Trans women will still be allowed to run in the London Marathon as females – despite a Supreme Court ruling that they are not legally women, says the Mail.
  • “JoJo Siwa admits ‘I am not a lesbian’ as she clarifies sexuality” – Dance Moms star JoJo Siwa has revealed she no longer identifies as a lesbian, according to the Mail.
  • “The blind singer cancelled for being anti-abortion” – Blind Swiss Croatian singer Bernarda Brunovic has been declared persona non grata in Switzerland over her views on abortion, writes Swiss FSU CEO Andrea Seaman in Spiked.
  • “Trigger warning for ‘historic language’ in Jane Austen brother’s memoir” – The memoir of Jane Austen’s brother has been published with a trigger warning for including “opinions of the era”, reports the Telegraph.
  • “Gary Lineker’s arrogant BBC interview proves he still just doesn’t get it” – Gary Lineker’s refusal to acknowledge why he shouldn’t be entitled to express political views on a taxpayer-funded TV channel reflects his staggering arrogance, says Michael Deacon in the Telegraph.
  • “Danish princess releases official portrait… holding her smartphone” – Denmark’s 18 year-old Princess Isabella has caused a stir online after posing for a strikingly modern photograph in which she is holding her mobile phone, reports LBC.
  • “‘It was our fault this started!’” – On GB News, Jacob Rees-Mogg discusses non-crime hate incidents with Toby, who says the Tories were asleep at the wheel in allowing the NCHI regime to be established.

'It was our fault this started!'@Jacob_Rees_Mogg discusses non-crime hate incidents with Lord Young of the Free Speech Union, who says the Tories were asleep at the wheel in allowing these incidents to be recorded. pic.twitter.com/kdmFJNKr2y

— GB News (@GBNEWS) April 22, 2025

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Tags: News Round-Up

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Global Warming is Mostly Caused By the Sun, Not Humans, Says Astrophysics Professor

Next Post

What I Learned from My College Stasi File

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

Tell me again what Mr Lineker said about people who chose not to “get the jab”… I forget.

136
-2
FerdIII
FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

White Lives Matter
Black Crime Matters
White Civilisation Matters
Bodily Autonomy Matters
Rejecting State Fascism and Rona-ism matters
Open borders and UK cultural destruction matters
Economic migrants here to suck on my tax teat matters
NHS failure matters
etc.

Don’t see any such tweets from the BBC or its paid religious like Lineker.
Why is that?

10
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
2 years ago

The FSU, as admiral as its intentions may be, seems to have misunderstood two key points. 1) An employee of the BBC has their salary paid by the public, and the BBC is a very special case of providing a public service. Its very remit is to be impartial – it must be as it’s supposed to represent the people. If you don’t like that part of the contract, you don’t sign. Simple. 2) We will never change anything by playing nicely with these people. They will take your help then spit in your face when you’re no longer needed. If you think you can appeal to their better nature, you are mistaken. There is no compromise with these people. We need to understand that.

It’s a war and we’re very late to the party. It’s time we started behaving accordingly, and that’s not treating these people like they’re our friends or that we have anything in common.

107
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

It’s not about playing nicely, just that rules brought in for ostensibly good reasons can and will be easily abused. I don’t care what Lineker tweets, I care that the BBC behaves like the media arm of New Labour, and has been doing so for decades.

The BBC cannot be impartial, it just needs to be broken up into little pieces and sold.

77
-1
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

The FSU is playing nicely. That was my point. Mark Steyn would have been a better target for their legal help. As for Linekar: Linekar IS the BBC, you cannot separate the two, so if you care about the BBC being impartial then you understand that the BBC and Linekar are intrinsically linked. Anyway, we’ve disagreed on this before, not much point doing that again. I respect your opinion, but do not agree with it.

23
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I agree the FSU should have offered to help Mark Steyn

44
0
A Y M
A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

The FSU should be hounding OfCom.

27
-1
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Indeed, though they are just doing their jobs. They should not exist, at least in present form. The state has no business regulating broadcasting content.

