• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Biggest British Debate Competition in the World Run by Oxford Union Pressures Hundreds of Children as Young as 14 to Declare Their Gender Pronouns

by Will Jones
12 April 2025 3:00 PM

The biggest British Parliamentary debate competition in the world run by the Oxford Union pressures hundreds of children as young as 14 to declare their gender pronouns every year. The Mail has the story.

Competitors at Oxfords Schools, aged 14-18, are instructed by organisers to specify whether they are “he/she/they etc” at the start of each round.

Anyone who fails to comply with the equity policy may be disqualified from the contest “with immediate effect”.

Oxford Schools – whose 2025 competition is currently ongoing – is the largest British Parliamentary school-level debate competition in the world, and the largest debating contest in the UK.

It states thousands of students are invited to participate every year and that last year, over 350 schools competed.

A statement unearthed by MailOnline reads: “We operate a gender pronoun policy at Oxford Schools. At the start of each debate, the judge will ask each speaker to introduce themselves with their name and their gender pronoun (such as he/she/they etc), or they may declare no preference.

“This is intended to stop people being misgendered, and prepares students for other competitions and university debating, where such policy is standard.

“Just as people like to be called by their correct name, so they should be called by the pronoun they feel most comfortable with.”

Student testimonies suggest that in practice, participants are not given the option to declare “no preference” when they are each asked in turn to stand up and make their pronoun declaration.

The policy, which has been in force over the last seven years, has been branded “unacceptable” by free speech advocates and “indoctrination pure and simple” by gender critical activists.

Lord Young, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, told MailOnline: “This is unacceptable. 

“What if the schoolchildren are debating whether sex is an immutable biological characteristic or a social construct that’s merely ‘assigned at birth’? 

“By forcing the participants to declare their pronouns, which is a tacit acknowledgement that someone can become a member of the opposite sex, the organisers of the competition are siding with those who believe that sex is a social construct.

“This is particularly egregious given that the organiser of this debating contest is the Oxford Union, which is supposed to be a bastion of free speech. 

“The conflict between sex-based women’s rights and trans rights is the subject of an ongoing public debate and not an issue on which the Oxford Union should take a side.

“The Free Speech Union will be writing to the Oxford Union, which is a registered charity, asking it to intervene and instruct the organisers of this competition to uphold the Union’s storied tradition of upholding free speech.”

Worth reading in full.

Tags: ChildrenGender PronounsOxford UnionOxford UniversityPropagandaTransgenderismWoke Gobbledegook

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Ethnic Minority Student Teachers Offered £5,000 More Than White Peers to Train Under ‘Anti-Racist’ Scheme

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago

At the start of each debate, the judge will ask each speaker to introduce themselves with their name and their gender pronoun (such as he/she/they etc), or they may declare no preference.

If you wish to refer to me how about you use my name?

10
0
Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
1 month ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Yes. Pronouns can be avoided entirely and many people are now doing this.

3
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I thought that but if you’re talking about the person to someone else you can’t really avoid referring to them as ‘she/he’ all the time. Maybe if you made a conscious effort but it wouldn’t roll off my tongue naturally.
“John’s leading by three points and he only needs two more points to win. Jane’s in second place and she needs to answer this next question correctly to equalise with him.”
Imagine the palaver trying to remember who wants to be called “they/them” and who wants to be known as the opposite sex? I’d make a right hash of it and end up offending many people, I think.

7
0
Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
1 month ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Yes, it’s ridiculous; that’s the point. It’s irrational behaviour and what happens when people are subjected to gaslighting. (Which is supposed to be illegal). It’s a way of resisting without being cancelled or worse. How did we get here?

4
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago
Reply to  Hound of Heaven

I’m sure it would be considered a micro-aggression. If I were doing it, it would be. 🙂

To consider Mogwai’s point above…

“John’s leading by three points and only needs two more points to win. Jane’s in second place and needs to answer this next question correctly to equalise with John.”

As a bit of a maths arithmetic nerd. I note Jane’s question is worth three points.

Last edited 1 month ago by soundofreason
2
0
Gezza England
Gezza England
1 month ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Just call them all ‘it’.

