243488
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Trump’s “Drill, Baby, Drill” Energy Policy Will Enjoy the Enthusiastic Support of the Global South

by Tilak Doshi
19 January 2025 5:00 PM

The inauguration of Donald Trump on Monday, January 20th as 47th President of the United States promises to dramatically change the trajectory of U.S. energy policies pursued by the outgoing Biden administration as well as the previous two-term Obama presidency.

In a speech and Q&A session on January 7th, the President-elect stated that both climate alarmism and Biden’s energy policies are “huge scams”; that he would terminate U.S. participation in the UN’s Paris Climate Agreement; that he would rescind Biden’s cynical permitting “pause” on LNG export infrastructure development allegedly to assess its impact on U.S. energy security and domestic natural gas prices; that he would do away with Biden’s EV mandates “very quickly”; that he would “un-ban” Biden’s blanket offshore oil and gas drilling ban; that he would rescind all the actions taken by the Biden regulators to disadvantage or ban gas appliances and stoves; and that he would unwind Biden’s offshore wind boondoggle. He has also vowed to rescind unspent funds earmarked for climate provisions contained in the euphemistically named, boondoggle-laden Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

It is of course too early to assess how quickly the incoming Trump administration can achieve these objectives. Vested interests, bureaucratic backsliding and the considerable resources of the climate industrial complex will seek to constrain the Trump administration’s energy policy ambitions.

But it would be a mistake to look at the Trump administration’s energy policy promises as the only hope in turning around what has been a decades-long onslaught against fossil fuels in the U.S. and Western Europe. Key developments in world energy affairs in 2024 suggest that a Trump administration will have important allies in Europe and around the world in its fight against the globalist climate agenda.

Europe’s deindustrialisation and the green backlash

The impact of Europe’s deindustrialisation – a process that began with Germany’s adoption of Energiewende in 2010 which sought to replace fossil fuels and nuclear power with solar and wind – became painfully evident last year. Germany’s Federal Statistics Office reported on January 15th that the economy contracted for the second consecutive year in 2024, highlighting the depth of the downturn gripping Europe’s biggest economy with few signs of any imminent reprieve. The avalanche of headlines on Germany’s economic and political implosion after Chancellor Olaf Scholz sacked his Finance Minister in November were only the latest in a series of reports over the past two years on the “sick man of Europe” (“Behind Germany’s Political Turmoil, a Stagnating Economy”, “Germany Is Unraveling Just When Europe Needs It Most”, “Europe’s Economic Apocalypse Is Now”) .

Sky-high labour and business operating costs, caused by the myriad regulations of over-reaching bureaucrats and among the world’s highest energy prices brought about by the follies of the EU’s and U.K.’s “climate leadership” policies of the past two decades, have cost Europe dearly. In 2008, the EU and U.S. economies were neck and neck. Today, the U.S. economy is 50% larger than its hapless ally across the Atlantic.

A growing ‘greenlash’ against the environmental agenda in Europe and U.K. – along with the rejection of mass immigration and the open-ended commitment to funding Ukraine’s war – has led to the rise of populist “far-Right” political parties. They have achieved significant success in regional and national elections in Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, France, Germany and the U.K.

Geert Wilders, the political leader of the Party for Freedom which is in a coalition of four parties which constitute the Dutch Government, sounded positively Trumpian as he decried government spending on the climate and supporting Ukraine and the need to reduce taxes, stating: “I want us to finally put the Dutch first.”

Alice Weidel, leader of the German AfD party that has 20% voter support across the country, making it Germany’s second strongest political party, is yet another potential Trump ally. In one of her typically fiery speeches to the Bundestag, she said: “Germany is deep in recession… And it’s not Putin, not the world, not some fictitious climate disasters that are to blame for this. This incapable Government is responsible for the collapse…”

In an extended interview with Elon Musk – who will lead the Department of Government Efficiency in Trump’s incoming administration – Ms. Weidel spoke of Angela Merkel as the first “green” chancellor who “wrecked and destroyed” the country with its “obnoxious energy policy” which made Germany “the first industrial economy that unplugged nuclear power plants”.

Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform U.K. party which is now neck and neck with the ruling Labour Party on 25% in some polls, has long been a personal friend of Mr. Trump. Like Mr. Trump and reflecting most Reform U.K. members, Mr. Farage is skeptical about climate alarmism. His party manifesto states that Net Zero policies are “crippling our economy” so “scrapping climate change goals should be made a priority for the next government as it would save the public sector £30 billion per year for the next 25 years”.

There are other leaders in the EU that share Mr. Trump’s opposition to the fundamentalist beliefs of the climate church. Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orban dismisses EU plans to tackle climate change as a “utopian fantasy”. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has pointedly stated that “ecology has been militarily occupied from the Left” and that “Greta Thunberg’s ideology will lead us to lose thousands of companies and millions of jobs in Europe”. Parties opposed to the unconstrained green climate agenda are now in governing coalitions in Finland, Sweden and Austria.

Energy pragmatists in the Global South

Ever since the first ever international forum devoted to the environment and climate change took place in Stockholm in 1972, the developed countries of the West have made climate policy a centrepiece in their international relations. From the earliest UN negotiations starting in 1992 at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit under the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), developing countries in the ‘Global South’ such as China, India, Brazil and South Africa had “common but differentiated responsibilities”.

This meant that the developed countries (primarily the West, but also its allies including industrialised Japan and South Korea) adopted commitments to reduce carbon emissions by specified amounts over a specified period. This was allegedly dictated by the ScienceTM popularised by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change periodic “Summary for Policymakers”. The developing countries not only did not have any binding policy commitments but were expected to receive considerable support in “climate finance” to assist mitigating and adapting to climate change.

After almost three decades of negotiations at the Conference of Parties (COP) at the UNFCCC forum, the chasm that exists between the policy perspectives of governments in the collective West and those of the rest of the world that make up 80% of the global population is no closer to being bridged. The delegations from China and India among other developing countries at COP26 held in Glasgow in 2021 successfully insisted at the last minute that the forum’s final communique refer to a “phase down” not a “phase out” of fossil fuels. This was to ensure there was no watering down of their aspirations for higher standards of living which depend on reliable and affordable fossil fuel supplies.

At COP28 held in Dubai in 2023, the contradictions between the climate alarmists of the West (which included both government representatives and a vast phalange of environmental NGOs that are accorded semi-official status at COP meetings) and the energy pragmatists of the ‘Global South’ broke into the open and was widely reported in the media.

Dr. Sultan Al Jaber, the President of the COP28 climate summit and CEO of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, said pointedly in an interview: “You’re asking for a phase-out of fossil fuels… Please, help me, show me the roadmap for a phase-out of fossil fuel that will allow for sustainable socio-economic development, unless you want to take the world back into caves.”

Nor is Dr. Al Jabber the only natural ally of the in-coming “drill, baby, drill” Trump administration. Al Jaber’s remarks were amplified by Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman who told Bloomberg that the world’s biggest oil exporter would not agree with Western demands to phaseout fossil fuels. “Absolutely not,” he said in an interview in Riyadh. “And I assure you not a single person – I’m talking about governments – believes in that… If they believe that this is the highest moral ground issue, fantastic. Let them do that themselves. And we will see how much they can deliver.”

Last year’s COP29 was held in Baku, Azerbaijan in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory in the presidential elections, much to the consternation of climate activists and a hyper-ventilating media around the world. The Financial Times saw Trump’s triumphant win as “a blow to global climate action” which would “cast a pall over the UN COP29”. Azeri President Ilham Aliyev, host of COP29, came out as among Mr. Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters, describing his country’s oil and gas resources as “a gift from God” and that oil and gas would be needed for “many more years”.

Upending green geopolitics

That the upcoming Trump administration will upend the green geopolitics pushed by the progressive environmental Left in the West is in no doubt. This was evident at the confirmation hearings for key nominees in the Trump administration which took place this week. Chris Wright, an oil executive and the nominee for Secretary of Energy, said this at his Senate hearing: “President Trump shares my passion for energy… if confirmed, I will work tirelessly to implement his bold agenda as an unabashed steward for all sources of affordable, reliable and secure American energy.” He continued:

There’s seven billion people in the world that don’t live lives anything like we do…They want what we have. And of course, they should get what we have. And through market forces and improvement and leadership, particularly leadership from the President-elect Trump, I think we’re going to see growing more abundant energy resource coming out of our country and hopefully out of the world so that everyone else can live lives like we do.

Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent was asked at his confirmation hearing about fears that President-elect Trump’s efforts to reverse gains made in green energy would favour China. He responded as follows:

China will build a hundred new coal plants this year. There is not a clean energy race. There is an energy race. China will build 10 nuclear plants this year. That is not solar. I am in favour of more nuclear plants. And I would note that the IRA as scored by the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] is wildly out of control in terms of spending on the upside.

Mr. Trump couches his promised energy policies in the mantle of “America First”. Yet in his ambitions to bring about a renaissance in energy production in the U.S., he enjoys the prospects of strong support from all corners of the world not beholden to the powerful lobbies of the globalist climate agenda.

Dr. Tilak K. Doshi is an economist, a former contributor to Forbes, and a member of the CO2 Coalition.

Tags: Alice WeidelChris WrightElon MuskGeert WildersGiorgia MeloniNigel FarageOlaf ScholzParis Climate AgreementPresident TrumpVictor Orban

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

“There is a Pakistani Problem and we Must Root it Out,” Says Head of Equality and Human Rights Commission

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
new follow-up comments
    Please log in to comment

    To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

    Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

    15 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    rms
    rms
    3 months ago

    Re President Biden’s ban on LNG exports, it’s worse than “cynical”. Per House Speaker Johnson, President Biden when questioned by the Speaker denied that he did it! If not President Biden doing that, then who did it and why?

    Last edited 3 months ago by rms
    8
    0
    Purpleone
    Purpleone
    3 months ago
    Reply to  rms

    The ‘blob’ we are to assume?

    0
    0
    huxleypiggles
    huxleypiggles
    3 months ago

    Still, at least we can take some satisfaction in knowing that Kneel is going to make this country the world leader in unreliables. We will be cold, poor, hungry and immobile but just think of the accolades…

    14
    0
    Arum
    Arum
    3 months ago
    Reply to  huxleypiggles

    Yes if we try really hard and all make sacrifices (except for members of the cabinet, obviously), we might be able to reduce Britain’s greenhouse gas emissions from 0.8% to 0.4% of the world total!

    9
    0
    huxleypiggles
    huxleypiggles
    3 months ago
    Reply to  Arum

    😀😀😀

    2
    0
    Arum
    Arum
    3 months ago
    Reply to  Arum

    ….on second thoughts, with the rate that China and India are developing, we can probably achieve that relative reduction without even trying

    8
    0
    RW
    RW
    3 months ago
    Reply to  huxleypiggles

    Wealthy Chinese tourists coming to visit us a we shiver in our caves because we’re neither allowed to wear fur nor light a fire as this would upset the climate? I mean, a whole country, especially one in the northern hemisphere, going back to the Paleolithic so that “green billionaires” can brag about this accomplishment in their Caribbean resorts ought to be quite of a tourist attraction. A large open air zoo of cavemen without any desire to improve their lots through technological progress to avoid upsetting mother nature and her high-priests Dale Vince and Chris Packham.

    8
    0
    varmint
    varmint
    3 months ago
    Reply to  huxleypiggles

    Except this absurd Labour Government cannot possibly last till 2029. There are already signs that they will be forced to reverse some of the absurdity like forcing heat pumps on people at considerable expense, forcing us all into EV’s etc etc, because reality is a very hard enemy to defeat. And the reality is that you cannot run Industrial Society on wind and sun as the Germans are now finding out.

    6
    0
    transmissionofflame
    transmissionofflame
    3 months ago

    I think it would have been better to show GDP per capita on the graph as that would eliminate differences in population growth as a factor but a quick internet search suggests that US growth per capita has been shockingly higher than Europe.

    9
    0
    varmint
    varmint
    3 months ago

    GREEN = Control of the world’s wealth, resources and YOU.—- The United Nations Politics of Sustainable Development has decided that the lifestyles in the prosperous west are too high and must be reduced. Ofcourse that standard of living comes from the use of Fossil Fuels, and that is why they want rid of them. The tragedy for citizens all across the western world who do not have a Trump fighting for their prosperity means that the EU and UK and to some extent Canada, Australia etc all have these eco socialist governments determined to follow the Sustainable Development instructions from the UN. ——The good news is that in many countries now there is a fight back against this tyranny. In Germany where this stupid phony planet saving nonsense has created a collapse of the Industrial base people are fighting back and here in the UK our absurd Labour Government with its draconian climate agenda that is determined to impoverish its own citizens we now see the surge in support for REFORM, who are totally against this and have stated they will halt Net Zero. —–Perhaps with Trump leading the way all of this can be achieved, and the western world can return to the prosperity that the UN/WEF seek to destroy.

    6
    0
    RW
    RW
    3 months ago
    Reply to  varmint

    The AfD is currently polling at 20% which means a coalition excluding it can always be formed. It would need at least 51% to actually have a chance to govern and I’m not convinced that the establishment parties would let that happen, should it become possible. After all, it’s well-known that the most dangerous enemy of the DINO¹ is people with unfiltered opinions who might not vote as they’re supposed to.

    ¹ Democracy In Name Only.

    1
    0
    Michael Staples
    Michael Staples
    3 months ago

    Germany’s renunciation of nuclear power plants followed the tsunami overwhelming the Japanese nuclear plant. Here is a map of Germany’s nuclear industry (as was) Template:Germany nuke plant map – Wikipedia
    Clearly, Merkel was terrified that tidal waves would overwhelm all these plants, four of the 26 being situated on the coast!

    0
    0
    Purpleone
    Purpleone
    3 months ago
    Reply to  Michael Staples

    And of those as you say, 4 are off the coast in one of the most stable tectonic regions of the world as I understand it. This basically confirms the German decision was 100% ideological, and nothing to do with science at all as we know

    Last edited 3 months ago by Purpleone
    1
    0
    DontPanic
    DontPanic
    3 months ago

    But will someone who makes much of his income from EVs, Elon Musk, allow this to happen.

    0
    0
    Purpleone
    Purpleone
    3 months ago
    Reply to  DontPanic

    I think he’ll play the long game here – he isn’t that daft. Tesla cars will continue to sell and have a reasonably large user base, they suit certain limited use types, as do other EV’s

    0
    0

    NEWSLETTER

    View today’s newsletter

    To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

    DONATE

    PODCAST

    The End of American Empire? – With Doug Stokes

    by Richard Eldred
    2 May 2025
    5

    LISTED ARTICLES

    • Most Read
    • Most Commented
    • Editors Picks

    News Round-Up

    7 May 2025
    by Richard Eldred

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    7 May 2025
    by David Turver

    Council Net Zero Madness

    7 May 2025
    by Charlotte Gill

    Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity

    6 May 2025
    by Will Jones

    News Round-Up

    39

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    30

    Conservatives Slump to 17% in Poll

    27

    Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity

    35

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    16

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    Definitive Guide to the WHO Pandemic Agreement

    7 May 2025
    by Dr David Bell and Dr Thi Thuy Van Dinh

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    7 May 2025
    by David Turver

    Council Net Zero Madness

    7 May 2025
    by Charlotte Gill

    China’s Climate Charade: A Green Façade for Economic Supremacy

    7 May 2025
    by Tilak Doshi

    POSTS BY DATE

    January 2025
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
    « Dec   Feb »

    SOCIAL LINKS

    Free Speech Union
    • Home
    • About us
    • Donate
    • Privacy Policy

    Facebook

    • X

    Instagram

    RSS

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password? Register

    Create New Account!

    Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

    Already have an account?
    Please click here to login Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    wpDiscuz
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Articles
    • About
    • Archive
      • ARCHIVE
      • NEWS ROUND-UPS
    • Podcasts
    • Newsletter
    • Premium
    • Donate
    • Log In

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    You are going to send email to

    Move Comment
    Perfecty
    Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
    Notifications preferences