15
0
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

Ironically, I’ve just read an editorial in a German football paper about this which claimed that the Lineker affair would clearly demonstrate that the BBC isn’t really impartial but just the media arm of the Tories and that the BBC had lost its moral compass because – while it bigottedly made some noises about the world cup in Katar – it would treat (implied comparable) human rights issue in the UK so much differently. Lineker’s statements, including the Nazi-reference, had been entirely appropriate as clear statement in support of human rights and against the dubious political trajectory of Brexit Britain.

https://www.kicker.de/causa-lineker-die-bbc-hat-das-groesste-eigentor-ihrer-geschichte-geschossen-941738/artikel?fbclid=IwAR1OtQ75M5cWxz7Dv4DKdHaPuhdyKIyUNh0-tkk_kuY9deXMaMhe5KVbWLc#fb
[German]

But I guess that present-day professional football isn’t really about sport but more about woke virtue signalling isn’t really news.

Last edited 2 years ago by RW
18
-5
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

How very depressing

21
-1
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

I can highly recommend ‘The Parasitic Mind’ by Gad Saad. Here is one relevant quote from this book:
“Angela Merkal’s astounding open border policy granting close to a million Muslim immigrants entry into Germany could be seen as self-flagellation for Germany’s historical transgressions. Laced with typical progressive lunacy, what better way to make up for the Holocaust than by admitting “refugees” who frequently exhibit genocidal hatred of Jews.”

40
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

“Angela Merkal’s astounding open border policy…”

Looking back this was actually one of the more blatant examples of the rolling out of the Reset agenda. Virtue signalling has nothing to do with it. And virtue from Merkel? Crikey.

28
-1
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yes, it was. Apparently no one smelled a rat when she said Germany could take in 1 million Syrians every year for 20 years – did she believe the war in Syria was going to last more than 20 years? The fact that we switched, without any explanation, from Syrians to anyone who could climb into a boat was another clue. Never hear a word about Syrians these days, other than that they didn’t get nearly as much attention or relief as Turkey during the recent earthquakes. So much for helping those in need.

37
0
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Here is Angela on the anniversary of the end of the Berlin Wall. Not sure she knew which way the wall worked.
“No wall that keeps people out and restricts freedom is so high… that it cannot be broken down.”

And here is the BBC commenting on the difference between Hungary and Germany on the 30th anniversary of the Pan European Picnic.
“Theirs are two very different views of the European project.
One liberal, seeking to incorporate outsiders who can contribute to Europe’s future, the other the more nationalist, eager to erect barriers and to stress the continents traditional Christian outlook.”

12
0
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

“Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience” – Adam Smith

26
0
MichaelM
MichaelM
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

Great quote.

In a similar vein:

‘Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.’  – C.S. Lewis

20
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

👍

8
-1
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  sskinner

That’s certainly neither relevant to me reporting something about a Kicker editoral nor to the Lineker issue. It seems pretty much run-of-the-mill German bashing by the so-disposed, always only 3.5″ away from the next Holocaust or Nazi-reference. At times, they do sound like a seriously ancient broken record.

1
-6
Smudger
Smudger
2 years ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

You are correct – it cannot, nor ever will be impartial. Sadly, however much Rees Mogg and other Tory MPs give the impression they oppose the licence fee the best that the Tories will offer is to promise to reform the BBC if you give us your vote.
For me hitting them in the pocket by being a licence fee refusenik is the best hope of bringing the BBC to its knees.

6
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago
Reply to  Smudger

Indeed. Don’t give them your money and don’t rely on the Tories doing anything about the BBC. They have had plenty of opportunity regarding that and many other issues on which they sometimes talk a good fight but don’t take action – NHS reform, freedom of speech, law and order, illegal immigration, woke nonsense in education and the civil service etc.

7
0
MTF
MTF
2 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

If you don’t like that part of the contract, you don’t sign. 

Technically Lineker is not an employee of the BBC – he is a freelancer. We don’t know the details of his contract but the Independent thinks it is ambiguous about his use of social media and the BBC would probably lose if it took him to court.