1
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Too much mental illness is pandered to nowadays, plus too many snowflakes getting offended at the drop of a hat. Loads of emotionally unhinged people taking to social media to upload a film of themselves having a spaz attack just because they’ve been misgendered in a shop.🥴
I think this illustrates my point. I was born in the 1970s;

https://x.com/LibertyCappy/status/1910542070080750043

4
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
1 month ago

Anyone with any self-respect even a child would just tell them where to go. Who wants to be part of a debate organised by such a sad sack of trivial losers. You would feel grubby taking part after that. We will make you wear the pink panties of submission one way or another. Free-thinking on our terms.

3
0
Art Simtotic
Art Simtotic
1 month ago

 As Groucho Marx always used to say, “I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member!”

Same goes for the South Midlands Arts College Debasing Society.

4
0
Toonraker
Toonraker
1 month ago

The arrogance of dictating how you want to be referred to in your absence is astounding.

8
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago
Reply to  Toonraker

Excellent point.

6
0
Baldrick
Baldrick
1 month ago

Well how you refer to me when I am not around does not matter. If you use a pronoun to refer to me directly then is that not offensive anyway? Of course it is best to make a joke about and not be offended by anything like that anyway, but the whole thing is a bit of a fuss over some nonsense that you should not be using to some ones face.

1
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
1 month ago

It is part of the general attack upon seriousness which constitutes a larger part of the demoralisation element of managed decline. Can you imagine someone announcing something really important to you and stating their pronouns first? Like if the police turned up in the morning to tell you that your son had been killed in a car crash or anything of moment. You would feel enraged by their triviality. You need to be mindful that their evil works best when it is an attack upon seriousness. Like a mallet they use to soften the meat up.

1
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 month ago
Reply to  Jabby Mcstiff

Like when I was readmitting my mother into A&E with a stroke and they persisted in asking her for her religious orientation.

1
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
1 month ago

They have so screwed you that you don’t know how to get back. It is sad and disappointing. They have you by the balls and you are crazy scared. I don’t hate you but I think less of you and feel that contact with you is dirtiness. Look at the disgusting mess that you have become.

0
0
Hardliner
Hardliner
1 month ago

What a load of shite… far too complicated. Just ignore the crap

Last edited 1 month ago by Hardliner
2
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  Hardliner

Does your post indicate ‘shitmunchers’ and ‘Hamassholes’ are now allowed to be posted on here, or is it just another case of “Rules for thee but not for me”? 🤔 Perks of the job, right?

0
0
EUbrainwashing
EUbrainwashing
1 month ago

The trick of political subversives is to win public office. (It is much easier to gain the power offered by public office than it is to win such influence by merit alone).

Once they are ‘in’ they work to make the conditions so oppressive, to right minded people, that they refuse to contest (I wouldn’t wish to stand for public office).

The little tikes gleefully taking up this challenge are on the path to telling us all what to do and think for the rest of all our lives. Let’s egg them all.

Last edited 1 month ago by EUbrainwashing
2
0
Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
1 month ago

Someone needs to stand up and say that their preferred pronouns are Jedi Master, or just Master for short. Halfway through the competition they could transition and ask to be called Sith Lord, or just Lord for short.

4
0
Hester
Hester
1 month ago

Kids won’t read this, but if they did, I would suggest they band together and take the P out of the request. The majority should follow the rule in stating how they wish to be called, BUT, say things like my pronouns are “Your Highness” “your Majesty”, or on the planet I come from my pronounsa are “Zeyfod, Zeyzar”. I am sure these bright young people can come up with lots more. Oxford will not be able to deny each child their right as to do so is to offend their chosen belief in what they are, thus making a lie of the thing they are asking each child to do.
Frankly if all logical, free thinking individuals be it children or Adults adopted this very simple pin prick to the balloon of magical thinking it would soon stop.
Today I am feeling that I am really a Pope so please address me as your Eminence.

2
0
Epi
Epi
1 month ago

Sounds like they’re all mass debaters.

1
0
coviture2020
coviture2020
1 month ago

Perhaps pronouns could be a topic for debate?

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences