I’ve written a piece for the Jewish Chronicle pointing out the discrepancy between the way antisemitic racism is dealt with by the police and the way they deal with other forms of racism, such as anti-black and anti-Muslim racism. I’ve tried to work out why it is that the police consider some minorities more deserving of their protection than others. Here’s the opening section:
The news that the Metropolitan Police has decided to take no further action against an Imam at an east London mosque who led a prayer for the destruction of Jewish homes does not come as a surprise.
But it’s ironic that it should follow so quickly on the heels of Essex Police’s investigation into Allison Pearson for a year-old tweet in which she accused the Met of double standards, saying that officers refused to pose with a British Friends of Israel banner but happily did so with some South Asian men holding up a green and red flag whom she described as “Jew haters”.
In fact, the men in the image were not pro-Hamas protesters celebrating the October 7th massacre but delegates from Pakistan’s Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan’s political party, and were posing a year earlier with the Greater Manchester Police, not the Met. But she had a point: why were police officers allowing themselves to be photographed next to men holding up a PTI flag, given the party’s history of tolerating antisemitism? In 2020, PTI’s vice-chairman, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, then Pakistan’s foreign minister, described Jews as having “deep pockets” and said they “control the media”.
In spite of the fact that Pearson deleted the tweet the following day, Essex Police are still investigating her more than a year later. Indeed, it’s been escalated to Gold Command status by the Chief Constable, a category usually reserved for the most serious crimes such as terror attacks. It seems that criticising the police – or accusing the PTI of harbouring antisemites, it isn’t clear which – is a far graver matter in their eyes than calling for the destruction of Jewish homes.
According to the Guardian, the claim that Britain suffers from two-tier policing is a “myth” put about by the “far right”. But as several people pointed out when the newspaper made this charge, the Guardian has published numerous articles accusing the authorities of two-tier policing when it comes to race and sexuality. In other words, it’s a truth universally acknowledged that the police are racist and sexist, but to accuse them of being more relaxed about antisemitism than Islamophobia is a conspiracy theory. Sounds like two-tier reporting.
The fact that you’re less likely to be prosecuted for antisemitism than you are for stirring up other forms of racial hatred is hard to dispute. At the Free Speech Union, the advocacy group I run, we’re currently defending a man who is due to stand trial in February for posting an allegedly Islamophobic video on Facebook. We are also appealing the sentences of two people who received serious jail time for saying supposedly inflammatory things in the wake of the Southport attack.
Contrast their fate with that of the men arrested in 2021 for allegedly being part of a convoy driving through East Finchley and nearby areas in cars draped with Palestinian flags, from which people were heard calling for the rape and murder of Jews. Four were initially charged with using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” that were likely to stir up racial hatred, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided there was no realistic prospect of a conviction.
What accounts for this double standard? Here’s my conclusion:
We all know the answer, of course. According to the high priests of our new public morality – radical progressive academics, for the most part – only black and brown people can be the victims of racism, with all Jews, including Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent, being considered “white”. This means that in the “pyramid of hate”, antisemitism is ranked far below anti-black and anti-Muslim prejudice.
This is the thinking behind describing Zionism as adjacent to “white supremacy”. It explains the outpouring of sympathy on university campuses across the West for the Palestinian victims of “settler colonialism”. It also accounts for the cognitive dissonance that has led to the emergence of groups such as Queers for Palestine. According to votaries of the woke cult, all “oppressed” peoples need to stand in solidarity with each other, even if one of those “marginalised” groups wants to throw the other off high buildings. They share a common enemy and the people with “deep pockets” who “control the media” are among the “oppressors”.
This thinking has long been entrenched in academia and the mainstream media but the fact that it has now infected the police and CPS is an alarming new development brought into sharp relief in the aftermath of October 7. The police are supposed to act “without fear or favour” and justice is supposed to be blind. We urgently need to restore those principles before we descend into a “two-tier society” in which some minorities enjoy the full protection of the law while others are considered fair game.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: The police force at the centre of the Allison Pearson row has not investigated a controversial imam who called for “Zionists” to be destroyed. The Telegraph has more.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.