The irony is that if the BBC and the government had ignored his tweet hardly anyone would have noticed.

6
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 years ago

“In a follow-up tweet, Gary Lineker said he wanted “to thank Tim Davie for his understanding during this difficult period”.
He added: “He has an almost impossible job keeping everybody happy, particularly in the area of impartiality. I am delighted that we’ll continue to fight the good fight, together.””

The part in bold says it all. The “good fight” is not providing excellent entertainment, great football punditry or whatever, the “good fight” is reshaping the world as they think it should be. The BBC is on a mission.

71
0
DomH75
DomH75
2 years ago

The TV licence has got to go. It’s that simple. The BBC are dragging their feet replacing it in the belief that Labour will walk the next election and give them another decade. The Tories need to be all over the BBC licence now and insist on a replacement with subscription by the end of this year.

Ultimately, little will alter if the BBC is a subscription service. Most people will continue to pay the subscription, the ones refusing to pay the licence will refuse to pay the subscription, the people watching without paying will no longer be able to watch. The BBC isn’t for everyone, so let’s stop pretending that it is.

42
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  DomH75

The BBC will not be got rid of no matter what government says. It wouldn’t matter if nobody paid the licence fee the BBC would remain, funded by our taxes. The BBC is the State Propoganda Service and as such too valuable to any executive.

We will always be lumbered with the BBC or its replacement.

40
-1
JohnK
JohnK
2 years ago
Reply to  DomH75

In the last hour, Rees-Mogg made the same point, and suggested that the beeb’s revenue is now a lot less than the likes of Sky, and Netflix.

6
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago

People who trust the BBC will tend to have been multiply jabbed.

That cheers me up.

61
-2
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

An excellent point. Some will undoubtedly be on God’s shortlist.

19
-3
A Y M
A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Not a great demographic for TV license future revenue streams.

13
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Oh stop wining and just pay up!
It’s the envy of the world!

?

13
0
Steven Robinson
Steven Robinson
2 years ago

Whether such a free-speech policy is consistent with the BBC’s special commitment, as the licence-fee funded national broadcaster, to be (and appear to be) impartial is another matter.

That is surely the central issue, and why I must differ from the FSU line. Unlike any other employing body, the BBC’s identity is defined by (1) an aspiration to impartiality and (2) a commitment to others (the public at large) having the right of free speech. Impartiality in the sense of neutrality entails balanced and objective reporting of events and issues, and discreet silence – self-restraint if necessary – by front-line employees when not speaking in an official capacity. To that extent, the issue of free speech is a special case. If front-of-stage employees (incl. tax-dodging freelancers), being left-wing in ideology almost to a man, claim the unfettered right of free speech to express their political views, they are violating the commitment to be ostensibly and actually impartial.

The distinction between political and sports commentators is hardly relevant: in the BBC they are all part of the same elite, and perceived as such by the public.

Last edited 2 years ago by Steven Robinson
26
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Steven Robinson

A decent post but intentional or not I must point out Lineker is NOT a “freelancer.” A chancer, yes but definitely NOT a freelancer.

23
-1
GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
2 years ago

There are always at least two sides to every story.
On the one hand migrants coming to the UK shows that they see our country as a safe haven and one which they can better themselves and something UK citizens should be proud of.
If they are asylum seekers fleeing war and oppression, they should be lauded and helped.
However, if they are economic migrants (often men of fighting age) coming originally from a stable country and land in the UK illegally where they immediately destroy all their documentation, we as a nation do not know who they are and whether they pose a criminal or terrorist threat to the country. They may be coming from France, but they may have moved through many other safe European countries to arrive here.
The UK government has to have the manpower in place for the sheer number of illegal migrants coming to UK shores and the correct protocols for dealing with them effectively.
Lineker is just another woke liberal luvvy who is the epitome of virtue signalling.

36
-1
Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
2 years ago

The BBC impartial when, did I miss something.

