When the leaked “RKI Files” were unveiled at a July 23rd press conference in Berlin, Aya Velazquez, who served as the conduit for the leak, proudly declared that the documents constituted the complete unredacted minutes of the RKI’s COVID-19 “Crisis Group”. The minutes had previously been released by the German public health authority, the Robert Koch Institute, in redacted form. However, critical German-speaking observers quickly noted that the “Aya” files were not in fact identical with the officially released versions – thus, at the same time, raising questions about the authenticity of the leak. Entire passages from the official versions were missing from the “Aya” versions.
But, somewhat astonishingly, what appears to have gone unnoticed is that not only passages, but indeed the entire record of the minutes of one meeting was missing from the “Aya” leak – and not the minutes of just any meeting, but indeed the minutes of none other than the very first meeting of the Crisis Group included in the official release.
As can be verified here on the dedicated website that was created for the leak, the minutes that Aya Velazquez posted as PDFs in a Zip-folder titled “Minutes_all” (Protokolle_gesamt) begin on January 16th. As can be confirmed here, however, the official minutes begin on January 14th. So, the “Minutes_all” folder does not in fact contain all the minutes.
Where are the missing minutes?
Well, when the discrepancies between the official versions and her versions were first pointed out, Aya Velazquez responded by saying that she had in fact assembled the posted PDFs herself from Word documents that her source provided, sometimes in multiple versions. While Velazquez (the name is a pseudonym) presently describes herself as a journalist, her self-avowed occupation until quite recently (see her article here, for instance) was prostitute. She gained notoriety, while precisely still practicing said profession, as an anti-Covid-measure activist and her notoriety has increased as a commentator on X.
After responding to the critics, she proceeded also to post the Word doc “source files” on the dedicated website for the leak. It should be noted that, as of this writing, these source files are not easily accessible, attempts to open them in Word giving rise to error messages such as the below.
However, per the file name (see above), the earliest minutes contained in the source doc folder are likewise those of January 16th 2020.
So, the source file folder does not contain the missing minutes either. Where are the minutes of the Crisis Group’s January 14th meeting?
Thankfully, a Google search using text from the official version turns them up: namely, in “supplementary material” (Zusatzmaterial), which was likewise posted on the dedicated website – and which, in this author’s experience, can also be very difficult (although not impossible) to access from the site.
The document is very revealing indeed. For what it shows is that the Robert Koch Institute had a direct and highly relevant link to Wuhan right from the start of the COVID-19 crisis, since an RKI staff member was not only from Wuhan but indeed a specialist in respiratory illnesses.
Many observers of the “RKI Files” saga – especially those who do not read German and who have not been able to follow its unfolding in real-time – will be under the impression that the previously published official versions were heavily redacted. This is not true. While first versions of the documents obtained by the journalist Paul Schreyer in response to an FOI request were more heavily redacted, very few redactions, apart from redactions of names, remained in the versions published on the RKI website in late May. Longer redactions, i.e., of textual passages, are few and far between in the official documents.
Apart from the names – and, as so happens, that of one Christian Drosten figures prominently and often – the entire interest of the “Aya” leak was thus to discover what was hidden beneath these last remaining textual redactions.
The January 14th minutes contain one such redaction, as can be seen below from the official release.
The passage runs: “…and regularly reads the texts published in China in Mandarin and shares the information”. The file included in the “supplementary material” – but for some reason not included by Aya Velazquez in the ostensibly “complete” minutes – reveals what was under this redaction, as can be seen below.
The full sentence reads (my emphasis): “A [female] colleague in FG36 comes from Wuhan and regularly reads the texts published in China in Mandarin and shares the information.” FG36 is the institute’s “Respiratory Infections” Unit.
Why was this information redacted in the official release? Note that the redacted passage does not contain the staff member’s name.
Is it because this incredible coincidence might have called attention to the many and intimate German links to the virology scene in Wuhan, which I have documented, among other places, in my ‘The Greatest Story Never Told‘? These links, as I have shown, include a decade-long publicly-funded research partnership and a full-fledged German-Chinese lab right in the city. Is it because the coincidence, given these links, is not in fact a coincidence?
Why, above all, was this document not included in Aya Velazquez’s “complete” unredacted minutes? Does this suggest a certain deference – whether on the part of source or recipient of the leak – to the wishes of the RKI not to call attention to the Berlin-Wuhan axis?
The fact that the leak did not include the minutes of three meetings that are also missing from the official release already raised some eyebrows among German-speaking observers and could likewise be construed as a sign of deference. (As discussed in the postscript below, the minutes of one of those meetings did turn up later, under somewhat mysterious circumstances, in the “supplementary material”.)
The below group photo from a 2015 “Sino-German Symposium on Infectious Diseases” in Berlin provides a graphic illustration of the closeness of the ties between German and Chinese virology circles.
Christian Drosten, Chair of the Virology Department at Berlin’s Charité University Hospital and designer of the “gold standard” SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, can be seen in the lower left-hand corner standing next to none other the Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s world-renowned bat coronavirus specialist. The buck-toothed Chinese man with the glasses in the lower right is the then Director of the WIV, Chen Xinwen. The woman with the long hair to Shi’s right appears to be Wang Yanyi, the current Director of the WIV. (For more on the picture and symposium attendees, see here.)
The former President of the Robert Koch Institute, Reinhard Burger, was also in attendance. He is the white-haired man with a blue shirt near the middle of the group.
The picture was taken at the Kaiserin Friedrich Foundation at 7 Robert Koch Square, just around the corner from the building that houses Drosten’s Virology Department on the Charité University Hospital campus. The Robert Koch Institute is about a 15-minute drive from the campus.
The RKI staff member from Wuhan, incidentally, is presumably Wei Cai, who completed a doctorate in Medicine at the Charité University Hospital in September 2021. See her dissertation here and the extract from the title page below.
Postscript: Mail from Aya Velazquez and related issues
In my original version of the above article, I wrote that the minutes of three meetings that are missing from both the official release of the redacted “RKI files” and Aya Velazquez’s supposedly complete leaked minutes – namely, those of January 6th and 8th and May 9th 2020 – “are not even to be found in the ‘supplementary material’” that accompanied the leak. Shortly after publication, I received e-mail from Aya Velazquez describing my article as a “hit piece” and specifically decrying this, as she put it, “falsehood,” which she has demanded I correct. Gladly, and consider it done, as can be seen above. The minutes of one of the missing meetings, that of May 9th, are in the “supplementary material”.
The language chosen by Aya Velazquez, as well as one of her colleagues in an X exchange with me, seems to suggest that I was lying about the May 9th minutes. But the reason I did not find them when consulting the folder is simple and obvious. The “supplementary material” folder does not comprise some anarchic mass of files, but rather is neatly arranged into years and dated sub-folders, each of which contains the minutes for that day plus “supplementary material” related to them.
As can be seen from the image below, the 2020-05-09 folder is indeed missing.
As I now know from her messages, shortly after critics had called attention to the missing minutes, Aya Velazquez somewhat triumphantly announced that the May 9th minutes had been found: namely, in a different folder – that of May 14th – and, according to her email correspondence with me, found by her team’s own data analyst. (In fact, the entire May 9th folder is present as a sub-folder in the May 14th folder.) But what were the minutes doing there?
As noted above, the fact that precisely those three sets of minutes that were withheld in the official release also appeared to have been ‘withheld’ from the leak raised some eyebrows among German-speaking critics: namely, because it seemed to suggest that the rogue former RKI-employee who is supposed to have been the source of the leak was perhaps not so rogue after all. (See here for one example.) But for anyone uncharitable enough to harbour such suspicions in the first place, they will surely not have been dissipated by a member of Aya Velazquez’s own team then fortuitously turning up the minutes in an improbable location shortly after these suspicions were raised.
Aya Velazquez herself dismisses the oddity of the May 9th file being hidden in a different folder as insignificant. “What was it doing there,” she wrote in a tweet, “presumably nothing at all”, and she suggested that its location was merely the result of “sloppiness” or an “oversight”.
Be that as it may, my article is not about that file or the other two still missing files in any case. These are only mentioned in passing. The “hidden RKI-file” of the title is rather that of January 14th 2020. These minutes are indeed in the official redacted release and they are also in the supplementary material, but they were not included in Aya Velazquez’s supposedly complete “minutes-all” leak-folder. The very description of the contents as complete thus represents a “falsehood”, to use Velazquez’s terminology, and there is no obvious, innocent explanation for it.
Why were these minutes not included? I asked Velazquez and she responded, somewhat obliquely, that “I published everything that the WB [whistleblower] gave me, and he gave me everything he found in the RKI archive”. But if the former is true, the latter obviously cannot be. For the January 14th minutes form part of the official release, and they are also visible, plain as day, in the “supplementary material”, as can be seen below. They are the very first minutes in the folder, as they are the very first minutes in the official redacted release.
Moreover, as touched upon above, Velazquez has said that she personally assembled the minutes included in the “minutes-all” folder, comparing various versions provided by her source as Word docs against the contents of the official release and choosing the most similar – a Herculean task, incidentally. But how then could she not have noticed that the January 14th minutes were missing?
In any case, the most important question raised by these minutes, now that they have been found, is a completely different and substantive one: who is Wei Cai? Did the RKI’s native informant from Wuhan have links to the German-Chinese partnership that gave rise to a full-fledged German-Chinese virology lab located almost at the epicentre of what is at least officially regarded as the initial outbreak of COVID-19 in the city? A look at her publications makes clear that she does. But I will leave that topic for another occasion.
I would have thought that Aya Velazquez would be interested in this matter too. After all, barely six months ago, she “urgently recommended” my “explosive” research on the German-Chinese partnership and lab to the German public. But I gather from the tenor of her messages to me that she no longer regards the topic as worthy of consideration.
Robert Kogon is the pen name of a widely-published journalist covering European affairs. Subscribe to his Substack.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Great Covid Con Never Again
latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online.
“Conservative Deputy Chairman Lee Anderson has warned Richard Tice to be “careful what you wish for”, according to the Telegraph, claiming a surging Reform will hurt the Tories more than Labour.”
Yes Mr Anderson you dunderhead, that’s the point. Instead of whining, try getting your party to adopt and enact some actual conservative policies. Is he for real?
”His Father, who was self-controlled,
Bade all the children round attend
To James’s miserable end,
And always keep a-hold of Nurse
For fear of finding something worse.”
It is indeed a shocking indictment of both the Conservative Party and our electoral system that the main reason to vote Conservative is ”for fear of finding something worse”.
I agree but I still have some sympathy for the idea of voting for ‘anyone but the […fill in pet hate here…] candidate’. I suspect that UKIP, for example, would have done significantly better if some voters had not declined to vote tactically for fear of splitting the vote of their least-worst-credible-chance-of-winning candidate. The country missed an opportunity to bring in AV at the second UK-wide referendum in 2011 – I suspect because it was associated with the Lib Dems (who claim they wanted PR instead).
I’m less enamoured of PR as the typical implementations seem to result in endless coalitions. For example, I think Geert Wilders has a long job ahead to establish a governing coalition in Netherlands.
There are two problems with your posting.
Firstly, UKIP is not the party it was under former leadership. It is now only a party for nihilists and fantacists.
Second, the AV system put forward by Cameron-Clegg was just about the worst possible version. It would have even further strengthened the position of party leaders. If you want AV look for a system that still allows local candidate selection, clear connection between elected representatives and a recognisable constituency and so gives a degree of local accountability.
In my opinion the additional member system used in Germany is effective on these criteria. If we also had mandatory recall provisions and voter mandated referendums (both at national, regional, City and local levels) we could expect a big improvement in the quality and performance of politicians and Whitehall.
I understand your points and totally agree with your first point. It matches my opinion. The present UKIP rump is not worthy of votes and may well be a good example of the ‘anyone but…’ candidates. Who knows what they might have become if, in earlier years, people had not considered a UKIP vote worse than a wasted vote?
As with most negotiations in politics a referendum vote for AV would not have been the end of the discussion. ‘The people want AV – what sort of AV shall we grant them?’. As in the third UK-wide referendum: ‘The people want Brexit – what sort of Brexit shall we allow them?’
However, if it became established, AV had the potential to enable policies which appeal to voters (possibly including tinkering with the form of AV itself) to be floated and tested in popular opinion.
I’m not fully decided yet but I will probably vote Reform at the next GE. The Conservatives have abandoned their natural base – not the other way around. One thing I fear about this is the outside possibility that Reform might win an outright majority; they would then have no, or very little ministerial experience to call upon in government – the Blob would run rings around them.
