Another important paper taking issue with the ‘settled’ climate narrative has been cancelled following a report in the Daily Sceptic and subsequent reposts that went viral across social media. The paper discussed the atmospheric ‘saturation’ of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and argued that higher levels will not cause temperatures to rise. The work was led by the widely-published Polish scientist Dr. Jan Kubicki and appeared on Elsevier’s ScienceDirect website in December 2023. The paper has been widely discussed on social media since April 2024 when the Daily Sceptic reported on the findings. Interest is growing in the saturation hypothesis not least because it provides a coherent explanation for why life and the biosphere grew and often thrived for 600 million years despite much higher atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases. Alas for control freaks, it also destroys the science backing for the Net Zero fantasy.
Many scientists contend that above certain levels the ability of CO2 to warm within narrow bands of the infrared spectrum falls off a logarithmic cliff. Recently, eight Taiwanese scientists led by Professor Peng-Sheng Wei found that the sensitivity of the climate to a rise in CO2 atmospheric levels from 100 to 400 parts per million (ppm) was “negligibly small” at 0.3°C. Current levels of CO2 are around 420 ppm. Seven Austrian scientists recently concluded that a future doubling of CO2 showed “no increase in the IR [infrared] absorption for the 15 u-central peak”. At most, it was stated, this could lead to warming of 0.5°C. Yet in spite of this, Elsevier decided to retract Kubicki’s paper with only a few words of explanation, a decision that is likely to send shock waves through any group of scientists seeking to examine the role of saturation of gases in the atmosphere.
The retraction reads: “Subsequent to acceptance of this paper, the rigour and quality of the peer-review process for this paper was investigated and confirmed to fall beneath the high standards expected by Applications in Engineering Science. After review by additional expert referees, the Editor-in-Chief has lost confidence in the validity of the paper and has decided to retract.”
Retraction in a scientific journal is a serious matter, relatively rare and potentially damaging to the reputation of authors. According to Elsevier’s withdrawal policies, articles may be retracted “to correct errors that impact the findings reported by an article where they are too extensive in the view of the editors to publish a correction, or due to infringements of Elsevier’s journal policies, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like”. None of these reasons for withdrawing the Kubicki paper have been given. Instead there is the pompous reference to a ”fall beneath the high standards expected”, supposedly confirmed by additional unnamed “experts”. Further details about the retraction may emerge given the important issues raised by Elsevier’s action.
Whatever the real reasons behind this retraction, it will not be the first science paper that has met this fate following publicity in the Daily Sceptic and subsequent widespread interest on social media.
In January 2022, a group of physics scientists led by Profession Gianluca Alimonti of Milan University published a paper in a Springer Nature journal that considered past weather trends. They concluded that the idea we’re in the throes of a ‘climate emergency’ was not supported by the facts. The paper attracted little attention outside academic circles until September 14th when the Daily Sceptic reported on it – and our promotion of the story on X resulted in 9,000 retweets. The story was covered by the Australian and Sky News Australia, after which attacks were launched by activist scientists and journalists such as Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann and Graham Readfearn of the Guardian. After a year of lobbying, Springer Nature retracted the paper claiming it no longer had confidence in the results and conclusions. This surprised many, not least because much of the data came from the International Panel on Climate Change. Science writer Dr. Roger Pielke published a number of leaked emails surrounding the affair and concluded: “Shenanigans continue in climate science, with influential scientists teaming up with journalists to corrupt peer review.”
In September 2023, a departing academic, Dr. Patrick Brown, came clean about a paper he’d written in Nature saying that climate change was increasing the risk of wildfires in California. “I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival Science, want to tell,” he explained. These key aspects, of course, include considering the role of arsonists and forest management. For its part, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change can find little or no evidence of human-caused climate change affecting ‘fire weather’ to date and going forward to 2100. In Brown’s view, climate science has become less about understanding the complexities of the world “and more about serving as a kind of Cassandra, urgently warning the public about the dangers of climate change”.
The Editor-in-Chief of Nature Magdalena Skipper reacted furiously to Brown’s comments, accusing him of “poor research practices” that are “highly irresponsible”, according to the Daily Mail. Despite all the controversy, Brown’s paper has not been retracted.
Dr. Matthew Wielicki had a senior position in the Geological Sciences department of the University of Alabama. His parents were academics and he grew up on a Californian university campus surrounded by freely-exchanged competing ideas. He only ever wanted to be an academic but he gave it up during Covid, seemingly disgusted at the turn against free speech in American universities and the effect it has had on climate science. If you speak out against the accepted narrative “you are a pariah in this community”, he said. Climate change is a “taboo” subject in academia and there is a “disconnect between what the science says and what the narrative in mainstream media is”. It isn’t about finding the truth in open discussion – It’s about silencing those who disagree with you, he observed.