23
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago

The Do gooding lefty Lineker makes me want to f-ing puke!
The Holier than thou, moralising, pedestal sitting, judgmental, box ticking, egotistical, popularity pampering, multi millionaire A-hole does not speak for me, and I guess, the majority of right minded common sense british people!
There! Glad that’s out my system!!

63
-3
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

As for the Lineker loving cowardly downticker,..are you sure your on the right forum?

25
-4
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

“He said it again!” 🤣

8
-1
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Goal hanging, big eared, crisp flogger!

Wow, we should all pay attention to what this twat has to say!

9
0
sskinner
sskinner
2 years ago

I don’t recall those fleeing persecution in the 1930s and 1940s going towards Germany. In addition, why would anyone ‘flee’ towards Great Britain if we are like 1930s Germany.

I can only repeat a quote from Peter Hitchens
“When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants – from anywhere – as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties. Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people – usually in the poorest parts of Britain – who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly “vibrant communities”. If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots. 
When we graduated and began to earn serious money, we generally headed for expensive London enclaves and became extremely choosy about where our children went to school, a choice we happily denied the urban poor, the ones we sneered at as “racists”. What did we know, or care, of the great silent revolution which even then was beginning to transform the lives of the British poor?
To us, it meant patriotism and tradition could always be derided as “racist”. And it also meant cheap servants for the rich new middle-class, for the first time since 1939, as well as cheap restaurants and – later on – cheap builders and plumbers working off the books. It wasn’t our wages that were depressed, or our work that was priced out of the market. Immigrants didn’t do the sort of jobs we did.
They were no threat to us. The only threat might have come from the aggrieved British people, but we could always stifle their protests by suggesting that they were modern-day fascists. I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was (and most of my revolutionary comrades were, too).”

69
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

You’ve lost me Toby. I renewed my FSU membership recently. I won’t be renewing it again. Or contributing to the Daily Skeptic. Goodbye.

9
-5
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

What’s happened?

0
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

This is not a free speech issue. Lineker would have us believe it is. Apparently Toby agrees. I don’t.

14
-4
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

I for one would be sorry to see you leave, you’ve wrote some brilliant stuff while I’ve been on here, I like earthy input like yours

5
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

You’re very kind to say so. My father and grandfather (on my mother’s side) were tradesmen. My grandfather was a joiner (carpenterj. He went to work in dungarees and a shirt and tie every day. What you might call the salt of the earth. Luckily his daughter my mother had the good sense to send me to a decent school and later university. I hope I inherited some of their working class common sense.

26
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

I’m a carpenter and my dad was a coal miner in Nottinghamshire so I know where the f your coming from.
The sceptic has a lot of very educated and intelligent people but that’s why I like it, I like to learn. Most of this lot make me look wanting, but where else would you get to voice your views in this sh#@*ole of a world? I don’t do any social media, none!

21
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I’m sure you can guess from my name how old I’m and I’m guessing by your passion and politics your roughly the same?

5
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Sleep on it, common sense people seem to be the minority at the moment, so we need all the level headed people like you we can get!

15
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

1958. As far as politics goes, I don’t feel so much passionate as betrayed. By the establishment that I was brought up to defer to and respect. All those institutions that we thought we could trust, Westminster and politicians, the BBC, Academia and science, the judiciary and courts, the police, the NHS and medical profession. All corrupt, self seeking, self absorbed treacherous charlatans. Taking taxpayers’ money and spending it like water on causes that diminish the taxpayers and weaken and undermine the nation.

Last edited 2 years ago by Boomer Bloke
25
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Then your in the right place here!
The vast majority would totally agree with you, including me. It’s very disheartening to watch a once proud and fair nation degrade into the shyte show that it has become!

9
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Apparent the downvoter thinks that I don’t have the right to decide how to spend my money.

14
-2
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

That’s his/her/them/they/…oh god you just get so sick of all this walking on eggshells!
That’s their problem, I’d sooner read your imput!