Your last point about Germany’s system is not a positive in my opinion; they have to include the loony Greens in their coalition.
Lee Anderson would better spend his time investigating the 150 con tory MP’s currently on the take from the eco nutters alliance.
Indeed. It’s hard to know whether he’s really as dense as he sounds or just another liar.
Lee Anderson happens to be my MP and I asked him about joining Reform of which he replied “they won’t win a single seat in paliment, you’ll just be allowing a labour win”
As Tof just explained, try fighting for votes instead of trying to blow other parties candles out to make yours look brighter!
I’m voting reform, its time we all voted for what we want and believe in, not just to keep someone else out!
100% agree. Anderson is either deluded or very efficiently repeating the same lying party line. Either way he can get stuffed.
Anderson has sadly holed himself below the water line with this crap.
He knows what the people want but, he dare not offend the pay wall that feeds him!
He accepted the job that toned him down by device! Chairman!
Think of Rishi saying this in your minds eye!(he’ll be smiling all the time of course)
Rishi- ” look, Lee, your a guaranteed red wall seat for us, but tone down the working man Bullshit, ….I’ll tell you what, I’ll make you Chairman!..How’s that sound?”
Wah- wah…yes boss!
I like Lee! But I cannot vote for him! Not while ‘these’ handlers are in government!
Imagine all reformers,…breathing life into Britain ” 
He needs to join reform!
Lee, Richard, Nigel, Andrew! The start of a new, real, party! It happened with the wigs, and later with labour!
more of the same….sorry 
!
What is the alternative?
We never needed good leaders more!
Here’s his reply:- 19/09/2023
Hi —-,
Thanks for your email and I do sympathise with what you are saying.
However I would politely suggest that Parliament needs more Tory MPs like me to speak out for people like you.
If I do not get re-elected you will be stuck with a Labour MP who will never speak out for you.
Regardless of who wins the next election you need a strong local voice in Parliament.
You can help make that happen.
Regards
Lee
Thanks for posting.
Thanks
On the face of it, an attractive response, but it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. His “speaking out” (which I missed during “covid” – don’t remember him saying a peep about it) does no good – in fact it’s the opposite. It perpetuates the illusion/delusion that we have a serious party of the political right – we don’t and we have not done for a long time. Any Tory MP with conservative ideas should resign from the party and join a proper right wing party or stay independent. A mass mutiny would shake things up.
His reply implies a two party state. As the Tories cannot win next time it implies a one party state.
Well done Lee!
Well, that’s interesting that Sky News allows that question to be asked. I wonder what the rest of the clip says.
But that moment when the NHS doctor confronted Javid about the jabs and natural immunity came to mind.
Apparently she launched into the standard ad hominem attack, as per this article:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/activist-guest-blasts-sky-news-for-platforming-climate-denying-gb-news-contributor/ar-AA1mlKz0
-proving, once again, that there’s no substance, just propaganda.
Savage Jabbit seems to have been knighted !!
FFS!
As I have posted previously their motto is:
‘Rub their noses in it and keep reminding them.’
https://news.antiwar.com/2024/01/01/survivors-of-nova-music-festival-sue-israeli-security-establishment-for-failing-to-protect-them/
Forty-two Israelis who attended the Nova music festival near the Gaza border that was attacked on October 7 have sued the Israeli security establishment for failing to protect the event.
The lawsuit filed a claim for $56 million against Israel’s Shin Bet security agency, the Israeli Defense Forces, the Defense Ministry, and the Israeli Police and says the agencies’ “negligence and the gross oversight” allowed the Hamas attack on the festival to happen.
“A single phone call by IDF officials to the commander responsible for the party to disperse it immediately in view of the expected danger would have saved lives and prevented the physical and mental injuries of hundreds of partygoers, including the plaintiffs,” the lawsuit reads.
Oh I don’t know. It seems quite reasonable that a biological male should represent un-women UK… Or have I missed the point?
Israeli govt want Alan Dershowitz to represent it at the Hague next week
https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/netanyahu-wants-alan-dershowitz-represent-israel-hague-report?nid=331061&topic=Israel-Palestine%2520war&fid=496086
As pointed out elsewhere, this is going to produce major cognitive dissonance in a large section of the US ‘progressive’ population – Dershowitz represented Trump at one of his impeachment trials….