Chris Morrison is the Environment Editor of the Daily Sceptic.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
But infections peaked at 55,000 in July and have since fallen to around 35,000 per day.
That should be positive “cases” not infections. You need symptoms for an infection.
That should be claimed positive test results, not cases. You need tests that are better than a coin flip to be able to claim a case.
Sadly, too many ATL articles reinforce the propagandised vocabulary.
Exactly… tune up the PC cycles = next wave…
Tune them down… no COVID. Convenient eh? Lockdowns on demand
Was outsourced to India. According to a friend who got the virus despite being vaccinated she was having calls from people who could barely speak English and were quite obviously reading from a script. Turned the phone off so she wouldn’t be bothered.
That’s hardly conclusive, given how strengthened the UK has been by diversity.
They might have been Scottish…
Naughty….Lol!
They are still busy importing more of these “important” people, mainly via Dover, and ably assisted now by the RNLI it seems.
Were they ever “needed”?
This will be such a blow for the public, third and salaried sector slackers desperately clinging to their Spy-n-Snitch app and hoping for more 10-day “free” holidays. Those Netflix queues aren’t going to binge themselves.
They’ll rehire them all this autumn, if Israel is anything to by.
It’s one of those very rare occasions to celebrate people losing their jobs.
It’s just a bit that the bureaucrats with sinecures who authorise their pay are not also receiving their p45s.
Mind you, there are quite a few who would satisfy that in Westminster!
Perhaps those laid off can now do something useful e.g. work in a care home, drive delivery lorries and/or use the delivery lorries in any blockades
interesting story
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58336998
woman cons billions out of investors for a disease diagnosis technique that was utterly fake
funny none of them asked for an independent audit of the technique. only got themselves to blame
If she beats the rap, perhaps there’s a place for her at Pfizer.
she was a psychopathic con artist who went to huge lengths to perpetuate her fraud. The podcast The Dropout has a lot more info than the BBC article and is a good listen.
There’s a great book about this whole scandal
Bad Blood
Non-jobs in the first place! Now get on and do something useful in your life and leave people alone and stop bothering them.
A few more million pissed up the wall because of Ferguson’s predictions. I wonder if he has any liability insurance? On no sorry the man’s a Saint for saving so many lives.
“Wrong in the right way”. The man should be heading to prison.
My friend reckons he received fifteen phone calls, some lasting as long as forty five minutes from T&T because he was ‘honest’ about his movements (on holiday) in the days before feeling a ‘little groggy’ (his words, symptoms lasted for one day).
This is what complicity does. Trapped and harassed by your own stupidity – and I said that to him.
Surely people only make this mistake once before they block the number too?
You’d forgive a few people for doing this yeh. Hopefully once bitten and all that.
This is not “news” to most people. The fact that it is only now being reported by a newspaper is yet another shocking element of the collusion between the government and the media. One of my friends worked in the Test & Trace office in Exeter before he gave up after 3 months having been so bored by making about 5 calls per day. When the NHS came to “audit” the staffing and activity the staff were all told to attend the office and pretend to be making calls to “ill” people. I wonder how the annual accounts of companies such as Serco and Sitel will look at the end of the financial years covering 2020 and 2021?
DHSC (T&T) are spending millions on temporary recruitment. Some of it is going through Public Buying Organisations (PBO) solutions so not all of it is made public through contracts finder. Public sector is required to publish notices on any contract over £25k on contracts finder. A lot don’t realise that this also applies to contracts awarded under PBO solutions so it’s often not made public.
Slightly out-dated, but a lot of these PBOs still exist – https://bid-better.co.uk/2018/10/16/what-are-collaborative-procurement-organisations/
“Dear,dear,what a pity,what a shame, never mind”.
With apologies to the late lamented “It ain’t half hot,mom”.
Weird, as I didn’t receive a single call in my 10 day quarantine post holiday.
I did and it was on my Thai phone number.
gave her short shrift and removed the sim from my phone.
‘Vaccine’, ‘Vaccinated’, ‘Vaccination’ NO. NO. NO. – anyone who tries to jab me, my family and my loved ones with that *monkey gunk* will learn the ultimate lesson. This is the hill I die on: FIGHT. BACK. BETTER. – Updated information, resources and useful links: https://www.LCAHub.org/
And how much does this all cost us?
Excellent.
Good riddance.
You must have a very low IQ if you still have the trick and trap app on your phone. (I never had it and I blocked the phone numbers they used as a double insurance).