12
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

With power comes responsibility!
Those with fame and power tend to forget this, they end up believing their own importance! Lineker and the bbc will have a day of reckoning! It comes to us/them… its call retribution and it comes from somewhere but not the rich ,famous, or our mortal leaders! Just a whisper I can’t put my finger on, but its powerful!
So endeth the lesson 🤣

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

I suppose some good might come from this shameful backdown. Lineker may well be emboldened by this ‘victory’ and see fit to carry on as before which will surely rile a large chunk of the population. Another case of wait and see.

Given that the Beeb are clearly acting on government orders (or Billy’s even) I cannot accept that the decision to allow Lineker to insult his employer and de facto his real employers – the public paying his wages – was taken solely by Tim Davie. This decision has Downing St all over it. A guaranteed way to stoke the rage of decent taxpayers which seems to be the modus operandi these days.

Lineker may well have the right to free speech but if he does so to do millions of public servants. Where was the right to free speech for those medical professionals who did bravely speak out during the abuses of the last three years and for those who lost their jobs as a result?

As someone who spent some years in the Civil Service I can absolutely guarantee that speaking out so publicly on a political issue would have guaranteed a P45. Yet again the law being used based on perceived social standing.

The decision of the FSU to support this toe-rag is therefore worrying. The FSU readily admits to picking its fights and so I can see no reason why it could not have sat this one out. Lineker has rubbished his employers and got his own way, upsetting many people in the process. There is no gain in this for the FSU.

A disgraceful little episode featuring a scammy public figure who is so full of ego he sees fit to undermine his country and his countrymen simply to satisfy his own grotesque self-importance.

What a long way this nation has fallen.

Last edited 2 years ago by huxleypiggles
40
-1
amanuensis
amanuensis
2 years ago

I don’t understand why the BBC didn’t use the opportunity to get rid of Linker. He’s a contractor, so there’d be no redundancy, and it would have sent a strong message to the others to stay in line.

Sure, there’d have been lots of sports presenters who would have ‘gone on strike’, but I’m sure they could have taken the opportunity to get some junior presenters, or perhaps some from local radio, to do the broadcasts instead — it would have added some variety to their output and also helped younger talent get a foothold in their career. I’m sure that it would have been at least as good as Linker’s pontification.

This missed opportunity will only serve to make their other ‘superstars’ (who appear to be quite average to me) even more insufferable.

Last edited 2 years ago by amanuensis
53
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

They commentate, ‘analyse’, pontificate and postulate about grown men kicking a ball across a field. Who gives a phlying phuck. Seriously?

25
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Nice, your still with us!
During the half time interval a band used to march up and down the pitch to entertain the crowd for 15 mins! Why do we need Pundits? Why?

14
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Yes I have a few days left of my most recent contribution. I won’t be renewing it.

1
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Completely agree – a massive missed opportunity, unless, as per my post…

9
-1
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
2 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

A DM article said the BBC would lose a lot of money for breach of contract. Quite possible, but not a good enough reason not to do it. It would indeed have sent a message that both employees and contractors have certain obligations to their employers/clients. It would also have been a good opportunity to review why Lineker got such a great, iron-clad contract. This is partly why I agree that the FSU has no need to offer their services to Lineker, I’m sure he had and has the best legal representation his money can buy. Supporting, on principle, his right to free speech does not mean you have to fight his battles for him, there are undoubtedly far more worthy cases out there in need of the FSU’s assistance.

20
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

“there are undoubtedly far more worthy cases out there in need of the FSU’s assistance.”

Precisely. Damned stupid of the FSU to get involved. It smacks of wanting to join the club.

I thought we were choosing our battles.

16
-1
ebygum
ebygum
2 years ago

..the reality, which people like Lineker don’t want to admit, is that the kind of migrants they talk about, are nothing like the migrants we have….they aren’t fleeing anything like war, or poverty, or disaster…most of them say they are leaving ‘modern slavery’ whatever that means….but Lineker and his ilk don’t care…it’s just empty, pretend faux-empathy….

“In a Freedom of Information requests conducted by Migration Watch UK, the Home Office has revealed that over half (51.1 per cent) of those identified or claiming to be potential victims of modern slavery who entered the UK by small boat in the first half of 2022 came from Albania; a significant increase on 2021 when Albanians made up 11.2 per cent of those referred as possible victims of modern slavery.”

(also 9 out of 10 Albanians arriving are young men..not families or children and women…)

Albania is not a ‘war torn’ country, and even if it were migrants need to travel through several countries such as Serbia, Hungary and Germany to get to France…all of these are safe countries…

What these overpaid arseholes do par excellence is virtue signalling, they don’t do common sense or any sense of giving a shyte about the places where these people end up, nor the residents that have to live with it…I hate them all with a fiery passion…

38
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
2 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Empty, pretend faux empathy – indeed it is.

Lineker believes the borders should be open to all refugees – does that mean without any limit? Let us set aside the argument that the majority are neither refugees nor by the time they come to the UK (or NL for that matter) in an unsafe country. Let us assume they truly are desperate refugees – the world is filled with people living in dreadful circumstances – I could argue that every woman in Afghanistan and Iran should be granted refugee status – that alone would tot up to around 60 million. China’s Uyghurs, Kurds, Mexicans living in areas run by drug cartels – on and on. It is simply impossible to take in every person who deserves a better and safer life. To argue a simple reality is not fascist and it is time that point is driven home.

More importantly, if a country does take in people, it should only do so if it can actually offer them a better life than they left. Housing, education, health care for non-contributors, most of whom will either never become contributors or will only do so after years (mainly through their children) costs money – tax money. The same tax money that our Gazza wants to keep in his pockets. Empty, pretend faux empathy indeed. If he really believed what he said, he would not fight his tax bill and would cough it up willingly – you know, to help the refugees. Never was put your money where your mouth is more apt.

44
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Nailed it.👍

10
-1
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

The Left is built on lies

Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane 

Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field 
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
 

Last edited 2 years ago by Lockdown Sceptic
10
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago

Lineker is ofcourse very naive. But he is entitled to be. — It isn’t so much his point of view that is the problem, because he is entitled to it, just as everyone visiting The Daily Sceptic is entitled to theirs. The problem is that he is a high profile presenter on BBC, and the BBC, being the state broadcaster is supposed to be impartial. Oh dear what to do what to do.————- So if Lineker is reinstated and is free to spout his left wing world view than right wing views must also be allowed otherwise left wing bias will still exist on BBC. So can we now expect BBC presenters to be seen saying things like “This whole climate change dogma is like communism in the old Soviet Union “——Eh I don’t think so. —–What we would all like to know is, what agreement has been reached between BBC presenters etc and the BBC regarding their views on social media on controversial and politicised issues? Apparently, staff were not supposed to say anything that brought the BBC into disrepute. So what changes have the BBC made to those rules? This idea that Lineker can get away with saying things that bring the BBC into disrepute because he is freelance is a bit dodgy. Let’s imagine that the person reading the 6 o’clock News is freelance, how would it look if he was telling us all on BBC News about covid and climate but saying the very opposite on social media? This would be absurd and hard for the BBC to explain away.

9
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

The very fact that Lineker has been continuously employed by the BBC since first commencing work in television is proof that he is “contracted.” He is not freelance and his Saturday job for Walkers is just that.

Lineker is and always has been a BBC employee.

Not content with insisting on an open borders policy this Next Tuesday thinks he can avoid making any contribution by refusing to pay tax.

This despicable piece of shyte belongs alongside Bozo and Co – treasonous barstewards.

7
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

They seem to be claiming he is “freelance”. ——-Sounds a bit dogy to me but I have no problem with what Lineker is actually saying on political issues. He is as entitled to his opinion as you and I. ——-But he is a high profile person on the BBC who will not allow certain issues like climate, immigration, vaccines etc to be discussed. They try to control the narrative on all of that and have a world view all to the progressive left. But not all license payers are Liberal progressives. You and I are therefore having to fund our own brainwashing by forking out for a license. But my main point is this——If Lineker gets away with spouting his social justice, then right of centre opinion must also be allowed. If Lineker and therefore other presenters and BBC employees can spout social justice then they must also be allowed to spout Right Wing opinions. You cannot just have free speech for liberals only.