Addendum – Malaysia now endorses SA’s suit.
https://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/-/malaysia-welcomes-the-application-by-south-africa-before-the-international-court-of-justice-against-israel-on-alleged-genocide-violations-in-the-gaza-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67865327
Having proved to be utterly useless at tackling real life crime plod has decided to tackle fantasy crime.
Madness off the scale.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/a-beginners-guide-to-covid-part-9-did-lockdown-work/
Part nine, the penultimate, of Paul Weston’s unmissable guide to the Scamdemic – lockdowns.
“...large numbers of deaths were the forced result of government-ordained lockdowns. It is difficult to understand why our politicians are not locked up for life after successful prosecution for crimes against humanity.”
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/holocaust-denial-has-gone-mainstream/
Very interesting article. How Holocaust denial has become acceptable. Very disturbing.
It is an interesting article and yet – the linguistic gymnastics used to state the case for a ‘mainstream’ holocaust denial don’t, I think, stand up to scrutiny. I accept that the situation vis a vis the concept of a holocaust has become far more polarised because of what’s happening at the moment but, aside from the usual descent into unhelpful emotive language, the writer appears to be 1) fully accepting that the deaths on 7th October (1139 according to the Israeli govt – some of which it accepts its own defence force caused) can be defined as a ‘holocaust’, yet unwilling to recognise that the deaths subsequent to that (21,000+, with 7000+ missing, 50000+ injured) could be too; and 2) does not actually define what ‘mainstream’ is. If the MSM is anything to go by, it is overwhelmingly pro-Israel: where is the holocaust denial there? The UK govt is overwhelmingly pro-Israel, as are those of the US, EU and many other Western states; I see no holocaust denial there. But when there are numerous statements from govts denying that an obvious genocide is taking place, a genocide that is flouting just about every regulation of various Geneva Conventions, when the murder of 1139 is instantly defined by a govt leader as a ‘holocaust’ yet the ongoing murder of 21000+ is ‘defence’, is there any wonder that people, dumb, subservient sheep they may be, start to question what the meaning of a ‘holocaust’ actually is? What is the writer’s purpose of aligning, however tangentially, a basic, human, anti-genocide sentiment with ‘holocaust denial’? References to Orwell have become so hackneyed and pedestrian these days it’s almost laughable – so here’s another one:
“Political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” George Orwell wrote these words, which come at the end of his essay “Politics and the English Language,” in 1946. He could be writing them from the grave today and thinking of ways in which language is being used in the context of the so-called “Israel-Gaza war.” “In our time,” Orwell says, “political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible.” He is not alluding to falsehoods or fallacies, but to words and phrases that keep us from the facts, or from the effect the facts would otherwise have on us. His essay is about “debased language”: language that defends the indefensible by preventing us from thinking.
https://contendingmodernities.nd.edu/global-currents/orwell-gaza-debasement-language/
I much appreciate your well considered response and thanks for the Orwell quote.
Notwithstanding the weaknesses in the author’s case which you have identified I do believe that there is an attempt to undermine the holocaust as fact. And to reinforce Orwell, people in our government executive pay lip service to the reality of the holocaust whilst at the same time blithely setting about the murder of their own citizens via their anti human lockdowns as Paul Weston has made abundantly clear in the series of articles I have been reposting.
That people such as Johnstone, Jabbit, Hancock, Valance, Michie, van Tam, Witty and scores of others still walk free after the mass care home deaths – and the rest – tells us all we need to know about the honesty and motives of these people.
( I have diluted my words somewhat. My actual views on the people named above are much stronger but detailing them here would get me banned).
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/had-you-known-would-you-have-taken-the-jab/
Pfizer facing court in the USA. The case is undoubtedly sound considering Pfisser’s wholesale lies but will the case be heard by a non-corrupted judge?
Let’s not get our hopes up.
“To this point, ‘victories’ against the hegemon that emerged in 2020 have been defensive in nature. Groups have fended off vaccine mandates, states have resisted calls for renewed lockdowns, and journalists have begun to expose the corruption that shattered Western civilization.
These efforts, though important, have failed to bring accountability against those who usurped our civil liberties and pillaged the national treasury. Paxton’s suit strikes at the heart of the corruption behind the Covid regime: how their success required mass deception and their profits depended on lies.
Though $10million in fines is little compared to the $75billion in revenue that Pfizer raked in from vaccines alone, the suit signifies that the resistance is at last on the offensive.
Big Pharma sees this is a grave threat, and its lobbying forces led a failed impeachment effort against Paxton this fall. They threw him out of his office, and disabled his ability to do his job that the voters sent him to do. Turning up nothing, the legislature rejected the entire drama. Now he is back and working and this is the result: accountability at last.”
We wish the plaintiffs all the best.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/02/gp-surgeries-could-be-earning-almost-1-billion-from-ghost-p/
The article opens with this para:
“Doctors could be earning almost £1 billion from “ghost patients” after a fraud investigation into how many people were registered with GPs was halted.”
And ends with this:
“We have not yet revisited the issue as we direct our resources to where the intelligence indicates the most appropriate priorities sit.”
So investigating the gifting of one billion pounds of taxpayers money to frankly poor quality GP’s is not where “priorities sit.”
Some P45’s are overdue – at least.
“GP surgeries could be earning almost £1 billion from ‘ghost patients’”
What if they are not ghost patients?
Maybe there is a greater population than being admitted?!
Absolutely Dinger. The exact same thought occurred to me. Loads of illegals roaming the country and lax record keeping in the surgeries. And of course another £125 quid a pop – that’ll do nicely.
Prior to computerisation, dealing with ghosts (we were an honest bunch og GPs) meant sending out letters to people who hadn’t been seen for years, in case they’d moved, died abroad or whatever. A couple of non-replies, and we deleted them.
Nowadays, it’s hard to see where any ghosts are coming from – patients register on a computer system that now uploads them to the NHS database. If they die that will be registered on the system codes whether in hospital or at home. If they change GP that too will yank them off the old GP’s system. That seems to leave just millions of people disappearing – migrating to Rwanda or being abducted by aliens, perhaps.
Or could it possibly be disinformation to blame the NHS ideology problems on the doctors?
We saw during Covid how inefficient the state is at recording deaths and we know there were millions more NI numbers issued than working age people in the country.
The sate in all its form and agencies is just not up to the job and, frankly, it has no intention of improving.
Can you believe this? The most natural biological waste is now regarded as pollution! Maybe they will clear all the forests of dirty rotting leaves and twigs and general natural detritus like wild animal poo and dead wild animal carcases and the like, oh and all plant life which ends up rotting back into the ground and producing millions of tons of all that ‘poisonous’ Co2! Ffs!
https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/01/02/france-implements-compulsory-composting-heres-how-it-will-help-slash-emissions
Thanks for posting.
So what is happening to our green bin collections in the UK?
https://www.recyclingbins.co.uk/blog/recycled-food-waste/
“Sadly, much of our recycled food waste goes straight to landfill, where it degrades and produces harmful greenhouse gasses such as methane. To overcome this, we need to reduce the amount of food we waste, redistribute edible food to those in need, and turn it into animal feed. But there’s only so much we can do at home.
According to a recent report by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), we waste 9.5 million tonnes of food in the UK every year. Of that, 4.5 tonnes of that comes from residential households. Our annual food waste, valued at over £19 billion, can generate thirty-six million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions if not disposed of correctly, causing catastrophic damage to the environment.”
So, basically what we patiently sort for the green bins goes in landfill and generates…
…36 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.
Oh my God.
Thirty six million tonnes! That’s just a guess but it is possibly backed up by the $cience.
“a surging Reform will hurt the Tories more than Labour”. Whose fault is that?
That is his assessment, just as the pundits used to say UKIP drew members and support only from the Tories. Until it turned out not to be true.
“There were almost six million more patients registered to GPs in England last year than the total population size of the country, according to the Telegraph.”
You would think a “world class” (sic) NHS which was short of funds (sic) would run checks between the NI numbers database and GP records.
BTW, what evidence do illegal immigrants and overstayers need to show to get free medical services in this county?
All Socialist Parties require a Great Leader.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/covid-19-vaccines-linked-to-increased-risk-of-swollen-lymph-nodes-in-children-study-5555737
I remember following the JCVI minutes/ Sage minutes during the Covid fiasco. The members were quite clear that they expected lymphadenopathy to occur from the vaccines. They appeared to be blasé about it.
I’m grimly interested to see what the lymphoma cancer rates are going to be over the next few years.