1
0
RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

I’m so looking forward to the lefty luvvies who “came out” for free speech in support of Lineker, doing the same for the likes of me when I say that a man in a frock (regardless of which dangly bits he does or doesn’t have) can never become a woman.

Oh …. and white lives matter just as much as black ones.

This issue of course isn’t one of free speech at all. It’s about a State Broadcaster which we are to all intents and purposes forced to pay for on the grounds it is politically impartial, being so such thing.

Scrap the BBC’s Telly Tax and the problem goes away …. as will a large number of people currently forced to pay for it.

11
0
FerdIII
FerdIII
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

100% correct.
If you criticise black crime, the tranny’s, the Muslims, the invading enrichers or the economic migrants who all look to be young males, you could elicit a visit from the police.
But Lineker can call anyone a Narzee and all is fine and even applauded.
He can even say the unstabbed like myself should be imprisoned or worse and the BBC has no issue with it.

5
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

This is where our once great nation, with a parliament, legal system, history of tolerance, national broadcaster and sporting heritage that were once the envy of the world, has got to. A football pundit who owes the treasury millions in back taxes can take down the national broadcaster by flouting the requirements of his contract on social media, while invoking nazi germany in a critique of government policy and new legislation aimed at solving a problem that the majority want to be solved. Meanwhile a woman is arrested for standing silently near an abortion clinic and saying precisely nothing. And another woman has to apologise for the childish behaviour of her children to a Muslim kangaroo court in the presence of senior police officers while the Muslim officials make threats of violence, and the children have their police records indelibly marred with a hate crime endorsements. That sounds about right fir a country where the leader of his majesty’s loyal opposition can’t define what a woman is, but if he could, she could have a penis, while taking a knee in memory of a drug addict with a history of violent crime who died of a fentanyl overdose in another country thousands of miles away.

Last edited 2 years ago by Boomer Bloke
25
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

That was quite a tirade. It is just utterly pathetic that it is all true.

11
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

And therefore probably a hate crime.

6
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Please don’t leave Boomer! Your the ipitome of common sense! 👍👍

7
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

A rather accurate appraisal.

8
0
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

And still therefore probably a hate crime.

3
0
MTF
MTF
2 years ago

What does it mean for the BBC to be impartial? It gets attacked from left and right.

The government definition of impartial seems to mean supporting the government line. If Lineker had tweeted in support of the government policy I don’t suppose there would have been any criticism. The important thing is not that the BBC pursue some meaningless concept of impartiality but that it is independent (as far as possible) of both government and commercial interests and is factually accurate. It has achieved this rather well over the decades but in the last 10 years the government has eroded that.

0
-8
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  MTF

I’m wondering how the millionaire football pundit in tax arrears would have hypothetically invoked nazi Germany in his hypothetical pro government immigration tweet. I’ll wait.

3
0
SomersetHoops
SomersetHoops
2 years ago

I can’t watch someone as opinionated as Lineker who is obviously so thick, his opinions are of little value. The UK has large numbers of legitimate immigrants, many for valid reasons of persecution, but no country can afford to take hoards of people breaking borders illegally and thus become responsible for their housing and upkeep. We have enough of our own poor who are suffering because too many of our resources to support them are being used to keep illegal immigrants in hotels. These people are coming from France where, although France wants to be rid of them, they are not being abused I think it’s reasonable for broadcaster employers to restrict public broadcasts as abusive as Lineker’s was. Lineker gets a salary way beyond his worth, and perhaps the BBC should limit the salary level of contract not directly employed workers so that if they do pay them at crazy high levels they must be directly employed. I’m sure with the group of directly employed BBC sports presenters, there are equally or more competent presenters.

4
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences